Log in

No account? Create an account
30 April 2018 @ 06:00 pm
Dismantling the bluster of idiots and liars that support the darkest side of humanity  

Seems that the shared brain cell establishment  have just the one propaganda template, it was used for the nonsensical, pathetic AGW by CO2 excuse to tax and spend for the profit and empowerment of the mass murdering, thieving, lying sacks of animal excreta that constitute the JOWG brigade and for the Iraq and Libya deceptions by the mass murdering, thieving, lying sacks of animal excreta that constitute the military-industrial-corporate-intelligence complex and that constitute their enablers in the seats of power. I'm sure it has a header, 'If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.' Funnily enough the same applies to the truth.

We are governed by criminals that display many aspects of the worst of the Nazi war party. Operation Paperclip transferred such from Germany to the US. Parts of the Nazi manifesto have since been imposed by the same cowardly, misanthropic thug types that were behind the Nazi party's rise to power, the EU(SR) for one example.

Dear May occupation regime, this article could have been written for your entire nest of traitors.

Douma: Part 1 - Deception In Plain Sight

Media Lens. Post 25 April 2018
Last Updated on 26 April 2018
By Editor
UK corporate media are under a curious kind of military occupation. Almost all print and broadcast media now employ a number of reporters and commentators who are relentless and determined warmongers. [Bold by Cc] Despite the long, unarguable history of US-UK lying on war, and the catastrophic results, these journalists instantly confirm the veracity of atrocity claims made against Official Enemies, while having little or nothing to say about the proven crimes of the US, UK, Israel and their allies.
[/Bold by Cc] They shriek with a level of moral outrage from which their own government is forever spared. They laud even the most obviously biased, tinpot sources blaming the 'Enemy', while dismissing out of hand the best scientific researchers, investigative journalists and academic sceptics who disagree.
Anyone who challenges this strange bias is branded a 'denier', 'pro-Saddam', 'pro-Gaddafi, 'pro-Assad'. Above all, one robotically repeated word is generated again and again:
'Apologist... Apologist... Apologist'.

Claims of a chemical weapons attack on Douma, Syria on April 7, offered yet another textbook example of this reflexive warmongering. Remarkably, the alleged attack came just days after US president Donald Trump had declared of Syria:

'I want to get out. I want to bring our troops back home. I want to start rebuilding our nation.'

The 'mainstream' responded as one, with instant certainty, exactly as they had in response to atrocity and other casus belli claims in Houla, Ghouta, Khan Sheikhoun and many other cases in Iraq (1990), Iraq (1998), Iraq (2002-2003), Libya and Kosovo.
Once again, the Guardian editors were sure: there was no question of a repetition of the fake justifications for war to secure non-existent Iraqi WMDs, or to prevent a fictional Libyan massacre in Benghazi. Instead, this was 'a chemical gas attack, orchestrated by Bashar al-Assad, that left dead children foaming at the mouth'.
Simon Tisdall, the Guardian's assistant editor, had clearly decided that enough was enough:

'It's time for Britain and its allies to take concerted, sustained military action to curb Bashar al-Assad's ability to murder Syria's citizens at will.'

This sounded like more than another cruise missile strike. But presumably Tisdall meant something cautious and restrained to avoid the terrifying risk of nuclear confrontation with Russia:
'It means destroying Assad's combat planes, bombers, helicopters and ground facilities from the air. It means challenging Assad's and Russia's control of Syrian airspace. It means taking out Iranian military bases and batteries in Syria if they are used to prosecute the war.'
But surely after Iraq - when UN weapons inspectors under Hans Blix were prevented from completing the work that would have shown that Saddam Hussein possessed no WMD – 'we' should wait for the intergovernmental Organisation for Prohibition of Chemical Weapons inspectors to investigate. After all, as journalist Peter Oborne noted of Trump's air raids:
'When the bombing started the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW)  was actually in Damascus and preparing to travel  to the area where the alleged chemical attacks took place.'
Oborne added:
'Had we wanted independent verification on this occasion in Syria surely we ourselves would have demanded the OPCW send a mission to Douma. Yet we conspicuously omitted to ask for it.'

Tisdall was having none of it:
'Calls to wait for yet another UN investigation amount to irresponsible obfuscation. Only the Syrian regime and its Russian backers have the assets and the motivation to launch such merciless attacks on civilian targets. Or did all those writhing children imagine the gas?'

The idea that only Assad and the Russians had 'the motivation' to launch a gas attack simply defied all common sense. And, as we will see, it was not certain that children had been filmed 'writhing' under gas attack. Tisdall's pro-war position was supported by just 22% of British people. Equally gung-ho, the oligarch-owned Evening Standard, edited by veteran newspaperman and politically impartial former Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, headlined this plea on the front page:


Guardian columnist Jonathan Freedland, formerly the paper's comment editor, also poured scorn on the need for further evidence:
'Besides, how much evidence do we need?... To all but the most committed denialists and conspiracists, Assad's guilt is clear.'

Freedland could argue that the case for blaming Assad was clear, if he liked, but he absolutely could not argue that disagreeing was a sign of denialist delusion.
Time and again, we encounter these jaw-dropping efforts to browbeat the reader with fake certainty and selective moral outrage. In his piece, Freedland linked to the widely broadcast social media video footage from a hospital in Douma, which showed that Assad was guilty of 'inflicting a death so painful the footage is unbearable to watch'. But when we actually click Freedland's link and watch the video, we do not see anyone dying, let alone in agony, and the video is not in fact unbearable to watch. Like Tisdall's claim on motivation, Freedland was simply declaring that black is white.
But many people are so intimidated by this cocktail of certainty and indignation – by the fear that they will be shamed as 'denialists' and
'apologists' – that they doubt the evidence of their own eyes. In 'mainstream' journalism, expressions of moral outrage are offered as evidence of a fiery conviction burning within. In reality, the shrieks are mostly hot air.
In the Observer, Andrew Rawnsley also deceived in plain sight by blaming the Syrian catastrophe on Western inaction:

'Syria has paid a terrible price for the west's disastrous policy of doing nothing'.

However terrible media reporting on the 2003 Iraq war, commentators did at least recognise that the US and Britain were involved. We wrote to Rawnsley, asking how he could possibly not know about the CIA's billion dollar per annum campaign to train and arm fighters, or about the 15,000 high-tech, US anti-tank missiles sent to Syrian 'rebels' via Saudi Arabia.
Rawnsley ignored us, as ever.

Just three days after the alleged attack, the Guardian's George Monbiot was asked about Douma:

'Don't you smell a set up here though? Craig Murray doesn't think Assad did it.'
Monbiot replied:
'Then he's a fool.'

Craig Murray responded rather more graciously:
'I continue to attract attacks from the "respectable" corporate and state media. I shared a platform with Monbiot once, and liked him. They plainly find the spirit of intellectual inquiry to be a personal affront.'

Monbiot tweeted back:
'I'm sorry Craig but, while you have done excellent work on some issues, your efforts to exonerate Russia and Syria of a long list of crimes, despite the weight of evidence, are foolish in the extreme.'

The idea that Murray's effort has been 'to exonerate Russia and Syria of a long list of crimes' is again so completely false, so obviously not what Murray has been doing. But it fits perfectly with the corporate media theme of Cold War-style browbeating: anyone challenging the case for US-UK policy on Syria is an 'apologist' for 'the enemy'.
If Britain was facing imminent invasion across the channel from some malignant superpower, or was on the brink of nuclear annihilation, the term 'apologist' might have some merit as an emotive term attacking free speech – understandable in the circumstances. But Syria is not at war with Britain; it offers no threat whatsoever. If challenging evidence of Assad's responsibility is 'apologism', then why can we not describe people accepting that evidence as 'Trump apologists', or 'May apologists', or 'Jaysh al-Islam apologists'? The term really means little more than, 'I disagree with you' – a much more reasonable formulation.
As Jonathan Cook has previously commented:

'Monbiot has repeatedly denied that he wants a military attack on Syria. But if he then weakly accepts whatever narratives are crafted by those who do – and refuses to subject them to any meaningful scrutiny – he is decisively helping to promote such an attack.'

Why Are These Academics Allowed?
The cynical, apologetic absurdity of questioning the official narrative has been a theme across the corporate media. In a Sky News discussion, Piers Robinson of Sheffield University urged caution in blaming the Syrian government in the absence of verifiable evidence. In a remarkable response, Alan Mendoza, Executive Director of the Henry Jackson Society, screeched at him:

'Who do you think did it? Was it your mother who did it?'

Again, exact truth reversal – given the lack of credible, verified evidence, it was absurd to declare Robinson's scepticism absurd.
Mendoza later linked to an article attacking Robinson, and asked:

'Why are UK universities allowing such "academics" - and I use the term advisedly because they are not adhering to any recognised standard when promoting material with no credible sourcing, and often with no citation at all - to work in their institutions?'

In 2011, Mendoza wrote in The Times of Nato's 'intervention' in Libya:
'The action in Libya is a sign that the world has overcome the false lessons [sic] of Iraq or of "realism" in foreign policy.'

The UN had 'endorsed military action to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe unfolding'.
In fact, the unfolding 'humanitarian catastrophe' was fake news; Mendoza's mother needed no alibi. A September 9, 2016 report on the war from the Foreign Affairs Committee of the House of Commons commented:

'Despite his rhetoric, the proposition that Muammar Gaddafi would have ordered the massacre of civilians in Benghazi was not supported by the available evidence...'.

The Times launched a shameful, front-page attack on Robinson and other academics who are not willing to accept US-UK government claims on trust. The Times cited Professor Scott Lucas of Birmingham University:
'Clearly we can all disagree about the war in Syria, but to deny an event like a chemical attack even occurred, by claiming they were "staged", is to fall into an Orwellian world.'

In similar vein, in a second Guardian comment piece on Douma, Jonathan Freedland lamented:
'we are now in an era when the argument is no longer over our response to events, but the very existence of those events'. Echoing Soviet propaganda under Stalin, Freedland warned that this was indicative of an intellectual and moral sickness:

'These are symptoms of a post-truth disease that's come to be known as "tribal epistemology", in which the truth or falsity of a statement depends on whether the person making it is deemed one of us or one of them.'

And this was, once again, truth reversal – given recent history in Iraq and Libya, it was Lucas and Freedland who were falling into an Orwellian fantasy world. Mail on Sunday columnist Peter Hitchens made the obvious point:
'Given the folly of the British government over Iraq and Libya, and its undoubted misleading of the public over Iraq, it is perfectly reasonable to suspect it of doing the same thing again. Some of us also do not forget the blatant lying over Suez, and indeed the Gulf of Tonkin'

Hitchens clearly shares our concern at media performance, particularly that of the Guardian, commenting:
'Has Invasion of the Bodysnatchers been re-enacted at Guardian HQ?
Whatever the dear old thing's faults it was never a Pentagon patsy until recently. Rumours of relaunch as The Warmonger's Gazette, free toy soldier with every issue.'

Hitchens questioned Guardian certainty on Douma:
'But if facts are sacred, how can the Guardian be so sure, given that it is relying on a report from one correspondent 70 miles away, and another one 900 miles away.. and some anonymous quotes from people whose stories it has no way of checking?'

He added:
'The behaviour of The Guardian is very strange & illustrates just what a deep, poorly-understood change in our politics took place during the Blair years. We now have the curious spectacle of the liberal warmonger, banging his or her jingo fist on the table, demanding airstrikes.'

Indeed, in discussing the prospects for 'intervention' in the Guardian, Gaby Hinsliff, former political editor of the Observer, described the 2013 vote that prevented Britain from bombing Syria in August 2013 as 'that shameful night in 2013'. Shameful? After previous 'interventions' had completely wrecked Iraq and Libya on false pretexts, and after the US regime had been told the evidence was no 'slam dunk' by military advisers?
In the New Statesman, Paul Mason offered a typically nonsensical argument, linking to the anti-Assad website, Bellingcat:

'Despite the availability of public sources showing it is likely that a regime Mi-8 helicopter dropped a gas container onto a specific building, there are well-meaning people prepared to share the opinion that this was a "false flag", staged by jihadis, to pull the West into the war. The fact that so many people are prepared to clutch at false flag theories is, for Western democracies, a sign of how effective Vladimir Putin's global strategy has been.'

Thus, echoing Freedland's reference to 'denialists and conspiracists', sceptics can only be idiot victims of Putin's propaganda. US media analyst Adam Johnson of FAIR accurately described Mason's piece as a 'mess', adding:
'I love this thing where nominal leftists run the propaganda ball for bombing a country 99 yards then stop at the one yard and insist they don't support scoring goals, that they in fact oppose war.'

Surprisingly, the Bellingcat website, which publishes the findings of 'citizen journalist' investigations, appears to be taken seriously by some very high-profile progressives.
In the Independent, Green Party leader Caroline Lucas also mentioned the Syrian army 'Mi-8' helicopters. Why? Because she had read the same Bellingcat blog as Mason, to which she linked:

'From the evidence we've seen so far it appears that the latest chemical attack was likely by Mi-8 helicopters, probably from the forces of Syria's murderous President Assad.'

On Democracy Now!, journalist Glenn Greenwald said of Douma:
'I think that it's—the evidence is quite overwhelming that the perpetrators of this chemical weapons attack, as well as previous ones, is the Assad government...'

This was an astonishing comment. After receiving fierce challenges (not from us), Greenwald partially retracted, tweeting:
'It's live TV. Something [sic – sometimes] you say things less than ideally. I think the most likely perpetrator of this attack is Syrian Govt.'

We wrote to Greenwald asking what had persuaded him of Assad's 'likely' responsibility for Douma. (Twitter, April 10, direct message)
The first piece of evidence he sent us (April 12) was the Bellingcat blog mentioning Syrian government helicopters cited by Mason and Lucas.
Greenwald also sent us a report from Reuters, as well as a piece from 2017, obviously prior to the alleged Douma event.
This was thin evidence indeed for the claim made. In our discussion with him, #Greenwald then completely retracted his claim (Twitter, April 12, direct message) that there was evidence of Syrian government involvement in the alleged attack. Yes, it's true that people 'say things less than ideally' on TV, but to move from 'quite overwhelming' to 'likely', to declaring mistaken the claim that there is evidence of Assad involvement, was bizarre.
Political analyst Ben Norton noted on Twitter:

'Reminder that Bellingcat is funded by the National Endowment for Democracy (#NED), which is funded by the US government and is a notorious vehicle for US soft power'

Norton added: 'It acts like an unofficial NATO propagandist, obsessively focusing on Western enemies.'

'Bellingcat founder Eliot Higgins is a fellow at the Atlantic Council, which is funded by NATO, US, Saudi, UAE, etc.
'According to Meedan, which helps fund Bellingcat — along with the US government-funded NED — Bellingcat also works with the group Syrian Archive, which is funded by the German government, to jointly produce pro-opposition "research"'
'The board of the directors for Meedan, which funds Bellingcat, includes Muna AbuSulayman—who led the Saudi oligarch's Alwaleed Bin Talal Foundation—and Wael Fakharany—who was the regional director of Google in Egypt & North Africa (US gov. contractor Google also funds Bellingcat)'
'Bellingcat—which gets money from the US gov-funded NED and fixates obsessively on Western enemies—claims to be nonpartisan and impartial, committed to exposing all sides, but a website search shows it hasn't published anything on Yemen since February 2017.'

Although #Bellingcat is widely referenced by corporate journalists, we are unaware of any 'mainstream' outlet that has seriously investigated the significance of these issues for the organisation's credibility as a source of impartial information. As we will see in Part 2, corporate journalism is very much more interested in challenging the credibility of journalists and academics holding power to account.

Part 2 #Douma: Part 2 - 'It Just Doesn't Ring True'

Anything the rump end of humanity desires it brands an enemy and uses our defence forces to bomb the crap out of it.
A person may wonder at some MsM employees' motives. Supporting mass murder, whatever the excuse, is to be an accessory. Supporting prostitutes in power is supporting our enemies' war on us.
Was - is Blair a jesuit? He's suspected of being a Rothschild illegitimate.
clothcapclothcap on April 30th, 2018 08:00 pm (UTC)
Excerpt from part 2
Peter Ford, former British ambassador to Syria, voiced scepticism:
'The Americans have failed to produce any evidence beyond what they call newspaper reports and social media, whereas Western journalists who have been in Douma [see below] and produced testimony from witnesses – from medics with names so they can be checked – to the effect that the Syrian version is correct.'

One may wonder whether any of the 103 missiles launched against Syrian targets contained chlorine destined for Douma, but was amongst the 70 or so that were downed by Syrian defences.
Believe Britain's (zio - fabian) occupation regime and it's prostitute MsM (with so many (ab)users, the intelligence agencies, the homosexual illuminati and masons, the zionists, corporation advertisers, paedos, editors, owners, Bilderberg, EU(SR) jesuits, etc.) at your peril.

Edited at 2018-05-01 05:21 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on April 30th, 2018 08:32 pm (UTC)
Houston Texas 200 Mph Hellcat Chase!!(Part1)

Speeds in excess of 130mph. Perhaps abc13 meant 200kmph.
So used to bending the truth, they can't stop?
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2018 09:30 am (UTC)
IMO The May regime is a gang of thieves amongst nodding donkeys
Not worth a carrot.

The Vatican (Propaganda Due controlled) private jesuit one world corporation goverment project headed by the satanic jesuit Black Pope Francis (accused of being the head of global child trafficking) includes a parliament of city mayors that rule over city states, Babylonian style. The May regime has arranged for the establishment of city mayors and city states (deceptively called metro cities) to be paid for by council taxes. Not a peep out of the leaders of the local councils. So much for them earning their fat salaries.
Write to your MP and withold your taxes. Don't spend them otherwise you may fall foul of the law. Small businesses are the key. They are being hit the hardest, deliberately, to drive them to the wall. Satanist run corporations don't like any form competition. The satanists' ambition is to have one single corporation, nothing else. Mrs May is involved in this project up to her neck. A traitor amongst traitors. And a thief by deception, a fraudster. Demand a refund of taxes you have paid that have been diverted to this foul project.
Whilst you are there, demand a refund of taxes that have been gifted to the IMF in tens of billions, which is lent to countries like Greece at exhorbitant rates of interest, >50%, plus insane compound interest.
Get organised, dear fellow sheep. Zionists such as those that run the IMF have no soul and are unencumbered by morals, like our occupation regime.

Edited at 2018-05-01 04:54 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2018 04:33 pm (UTC)
How many companies has turkey Google gobbled up?

Oath, Yahoo, Verizon and others are conglomerating.
The Admiralty law aka corporation law, aka law of the seas, aka Ba'al (mythical lord of the seas) law. all inferior to Common Law aka God's law, is and has been in force since WWII?
Ba'al is the imaginary deity of zionists and masons.
So, no good looking for help from lawyers or judges. They have betrayed us just as the lawmakers have. It's up to us to invoke Common Law. Hanging for treason is still valid in Common Law.
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2018 05:06 pm (UTC)
Dear LJ support

It would be nice if the expand - collapse option was available for the post's own page.

It would be nice to have a character count available for comments, instead of finding out after clicking 'post comment' you've gone over the limit.

Please don't get rid of the HTML option in the new editor.
(A thought. Select a section in the WYSIWYG editor, right click menu, edit html, pop up a text editor with the relevent HTML, pass any edit to the page source.)

A dedicated help section available in the new editor to explain the options available would be nice.

Is it possible to check whether the log in has expired on clicking post comment but before leaving the page where a comment has been composed?

Edited at 2018-05-01 11:57 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on May 4th, 2018 09:43 am (UTC)
The councils are controlled by humanity's enemies

UK Column
Media on Trial Booking Cancelled
Media on Trial has released the following statement:
Today, on World Press Freedom Day, Leeds City Museum, a city council owned and operated venue, cancelled the Media on Trial’s booking for the event we had planned for 27 May.
The fact that the event was cancelled is perhaps bad enough. What became clear as the day has progressed, though, is that Leeds City Museum appear to have informed the press and media of the cancellation before they informed Media on Trial organisers. Indeed they waited for the Media on Trial representative to arrive at the venue for a planned meeting following a four hour train journey before giving us the news.
They seem to have taken this decision on the basis of misinformed assumptions about the content of the event, and offered no right of reply to Media on Trial.

Leeds City Museum has cancelled an event that threatened mainstream media and UK Government narratives that have enabled another regime change war to be waged against Syria, financed by British taxpayers contributions.

The cancellation of the event denies public consensus a platform to express its profound dissatisfaction with the systematic disinformation campaign run by a British media that protects power from truth, rather than holding truth to power.
Media on Trial fully intends to hold this event despite these attempts to silence us. We will be in contact with ticket holders shortly to explain our plans.
Further information will be published at https://www.mediaontrial.uk in due course. If anyone in the Leeds area can suggest alternative venues, please let us know and we will pass the information along. In the meantime, please share this as widely as possible.

UK Column home page

UK Column News video archives
clothcapclothcap on May 4th, 2018 02:17 pm (UTC)
A couple via Yahoo

Cambridge Analytica to shut down following Facebook data sharing scandal
Yahoo 3 May 2018
The Cambridge Analytica consultancy at the center of this year's Facebook privacy row has declared itself bankrupt and announced it is closing. Nigel Oakes founder of SCL Group, the parent company to the consultancy firm confirmed it was closing on Wednesday, the Wall Street Journal reported. The newspaper added, citing an unnamed source, that the decision was taken because the companies were losing clients and facing mounting legal fees in the Facebook investigation.
This is a zJOWG tactic. Nalco, famed for the (Standard Oil > ESSO > Exxon's) Corexit contamination of the Mexican Gulf was taken over by Ecolab, and the same is being done with Monsanto, being swallowed by Bayer. These companies are criminal operations against humanity.

Brexit news latest: Key ministers reject customs partnership at crunch meeting
Evening Standard
Yahoo 3 May 2018
Key ministers have rejected proposals for a customs union with the EU following a crunch meeting with Theresa May, it has emerged. New Cabinet members Sajid Javid and Gavin Williamson both came out in the meeting against the "customs partnership" model, under which the UK would collect tariffs on behalf of the EU. The BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg tweeted that sources had told her that Williamson and Javid had raised “significant” and “grave” concerns.
Mrs May and her fabian gang that have occupied the seat of power by deception are trying every whichway to convey Brits' wealth, independence and defence forces out of the country. A masonic banksters + Vatican satanists' plunder fest.

Edited at 2018-05-05 08:50 am (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on May 4th, 2018 11:45 pm (UTC)
Brain patterns

Are there good satanists and bad satanists?

The difference between a bankster and human.
To a human, the numbers the banksters present to you from time to time on a piece of paper made to look as formal as possible represent the human's ability to create an impression in their circle of their worth. A positive number creates a positive mindset. A negative number creates a negative mindset where the desire to impress conflicts with the desire to be comfortable.
To a bankster, those numbers are a means to create a mindset. Just numbers on a piece of paper, and education to believe/obey authority. THEY are insects.
Wake up.
Karen Hudes, Rothies' (which one, David?) piece positioner, is an enabler. She is giving away all but the life boats of the banksters' already made paradise. The wealth is being transferred to an independent, The Fed Res??? (Whoaaaaa!) (Referee! Oh yeah, hello, Dave?)
That is what the game is for. Control of that gold.
Karen's mini cartel can't keep the gold from the bad satanists, not even with the Talmud - Noahide Law on her side. So, give it to them?

We have a Rothy as referee. Has he been loaned out?

The Tongs obviously form one team, masons doncha know? Russian muscle on that side. China already infiltrated, Rothschild agent Strong's chinese family connections, history of respect between Putin and Rothy...
An out-take of how my brain is slowly turning over ideas for the next hollygreed presentation to humanity. The WWiii and alien invasion conjured by the combination of swallowing too much of London's cocaine saturated sewage, neuro toxin aluminium particles, glyphosphate and ...
They have been robbing us blind for centuries. It is a family tradition. Mrs Windsor was in power by their means, I guess. That's why Charlie has an ethic's problem? (C'mon, he supports the CO2 nonsense - the benefits outweigh the wrong?) The royals benefit from hereditary control of the coastal territory and its sea perimiter. Look at the windfarms in the water. Ask who benefits. Ask who maximised the benefits. Ask whose pocket those benefits came out of when you get your next energy bill. Ask how you were persuaded to accept the tax. Then look at the UN IPCC. Then look at the politicians that used their lies. Then look at your energy bill. Then look at the Crown and the royals that are paraded to keep you entertained - at your expense. Without your consent.

Hello Jeremy. Did she put honey on the back of her hand? Or did the advisers provide some coercion?

A peron can't be a bit of this and bit of that unless they call themself a jew. Jeremy? A human or a deceiver, a choice. Be kind and lie or be right and speak.

Even a quick scan shows chapters are missing. Still, its just a comment box after all.


Are there good ant killers and bad ant killers?

Not many humans know, if we pissed off the ants enough we wouldn't be here. The satanists haven't pissed us off enough yet. They keep us near the limit for the maximum profit.
Crashing aircraft, satanist asks a fellow passenger, "do you want to buy my seat belt, it's signed by James Cameron."

The wages of sin are high. What am I doing wrong? :)

Edited at 2018-05-05 04:20 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on May 5th, 2018 12:01 am (UTC)

It's been a while since I availed myself of inspiration. Seeing signs of defeat everywhere. Disheartening. Traitors working for our common enemy don't realise, or do they, when they strong arm us with metaphors of Prince John's 'tax' thugs. Taxes resulting from paying ransoms.
Dear Mrs Windsor. What happened to the good magic?

Edited at 2018-05-07 07:45 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on May 5th, 2018 08:48 am (UTC)

A beautiful day to start the rest of our life.

I got a pressure washer. Time to go play.
clothcapclothcap on May 5th, 2018 02:49 pm (UTC)
Did they bother to look at the evidence presented?
Phillip Schofield and Holly Willoughby baffled by Flat Earthers on This Morning
Mike P Williams
Yahoo Celebrity UK3 May 2018

Presenters Phillip Schofield and Holly Willoughby were left bemused and baffled after interviewing three Flat Earthers on yesterday’s This Morning.
The three men appeared on the show’s couch to discuss their ‘theory’ that the Earth isn’t round after all and is, as per their name, flat.
And, like many people who’ve seen the proof that the world is indeed a circular, planetary shape, Phillip, 56, and Holly, 37, were left totally amazed by their persistence that any space exploration was faked and that that everyone involved – including British astronaut Tim Peake – is a liar working for the military.
Holly recalls interviewing Tim, 46, and asks the men ‘is he not in outer space? Where is he then?’ to which the deniers all pipped up at once.
‘In a Hollywood studio type environment – maybe even here,’ one of them suggested.
‘If you look at Tim Peake and people like Neil Armstrong and all the astronauts, they’re all military guys – if you look at them they’re all military – and not scientists.’
Which was where an irate Phil cut him off to say: ‘No. No they’re not, no they’re not.
‘230 individuals from 18 different countries have visited the space station – they were not all military. Some were teachers, we’ve met some of them – ordinary people!
Image ‘Are all 230 people liars?’
The third man then chips in to say: ‘Can we end this debate by saying-‘
Before Phil jovially interrupts, saying: ‘No way.’
Flat Earthers are individuals who actively promote the idea that the Earth isn’t spherical and is unsurprisingly ridiculed by a majority of people.
Video https://uk.news.yahoo.com/phillip-schofield-holly-willoughby-baffled-flat-earthers-morning-141626646.html
[Doesn't play in my browser]

Bubbles rising from the helmets of men in space suits?
A beach buggy that couldn't possibly fit in the module that allegedly transported it?
Shadows in all directions from multiple light sources?
Pictures of buildings and other objects visible up to and over 100 miles beyond the 12 miles horizon?
6 'astronauts' back from the dead?
Instead of defending the fakers, the baffled pair should be asking for explanations and demanding NASA's closure.

As good a place as any to jump in if you think the planet is a globe:
The Society of Jesus - NASA fraud on humanity:
D/L https://seed02.bitchute.com/1576/30DxDr7FQko.mp4
Tell a friend. Get laughed at - until they actually look.

Edited at 2018-05-06 06:07 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on May 5th, 2018 10:50 pm (UTC)
In the House of the Strongman, Sodomy is the Key

Why are we being buggered by a woman? Why is Mrs May paying the EU(SR) zionists the demanded ransom, and what is being held for ransom by the EU(SR) zionists?
Us, our land, our coastal waters and our military'n'nukes that were signed away by traitors from Heath to cameron. And May?
Our justice system is occupied by pro EU(SR) zio-fascio communist unnatural humans. EU(SR) law says guilty until proven innocent. A gift to the soulless mafia some call the shadow government. I call them animated sacks of animal leavings, regardless of their perverted sexual preferences of which they are guilty until proven innocent, a rule they prefer over british law? Or do they just prefer it for application against the tax stock debt slaves?
Take away the sugar coating and the blind-siding by absence of reporting of the bad sides of the EU(SR) by the zio controlled MsM, (profitable energy from nuclear fusion multi billion euro (VAT) investment, boondoggles beyond reason, no closable accounts since inception, criminal expenses allowances for collaborators (EU(SR) MPs, contractors, etc.), what is left? A self-imposed regime of crooked, likely perverted, pretend (european) hebrews. If their complete SNAFU system is imposed on India, what is left, complete chaos by design?

Are zios good people? Judge for yourself. Candy from babies that good people don't do.

The Hidden Tyranny - Harold Wallace Rosenthal interview

Deprogrammer Interview with Marion Knox: In the House of the Strongman, Sodomy is the Key - by Elana Freeland


A good friend is waking up slowly. He said the flat Earth proponents have a case.

Hopefully NZer is realising all is not as advertised. And my cranium is not completely pickled.

That the FEs have a case that deserves investment of our wealth in its investigation is beyond doubt. We need some academics and respected institutions like UKC and Dr Benny Peiser's GWPF of thinkies on board to push for, at the very least, evidence proving we live on a globe.

Let's see.

Change of the climate regime from the warming side of the almost sine curved climate cycle to the cooling slide is now accelerating. Difficult to predict gales, hail storms, killer hot days, unseasonable, almost Monsoon type thunder- and strong rain storms. I remember them well from the last but one regime change, when the winters made my knees red.

Do the weather fackers even understand the influence of deforestation, a radioactive Pacific, an aluminium oxide and radiation polluted atmosphere? Have they any conception of a deglaciated plane t? We're paying them and the pharms industry to poison us and our 2D blue marble, via the politician wealth conveyancers (conveyors)... Their employers demand ever higher returns. From us.
Google map references to follow?
clothcapclothcap on May 5th, 2018 10:56 pm (UTC)

There must be long term shelters or means of escape from our terrarium in the (alleged) southern hemi., otherwise why would the buggered rich have flown in that direction?

The Bransons and Gates zionist accessories will wake up one day to find the Titanic Earth they are helping fashion is it. There isn't a way off. Imagine if they were on our side.

Edited at 2018-05-05 11:02 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on May 5th, 2018 11:21 pm (UTC)

On a flat Earth, flying due east or west by compass will result in flying in a circle. A person flying due east a few miles north of the South Pole would describe circle close to the circumference of our supposed terrarium, all the time over ice.


Did the shadow sacks do a bin Ladin with Prof. Hawkings? If true the effigy was a nodding donkey.

Edited at 2018-05-05 11:24 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on May 5th, 2018 11:46 pm (UTC)

Looking at the way zionists use jews as a protective layer, dupes similar to Masonry concealing illuminati leadership, are the royals just another layer?

Hey, Mr P. Suppose you write a book, call it fiction. Perhaps, "Behind And Beyond The Reality Show" about what is real and what is pretend, like 9-11, 7-7, CAGW, Iraq, how Blair got £50+ mil richer as soon as he stepped down, Boston Marathon, Sandy Hook, and so on. Perception is programmable. We get that, too late as ever.


What do european jewish schools in Britain teach regarding the shape of our living area? Would their teachers dare lie to their developing gene bearers?
The reason for my enquiry:


"The Masonic Royal Society." Masonry's bureaucratic overburden is Illuminati. The Illuminati bunch are jesuit, maybe ensconced in Scotland.


Why should we give control of our defence forces in any degree to a foreign corporation titled EU?

Why should we pay to leave a club we never voted to join and when asked, voted to leave?

From Heath on, each leader that signed sovereignty over to zionist EU(SR) corporation leaders committed treason. ALL the EU(SR) treaties have no validity. There is nothing in the treaties to compel a "divorce" settlement. IMO, even were there to be, such a condition would be invalid due to the treaties having been signed without mandate, without authority.
Mrs May gives every appearance of acting against our interests.
She gives every appearance of being biased, for whatever reason, loyalty to previous deceiver occupants perhaps.
She has arranged for all EU(SR) laws to be incorporated into British State Law under acquis, a condition of membership. This must be reversed. The opposition party is not fit for purpose. We need one that represents what the public wants.
IMO she is not fit to speak for me, a native.
(Native, my birth cert. is written in long hand and I have the original. Any corporate fictional entity or trust in my name with guardianship or ownership claimed by other than me is fraudulent.)

Edited at 2018-05-06 09:02 am (UTC)