Log in

No account? Create an account
28 April 2019 @ 05:47 am
SOS. Save Our Sovereignty  
Lord James:

Remaining in the EU will constitute perjury by the Queen

byApril 2019
Lord James of Blackheath, the man who spotted the first lead that revealed British and Israeli involvement in the Iraqi Supergun affair and who in 2010 became just about the only peer of the realm to raise the issue of the national debt in proper terms in the House of Lords, has released this paper, which calls upon the Lords to prevent the Crown shattering the Constitution by acting in breach of the Monarch's oath of office to uphold the Declaration of Rights 1689.

A constitutional initiative to override political deadlock

Public anxiety and dismay as to Brexit political arguments reflects the similar mood and confusion in the House of Commons, which makes it extremely difficult for the public, poorly served by the media, to understand the critical issues — which in turn will make it more difficult to gain wide acceptance to find any kind of solution.  In particular, it is noticeable that the Parliamentary discussions are failing to address significantly critical Constitutional problems, which may vary according to which solution is the outcome.  It may be helpful to win public support if these are now more clearly explained and understood, yet only the Daily Express last Friday has made any significant move toward this.

Nothing would help more to achieve public understanding of the Constitutional hazards than to initiate urgently a direct appeal to the United Nations seeking their support for bringing the European Commission into strict conformity with the requirements of Clause 46.1 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969.  Serving this Notice would also provide immediately justifiable cause for an extension to the Chapter 50 timetable and would demonstrate a firm and legally justified Government initiative.

In line with that application to the UN, the Government should then explain to Parliament, and in the media, the different constitutional hazards arising from the alternative solutions available.  For example, remaining in the EU — whether temporarily or indefinitely — may well see the UK embroiled in the coming move to Qualified Majority Vote in 2020 and beyond.

This is contrary to the popular vote and that which our Government has promised to deliver. It is utterly inimical to our constitution. It will involve the creation of a European standing army and loss of control of our defence forces. We have been warned of very significant consequent damage to our intelligence services, there will be a loss of control of fiscal [tax] independence and currency, and loss of diplomatic independence to make international treaties. A full destruction of our constitutional autonomy and sovereign independence could, and most probably will, rapidly follow any arrangement that does not recover sovereignty, which was originally breached in the Lisbon Treaty. We must exit by initiating a supra-party-political consensus confirming our constitution.

The way forward from this is to:-

1. Make an immediate appeal to the United Nations making reference to a potential breach of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaty Making 1969 under Article 46.1, with a view to seeking an adjudication that the EU is attempting to force us to agree a treaty based upon fundamentally unconstitutional arrangements unacceptable to the British Crown.  I repeat my earlier contention that the Attorney General previously discouraged this initiative because he had addressed the wrong clause in the Treaty.  The correct clause states that no trading agreement may be entered into which significantly compromises the constitutional integrity of the responding nation, which is surely an accurate description of the European Commission's exit position.

2. If the application could be supported by Her Majesty, it would add significant force. This application to the UN could surely be assembled by a Government legal team within a single working day and be ready to be presented by the UK’s Ambassador to the UN on behalf of Her Majesty within 48 hours.  Media coverage would immediately raise the entire public perception of the Brexit issue; put into perspective political loyalties; and engender, hopefully, a public patriotic response.

3. In the meantime, we must begin to educate the public and electorate as to the relative risks of both a Remain strategy and the reasons why a No Deal exit may be the only means to preserve our national independence and our continuity of our proud sovereign status.  We must also show how this sovereign status will only be placed in ever greater risk unless we are set free and clear from the European Commission’s qualified majority strategy due to commence in 2020.  If the UN do not uphold our complaint, then only the Leave without a Deal solution will achieve this.

4 The dire constitutional consequences of remaining will very likely force an abdication by the Monarch. She would either have to accept a state of perjury or maintain the Crown's honour by abdication. Her oaths of office will have become entirely corrupted such that no successor could undertake them, thus the total demise of the Crown is a very real and inherent risk in remaining.

Failure to terminate the membership of the European Union will continue to lead us all deeper into a treasonous liability arising from placing our governance subject to a foreign Potentate. That Potentate is unelected by the UK's electorate, is unaccountable to them and irremovable by them.

This is an absolute affront to the Dignity and Majesty of the Crown. It could foreshadow the total demise of the Monarchy.

When Brexit is finally done, Parliament must be shown to have discharged its absolute responsibility not to have reduced its own omnipotence.

In summary, the British public must be brought to an understanding that Brexit is a vital precondition for the maintenance of our sovereignty and independence and that our political forces are acting responsibly and with great integrity on behalf of the whole community.  In passing, it will do no harm to remind all levels of Parliament in this process.

Lord James of Blackheath CBE

Source https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/lord-james-remaining-eu-will-constitute-perjury-queen
clothcapclothcap on April 28th, 2019 05:09 am (UTC)
Brexit: The Constitutional Position
by John Bingley
27th February 2019
The EU has been insensitive bordering on contemptuous in seeking to impose what amounts to unconstitutional conditions upon us. This cannot be and the result has been made clear by the wholesale rejection of the base proposal.
Whilst widespread rejection by many Lords and MPs has occurred, many are perhaps ignorant of the vital constitutional issues at stake. They are critically important and exposed in this document and must be fully understood by all and taken into account.
The Rules of our laws which lay down the conditions for the Crown's constitutional limitation and thus its duty in governance and in Parliament may not be broken and are in fact bound to be fulfilled. The Crown can do no wrong because it is compelled to do right. Breach of sovereignty can only occur by error. It may not normally be sanctioned under the terms of our laws, yet it has occurred. We all acknowledge this.
Parliament is a tripartite body and the rule of law binds its individual parts, most particularly the Crown. The two Houses hold the key to the context and content of the law making but the power of Governance is always in the Crown and through the constitutional use of the law. At times of dissolution it becomes starkly apparent where the Sovereign constitutional power resides. The Commons are non-existent and set for re-election and the House of Lords are on hold. Yet there is no transfer of power. The armed services report to the Crown. A dissolution may democratically adjust the membership of the those who sit to advise in the Commons but does not alter the placement of sovereign power. Bills are of no force or effect without Royal Assent; and Ministers are Crown Servants. So it is clear the sovereign power of governance is held by the Crown under a constitutional contract:-

Blackstone quote: the Coronation Oath is a contract

Constitutionally it is the imperative and paramount duty of the government to repair, recover and correct any and all breaches of sovereignty at the earliest moment. This is compulsory according to our law. The treaties that have enabled this unconstitutional intrusion can only have been agreed in error. They are in conflict with our constitution so far as any breach of Sovereignty is created or enabled. Effectively the Crown has been deceived in its grant.
There comes a point in our constitutional arrangements where the Crown is compelled to act by the common law, the statute law and the custom in order to defend and maintain the constitution. If a situation arises where the failure of government to re-establish and secure sovereignty continues, the people may require the Crown by right of petition to deliver correction forthwith.
The Coronation Oath, a broken contract.
clothcapclothcap on April 28th, 2019 09:33 am (UTC)
Military Union: British Government Policy Since 1948
by Mike Robinson
UKC 15th January 2019
As pressure builds for the issue of EU Military Union to enter the Brexit debate, government becomes ever more vociferous that Britain will not be part of any such project. Strangely, though, history seems to suggest that Military Union was British policy from the beginning. Is it credible that Britain would not be part of something it has spent so much effort building?
In March 1947, claiming concern over a possible German resurgence combined with changing attitudes towards Soviet Russia, Britain and France signed a mutual assistance pact in Dunkirk. Tensions continued to rise with Russia as Britain in particular increased its anti-Soviet rhetoric.
clothcapclothcap on April 28th, 2019 09:41 am (UTC)
Why are Tories pursuing Tony’s Blair’s “essential” policy of EU Defence Union?
Why are Tories pursuing Tony’s Blair’s “essential” policy of EU Defence Union?
by Mike Robinson
UKC 27th February 2019
“Mr Blair, I want to know what your point of view is regarding a European Army, and do you think this might be an additional incentive for a Brexit?”
This was the first question put to TB at a Technical University of Munich event on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference at the weekend.
“So, you see,” he replied, “the European defence concept actually was started by a summit between myself and President Chirac back in the year 2000, and its really a very important issue because one of the things that I think is vital for Europe to develop in the future.”
Blair’s memory slightly failed him here. In fact the summit took place in December 1998. The resulting declaration makes a lie of any claims in the British mainstream media that Britain was not, and is not, fully behind the EU Military Union project.
“The European Union needs to be in a position to play its full role on the international stage,” the declaration says. “To this end, the Union must have the capacity for autonomous action, backed up by credible military forces, the means to decide to use them, and a readiness to do so, in order to respond to international crises.”
The declaration goes on to restate the requirements that this should happen both within the NATO framework and also within the institutional framework of the European Union (European Council, General Affairs Council, and meetings of Defence Ministers).
It is true that this is a declaration, and as such is not legally binding. Yet a declaration is a clear statement of intent; an intent which was first actioned the following year at the Helsinki European Council meeting, when the target date of 2003 was set for the creation of the EU’s Rapid Reaction Force.
Brexit and the UKGov EU Defence Union Prenup
Fast forward to 2015 and we began to hear the first overt demands from the EU side for an ‘Army’. The demands came from Jean-Claude Juncker.
"Europe has lost a huge amount of respect,” he told Die Welt. “In foreign policy too, we don't seem to be taken entirely seriously."
clothcapclothcap on April 28th, 2019 10:15 am (UTC)
Who do politicians work for? Not us.
Brexit: Is Britain's Democracy All But Dead?
by Martin Edwards
UKC 20th March 2019
The Government’s Withdrawal Agreement, which is disliked equally by those on both sides of the Brexit argument, has twice been soundly rejected in Parliament by record margins.
Prior to this recent series of votes Parliament had already passed the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. As we examine the text of that Act, the sincerity of the Government’s promise to honour the referendum result rapidly evaporates.
Section 1 of that Act provides that “The European Communities Act 1972 is repealed on exit day.”
However Section 2 (1) provides that “EU-derived domestic legislation, as it has effect in domestic law immediately before exit day, continues to have effect in domestic law on and after exit day.”
This means that all domestic legislation (UK Statutory Instruments) made under section 2(2) the European Communities Act 1972, continue in force.
Additionally, Section 3 (1) provides that “Direct EU legislation“, so far as operative immediately before exit day, forms part of domestic law on and after exit day.”
Therefore, even if we somehow arrive at ‘exit day’ it has already been pre-determined by Parliament that, despite the Brexit result of the referendum, all EU law existing at the time of the referendum, and all EU law enacted since the referendum will become part of UK domestic law. In other words, the die has already been cast – the Government’s so-called Withdrawal Agreement was nothing other that Brexit in name only.
The key issue, wholly ignored by the mainstream media, is that until June 2016 the British electorate were never asked in a referendum whether they wished to join the European Union. The 1975 referendum was about joining the 'Common Market', although Edward Heath's Tory government had already signed up to the fledgling European Union in 1973.
Heath’s key claim at the time was that joining the Common Market would lead to no loss of British Sovereignty.
Heath lied and admitted he lied, treason. His lies have been continuously propagated.

Brexit: The UK Will NOT Leave
by UK Column Reporters
UKC 28th February 2019
Francois Fischer, Head of the Intelligence Analysis Division, European Union Intelligence and Situation Centre, comments on Brexit.

The brick wall behind the curtain.
clothcapclothcap on April 28th, 2019 11:03 am (UTC)
More horreur stories from UKC
Will the New Treaty of Aachen make the EU Dream Come True?

The Aachen Treaty: Germany and France become all but a single state

Integrity Initiative: Follow the money

Beyond Integrity Initiative: The Scale of UKGOV Counter Disinformation

Common Purpose? Another time. If we get out, they may become the IJ EU's stay-behind army. A chilling thought when you are aware of the atrocities WWII stay behinds committed at NATO's behest. Search Gladio and Gladio B.

UKC led by fmr Commander Brian Gerrish and company are doing their level best in this Battle for Britain (and NI). Care to help them?
Enlist: https://www.ukcolumn.org/community
Give: https://www.ukcolumn.org/donate
clothcapclothcap on April 28th, 2019 11:15 am (UTC)
Latest News from UKC

UK Column News - 26th April 2019
Brian Gerrish and Mike Robinson are joined by David Ellis for today's news update from the UK Column.

(Previous news shows: https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news-archive )

UKC channel Youtube:: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr_dQZ0irQdRiwVatkuHPcA
clothcapclothcap on April 28th, 2019 11:38 am (UTC)
From Tap News

Why Do Jews Stage “Hate Crimes?”
April 24, 2019
“We found evidence of a crime,”
said the Winnipeg Police Chief.
“It just wasn’t a hate crime,”
Kosher restaurant owners stage a hate-crime attack.
1000 man-hours by 25 officers were dedicated to this hoax

26 Apr 2019
Dear Henry, what emerges from the silence of the mainstream media regarding Brexit is the deafening sound of an old world disintegrating.
Few stories illustrate this better than the coverage of our case. The English Democrats are bringing a High Court case using the Judicial Review procedure to sue Theresa May and the government...

Discussing 5G With Ian R. Crane.
18 hours ago 1
posted by NPP
5G, is it safe? by Ian R Crane As Ian says when asked about 5G, Health Minister and my MP Matt Hancock answers as if reading a script from Yes Minister! He is a classic example of a mouth piece offering up statements without commitment; indeed, it is his specialty. “A considerable amount of …

Extinguish Extinction Rebellion and their secret commercial agendas
15 hours ago
posted by Tapestry
Who runs Extinction Rebellion? What is the fourth industrial revolution? What are their goals? What is a climate emergency? What is sustainable development? How is 5G connected with all of the above?

It’s geo-engineering, not climate change
27 Apr 2019
posted by Tapestry
Study HAARP, heating up the ionosphere, jet stream redirecting, chemtrails and much more. They can change the weather in a matter of hours by heating the ionosphere.
Tax funded.
clothcapclothcap on April 28th, 2019 12:52 pm (UTC)
Free Energy
The Egyptians had it before Tesla discovered it.

There Are Things Inside This Pyramid That Defy All Logic!

Ancient Secret Discoveries
Youtube on Apr 21, 2019
This explains everything.
clothcapclothcap on April 28th, 2019 03:29 pm (UTC)
ABC News (Australia)
Youtube on Oct 8, 2018

Four Corners investigates the secret tactics used by global chemical giant #Monsanto to protect its billion-dollar business and its star product — the weed killer, #Roundup.

Read more here: https://ab.co/2C0kyTD

For more from ABC News, click here: http://www.abc.net.au/news/

Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/abcnews
Like us on Facebook: http://facebook.com/abcnews.au
Subscribe to us on YouTube: http://ab.co/1svxLVE
Follow us on Instagram: http://instagram.com/abcnews_au

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JszHrMZ7dx4
Watch 40:22 thru 40:50 for a partial horizon pan.
Perhaps it's just Australia that is flat. /sarc

Thanks ABC News (AU). Perhaps you could do a flat Earth feature? Don't go for the science, it's not ready yet.

Edited at 2019-04-28 04:16 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on April 28th, 2019 05:03 pm (UTC)
How long before Australia is a barren land?

Where nothing will grow except G M O.
And lymphomas.

Some gift horses' mouths should be looked in.
clothcapclothcap on April 28th, 2019 07:28 pm (UTC)
Zero Hedge 25th-26th April
New York's "Green New Deal" To Phase Out Red Meat By 50%
"We hope other cities will soon follow suit."

Global Government And Mass Surveillance Needed To Save Humanity, Expert Says
"Elitist propaganda is so backward that they do not seem to notice the inherent and obvious contradictions..."

Activists Protect Venezuelan Embassy From US-Supported Coup
The Trump-orchestrated plan of creating a parallel government in Venezuela and then simply taking over diplomatic premises is totally illegal...

'The Satanic Temple' Has Evolved Into An Anti-Trump Movement, And Leftists Are Flocking To It
"The Satanic Temple is the perfect religion for progressives. You can believe anything you want, as long as you hate what Donald Trump, Christians and conservatives believe..."

Will The West Allow The Construction Of Railroads Linking The Gulf And The Med?
Two projects for railroads are currently in competition – the first intended to develop the region, the second to divide it. Are the Westerners behaving like human beings, or are they pursuing their dream of world domination?

Assange's Imprisonment Reveals Even More Corruption Than WikiLeaks Did
By locking up Assange, they’ve inadvertently exposed themselves for what they are, and we are now able to point at it for everyone to see. They reached too far out into the light and exposed their true face...

Macron Woos Yellow Vests With Tax Cuts, Immigration, And Warning Over Threat Of 'Political Islam'
"I'll be simple, I don't want tax increases. I want cuts for those who work by significantly reducing the income tax."

New York Tickets 12 People For Defying Measles Vaccination Order As Cases Spike
"The 12 people issued summons for defying the order must attend a hearing and face a fine of up to $1,000 if found to be noncompliant."

In "Stunning Decision" Bayer Shareholders Dump CEO Over Disastrous Monsanto Purchase
"Mr. Baumann, what have you done with our stable company?"
The public is waking to the fact it can kill corporations quite easily. (Hey Joe, you can do it to banks too.) Will their politicians make corporationcide a capital offence?

"I Will Dispose Of It": Trump Pulls Out Of UN Arms Trade Treaty Over 2nd Amendment Concerns
"Under my administration we will never surrender American sovereignty to anyone..."
clothcapclothcap on April 28th, 2019 07:32 pm (UTC)
Zero Hedge 26th-27th April
The Essence Of Evil: Sex With Children Has Become Big Business In America
This is America’s dirty little secret...

The European Union Is Obliged To Participate In US Wars
In less than six months, the foundations of international relations have been 'rebooted'... The war that Hillary Clinton promised to start has been declared, but not only by military force...
"Since the Treaty of Maastricht, all the members of the European Union (including the neutral countries) have placed their defences under the suzerainty of NATO, which is directed exclusively by the United States. This is why, when the Pentagon delegates the economic headquarters of the countries it wishes to destroy to the US Department of the Treasury (USDT), all members of the European Union and NATO are obliged to apply US sanctions."

Push Them Hard Enough And The Productive Class Will Opt Out Of Servitude
People love their big paychecks, but they also value their sanity...

US-Led Bombing Campaign in Syria Left Raqqa "Most Destroyed City in Modern Times": Study
"US, UK and French forces also launched thousands of air strikes into civilian neighborhoods, scores of which resulted in mass civilian casualties" — Amnesty, Airwars joint report

WikiLeaks Cites Evidence US Seeking Capital Offense Case Against Assange
New DOJ letter reveals extent of US investigation...

Russian Spy Plane Flies Over Washington, US Military & Nuclear Bases
It's that time again...

"State Of Hostility Could Easily Return": More Details From Putin-Kim Summit
Trump reportedly embraced Putin's efforts at finding a way forward.

Why A Chernobyl-like Financial Disaster Is Inescapable
The main take-away from Chernobyl is that people frequently charge forward with misplaced beliefs in unfounded theories and ideas... these adventures in madness nearly always end in disaster...

Saudi Savagery: Kingdom Beheads 16-Year-Old For Sending Whatsapp Message
Human rights organizations are outraged.
clothcapclothcap on April 28th, 2019 09:27 pm (UTC)
Hoax Within A Hoax: UK Bar Slams Shrimpton for Outing Real Nuke Threat

VT Editors -
April 11, 2019
The story below is typical of the standards of truth we see in the world today. Veterans Today correspondent, Michael Shrimpton, was not only jailed but disbarred and an unsuccessful attempt (now erased from public record) was made to put child pornography on his computers….all because he reported what we have real (like those that can testify in court if allowed…if..) sources that prove Shrimpton correct.
Two NST Teams from the US recovered a Soviet built 550kt thermonuclear weapon in a warehouse 8 miles from the Olympic Stadium outside London in 2012. Shrimpton tried to report this to British intelligence and was charged, though he both backchannels and a tip line to report terrorism.
He was found guilty of knowing too much and needed to be destroyed. If with Shrimpton’s good personal relationship with Israeli intelligence and their obvious power in London, when approached even they refused to get involved…though acknowledged Shrimpton was correct. Helping Shrimpton, according to a high level Mossad source “was a bad use of assets inside Britain.”
The story below, as reported two days ago and from a 3rd party source in 2016. Read it all.
Olympic bomb hoax barrister fails in disbarment appeal
By Max Walters
A barrister and former part-time immigration judge jailed for falsely claiming that spies were plotting to detonate a bomb at the London Olympic Games in 2012 has failed in his appeal against the decision to disbar him.
In Shrimpton v Bar Standards Board, Mrs Justice Jefford DBE ruled the decision to ban Michael Shrimpton from practising as a barrister ‘was not wrong and nor was there any serious procedural error that rendered the decision unjust’.
Shrimpton was convicted of communicating false information and jailed for a year in 2015. A year earlier, he was also convicted of an offence contrary to the Protection of Children Act 1978 and sentenced to a three-year supervision order.
Shrimpton was convicted in 2015 of communicating false information
During the trial for the 2014 conviction at Aylesbury Crown Court, the barrister, called to the bar in 1983, said that secret service agents planted the images on his computer memory stick in a plot to discredit him.
The bomb hoax was made in April 2012. Shrimpton, according to the judgment, had a telephone conversation with a man referred to as Mr Burton, private secretary to the then Secretary of State for Defence in which he said that one of four thermonuclear warheads retrieved from the Russian submarine, The Kursk, was being held in East London. The Kursk sank in the Barents Sea in 2000.
The following day Shrimpton called a political agent of David Lidington MP, then a Foreign Office minister. Shrimpton, on his own account, said the purpose of the call was to set up informal drinks at the London residence of the Foreign Secretary at which the Russian government could verify the intelligence about the nuclear warhead, whilst preserving deniability.
He was disbarred in September last year.
and, Republished from: http://goldenageofgaia.com/2016/01/10/jailed-for-stopping-a-nuclear-attack-on-london/
Jailed for Stopping a Nuclear Attack on London
By Steve Beckow
Michael Shrimpton blew the whistle on an attempt to explode a nuclear bomb, taken from the Russian submarine the Kursk, in London during the 2012 Olympics. For his troubles, he landed up in jail. But the false-flag incident was stopped.
5* recommended.
IMO. We have a nightmare puppet of a psychopath or psychopaths' occupation regime. They would have mass murdered how many people in the name of destroying Russia for profit, geopolitics and continued control? Now May has our nation helping in trying to set-up Russia for a first strike nuclear attack with no way to respond. She appears to be as rabid as her masters. Clintonesque. Russia is helping develop Asian and European trade for their (and Russia's) mutual benefit. With the alliances Russia has made their union rivals or exceeds that of the West in every way.
clothcapclothcap on April 29th, 2019 04:58 pm (UTC)
Carbon dioxide is not a poison but the world’s best friend. David Bellamy.
Tap Newswire, 22 Apr 2019 2
posted by Tapestry
Stop The Eco-Fascists.
Cambridgeshire 19th March 2011
Back in the 1980’s when the latest scare about an impending ice age caught the imagination of pop science and the headline driven press I was teaching ecology at Durham University. However safe in the knowledge that there have been many ice ages, little ice ages, interglacials and interstadials some of the latter degrees warmer than today I was in no hurry to make predictions or apply for a post in Australia. We discussed it in a rational way during seminars.
Like the fluctuations of any interstadial, the “end of the world” arguments soon swung the other way and the fear of carbon-induced warming was born on the computer models of the IPCC.
More powerful and faster computers along with the development of the internet, sped the reaction time of both the programmers and the press. So much so that the prediction of models and the predilections of the press for bad news began to usurp the precautionary principles that used to be the cornerstones of peer reviewed science.
About this time I was invited to visit The Hadley Centre for Climate Research and Prediction in Exeter. After a four-hour session and a nice working lunch I was asked if I would help put over their point of view to the general public.
I agreed that I would do my best to digest all the power points I had been given and call them back.
My answer was a polite no and so I got caught up in the ongoing argument and the totally unscientific fracas that was developing around so called global warming heretics.
Spiced with all the venom of celebrity status I soon began to feel the heat of the machine of vilification already focussed on anyone who questioned the catastrophe dogma spun from the computer predictions that flowed from IPCC and centred on carbon as the bad guy.
For a while I retreated behind the fact that what was happening “beggared belief” and given time would die of natural causes.
However the bandwagon of doom, gloom and vilification rolled on turning into a tumbril of their own making.
The first real ray of hope was a statement from Mike Hulme Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research University UEA on BBC news November 4, 2006 key points of which were:
“I have found myself increasingly chastised by climate change campaigners when my public statements and lectures on climate change have not satisfied environmental drama and exaggerated rhetoric”.
“Why is it not just campaigners, but politicians and scientists too who are openly confusing the language of fear, terror and disaster with the physical reality of climate change, actively ignoring the careful hedging which surrounds science’s predictions?”
These singular revelations from this highly qualified horses mouth makes it clear that the politicians, campaigners and loose-cannon scientists engaged in relentless fearmongering over global warming are ignoring science and are out of touch with reality.
So why, one must ask, has the Hadley Centre not cautioned Houghton, May, King, Blair, Cameron, Stern, and Gore by pointing out (using Hulme’s own words) “that their fixation on catastrophe could be in danger of tipping society onto a negative, depressive and reactionary trajectory”.
Fortunately for science Hulme could not or would not be silenced, for some two months later just days before the publication of IPCC 4 he opened up another can of worms by saying on BBC Radio 4 that this massive tome
“… is not going to talk about tipping points; it’s not going to talk about 5m rises in sea level; it’s not going to talk about the next ice age because the Gulf Stream collapses; and it’s going to have none of the economics of the Stern Review.”
Co2 warming was (it's now cooling) a for profit and excuse to tax (for the NWO's OWG) scam imposed by con men.
Read this for authoritative scientific realism else go to the BBC and listen to establishment propaganda.
clothcapclothcap on April 29th, 2019 05:10 pm (UTC)
Duelling HAARPists?

If this is down to tech playing dribble with the weather, are they brain dead? Imagine if they interfere with the Gulf Stream? "Ice age now" (advancing glaciation) could become an overnight reality.