?

Log in

No account? Create an account
 
 
23 February 2011 @ 04:15 pm
The UN IPCC in cahoots with the EC and the BBC has fooled the world  
Open Letter: Malcolm Roberts: Is this another pseudo-scientist treating the ATO as his ATM?
To federal MP's, friends, scientists, journalists.
Copied to UNSW Professor Matthew England, Co-Director of Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC).
Professor Matthew England responded to my request for real-world evidence of claims that carbon dioxide (CO2) produced by humans caused global warming. Below I reveal his complete failure.
Exposed are glaring falsities driving the government's climate fraud.
Below the summary is my detailed analysis sent to Matthew. It contains references so you can check for yourself—including what seems to be the Australian Bureau of Meteorology's corruption of temperature data.

To federal MP's, friends, scientists, journalists.
Copied to UNSW Professor Matthew England, Co-Director of Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC).
Professor Matthew England responded to my request for real-world evidence of claims that carbon dioxide (CO2) produced by humans caused global warming. Below I reveal his complete failure.
Exposed are glaring falsities driving the government's climate fraud.
Below the summary is my detailed analysis sent to Matthew. It contains references so you can check for yourself—including what seems to be the Australian Bureau of Meteorology's corruption of temperature data.

Executive Summary
Government and Greens climate policies are based on reports by the UN's climate body, the UN IPCC.
• Each of the UN IPCC's four (4) reports to national governments and media is based on a falsity at the core of its world-wide media campaign -1990, 1995, 2001, 2007. These are revealed below;
• There is no observational (empirical), physical, theoretical or logical basis for the UN IPCC's core claim that human production of CO2 caused global warming. This is proven below.
Real-world data including that provided by the UN IPCC itself exposes the UN IPCC's claim as fraudulent;
• UN IPCC data obtained from the UN IPCC itself reveals that only five UN IPCC (5) reviewers endorsed the UN's claim that human CO2 caused warming—and there's doubt they were even scientists.
Not 4,000 scientists as publicly stated by former PM Kevin Rudd and by UN IPCC Chairman Pachauri;
• Contrary to UN claims, its reports are not peer-reviewed and are not scientific;
• The UN IPCC conducts no scientific research. It's not accountable to any national governments;
• The UN IPCC's predecessor, UNEP has been attributed with deaths from malaria of more than 30 million people due to UNEP's politicised 1970's actions contradicting science;
• The UN IPCC's claim about human CO2 relies purely on falsities and erroneous unvalidated computer models. These are based on factors that even the UN IPCC admits have low and very low levels of understanding. And on outdated 'theory' using assumptions from the 1800's that contradict reality;
• CO2 is less than 0.04% of Earth's atmosphere. Annually Nature produces 97% of Earth's CO2 production. This means that in every 33 molecules of CO2, only one is from human activity. That's 1 molecule in 85,800 molecules of air. It's impossible for that molecule to produce warming. It's insane to claim it produces warming while Nature's 32 molecules in 85,800 do not;
• No net atmospheric warming since 1958—just inherent cyclic variation in natural cooling, warming, cooling cycles;
• UN omitted 90,000 reliable measurements of CO2 levels and separately corrupted its CO2 data;
Real-world scientific evidence show Carbon Dioxide levels are a consequence of temperature not a cause. Temperature determines CO2 levels;
Thus government and Greens policies cannot have any impact on global temperature or climate;
The government and Greens climate policies are based entirely and only on fraud. No real-world scientific evidence. They contradict real-world science.
• The policy's effect on the environment is demonstrably damaging to the environment. That's proven.
• Their policy is designed to increase energy prices to reduce energy availability and use. To have any impact on energy use it has to increase the cost of energy to consumers. Claims of protecting some users is nonsense because costs are passed on. If all consumers aren't impacted, nothing happens.
• It's designed to increase the cost of living. Nowadays, energy affects every part of our lives. Raising energy prices affects every part of your cost of living. Yet can have no impact on climate because temperature drives CO2 levels. 'Energy policy' is simply a tax and a control on people's lives;
• Prof England's responses show he does not understand real-world science. Yet the government-funded ABC repeatedly broadcasts him nation-wide as an expert;
Check for yourself below—you're being deceived. Now it's clear, take action.

Plenty more evidence coming next month.

Malcolm Roberts
BE (Hons), MBA (Chicago)
Fellow AICD, MAIM, MAusIMM, MAME (USA), MIMM (UK), Fellow ASQ (USA, Aust)
---------------
Full details from Climate Realists (PDF) link

Key words. Fraud and misrepresentation.

Every MP and MEP should be compelled to read this pdf and then tested to make sure they understood the contents. The UN IPCC in cahoots with the EC, BBC, RS, CRU, Britmet, Grantham Inst. and many other pseudo honest organisations on public welfare, has fooled the world. The UN must be held to account and a refund demanded. This is one crime that will not be allowed to die a quiet death. Anything less will avoid the  opportunity for the coalition to escape accusations of complicity with the Blair-Brown governments in the perpetration of this confidence trick.