Log in

No account? Create an account
06 April 2019 @ 01:44 pm
I-JEU created the euro from fresh air. Now the World Gov racketeers want in on the scam  
The UN is a failed gang of crooks controlled by another gang of controlled crooks that works with the private IMF and World Bansters to defraud nations via war damage rebuild loans. The SDR is just another forged currency ponzi that has no intrinsic value beyond the signature of an employee.
The IMF racket  works to deprive natives from their future earnings by means of a loan taken out by complicit crooked regime leaders and dictators and secured in favour of corporations by mineral and hydrocarbon rich land. The loan invariably gets misspent. Britain participates in the racket by funding the IMF with British public funds that the public pays interest on, that goes to bank shareholders, the Crown Ltd (City) and the Vatican. Borrowers are likely obliged to use globalist owned corps for the rebuild, such as Haliburton.
SDRs are fraudulent intruments that bear interest. A pretend debt currency.
The UN was closed down as a failed corporation. It is now a zombie fictional entity.

From Zero Hedge, posted by Tyler Durden
It Begins: Former UN Under-Secretary-General Calls For One World Currency

Authored by José Antonio Ocampo, formerly United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs, via Project Syndicate,

This year, the world commemorates the anniversaries of two key events in the development of the global monetary system. The first is the creation of the International Monetary Fund at the Bretton Woods conference 75 years ago. The second is the advent, 50 years ago, of the Special Drawing Right (SDR), the IMF’s global reserve asset.

When it introduced the SDR, the Fund hoped to make it “the principal reserve asset in the international monetary system.” This remains an unfulfilled ambition; indeed, the SDR is one of the most underused instruments of international cooperation. Nonetheless, better late than never: turning the SDR into a true global currency would yield several benefits for the world’s economy and monetary system.

The idea of a global currency is not new. Prior to the Bretton Woods negotiations, John Maynard Keynes suggested the “bancor” as the unit of account of his proposed International Clearing Union. In the 1960s, under the leadership of the Belgian-American economist Robert Triffin, other proposals emerged to address the growing problems created by the dual dollar-gold system that had been established at Bretton Woods. The system finally collapsed in 1971. As a result of those discussions, the IMF approved the SDR in 1967, and included it in its Articles of Agreement two years later.

Although the IMF’s issuance of SDRs resembles the creation of national money by central banks, the SDR fulfills only some of the functions of money. True, SDRs are a reserve asset, and thus a store of value. They are also the IMF’s unit of account. But only central banks – mainly in developing countries, though also in developed economies – and a few international institutions use SDRs as a means of exchange to pay each other.

The SDR has a number of basic advantages, not least that the IMF can use it as an instrument of international monetary policy in a global economic crisis. In 2009, for example, the IMF issued $250 billion in SDRs to help combat the downturn, following a proposal by the G20.

Most importantly, SDRs could also become the basic instrument to finance IMF programs. Until now, the Fund has relied mainly on quota (capital) increases and borrowing from member countries. But quotas have tended to lag behind global economic growth; the last increase was approved in 2010, but the US Congress agreed to it only in 2015. And loans from member countries, the IMF’s main source of new funds (particularly during crises), are not true multilateral instruments.

The best alternative would be to turn the IMF into an institution fully financed and managed in its own global currency – a proposal made several decades ago by Jacques Polak, then the Fund’s leading economist. One simple option would be to consider the SDRs that countries hold but have not used as “deposits” at the IMF, which the Fund can use to finance its lending to countries. This would require a change in the Articles of Agreement, because SDRs currently are not held in regular IMF accounts.

The Fund could then issue SDRs regularly or, better still, during crises, as in 2009. In the long term, the amount issued must be related to the demand for foreign-exchange reserves. Various economists and the IMF itself have estimated that the Fund could issue $200-300 billion in SDRs per year. Moreover, this would spread the financial benefits (seigniorage) of issuing the global currency across all countries. At present, these benefits accrue only to issuers of national or regional currencies that are used internationally – particularly the US dollar and the euro.

More active use of SDRs would also make the international monetary system more independent of US monetary policy. One of the major problems of the global monetary system is that the policy objectives of the US, as the issuer of the world’s main reserve currency, are not always consistent with overall stability in the system.

In any case, different national and regional currencies could continue to circulate alongside growing SDR reserves. And a new IMF “substitution account” would allow central banks to exchange their reserves for SDRs, as the US first proposed back in the 1970s.

SDRs could also potentially be used in private transactions and to denominate national bonds. But, as the IMF pointed out in its report to the Board in 2018, these “market SDRs,” which would turn the unit into fully-fledged money, are not essential for the reforms proposed here. Nor would SDRs need to be used as a unit of account outside the Fund.

The anniversaries of the IMF and the SDR in 2019 are causes for celebration. But they also represent an ideal opportunity to transform the SDR into a true global currency that would strengthen the international monetary system. Policymakers should seize it.

*  *  *

We are being primed and propagandized to desire this inevitability! Coming just a day after the Saudis threatened to end the Petrodollar, Ocampo's op-ed is well-timed to say the least.

As we noted previously, nothing lasts forever.

Source https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-05/it-begins-former-un-under-secretary-general-calls-one-world-currency
Just another con job to finance the failed I-J World Gov coup, eh Cameron? If the UN, WB, IMF, G7 got nuked tomorrow the world would be a better place.
Except Mossad never attacks its own.
clothcapclothcap on April 6th, 2019 12:55 pm (UTC)
What next? Another prick demands world pop chipped?
Special drawing rights carry a weekly determined interest rate, but no party pays interest if an IMF member country maintains the amount of XDRs allocated to it.

For a country using a private central bank's ponzi currency that don't hold sufficient XDRs, the public will be paying interest on that bank's ponzi currency and the IMF's as well as repayments.

From the latest ZH commenters at time of reading:
Cardinal Fang
So let me get this straight, Boeing is going to design a robot with AI programmed by google to issue UN digital currency to be spent at Walmart?
What could go wrong?

Globalist elites will not stop until every western human has a probe shoved up their *** to monitor their bowel movements. The only resolution will be a nice big huge war to reset everything once again, it will mean a few billion people are gone but what they hell that will improve the living space for most.

Fluff The Cat
A one-world currency, controlled by Jewish bankers. What could possibly go wrong? /s
Zio banksters.

The IMF and others are promoting global use of the SDR because it is their creation and they own it and it would give them control of international finance.
There's nothing wrong with using gold and silver for this purpose except they are subject to free market arbitration which the IMF doesn't want.

Gold price is controlled daily by a handful of private (13 families) bank rackets.
clothcapclothcap on April 6th, 2019 10:05 pm (UTC)
Prepare to have your reality turned right side up.
New Michael Tellinger Some of the Strangest Discoveries Ever Made on Ancient Origins
Zohar StarGate Ancient Discoveries
Youtube on Sep 17, 2018
Michael Tellinger discloses some of the latest discoveries around the Ancient Ruins in Southern Africa, Stone Circles, Adam’s Calendar, the fossils of giants and strange creatures, sound technology, resonance, magnetism, the nature of our reality and the particle physics agenda. Connecting the dots between science, spirituality and consciousness.
These mysterious ancient people left behind more than 10 million stone ruins scattered throughout southern Africa. They carved detailed images into the hardest rock, worshiped the sun, and were the first to carve an image of the Egyptian Ankh – key of life and universal knowledge, 200,000 years before the Egyptians came to light. Michael reveals many of the latest measurements and presents the evidence that this vanished civilisation had an astute knowledge of the laws of nature and the generation of free energy from Mother Earth for all their needs. They used the power of sound and frequency as a source of energy, which underpins the scientific conclusions reached by Tellinger.

For flat earthers:
The toroidal accretion plane called Earth
Starts around 2:08:00
For physicists:
Gravity is an electromagnetic force. 2:35:00
Coulomb's law.

Solution to the crooked banksters world:
Create a social system where money is not needed.
Contributism defeats competitionism every time.

Edited at 2019-04-06 10:20 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on April 6th, 2019 11:17 pm (UTC)
Meantime back on weakly alleged globe Earth
Intel Drop: Shooting Real, Shooter Fake, Jewish Born Freemason like Brevik
(VT hacked 7 minutes after posting)
All done, according to the "manifesto" in the name of "Donald Trump" and, if one were to read between the lines, the now pseudo-legally designated "Jewish Only" State of Israel
By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor - March 16, 2019
odd modifications, no flash suppressor, strange stock, none of which is required by New Zealand law....we have never seen a weapon like this...piece of junk
by Gordon Duff, VT Sr. Editor, …with Sources in Israel, the Balkans and Turkey
We have an “OP” going on. Same day, the fake website “The Intercept” called for the ICC to prosecute President Assad, the savior of the Syrian people, as a “war criminal.” We had been waiting for their fake criticism of Israel to turn around, now that Israel faces full complicity for training and arming the Jewish shooter in New Zealand.
Start watching, roaches are streaming out of the woodwork on this one. Confirmed, Glenn Greenwald is pure Mossad and this makes Snowden as big a fake as Israeli trained Julian Assange. The Intercept, powerfully funded, was being closely watched. We knew it was too good to be true.
The New Zealand mass killer trained in Israel in 2017 and 2018 then visited Turkey and the Balkans, this is confirmed.
When automatic fire broke out barely a mile from a police station, the Freemason ridden police waited, waited, waited and finally, 17 minutes later, showed up. We saw this in Columbine and in nearly every shooting since, with few exceptions.
On November 7, 2018 in Thousand Oaks, California, a police officer, gun drawn, ran into a bar to stop a mass killing (attributed to a 28 year old Marine veteran named Ian Long). The officer was murdered, at the scene, by his own men. He didn’t know the rules.
Our story begins in 1948 where an impoverished Jewish family leaves Palestine for Britain and then Australia, where in 1970 they gain citizenship. Five years later, a son is born, who in the succeeding 42 years only ages 28. With the family now living in Australia, dad dies of mesothelioma (asbestos) and “Brenton” suddenly inherits enough money to travel the world though, as holocaust survivors, no living relatives exist.
clothcapclothcap on April 7th, 2019 08:37 am (UTC)
Lord James: Remaining in the EU will constitute perjury by the Queen
by UK Column Reporters
1st April 2019
Lord James of Blackheath, the man who spotted the first lead that revealed British and Israeli involvement in the Iraqi Supergun affair and who in 2010 became just about the only peer of the realm to raise the issue of the national debt in proper terms in the House of Lords, has released this paper, which calls upon the Lords to prevent the Crown shattering the Constitution by acting in breach of the Monarch's oath of office to uphold the Declaration of Rights 1689.

A constitutional initiative to override political deadlock

Public anxiety and dismay as to Brexit political arguments reflects the similar mood and confusion in the House of Commons, which makes it extremely difficult for the public, poorly served by the media, to understand the critical issues — which in turn will make it more difficult to gain wide acceptance to find any kind of solution. In particular, it is noticeable that the Parliamentary discussions are failing to address significantly critical Constitutional problems, which may vary according to which solution is the outcome. It may be helpful to win public support if these are now more clearly explained and understood, yet only the Daily Express last Friday has made any significant move toward this.

Nothing would help more to achieve public understanding of the Constitutional hazards than to initiate urgently a direct appeal to the United Nations seeking their support for bringing the European Commission into strict conformity with the requirements of Clause 46.1 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969. Serving this Notice would also provide immediately justifiable cause for an extension to the Chapter 50 timetable and would demonstrate a firm and legally justified Government initiative.

In line with that application to the UN, the Government should then explain to Parliament, and in the media, the different constitutional hazards arising from the alternative solutions available. For example, remaining in the EU — whether temporarily or indefinitely — may well see the UK embroiled in the coming move to Qualified Majority Vote in 2020 and beyond.

This is contrary to the popular vote and that which our Government has promised to deliver. It is utterly inimical to our constitution. It will involve the creation of a European standing army and loss of control of our defence forces. We have been warned of very significant consequent damage to our intelligence services, there will be a loss of control of fiscal [tax] independence and currency, and loss of diplomatic independence to make international treaties. A full destruction of our constitutional autonomy and sovereign independence could, and most probably will, rapidly follow any arrangement that does not recover sovereignty, which was originally breached in the Lisbon Treaty. We must exit by initiating a supra-party-political consensus confirming our constitution.

The way forward from this is to:-

1. Make an immediate appeal to the United Nations making reference to a potential breach of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaty Making 1969 under Article 46.1, with a view to seeking an adjudication that the EU is attempting to force us to agree a treaty based upon fundamentally unconstitutional arrangements unacceptable to the British Crown. I repeat my earlier contention that the Attorney General previously discouraged this initiative because he had addressed the wrong clause in the Treaty. The correct clause states that no trading agreement may be entered into which significantly compromises the constitutional integrity of the responding nation, which is surely an accurate description of the European Commission's exit position.

2. If the application could be supported by Her Majesty, it would add significant force.

Has lord James collaborated with the JEU commission and council and the private ECFR (MIIC) to kick the bucket further down the road to enable the illegal siphoning of British wealth to foreign agents to continue?
clothcapclothcap on April 7th, 2019 08:47 am (UTC)
Lord James chooses now to do what is right?
Why not 2009? Or when Heath committed the treason against the British public that got us into this unholy mess? Or when each leader since committed treason in signing away sovereignty, countersigned by the then HMQEII?
Basically, as Queen, Mrs Windsor co-operated with the treason committed against our people. Complicit at each step, unless she was criminally advised.
The trans generational, cross-party treason is greater than Bush-Cheney's treason against the US people and humanity.
We were led as sheep to the slaughter into the Bilderberg - CIA multi-state coup government. The implementers of the coup were complicit in each case of treason against this county and any further dealings with those despicables only adds to the crime.
Presumably the Lord has full knowledge of the treason and by advocating a pathway to further negotiation with criminals by further extending the deadline is himself risking the charge of aiding and abetting the treason of the May regime and rape of the nation in collaboration with foreign actors.
Elisabeth Beckett (R.I.P.) demonstrated HMQEII's folly in 2009. She was not ignored, quite the reverse. She was treated in a most disrespectful manner and not one titled person defended her.
So forgive me for for considering that the Lord's recommendation is politically, or worse, agenda motivated to extend the continued criminal siphoning of British wealth to foreign criminals that has continued without a break since the public expressed their will to exit the criminal's arrangement.
Were the ICC more than a political gang, it would be that office the crime should be referred to. But of course the May and previous regimes have regularly ignored international law, deceived the public and co-operated in the transfer of the nation's wealth to the control of crooks.
Where the gentlemen to be on the side of the people he would have named the crime and the criminals responsible instead of attempting to aid the subterfuge.
In view of the FACTS, the only correct course of action is to immediately cease all arrangements whilst seeking restitution.

Because government is against the people and against the nation's interests, the only right action is to close it. One way or another.

Edited at 2019-04-07 08:50 am (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on April 7th, 2019 09:01 am (UTC)
Namaste Publishing: Tribute to a Great Lady – Elisabeth Beckett 29 July 1924 – 7 February 2009
The following is Elisabeth’s last letter to the Queen, written before she died.

Her Majesty The Queen
Buckingham Palace
London SW1A 1AA
21 January 2009
Unconstitutional reign
Giving careful consideration to the mode of address in this letter, although in courtesy I have addressed it in conventional manner, it is clear that having, in effect, abdicated by failure to perform your coronation oath you leave the people of this nation without effective titular head to whom we may address our petitions. I write to you only in your pre-eminence in Common Law.
I write on Edmund Burke’s remark that for evil to flourish it is sufficient for good men to do nothing.

At your coronation you swore on oath to rule this country according to our laws and customs. This contract with us was written clearly in Magna Carta and replicated by Edward I in 1274. After saying that he would give no such oath, the archbishops, bishops, barons and freemen said that, in this case, they would get another king.
In Magna Carta it was made clear that if the monarch went against this oath then chapter 61 would apply, the contract would be broken and the monarch would have to give up his position and possessions. You have, throughout your reign, disregarded our laws and customs in the legislation that has gone through Parliament.
I believe that you have done this on the basis of the Fabian inspired Parliament Act of 1911 which argued untruthfully that since royal assent had never been denied by a monarch since 1707 (when Queen Anne sent back a Bill) the use of the royal assent had fallen into abeyance. This claim was untrue and treasonable. Only the year before, Asquith had been forced to go to the country by Edward VII who sent back the same Bill to Parliament. And indeed monarchs had refused assent on at least six other occasions since 1707. On each occasion this refusal of assent was because the Bills concerned breached our constitution.
In other words, the 1911 claim, is incorrect and the monarch’s assent was never and can never be deemed unnecessary or automatic, even though George V chose to accept that the royal assent was now a formality and that the monarch could not, in reality refuse assent – as in the Northern Ireland Bill.
Despite all the long years of your reign this method of agreement, either forced on you, or under “automatic assent” nevertheless cannot be upheld as lawful.
Many people who have written to you on constitutional matters have received replies from your secretary (most recently, Sonia Bonici) saying that their letter had been forwarded to the government department misleadingly called the Department of Constitutional Affairs and Ministry of Justice. Your compliance with this has permitted the judiciary under these government departments to claim, as in the Chagos Archipelago appeal, that our fundamental liberties do not exist and that the peoples of these islands have no rights under our law.
I am old and now seriously ill. I cannot die without making clear to you that you have broken your oath to us your people.
The 1911 act purports to permit taxes to be levied on us merely by a majority in the House of Commons and without reference to the upper chamber. This again is against our constitution and specifically not permitted by our Petition of Right of 1627. The most serious instance of this is the use of our taxes to fund the banking system of this country: this is being explained to the electorate as a step which will in some way make us rich, whilst in fact it is not only unlawful, but a most serious abrogation of our rights and your duties under our constitution.
Your contract with the people of this country and the colonies and dominions cannot be destroyed by the chicanery of the Fabians in the 1911 Act, nor by subsequent legislation. If you have the courage to fulfil your contract, however belatedly, you could prorogue Parliament now and have a free election with or without party divisions so that this country can go forward in a proper and united way to remove us from the difficulties that have ensued since the 1911 Parliament Act.

Yours Faithfully,
Elisabeth Beckett

Edited at 2019-04-07 10:22 am (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on April 7th, 2019 09:15 am (UTC)
Atissue, atissue, all fall down.
Brexit: The Constitutional Position
by JOHN BINGLEY 27th February 2019
The EU has been insensitive bordering on contemptuous in seeking to impose what amounts to unconstitutional conditions upon us. This cannot be and the result has been made clear by the wholesale rejection of the base proposal.
Whilst widespread rejection by many Lords and MPs has occurred, many are perhaps ignorant of the vital constitutional issues at stake. They are critically important and exposed in this document and must be fully understood by all and taken into account.

The Rules of our laws which lay down the conditions for the Crown's constitutional limitation and thus its duty in governance and in Parliament may not be broken and are in fact bound to be fulfilled. The Crown can do no wrong because it is compelled to do right. Breach of sovereignty can only occur by error. It may not normally be sanctioned under the terms of our laws, yet it has occurred. We all acknowledge this.

Parliament is a tripartite body and the rule of law binds its individual parts, most particularly the Crown. The two Houses hold the key to the context and content of the law making but the power of Governance is always in the Crown and through the constitutional use of the law. At times of dissolution it becomes starkly apparent where the Sovereign constitutional power resides. The Commons are non-existent and set for re-election and the House of Lords are on hold. Yet there is no transfer of power. The armed services report to the Crown. A dissolution may democratically adjust the membership of the those who sit to advise in the Commons but does not alter the placement of sovereign power. Bills are of no force or effect without Royal Assent; and Ministers are Crown Servants. So it is clear the sovereign power of governance is held by the Crown under a constitutional contract:-

Constitutionally it is the imperative and paramount duty of the government to repair, recover and correct any and all breaches of sovereignty at the earliest moment. This is compulsory according to our law. The treaties that have enabled this unconstitutional intrusion can only have been agreed in error. They are in conflict with our constitution so far as any breach of Sovereignty is created or enabled. Effectively the Crown has been deceived in its grant.
We are governed by crooks.
clothcapclothcap on April 7th, 2019 11:05 am (UTC)
Tuesday, 2 April 2019
In New Zealand, a prominant mosque leader has blamed Mossad for the Christchurch attack.
Ahmed Bhamji said:
"Do you think this guy was alone... Where did he get the funding from?"
"I have a very very strong suspicion that there's some group behind him and I am not afraid to say I feel Mossad is behind this."
Mosque leader blames Mossad for Christchurch attack...
Reportedly, the Zionists use Freemasonry to promote their agenda.
Reportedly, Brenton Tarrant's agenda was meant to send out the following message:

1. Moslems and mosques lead to trouble.

2. Do not blame Israel for sending a lot of Moslems to your country.

Pic. Candace Owens (right), a strong supporter of Israel.
'Brenton Tarrant' wrote that his chief inspiration was Candace Owens.
Candace Owens, the woman who 'inspired' the Christchurch shooter...
Candace Owens has said that: "if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, OK, fine."
Pic. Candace Owens.

Candace Owens is the Director of Communications at the conservative group Turning Point USA whose major donors include the Dick and Betsy DeVos Family Foundation.

There is a belief that the Moslem terrorists, Zionist terrorists and Nazi terrorists all work together on the same side.

Vid "Exclusive footage obtained by NBC News shows an active shooter drill in which blanks and fake blood were used by students and crisis actors."
The Parkland students (Florida school shooting) grew connected to the Christchurch community when they visited New Zealand in July 2018 on a learning and healing trip.
Parkland students received some healing during New Zealand visit ...

Pic. Above, we see 'Julie Phillips Pollack', carrying a very large gun.
Julie Phillips Pollack is the mother of Meadow Pollack, who reportedly died in the Florida School shooting..


Pic. Clockwise from left: Ofer Mizrahi (died), Ofer Levy (died), Gabi Ingel (died), Liron Sade, Guy Jordan and Michael Fraidman.
In 2011, there was a major earthquake in Christchurch, in New Zealand.
Six Israelis were hit.
An Israeli, named as Ofer Mizrahi, was found with at least five passports when his body was recovered after masonry fell on his van.
Three Israelis in the vehicle escaped serious injury and rapidly left the country within 12 hours.
The Southland Times said the group were suspected of trying to hack into the country’s police computer system.
Christchurch earthquake unmasked team of Israeli spies in New Zealand
clothcapclothcap on April 7th, 2019 11:25 am (UTC)
Aangirfan Decline of UK after joining NAZI EU
Monday, 4 March 2019

Audio, illustrated: https://youtu.be/oAq1q1_swyM

There is said to be a cousinhood which includes the Montefiore/Carvajal, Rothschild, Rockefeller, Oppenheimer, Goldsmid, Sassoon, Warburg, Samuel, Franklin, Stern, Cohen, Schiff, Morgan, and Lazard families. MONTEFIORE FAMILY
Source https://aanirfan.blogspot.com/2019/03/decline-of-uk-after-joining-nazi-eu.html

Edited at 2019-04-07 11:55 am (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on April 7th, 2019 11:59 am (UTC)
The Brussels Business - Who Runs the EU ?
HD (sub - serb/cro)
Youtube on Dec 13, 2015
This movie is subtitled in ( serb/cro)
THE BRUSSELS BUSINESS is a docu-thriller that dives into the grey zone underneath European democracy. An expedition into the world of the 15,000 lobbyists in the EU-capital, of the PR-conglomerates, think tanks and their all embracing networks of power and their close ties to the political elites.

Donate and Support TBU NEWS. Thank You! https://www.patreon.com/tbunews
For more information visit here:
Please Give Support
Best Regards
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statue that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
clothcapclothcap on April 8th, 2019 08:36 am (UTC)
Has Parliament abdicated?
Why are the performing seals still behaving as if we have any responsibility to the I-JEU? We owe the I-JEU bureaucrats nothing, zilch, zero. They owe us everything that has been extracted from us by fraudulent means since Heath deceived us.
Can we send in the bailiffs?

Britain’s pride can still shine inside our EU prison.

Tap Blog 7 Apr 2019
posted by Tapestry
Whatever happens in the High Court and the Supreme Court with Tilbrook’s Writ, it is important to know that Britain left the EU on the 29th March 2019. Under the terms of The Withdrawal Act 2017, which has not been repealed, at 11pm on the 29th March Britain left the EU.
The rest of the Parliamentary discussions about Brexit are simply waffle as no Act Of Parliament resulted. The Law is created not by debates and votes in the Commons or the Lords, but by Acts Of Parliament, which have to follow a set procedure of Readings and be signed the Queen.
The government might argue that negotiations about Britain’s Withdrawal were handled under the Royal Prerogative, but as the Gina Miller case recently stated that Britain’s withdrawal can only happen (or not happen) by Act Of Parliament, and not through use of the Royal Prerogative, that suggestion does not hold water.
The Government claim they used Statutory Instruments created by a different Act of Parliament which was about details of how withdrawal was to occur, not whether we withdrew or not. This is palpable nonsense, and was a desperate attempt to get round the fact the Government could not get an Act passed to overwrite or repeal the Withdrawal Act of 2017.

The media has done almost nothing to explain this to the public, bar The Daily Express.
If Britain is to be held as a prisoner inside EU structures against the will of her people, at least we can always say that legally we in fact left, and we are being held illegally against our will. We hold the moral high ground over our EU prison authorities.
The democracy we once had, managed to spit out the EU, even if ‘our’ legal system has already been captured, making it impossible to actually gain our freedom in practice. By leaving our departure too long, Parliament’s Laws maybe can now be overturned merely by ‘influence’. In effect our country will have already ceased to exist.
Even Article 50 says that the withdrawal negotiations of a member state must be carried out under the member state’s own Constitutional Laws. For Tilbrook’s Writ to fail, the EU would have to ignore its own Laws as well as British Laws. In fact Law would have nothing to do with it. It would simply be an illegal seizure of another country, carried out with the cooperation of its own government, media and judiciary.
Not that I want to insert any pessimism into the chances for Tilbrook. I have sent him support and have read the full details of the Writ. It should be persuasive to any judge under normal circumstances. I hope it wins.
But in the event that it doesn’t, it is important to know and to say that Brexiteers won the political battle.
Britain left.
It will only be because of power structures beyond Parliament and democracy that we will have been denied our freedom.
We can carry that thought with us as we soldier on through whatever horrors are to come. Britain’s democracy did what was right. Despite all the media and cultural programming for nearly fifty years, we still recognise the EU for what it truly is, a coming totalitarian state, and we did what we could to stop it. And we did just that if the Law has any validity.
Britons can be proud, and hold up our heads. In our minds, in our hearts and within our own Constitution we succeeded. That can never be taken away from us, no matter what the legal system manages to decide next week. We were true to ourselves and did all we could, even if the power of money and greed proves too much for the lawyers, the politicians and the media.
Tilbrook might yet succeed.
The public should be told what is happening. The events in the Royal Courts Of Justice are far more significant than anything going on in Westminster.

Edited at 2019-04-08 08:42 am (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on April 8th, 2019 09:23 am (UTC)
The plunder continues despite that the I-JEU crime syndicate owes us!
A large proportion of VAT goes to the I-JEU. Anything paid to the I-JEU since 29 March is theft from the nation by the regime and the I-JEU is guilty, amongst so many other crimes, of laundering wealth stolen from Britons.

Selling our aircraft carriers to the I-JEU? Mrs May and her sick parody of merry men need to be stopped fast.

Any lump sum cash transfer to the I-JEU needs to be investigated and brought to the nation's attention.

Perhaps an investigation of MP's bank accounts would reveal why the black comedy is ongoing.

We use to have an opposition party.
clothcapclothcap on April 8th, 2019 10:12 am (UTC)
Should maps show it as Israel or occupied Palestine?
Should the Rothschild corporation (Knesset) ruled occupied Palestine be internationally recognised as occupied Palestine being the correct name for the land governed by zionists that call it Israel (with the ltd. silent)?

Should anti-palestianism be made illegal under law? Or is that anti-semitic, even though palestinians are semitic?

That would be interesting. When the baddies are going down, (Netty for fraud), send the boot in, it's what the zionist oppressors would do.

Why do jews tolerate sabbatean frankists, nowadays zionists (a political gang that includes illuminati Masonry and the Society of Jesus, maybe the Vatican too) that have given them such a bad name? Some, mainly in N. America, strongly ignored by MsM don't.

The I-JEU is a sabbatean frankist cult gang.

How did Britain go from a country with its government as an asset to a corporate regime with Britain and its peoples as an asset? Ask the Mason rulers of City dwellers, Mrs Windsor or the Vatican tit. head of the day.
clothcapclothcap on April 8th, 2019 10:48 am (UTC)
Know the enemy. This is the I-JEU and many in the seat of power
Sabbatean/Frankists, also referred to as the Cult of the All-Seeing Eye are everywhere. Everywhere where there is power.
Jacob Frank (1726-1791), the leader of the Sabbatean/Frankists, proclaimed himself to be the reincarnation of Sabbatai Zevi and the living Messiah for all Jews.
If it is possible to have evil personified, Jacob Frank represented evil at its absolute worst. Not even Sabbatai Zevi was as evil as Frank and his disciples.
It was the Kabbalistic leadership that handpicked Jacob Frank to develop the teaching begun by Sabbatai and to indoctrinate Mayer Amschel Rothschild and Adam Weishaupt. This alliance of Frank-Rothschild-Weishaupt formed an unholy trinity.

1. THEOLOGY: Jacob Frank was in charge of creating a theology that would be the foundation for revolutions.
2. BANKING: Mayer Amschel was in charge of world banking.
3. REVOLUTION: Adam Weishaupt was in charge of the revolutionary political development in the world.

Jacob Frank taught "holiness through sin" and that "good" would come through the triumph of Evil. What was prohibited would be allowed including adultery, incest and pedophilia.
To ascend one must first descend. No man can climb a mountain until he has first descended to its foot***. Therefore we must descend and be cast down to the bottom rung, for only then can we climb to the infinite. No region of the human soul can remain untouched by this struggle.
(*** Wrt the British contingent, ascended to its foot.)

I think the I-JEU and our share of their scum are as low as is inhumanly possible. Time for them to start climbing the mountain they have created? Confession would be a good place to start.

Edited at 2019-04-08 11:01 am (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on April 8th, 2019 05:54 pm (UTC)
I was about to close the Michael Tellinger vid after watching it again when I thought, I wonder how many views? It showed 474K, I refreshed, et voila 516,239. I hope his group's ideas for an internally cashless society, presumably bankless or community bank served. I wonder how the hierarchy works for the administration of it?
clothcapclothcap on April 8th, 2019 06:26 pm (UTC)
The vids I show are 2D

If you looked around septemberclues.org where the how 9-11 fakery was done is explained and demonstrated, and that act of war was 18 years ago, imagine how much more deceptive the fakers can be with modern software and huge capacity computers.
Personally, I find them absorbing regardless.

Why were thousands claimed killed? If the layer of fake deaths hadn't been created, mostly composites made from images sourced online, the names of the murdered staff that were working on where the missing trillions went and how the USSR was brought down using misappropriated funds to destroy corporations would have been prominent.
7 that had a large CIA office was demolished likely to destroy evidence.
clothcapclothcap on April 8th, 2019 07:27 pm (UTC)
Wheeeeeeee. Piddle..
Presuming the Tap post is correct and we are legally out, Mrs May and her fellow conspirators have no-one to pass the buck to. Parliament is responsible for everything that happens from the 29th March.
Has Mrs May paid rather than received the "divorce" settlement penalty?
Has she sold the aircraft carriers? Who will pay for their replacement? (Hint: us.)
Has she handed control of our military (except for local policing duties) over to the I-JEU and what was or will be her commission?
Has she cancelled all VAT transfers? If not does the con party have sufficient funds to compensate the brexiteers for the fraudulent payment? Bremoaners of course won't want any compensation as they wanted us to keep rewarding the crooks that are soon to be the bureaucracy of a fully fledged police state.
Are there sufficient passport controls on all points of entry?
Have any WTO deals been struck?
Will the I-JEU declare bankruptcy and call in the UK regime funded zombie IMF ltd, World (families') Bank to act as trustee?
Justice won't be seen to be done until Italy pulls the plug and the sabbatean frankist enterprise is staked. France is threatening to be a domino too.
One wonders if Ms Spectre has realised her arrogance was misplaced? I'm sure the vids of her turned the I-JEU haters into a bigger majority.
clothcapclothcap on April 8th, 2019 08:02 pm (UTC)
They Found Something In Outer Space and It's On It's Way Here!
Matrix Wisdom
Youtube on Apr 7, 2019
Do they know?

In the commentary, Nibiru ain't due till 3855. Why is NASA faking it? It's a rehearsal for the folk waaaay in the future of course. Else it is a Vatican-Pilgrims-sabbatean frankist-NASA's stage managed return of Jesus' bro, Luci that will magically descend into some prince or other's body and declare himself. Guess he didn't enjoy his sojourn into Pope Franky.

Edited at 2019-04-08 08:05 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2019 09:57 am (UTC)
Cap tip to the deceivers
The I-JEU they got a long way towards their objective, a USSR replica but with limitless currency. Satanic eco-fascist plunder without end.

Spending a few moments considering where Michael's cashless society leads. Definitely not towards stock chipping. Away from eternal debt slavery and a retaking of governance (from tax stock, debt slave status to self-service, self-determination, self-control) by the public.
Taxation no longer serves the public, if it ever did. It should be abolished regardless of the consequences.

Edited at 2019-04-09 11:53 am (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2019 10:40 am (UTC)
Veterans Today, from the front page
The Jesuit Order as a Synagogue of Jews: Jesuits of Jewish Ancestry and Purity-of-Blood Laws in the Early Society of Jesus
Robert Aleksander Maryks
Brill, 2010.
Free Download
“Those from the circumcision subverted the entire house of the Society. As sons of this world who are shrewd in dealing with their own, and avid of new things, they easily excite disorders and destroy the unity of souls and their bond with the government.”
Lorenzo Maggio, Jesuit Curia in Rome, 1586.
Review: The Jesuit Order as a Synagogue of Jews – Part One

Libyan National Army commander orders offensive on Tripoli
April 4, 2019

Beijing and Moscow to NWO: Maduro stays
April 5, 2019

Russia warns US over claims of Iran behind deaths of 600 troops
April 5, 2019

Syrian War Report – April 5, 2019: Russian Jets Pound Idlib Terrorists, Kurdish Rebels Attack Turkish Proxies
April 5, 2019

video: As American Citizen and CIA Employee, “General Haftar” Takes the Tripoli Airport
April 6, 2019

Is this the final showdown for control of Libyan oil?
April 6, 2019

Tahrir Al-Sham, White Helmets Mount Chemical Warheads on over 100 Missiles in Demilitarized Zone
April 7, 2019

Secret document outlines US-Israeli plan for a Syria style war in Lebanon

A New Battle For Tripoli: Preconditions and Prospects

Israel PM vows to annex West Bank settlements if re-elected
The delusion that israeli zios are the chosen frays to the core.

Iran puts US forces in West Asia region on its terror blacklist
April 8, 2019

Proof: Intel Drop UPDATED Trump, Bolton behind Syria chemical attacks, confirmed

The Delusional Futurism Of “Liberal World Order” Academics- Good Read
April 5, 2019

Chuck Baldwin: I Was Right About Russia-Gate; And I’m Right About Israel-Gate
April 1, 2019

Trump’s belief that Golan Heights belongs to Israel is ‘delusion’: Scholar
April 2, 2019

Freemasonry and Major Crimes
April 6, 2019

Russia redeploys Su-57 stealth fighter to Syria
April 8, 2019

Britain Criminalized Criticism of Public Figures, Independent News
clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2019 11:03 am (UTC)
Either the God that promised the land to judeans that converted to his worship lied
Or the khazarian descendents that have occupied the land, that worship a different "god" lied.
My money is on the khazars.

Why does the Vatican support the satanic sabbatean frankist khazars? Perhaps because the Vatican is a sabbatean frankist establishment. It taxes, charges interest on loans and hordes gold for example, practices paedophilia and child sacrifice according to testimonies and supports war and political oppression using natural climate change Exactly like a zionist bank?

More importantly, how will the electromagnetic pole shift affect electromagnetic gravity on a flatish Earth?
clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2019 12:21 pm (UTC)
500 ton dinos couldn't stand up in today's electromagnetic gravity
What changed it?
New Younger Dryas Cosmic Impact Paper - reviewed in detail!
UnchartedX Podcast #2
Youtube Mar 28, 2019
I review the recently released peer-reviewed scientific paper that investigates the Younger Dryas cosmic impact effect in South America.
This is UnchartedX Podcast #2 - set to imagery and video here on youtube, or you can find the mp3 on my website.
Link to paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-38089-y
My marked up copy of the paper is here:

Please remember to subscribe to the channel, and leave me a comment below with your thoughts!

UnchartedX: http://UnchartedX.com

Support my work: http://unchartedx.com/support
Paypal tip jar: http://paypal.me/unchartedx
Patreon: http://patreon.com/unchartedx
SubscribeStar: http://subscribestar.com/unchartedx
Bitcoin: bc1qtg5kaq0s7434fsulm7w94zsqkww57ueel4f4ed

Contact me on:
Twitter: http://twitter.com/unchartedx1
Instagram: http://instagram.com/unchartedx7
Email: info@unchartedx.com

#youngerdryas #cosmicimpact #podcast

Podcast #1: Ancient Mysteries, Perspective, and a Nikola Tesla Tale!
clothcapclothcap on April 10th, 2019 12:49 pm (UTC)
A couple more from Tapestry
Queen refuses to sign in person Brexit delay ‘Laws’
9 Apr 2019
posted by Tapestry
Handout photo from the Twitter page of Yvette Cooper of the Royal Assent for her cross party bill. Photograph: Yvette Cooper/Twitter/PA Wire . Interesting that the Queen is not putting her own Signature to these supposed ‘Acts Of Parliament’. You would imagine that Acts Of Parliament affecting the British Constitution would …

Conservative publication features Tilbrook’s Writ that UK left the EU on March 29th
posted by Tapestry
Why, M’lud, we left the EU on March 29 The English Democrats are bringing a judicial review action in the High Court for a ‘Declaration that the UK is already Out of the EU’. Robin Tilbrook is the chairman of the English Democrats and is the solicitor running …