?

Log in

No account? Create an account
 
 
08 November 2010 @ 04:27 pm
More info on WTC 9/11 twin towers demolition  
From the article "End The Truth Blackout: Email Alternative/Progressive/Anti-War Sites, Demand That They Support A New Criminal Investigation of The 9/11 Attacks" Here
...the scientific discovery of nano-thermite in samples of the World Trade Center dust by a team of scientists, physicists, and chemists. This incredible piece of information completely rules out the official version of the events of September 11 because only advanced military establishments are in the possession of nano-thermite, which is a high-grade explosive.

To publicize the explosive discovery, Steven Jones, Niels Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, and Bradley R. Larsen wrote an article together called Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe” that was published in 2009 in the peer-reviewed Open Chemical Physics Journal. If you want to read a summary of their findings, check out Jim Hoffman’s article “Explosives Found in World Trade Center Dust.” Physics teacher David Chandler has also done outstanding work, particularly in this five minute video clip, in which he presents clear analysis of the North Tower exploding into dust.

*******************************************************

From Jim Hoffman’s article
Introduction
The scientific paper Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe conclusively shows the presence of unignited aluminothermic explosives in dust samples from the Twin Towers, whose chemical signature matches previously documented aluminothermic residues found in the same dust samples. The present review of the paper and related research is intended to summarize those findings for the non-technical reader. To that end, I first provide a short introduction to the subject of aluminothermic explosives, then outline the methods and results of analysis of the dust samples, and finally explore the significance of these findings.

********************************************************
From the article "Is this really what happened? Arms Trafficking, Stolen Missiles, Soviet Submarines, Nuclear Detonations and 9/11: Interview with Dimitri Khalezov in Bangkok" Here


[...] This missile deems to be totally indestructible, because NATO lacks any means to shot down this missile even if they detect it in advance. In fact, it was demonstrated in the case of the Pentagon attack on 9/11 - NORAD managed to detect the upcoming "Granit" missile at least 6 minutes before it struck the Pentagon. NORAD's operational officers managed to ring the atomic alert, scramble the so-called "Doomsday plane" in response, but were not able to prevent the actual strike - the missile managed to successfully approach Washington DC and hit the wall of the Pentagon despite being detected by NORAD 6 minutes in advance. Make you own conclusions - as to the danger of this weapon. I would also like to note, that according to the Soviet and Russian strategic plans, the submarines armed with the "Granite" missiles could be used as a "back-up" option for the retaliatory nuclear strike against the United States (while the primary role in such a strike belongs to strategic intercontinental- and submarine-launched ballistic missiles, of course).

For the reason of possible usage in the retaliatory strike the "Granit" missiles are also designed to produce airbursts above the US cities - so they are equipped with special non-contact detonators for such reason, in addition to the usual contact detonators. I should mention also that the "Granit" missile has a very advanced inertial guidance system that also has a list of pre-loaded most important NATO targets. While flying above the ocean the "Granit" missile will scan and reconnoiter the operational theater and try to distinguish ship orders and especially aircraft-carrier battle-groups and to select the most important targets in the ship orders and to strike them in automated manner. If flying above the territory the missile will reconnoiter it too and will try to detect the most important stationary targets by comparing their coordinates with those pre-loaded in its warhead.

Once encounter such targets the missile's on-board computer will immediately select the most important target by the order of priority and the missile will strike it. So, once the missile was fired towards Washington D.C. it compared the two most important targets - the White House and the Pentagon and "preferred" to strike the latter one as being in its "opinion" the more important target. Perhaps I should mention that this is the most heavily armored missile in the world - it is made from very thick steel and in fact it could be compared with a flying tank or with a giant bullet. Due to its tremendous speed, weight and strength of its body this missile managed to penetrate six capital walls of the Pentagon building when it struck it on 9/11. /continues

***********************************
The truth will out.