“The goal is to meet the challenge of racial interbreeding. The challenge of racial interbreeding that faces us in the 21st Century. It’s not a choice, it’s an obligation. It’s imperative.
We cannot do otherwise. We risk finding ourselves confronted with major problems. We MUST change; therefore we WILL change. We are going to change ALL at the same time.
In business, in administration, in education, in the political parties. And we will obligate ourselves as to results. If this voluntarism does not work for the Republic, then the State will move to still more coercive measures.”
- Nicholas Sarkozy, Jewish former President of France. [And CIA asset.]
Posted by Whoselaw Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/9S8xe7g3zqIT/
Pillaging the World. The History and Politics of the IMF
By Ernst Wolff
Global Research, October 26, 2019
Global Research 2 January 2016
The following text is the forward to Ernst Wolff‘s book entitled : Pillaging the World. The History and Politics of the IMF, Tectum Verlag Marburg, 2014, www.tectum-verlag.de. The book is available in English and German. First posted on Global Research in January 2016
No other financial organization has affected the lives of the majority of the world’s population more profoundly over the past fifty years than the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Since its inception after World War II, it has expanded its sphere of influence to the remotest corners of the earth. Its membership currently includes 188 countries on five continents.
For decades, the IMF has been active mainly in Africa, Asia and South America. There is hardly a country on these continents where its policies have not been carried out in close cooperation with the respective national governments. When the global financial crisis broke out in 2007, the IMF turned its attention to northern Europe. Since the onset of the Euro crisis in 2009, its primary focus has shifted to southern Europe.
Officially, the IMF’s main task consists in stabilizing the global financial system and helping out troubled countries in times of crisis. In reality, its operations are more reminiscent of warring armies. Wherever it intervenes, it undermines the sovereignty of states by forcing them to implement measures that are rejected by the majority of the population, thus leaving behind a broad trail of economic and social devastation.
In pursuing its objectives, the IMF never resorts to the use of weapons or soldiers. It simply applies the mechanisms of capitalism, specifically those of credit. Its strategy is as simple as it is effective: When a country runs into financial difficulties, the IMF steps in and provides support in the form of loans. In return, it demands the enforcement of measures that serve to ensure the country’s solvency in order to enable it to repay these loans.
Because of its global status as “lender of last resort” governments usually have no choice but to accept the IMF’s offer and submit to its terms – thus getting caught in a web of debt, which they, as a result of interest, compound interest and principal, get deeper and deeper entangled in. The resulting strain on the state budget and the domestic economy inevitably leads to a deterioration of their financial situation, which the IMF in turn uses as a pretext for demanding ever new concessions in the form of “austerity programs”.
The consequences are disastrous for the ordinary people of the countries affected (which are mostly low-income) because their governments all follow the same pattern, passing the effects of austerity on to wage earners and the poor.
In this manner, IMF programs have cost millions of people their jobs, denied them access to adequate health care, functioning educational systems and decent housing. They have rendered their food unaffordable, increased homelessness, robbed old people of the fruits of life-long work, favored the spread of diseases, reduced life expectancy and increased infant mortality.
At the other end of the social scale, however, the policies of the IMF have helped a tiny layer of ultra-rich increase their vast fortunes even in times of crisis. Its measures have contributed decisively to the fact that global inequality has assumed historically unprecedented levels. The income difference between a sun king and a beggar at the end of the Middle Ages pales compared to the difference between a hedge fund manager and a social welfare recipient of today.
Although these facts are universally known and hundreds of thousands have protested the effects of its measures in past decades, often risking their lives, the IMF tenaciously clings on to its strategy. Despite all criticism and despite the strikingly detrimental consequences of its actions, it still enjoys the unconditional support of the governments of all leading industrial nations.
Why? How can it be that an organization that causes such immense human suffering around the globe continues to act with impunity and with the backing of the most powerful forces of our time? In whose interest does the IMF work? Who benefits from its actions?
The IMF that is controlled by jews is a satanic UN operation. In concert with the World Bank it is the trustee of the bankrupt 'The UNITED STATES Inc' and 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Inc' (or something similar) with the american public as leading creditor.
Is the UK Inc in a similar situation?
Why would the UN and the respective regimes keep this situation quiet? It seems contrived to place nations in the hands of the globalists by convincing the respective public that they are wholly responsible for paying the politician-banker arranged debt, even though they are the principal creditor.
It's a money-go-round for the bankers and their cohorts. They don't want our cash and sub surface wealth, they want us to not have it. Then we are totally controlled. Behind this idea, supported currency was cancelled and paper money became worth only as much as a person would accept as an IOU. The next stage was to create invisble currency. Now you see it, now you don't. A bit like history. The trick is how to make the invisible invisible? It's an ethereal commodity. People gamble that other people will be dumb enough to think it has value and that value can go down. To zero. A SLOW CON.
The police chase ONLY the little people. And non masons.