Log in

No account? Create an account
06 March 2017 @ 01:19 pm
The deceivers rewrite and conceal the past to hide true history  

The Invention of the Jewish People

CounterPunch February 4, 2010
by Harry Clark

The fundamental myth of Zionism is the return of the Jewish people to its land. The sovereign people was conquered, and exiled far and wide, but remained aloof and united, inspired by the memory of its ancient sovereignty. In the late 19th century the people began its return, which culminated in the dramatic establishment of the state of Israel in 1948, fulfilling two millennia of longing. Tel Aviv University historian Shlomo Sand, in his remarkable book The Invention of the Jewish People, marshals past and present academic work to refute the Zionist historiography underlying this myth, and tells instead a story of a religious minority and its creed, waxing and waning through proselytizing and conversion, subject to the same social forces as any other religious minority.

Inspired by Zionist myth, Israeli Jews

“know for a certainty that a Jewish nation has been in existence since Moses received the tablets of the law on Mount Sinai, and that they are its direct and exclusive descendants (except for the ten tribes, which are yet to be located). They are convinced that this nation “came out” of Egypt; conquered and settled the “Land of Israel”…They are also convinced that this nation was exiled, not once but twice, after its period of glory—after the fall of the First Temple in the sixth century BCE, and again after the fall of the Second Temple, in 70 CE…

“They believe that these people—their “nation,” which must be the most ancient—wandered in exile for nearly two thousand years and yet, despite this prolonged stay among the gentiles, managed to avoid integration with, or assimilation into, them…

“Then, at the end of the nineteenth century, they contend, rare circumstances combined to wake the ancient people from its long slumber and to prepare it for rejuvenation and return to its ancient homeland. And so the nation began to return, joyfully …

“…Some uninvited guests had, it is true, settled in this homeland, but since “the people kept faith with it throughout their Dispersion” for two millenia, the land belonged only to that people, and not to that handful without history who had merely stumbled upon it. Therefore the wars waged by the wandering nation in its conquest of the country were justified; the violent resistance of the local population was criminal; and it was only the (highly unbiblical) charity of the Jews that permitted these strangers to remain and dwell among and beside the nation, which had returned to its biblical language and wondrous land.”

Sand notes the reactionary purpose served by the myth.

“Dominated by Zionism’s particular concept of nationality, the State of Israel still refuses, sixty years after its establishment, to see itself as a republic that serves its citizens…The excuse for this grave violation of a principle of modern democracy, and for the preservation of an unbridled ethnocracy that grossly discriminates against certain of its citizens, rests on the active myth of an eternal nation that must ultimately forgather in its ancestral land.”

The absence of evidence for expulsion and the counter-mythical prevalence of conversion and proselytizing show that Jews and Judaism were like any religious minority and its creed. The Babylonians did deport the elite when they conquered the kingdom of Judah in 6th c. BCE. Yet the Babylonians and Assyrians did not deport whole populations. The Temple was rebuilt and Jerusalem devastated by the Romans in suppressing the Zealot rebellion in 70 CE, yet “[n]owhere in the abundant Roman documentation is there any mention of a deportation from Judea.” Nor did the Bar Kochba revolt result in expulsion. “Captive fighters were probably taken away, and others must have fled…but the Judean masses were not exiled in 135 CE.”

The nationalist historians (Heinrich Graetz, mid-19th c., Simon Dubnow, late 19th-early 20th, Salo Baron, mid-20th) did not link exile and destruction. Graetz and Dubnow echoed Flavius Josephus’s dramatic account of destruction; Baron was more scholarly, but sought above all “to avoid a connection between the end of Judea as a political entity and the disappearance of the Jewish ‘ethnic nation’” “which ‘never completely fitted into the general patterns of national divisions.’ The Jews, then, are a people with an extraordinary past unlike any other people.” The Zionist historians (Yitzhak Baer and Ben-Zion Dinur, Hebrew University, mid-20th) did not claim expulsion in 70 CE, but post-dated it to the Arab conquest in the seventh c. CE, as discussed below.

The rapid growth of the Jewish population around the eastern Mediterranean before 70 CE posed another problem for the nationalist historians. The Zionist view lists, in descending order of importance, deportations, emigration from hardship, voluntary emigration, and finally, a proselytizing and conversion movement that climaxed in the first century CE. Sand argues that the last factor was by far the most important, despite the conventional view that Judaism is a non-proselytizing, aloof religion. A heterodox 1965 dissertation at the Hebrew University by Uriel Rapaport stated flatly: “‘Given its great scale, the expansion of Judaism in the ancient world cannot be accounted for by natural increase, by migration from the homeland, or by any other explanation that does not include outsiders joining it.’” “Rapaport joined a (non-Jewish) historiographic tradition that included the great scholars of ancient history” which “asserted, to use the sharp words of Theodor Mommsen, that ‘ancient Judaism was not exclusive at all; it was, rather, as keen to propagate itself as Christianity and Islam would be in the future.’” The dissertation “was well received at the Hebrew University” in 1965, “before the war of 1967, before the hardening of ethnocentrism in Israel, and then in Jewish communities in the Western world.”

Expansion by conversion was the chief practice of the Hasmonean dynasty, founded in 165 BCE. Zionist historiography, “presented Judaism as opposed to Hellenism, and described the Hellenization of the urban elites as treason.” Yet “what the Maccabees drove out of Judea was not Hellenism but polytheism…The Hasmoneans and their power structures were both uncompromisingly monotheistic and typically Hellenistic.” “Hellenism injected Judaism with the vital element of anti-tribal universalism, which in turn strengthened the rulers’ appetite for propagating their religion…The Hasmoneans did not claim descent from the House of David, and saw no reason to emulate the story of Joshua, the mythological conqueror of Canaan.” The Hasmoneans conquered central and southern Palestine and forcibly converted its inhabitants, and later did the same to the Galilee. A Greek translation of the bible was undertaken in Alexandria, starting in the third c. BCE; Judaism was “turning into a multilingual religion.” “It would not be an exaggeration to say that, but for the symbiosis between Judaism and Hellenism, which, more than anything, turned the former into a dynamic, propagative religion for more than three hundred years, the number of Jews in the today’s world would be roughly the same as the number of Samaritans.” “The Mishnah, Talmud and the many commentaries are full of statements and debates designed to persuade the Jewish public to accept the proselytes and treat them as equals.” Part of Christianity’s competition with Judaism in the first centuries CE was the “mythology about the Jews being exiled in punishment for their rejection and crucifixion of Jesus,” dating from the writings of Justin the Martyr in the second century, which were echoed by other Christian writers.

When Christianity became the Byzantine state religion under Constantine I, “the legal status of Jews was not drastically altered,” but repressive edicts contributed to Judaism’s decline. Moreover, “Jewish believers…began to adopt the notion of exile as divine punishment.” “The concept of exile came to shape the definitions of rabbinical Judaism vis-a-vis Christianity’s growing might.” The “future that would annul [exile] was wholly messianic and totally outside the power of the humbled Jews.” The Jewish population began to decline, as proselytizing gains became losses by conversion to Christianity.

For Zionist historians, it “was still necessary to have a forced exile, otherwise it would be impossible to understand the ‘organic’ history of the ‘wandering’ Jewish people…The start of the ‘exile-without-expulsion’…began only with the Arab conquest.” This helped “reduce the time in exile to a minimum so as to maximize the national proprietary claim over the country.” “According to Dinur, it was only because ‘the ceaseless penetration of desert people into the country, their amalgamation with its alien (Syrio-Aramean) elements, the capture of the agriculture by the new conquerors and their seizure of Jewish lands,’ that the country changed hands.” Yet an “embarrassing lack of material is cited by Dinur in his effort to substantiate his thesis” on a Muslim expulsion of Jews. The sharp reduction of the Jewish population “following the Muslim conquest in the seventh century…was not due to the uprooting of Jews from the country, for which there is not a shred of evidence in the historical record.”

Any land seizures were minimal, because the conquering army was relatively small, and left for other campaigns after its victory. The conquerors also had a “relatively liberal attitude toward the religions of the defeated people—provided they were monotheists, of course.” Christians and Jews were required only to pay a poll tax. Absent other evidence it “is reasonable to assume that a slow, moderate pace of conversion took place in Palestine/Land of Israel, and accounted for the disappearance of the Jewish majority in the country.”

Outflanked in the Mediterranean, Judaism expanded on the margins of Christianity. The powerful Himyar tribe and kingdom which ruled today’s Yemen converted to Judaism in 378, and a Jewish dynasty ruled until the first quarter of the sixth c. The Himyars may have been the source of the Falasha tribe of Ethiopian Jews. In 525 the Himyar kingdom was conquered by the Christian kingdom of Axum, across the Red Sea in modern Ethiopia. In 570 the area was conquered by the Persians, halting its Christianization, but it did not convert to Zoroastrianism. Arriving in 629, the Islamic armies found a Christian and Jewish population, and “the prophet warned them in a letter not to force the local populations to convert to Islam.”

The Himyarite Jews were the basis of historic Yemeni Jewry. Baron wrote “several pages about ‘the ancestors of the Jewry of the Yemen,’ and sought in various ways to justify their harsh treatment of the Christians,” such as the massacre by Himyar King Dhu Nuwas of 20,000 who refused to convert. The massacre was discussed in a BBC program on the Himyars and prompted protests from the Board of Deputies of British Jews, whose spokesman dismissed Dhu Nuwas as a “renegade convert.” “It is widely known that Judaism is not a proselytising religion.” The BBC was supported by Israeli historians, one of whom stated: “He [the king] did massacre many Christians. The volume of knowledge on the subject is growing. The tribe did convert at the end of the fourth century and Judaism was considered missionary in those days. It’s a sensitive matter from a Jewish [Zionist!] point of view.” The Himyars disappeared from Zionist historiography.

“Dinur’s monumental compilation Israel in Exile opens with ‘the Jewish people going into exile’ in the seventh century CE, and so the earlier Jewish kingdom in southern Arabia disappears. Some Israeli scholars questioned the Jewishness of the Himyarites, which was probably not entirely rabbinical; others simply passed over this troublesome historical chapter. School textbooks issued after the 1950s made no mention of the proselytized southern kingdom.”

Haim Ze’ev Hirschberg, an Israeli scholar of Arab Jewry, asserted that “‘the Jews who had come from the Land of Israel…were the living soul of the Jewish community in the Yemen…they decided every issue.’” Sand argues that “Hirschberg had not the slightest evidence concerning the number, if any, of ‘born Jews’ in the different classes of Himyarite society, nor about the origins of those who clung to the Jewish faith. But the ethnocentric imperative was stronger than his historical training, and demanded that he conclude his work with the ‘call of the blood’.” Yemeni historians, in contrast, “insist that the Jews of Yemen are ‘an inseparable part of the Yemeni people. These people converted and adopted the Jewish religion in their homeland, which was then religiously tolerant.’”

North Africa was another successful chapter in Jewish proselytizing, probably beginning with the Phoenician survivors of the Roman sack of Carthage. There is substantial archaeological and epigraphic evidence of Jewish religious life. The years 115-17 saw a “large-scale, messianic, anti-pagan revolt,” led by a Jewish Hellenistic king. The Severan Roman emperors of 2nd-3rd c. originated in North Africa and had a philo-Semitic policy. North African Christian writers Tertullian and Augustine acknowledged the strength of Judaism.

A Jewish Berber queen, Dihya al-Kahina, rallied tribes in eastern Algeria and defeated the Umayyad general Hassan ibn al-Numan in 689. Five years later his forces killed her in battle, and her sons converted to Islam and joined the conquerors. Ibn Khaldun in the 14th c. recounted her reign, and described Jewish Berber tribes from the region of modern Tripoli to Fez in Morocco.

“[T]hese tribal areas roughly correspond to the sites where Jewish communities persisted until modern times.” In Sand’s account, Hirschberg dismissed this history, including the Jewish Berber queen, and evidence of Jewish Berber ancestry. “His constant effort to prove that the Jews were a nation-race that had been torn from its ancient homeland…met the imperative of mainstream Zionist historiography…[which] constituted the ‘scientific source’” for the “standard history textbooks of the Israeli educational system.”

Discarding this history leaves a “great conundrum in the history textbooks in Israel…the existence of such a large Jewish community in Spain.” Linguistic evidence suggests that “‘the Sephardic Jews are primarily descendants of Arabs, Berbers and Europeans who converted to Judaism.’” Moreover, “Hebrew and Aramaic made their appearance in [European] Jewish texts only in the tenth century CE, and were not a product of an earlier autochthonous linguistic development. This means that exiles or emigres from Judea had not settled in Spain in the first century CE or introduced their original language.” The Iberian Jews welcomed their conquerors as a respite from Visigothic Christianity, and the Berber influx and further proselytizing swelled Jewish ranks, until conversion to Islam set in. This was offset substantially by the “immigration of Jews from all over southern Europe and even more from North Africa” due to the “admirable symbiosis between [Judaism] and the tolerant Arabism of the kingdom of Al-Andalus and the principalities that succeeded it.”

The Himyar and Berber proselytes are overshadowed by the Khazars, who ruled from the fourth century, along the Volga, and in the eastern Ukraine, the Crimean peninsula and modern Georgia. The Silk Road and the Don and Volga gave the kingdom a rich and flourishing trade, and means for a powerful army. While the “spoken Khazar language consisted of Hunnic-Bulgarian dialects with others from the Turkic family,” “[t]here is no doubt…that the Khazars’ sacred tongue and written communication was Hebrew.” The Khazars converted over time between the mid-eighth and mid-ninth centuries, and for the same reason “that accounted for Himyar’s conversion…[t]he desire to remain independent in the face of mighty, grasping empires…Had the Khazars adopted Islam…they would have become subjects of the caliph. Had they remained pagan, they would have been marked for annihilation by the Muslims…Christianity, of course, would have subjected them to the Eastern Empire.” Conversion began with the elite and included the larger population over time. Khazar Judaism was substantially rabbinical, though Kairate Judaism, a Protestant-like sect which regards the Hebrew Bible as solely authoritative, may have flourished also.

Like Andalusia, “the Khazar power sheltered Jews, Muslims, Christians and pagans.” In the late 10th and early 11th centuries, Kiev, until then a Khazar vassal territory, allied with Byzantium and defeated the Khazar kingdom. Evidence of Judaism in the towns, steppes and mountains remained, to be swept away in the Mongol conquest of the 13th century, save for traces in the mountains. The Khazar empire was too well attested “by Arabic, Persian, Byzantine, Russian, Armenian, Hebrew, and even Chinese sources” to ignore, but Graetz, Dubnow, Baron and Dinur dismissed it as a passing phenomenon, a puzzle, or the result of a massive migration from the “Land of Israel.”  The only Israeli study of the Khazars, by Abraham Polak, last published in 1951, assured its readers that “‘a large Jewish community grew there, of which the proselyte Khazars were only a part.’” Sand suggests that in the 1950s and 1960s “the Israeli memory-merchants” were anxious “about the legitimacy of the Zionist project, should it become widely known that the settling Jewish masses were not the direct descendants of the ‘Children of Israel.’” “The conquest of the ‘City of David’ in 1967 had to be achieved by the direct descendants of the House of David—not, perish the thought, by the offspring of tough horsemen from the Volga-Don steppes, the deserts of southern Arabia, or the coast of North Africa.”

Sand also considers the argument popularized by Arthur Koestler in The Thirteenth Tribe, that migration by the Khazars was the basis of east European Jewry, against the standard Zionist view that those Jews emigrated from western Germany (via Rome and the “Land of Israel.”). “Khazaria collapsed some time before the presence of Jews in Eastern Europe, and it is difficult not to connect the two.” The Khazars were studied extensively by credible Russian, Polish and Soviet scholars, Jewish and non-, from the early 19th c., and were commonly seen as the source of east European Jewry. Polak, and after him Baron and Dinur, acknowledged the Khazars as the source of eastern Jewry, even if they all deprecated the Khazars’ proselyte origins.

Perhaps the most persuasive source cited by Sand on the proselyte origins of Ashkenazi Jewry is Tel Aviv University linguist Paul Wexler, author of The Ashkenazic Jews: A Slavo-Turkic People in Search of a Jewish Identity  (and of The Non-Jewish Origins of the Sephardic Jews). Wexler argues that “the language known as Yiddish…developed in the bilingual Germano-Slavic lands in the 9th century as a Judaized form of Sorbian.” Sorbian is a Slavic language spoken today by about 50,000 people in southeast Brandenburg. “Yiddish is not a ‘form of German.’” The “tiny Jewish communities in the monolingual western German lands” cannot have been the basis of the millions of east European Jews. “Judeo-Sorbian underwent ‘re-lexification’…beginning with the 9th-10th centuries, but at the latest by the early 13th century.” “The result was…the grafting of [eastern] High German vocabulary…onto a Judeo-Sorbian syntax, phonology, phonotactics, and to some extent, morphotactics. Thus, despite its ‘German look,’ Yiddish remains a west Slavic language.” Modern Hebrew is also a Slavic language, not a “rebirth” of Old Semitic Hebrew, which is “impossible…because there are no native speakers to provide a native norm.” “Modern Hebrew simply embodies the syntax and sound system of the Eastern Yiddish language spoken by the first Modern Hebrew language planners in Ottoman Palestine, while its lexicon…was systematically replaced by Biblical and Mishnaic Hebrew vocabulary.”

Wexler argues from linguistic and other evidence “that the Ashkenazic Jews must have consisted of a mix of Greek, Balkan Romance and Balkan Slavic, Germano-Slavic and Turkic (Khazar, Avar) converts to Judaism and their descendants and only a minority of ethnic Jews—many of whom in all probability came from other parts of Europe rather than Palestine itself.” Wexler rejects the Khazar mass migration hypothesis on linguistic grounds, arguing that there was more conversion in place than migration. “Hence, contemporary Judaism is best defined not as the continuation of the Judaism which served as an antecedent of Christianity and Islam, but as a newly Judaized variant of European (mainly Slavic) paganism and Christianity…most of the features of Old Palestinian Judaism and Semitic Hebrew to be found in Ashkenazic ‘Judaism’ and Medieval Ashkenazic/Modern Israeli ‘Hebrew’ were latter borrowings rather than original inheritance [original emphasis].” This thesis has been obscured by philo-German and anti-Slavic chauvinism among scholars, Jewish and non-, of Ashkenazi Jewry, by disciplinary blinders, and by inertia.

Sand also considers Zionist racialism, from proto-Zionist Moses Hess, who “needed a good deal of racial theory to dream up the Jewish people,” to kibbutz godfather Arthur Ruppin’s “ideas about the Darwinist struggle of the ‘Jewish race’,” including consultations with “experts” in Nazi Germany, to the discreet attempt of Israeli genetics after 1948 “to discover a biological homogeneity among the Jews in the world” while investigating Jewish diseases, which revealed east European carriers of Tay-Sachs, but also Yemeni and Iraqi carriers of favism.  “Israel’s rule since 1967 over a growing non-Jewish population,” and concomitant need to “find an enclosing ethnobiological boundary” which highlights “the basic genetic similarities…and the small proportion of ‘alien’ genes in the genetic stock characteristic of Jews” led to “new findings” which “corroborated the literature about the dispersal and wanderings of the Jews from ancient times to the present. At last, biology confirmed history,” in the current pseudo-science of “Jewish genetics.”

Israel “became a world leader in the ‘investigation of the origins of populations’” even as “Israeli researchers…regularly blended historical mythologies and sociological assumptions with dubious and scanty genetic findings.” These included mitochondrial DNA purportedly showing that “40 per cent of all Ashkenazis in the world descend from four matriarchs (as in the Bible),” and a haplotype carried by 50 per cent of men named Cohen, which “proved” that “the Jewish priesthood was was indeed founded by a common ancestor thirty-three centuries ago.” This dreck appeared in publications such as Nature and the American Journal of Human Genetics, and was respectfully reported in Haaretz and elsewhere, but rarely skepticism or contrary findings. “Yet so far, no research had found unique and unifying characteristics of Jewish heredity based on a random sampling of genetic material whose ethnic origin is not known in advance…after all the costly ‘scientific’ endeavors, a Jewish individual cannot be defined by any biological criteria whatsoever.”

Sand’s account of Judaism, from exclusive Israelite genealogy, to Hellenic proselytizing, to proselytizing and conversion on the margins of Christianity, in Arabia, North Africa, Spain, and among the Khazars and the Slavs, to defensive introversion amidst the final triumph of Christianity, is the interesting and compelling story of a religious minority subject to normal historical forces.

The contrary view of the unitary Jewish people expelled from its homeland, and wandering aloof in exile for two thousand years, until beginning its return in the late 19th c., is a reactionary myth which Zionism has deployed to conquer Palestine and compel support for it. The myth prevails unchecked today not only in Israel but worldwide. Nothing “has challenged the fundamental concepts that were formed in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.” Advances in the study of nations and nationalism have not “affected the departments of the ‘History of the People of Israel’ (aka Jewish history) in Israeli universities.

Nor, amazingly, have they left their imprint on the ample output of Jewish studies departments in American or European universities.” The Zionist myth expresses a virulently racialized Jewish consciousness. In the canonical liberal view “anyone who argued that all Jews belong to a nation of alien origin would have been classified at once as an anti-Semite. Nowadays, anyone who dares to suggest that the people known in the world as Jews (as distinct from today’s Jewish Israelis) have never been, and are still not, a people or a nation is immediately denounced as a Jew-hater.”

Sand states in closing that “the mood at the end of this book. . .is more pessimistic than hopeful.” His final paragraph asks:

“In the final account, if it was possible to change the historical imaginary so profoundly, why not put forth a similarly lavish effort of the imagination to create a different tomorrow? If the nation’s history was mainly a dream, why not dream afresh, before it becomes a nightmare?”

HARRY CLARK can be reached at andalus01@gmail.com.
A PDF of this article with notes is at http://sites.google.com/site/alandalusdoc/palestine/sand.pdf

More articles by:

Source http://www.counterpunch.org/2010/02/04/the-invention-of-the-jewish-people/
clothcapclothcap on March 6th, 2017 05:12 pm (UTC)
Another two books by Shlomo Sand
The Invention of the Land of Israel by Shlomo Sand - scribd.com
Read The Invention of the Land of Israel by Shlomo Sand by Shlomo Sand for free with a 30 day free trial. Read eBook on the web, iPad, iPhone and Android
From the Publisher
What is a homeland, and when does it become a national territory? Why have so many people been willing to die for them throughout the twentieth century? What is the essence of the Promised Land? Following the acclaimed and controversial Invention of the Jewish People, Shlomo Sand examines the mysterious sacred land that has become the site of the longest running national struggle of the twentieth-century. The Invention of the Land of Israel deconstructs the age-old legends surrounding the Holy Land and the prejudices that continue to suffocate it. Sand’s account dissects the concept of ‘historical right’ and tracks the invention of the modern geopolitical concept of the ‘Land of Israel’ by nineteenth cntury Evangelical Protestants and Jewish Zionists. This invention, he argues, not only facilitated the colonization of the Middle East and the establishment of the State of israel; it is also what is threatening the existence of the Jewish state today.
A Rothschild con enabled by Balfour and the British and US regimes, 'legitimsed' by the UN. Sustained by every zionist bank controlled regime since.
Amazon https://www.amazon.co.uk/Invention-Land-Israel-Holy-Homeland-ebook/dp/B00G2DO8R0/ref=dp_kinw_strp_1
£10 - £15

How and When I Stopped Being Jewish:
Shlomo Sand and Demystifying the Myths of Zionist Historiography

Doha Inst 10 Nov, 2013
by Mahmoud Muhareb
The Dissemination of a Religion and not a Racial Diaspora
Sand stresses that Judaism is a religion and not a nationality or a race, moreover a missionary religion that strives to expand and spread its message. Sand asserts that Judaism spread widely in the ancient world through the conversion of different races, tribes, and peoples; and not through the migration of a race, as Zionism claims. He also attributes the decline in the spread of Judaism to Christianity’s triumph in the 4th century and its adoption by the Roman Empire, who thereafter imposed restrictions on the spread of Judaism in its territories. The expansion of Judaism was further curbed with the appearance and rise of Islam, starting in the 7th century.
Judaism spread before the emergence of Christianity and Islam and their rise throughout the ancient world, the Middle East and the Mediterranean Basin. Judaism had by then spread to Palestine and Greater Syria, and among many Arab tribes in different parts of the Arabian Peninsula and among different ethnicities in North Africa. Among states that had adopted the Jewish religion were the Principality of Hidyab in northern Iraq, which became Jewish in the 1st century, and the Himyarite Kingdom in Yemen, which also adopted Judaism in the 5th and 6th centuries
It is the spread of the Jewish religion in the Khazar Kingdom, however, that had a monumental impact on Jewish history and on the dissemination of the Jewish religion and increase in its followers.
More http://english.dohainstitute.org/release/2fd3c06b-ab8e-41f1-8744-73b83a546252
The Question of Jewish Identity
CounterPunch April 6, 2015
by Joan Roelofs
His major argument is that the claim that today’s Jews are descendants of the ancient Israelites is simply a myth, of considerable use to the Zionist cause. Sand’s theories are ably expounded in a CounterPunch article of February 14-16, 2014, by Paul Atwood.
Briefly, Sand contends that European Jews, and even many of the Middle Eastern ones, are descendants of converts to Judaism, with no biological connection to ancient Israelites. Yet the founders of Zionism, mostly secular and atheist Jews, while rejecting the supernatural aspects and miracles of the Old Testament, proposed its stories to be accurate history.
Full http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/04/06/the-question-of-jewish-identity/
£4 - £12
clothcapclothcap on March 6th, 2017 05:16 pm (UTC)
Zionism and the Palestine Question
Information about the ongoing Zionist war waged against the peoples of Palestine and the Middle East, and Zionism's totalitarian and racist backgrounds.

• Basic introductory documents

• Zionism's historical roots

• Zionism's and Israel's Apartheid and Racism

• Intra-Jewish Discrimination and Violence

• Zionist-Nazi Alliance, Anti-Semitism, and the "holocaust"

• Politicizing the "holocaust"

• "Importing"Jews, even if they weren't Jews

• Labor vs Likud: No Difference in Actions

• Historical Documents and Chronologies

clothcapclothcap on March 6th, 2017 05:21 pm (UTC)
Jewish Manipulation of World Leaders
By Amalek
September 08, 2012
Observing Jewish Manipulation of non-Jewish "Goyim" Leaders ...
"Foreigners will rebuild your walls,
and their kings will serve you. [...]
Your gates will always stand open,
they will never be shut, day or night,
so that men may bring you the wealth of the nations — their kings led in triumphal procession.
For the nation or kingdom that will not serve you will perish; it will be utterly ruined."
["utterly wasted", "utterly destroyed" in some translations]
- Jewish Old Testament, Isaiah, Chapter 60:10-12, "The Glory of Zion".

Before you look at the photos, I want you to consider something...
Think about the people who rule your country... with their thousand dollar suits, their chic stretch limousines, their 200 dollar luncheons - paid for by you, of course - their many lucrative contacts with moneyed-up corporate sponsors, as well as their ties to "big banks" and "special interest" groups of all kinds...
Think about YOUR untouchable leaders.
Now ask yourself honestly:
How many of these so-called "leaders" would actually take the time to meet with us, if we so desired?
How many of these "leaders" would not only set aside the time to meet with us, but actually invite us into their work environment, so that we may confide in them; so that we may express our heartfelt desires for the betterment of our people and our families?
Not too many, I hear you say.
Indeed, no matter how you look at it, whether you admire your leaders, or despise them; we all know that the vast majority of them would NEVER voluntarily meet with "us".
Enter the Jewish Chabad-Lubavitch...
This group of fanatically Zionist Jews - who blindly support the most dangerous apartheid regime on earth (virtually as an Article of Faith) - can literally meet and greet most any politician, across the length and breadth of this lonely planet.
At their beck and call, Gentile leaders fawn and swoon; giving them the softest of glances, the warmest of handshakes, the gentlest of words... and no amount of Palestinian or Lebanese blood, nor the blood of the Rachel Corries of this world, nor even the blood of children targeted by psychotic U.S funded Israeli snipers, nor mountains of human-rights abuses (all caused by the Jewish Lubavitcher's "beloved" Israel), can stop or even hinder, the tenor of such meetings...
One could not be blamed for thinking that it must not be mere "men" that our leaders are meeting with, but perhaps "ot;ot;ot;Kings"! For they MUST be important beyond belief to be so easily, and so regularly, shuttled into the schedule of what must be some of the busiest men on earth...
Surely our criminally-inclined, (s) elected leaders only meet with individuals, or groups, when such meetings will translate into votes at the ballot box, no? For example, when there's a community-oriented photo opportunity for local snap-happy media rags, or when the result of certain public gatherings is a well calculated windfall of sponsorship dollars for the Party coffers ... or when a visit to dying children in a hospital's Cancer Ward (just before election time, mind you) can result in a whirlwind of "goodwill" from an overly gullible vote-ready constituency ... Of course, for all these reasons and others besides, a political leader will gladly make room in his precious schedule.
But... the last time I checked, Jews made up only 2% of the total U.S. population, and only 1.2% of Canada's total population; barely 1% of France's population and a mere 0.5% & 0.45% of the U.K & Australian populations respectively. And for a greater understanding, consider that of the 13,000,000 or so Jews living on this planet, only 200,000 of them claim to be Chabad-Lubavitchers!
It is as clear as the sun at midday, that appealing to such a minority group, under normal circumstances, would not - nay, COULD NOT - result in any significant swing in potential votes!
So, if it's not about the "vote"... then what is it about?
The question must be asked: Where does the loyalty of our leaders lie?
More (scroll past the pics) http://radioislam.org/jewish-photos/manipulat-the-wold/world-leaders-manipulated.htm
Where? £, $, etc.
clothcapclothcap on March 6th, 2017 05:24 pm (UTC)
Who he?
Herr Schubert (commented at SyrPer)
Jesus was Rabbi Yeshua bar Abba, ie Jesus Barabbas in my 5th Century Greek Latin NT.
um it’s a bit silly comparing the Khazars with the Pharisees isn’t it? Not really any connection. The Khazars adopted Judaism centuries after the Pharisees really were no more.
The one on the cross? According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, the first written Gospel was that of Marcion of Sinope AD 140 (yes that’s when Christianity FIRST started and it was a Greek, not Jewish affair and antisemitic to boot). Of course YOUR Christianity started in 325 AD with PAGAN Constantine, the pommie guy and they had to rewrite a lot of the stolen Marcionite text as they really wanted to keep the Judaism. A good example is Paul who was definitely Greek was made out to have previously been a Jew, Saul. Now this entire Epistle was never in Marcion’s original Pauline Text.
His name was ISU CHRESTOS (the kind one, the higher GOD than Jehovah, whom they despised).
Religion is silly. It’s not about us against the Jews anyway. The rulers of the human race are the Illuminati, which includes the Khazars and the European Nobility. Both are 5000 year old descendants of Nimrod. They eventually adopted Judaism and Christianity respectively, but secretly worship Baal to this day.
I can’t read online without finding an article about the horrible abuse of children in Australia, Ireland and elsewhere. The crimes were committed by the Catholic Church and others.
I don’t go looking for this stuff. I studied it for a decade years ago. It’s right in your face now.
"...by the Catholic Church and" other luciferian gangs.
clothcapclothcap on March 6th, 2017 05:41 pm (UTC)
Confessions Of A Wayward Jew
By Brother Nathanael Kapner January 29, 2017
DEAR DIARY, something’s disturbing me and I’m not sure what.
Perhaps it’s due to an email sent to me this morning: “Do you think we are witnessing a paradigm shift and if so is it good or bad?”
I answered, “Trump is on a long and short leash by the Jews, and that’s bad.”
He’s on a long leash due to Jewry’s grasp of the restive mood of white, middle Americans and will barely allow him to initiate his anti-immigration plans, jobs policies, and a few other bones thrown to the goys.
He’s on a short leash with regard to the criminal network of International Zionism whose enemies will be Trump’s (and America’s) and whose wars will be Trump’s (and America’s.)
And, how does Trump’s conciliatory approach to Putin and Russia play into it?
Jewry is allowing Trump to “talk” with Putin about fighting Isis and Islamic terrorism.
That’s all the Jews will allow since Trump’s “Islamic terror” rant can be used by pointing to those “hateful” Palestinians as justification for the annexation of Gaza and the West Bank and the annihilation of its molested residents either by genocide or expulsion.
Jewry fears Russia with its emerging Orthodox Church and its global influence. Thus, it will not countenance a detente with that nuclear-armed nation allied with Iran and China.
Jewry must eliminate Iran as a Middle East power along with Syria and Lebanon since this “Axis of Resistance” obstructs Israel’s hegemony in the Middle East. And Russia is an external player in this Jew-targeted axis due to its role and military bases in Syria.
IT’S ALL A JEWISH SHOW, a media event (the staged enmity between it and Trump to deflect the goys from the JEWish elephant in the living room), with everyone thinking that a “new paradigm” is in place that the media opposes.
But the assumptions remain the same: “Israel is a victim of ‘extreme Islamic terrorism.’”
Ways of thinking remain the same: “Israel is our friend, Arabs are our enemies.”
Methodologies remain the same, with nuance: “Trumpism is a business model for shaping domestic and foreign policy.”
All told, the end result is set in stone: “Jews will get a greater Israel, greater than it’s ever been before.”
I KNOW NOW what’s disturbing me. It’s capsulized in this question:
If Israel was created as a “homeland” for the Jews, why aren’t Jews moving there en masse yet are still supporting it through bribing and blackmailing political hacks in DC?
As a ‘wayward’ Jew—(I rejected Judaism and am now an Orthodox Christian)—I know the answer, having grown up in an upper-middle class synagogue.
A Jewish “state” confers legitimacy on a national military equipped with nukes.
A Jewish “state” brings its embassies, spies, trade deals, and intelligence and military symbiosis with other countries.
Moles can be visibly placed in strategic positions such as Jared Kushner now a permanent fixture in the Oval Office whose fondness for Israel supplants devotion to America.
And so, dear diary, I’ve fleshed it out. I’m still disturbed, bothered…but not bewildered.

Trump Takes A Dip In The Jewish Swamp

Why Israel Gets Away With Murder Click Here

Trump’s First Hundred Days Click

Can Trump Defy The Jewish Lobby? Click

Why Israel Is A Threat To World Peace Click

Jared Kushner -Trump’s Court Jew Click
clothcapclothcap on March 6th, 2017 05:42 pm (UTC)
England: the Banana Monarchy
March 6, 2017
by Luke O'Brien
Several rungs below banana republics on the roster of government types, one might find “banana monarchy”. This is post-Brexit Britain.
Some apologists of monarchy would have you believe that Britain’s first family is actually its worst off. They, like Dostoevsky’s Grand Inquisitor, or O’Brien of the 1984‘s Inner Circle, suffer a burden so great – all so that the thousands of millions may maintain their authoritarian consolations. A self-selected few keeping big, bad Freedom from our doors.
But do they let the mask slip? Do they let on that, behind the enchanted glass, sits nothing more than a troop of hairless apes (with just as many, if not greater, foibles than the rest)? Do they heck. They trudge along through opening ceremonies, and palace balls, and horse shows, waving and granting this and that, trailing past glories. This, they do for us. Or, more pointedly, they do it for you. Why would you – and why do you – inflict such existences? Upon they, who by accident of birth have to lord it over you. Isn’t it about time we end this protracted farce?
I suggest so. It’s time we got together, take the Windsors to one side and say, “you can pack it in dears, we can see through you”.
The one industry prevented from collapse by Maggie Thatcher and her heirs is the arms. This broader trend – one you might call military protectionism – mimics another. As revealed in Curtis’ The Mayfair Set, under David Sterling the SAS evolved from being a band of Lawrences into the world’s premier mercenary force. Of course, like private physicians, they do a bit of “national service” (the raid on the Iranian Embassy) but the bulk of their work is the propping of Arab princes and African despots, so that they may, in turn, fulfill the Foreign Office’s need for “forces of stability”.
So vital, to take one salient example, is Saudi Arabia as a lynchpin (putting solidarity between kings to one side), that we routinely overlook this hub and exporter of Wahhabism – the greatest ideological foe to British values found offshore.
This relationship almost guarantees perpetual war. Wars, we were told, nuclear weapons had made redundant. Trident, in its titanium skin, with its terrible luminous eyes trained on its equals on what we call Russia and China – perhaps even on those currently irradiating American soil. I say ‘perhaps’ because the Keepers, as Martin Amis named nukes in his essay Thinkability, are incomprehensible. Their purposes are beyond the scope of human imagination, Their intentions surpass the confines of theory. And to Them, the spawn of Rutherford and Oppenheimer: we are nothing. Mere fetuses of the post-civilisation age – the age of Atom.
Continues http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/03/06/england-the-banana-monarchy/
clothcapclothcap on March 6th, 2017 05:44 pm (UTC)
Mass murder
Has Van Jones Lost His Mind, Or Are Sane People Missing the Point?
March 3, 2017
by David Swanson
A rational and moral person might think of the recent U.S. raid in Yemen this way. Here’s one small incident out of a war consisting primarily of a massive bombing campaign that has slaughtered innocents by the thousands and is threatening to lead to the starvation of hundreds of thousands. In this one incident some 30 people were murdered, some 10 of them women and children, one of them the 8-year-old sister of a 16-year-old American boy whom President Obama had earlier murdered just after having murdered his father. There wasn’t some Very Important Thing accomplished, such as learning the cell phone number of someone suspiciously Muslim or whatever, that an immoral hack could try to claim justified this incident. This was mass murder.

In the course of this mass murder, one American taking part in it was killed.

The first paragraph above is of virtually no interest to the U.S. media. The second paragraph above is of intense and passionate interest. But there is a very different point that this interest misses. Much of the media coverage suggests that the One American being killed was a very negative thing for Donald Trump. I’d suggest that it was a very negative thing for the man killed and his family and loved ones, but not necessarily a bad thing for Donald Trump or Lockheed Martin. Here’s why.
When Van Jones appeared to lose his mind and declare Trump some sort of deity because of his Very Solemn treatment of the death of the One Person Who Mattered, Van Jones was following a long tradition of treatment of the sacred sacrificing of lives to the God of War, the feeding of troops to the Holy Flag. Only lives that matter can be used in this ritual. Only lives that have been lost and that mattered can be used to justify hurling more lives after them. President Polk knew this when he got U.S. troops killed in Mexico. So did those war propagandists who “remembered the Maine.” The mast of the Maine still stands at the Naval Academy in Annapolis as a monument to the fundamental rite of lying about dead people who mattered, in order to remove all constraints on behavior.
Continues http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/03/03/has-van-jones-lost-his-mind-or-are-sane-people-missing-the-point/

Edited at 2017-03-06 11:52 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on March 6th, 2017 11:55 pm (UTC)
Jeff Sessions Tells Pelosi He ‘Will Not Back Down’ From DC Pedo Investigations
by IWB · Published March 2, 2017
by Baxter Dmitry
A former CIA agent has warned that the deep state is working overtime to oust Attorney General Jeff Sessions from the White House because he is refusing to back down in his campaign to break up the sex trafficking and pedophile networks that control Washington D.C.
A former CIA agent has warned that the deep state is working overtime to oust Attorney General Jeff Sessions from the White House because he is refusing to back down in his campaign to break up the sex trafficking and pedophile networks that control Washington D.C.
According to Robert David Steele, Jeff Sessions is being set up as another “Russian fall guy“, just like General Flynn, to taint the Trump administration and push the president closer to impeachment.
But most importantly, Steele warns, the deep state is determined to remove the most determined anti-pedophile and -corruption enforcer the office of Attorney General has seen in decades.
The former CIA agent says that the Democrats push to remove Sessions from office, led by House Minority leader Nancy Pelosi, has “every chance of succeeding” because AG Sessions has made it clear he “will not back down” under any circumstances.
Federal authorities have locked up more than 1,500 people on child trafficking and pedophilia charges since President Trump and AG Sessions assumed office, however the huge increase in numbers on recent years is being completely ignored by mainstream media.
More https://investmentwatchblog.com/jeff-sessions-tells-pelosi-he-will-not-back-down-from-dc-pedo-investigations/
clothcapclothcap on March 6th, 2017 11:58 pm (UTC)
As Feds Continue To Blame Russia, Indiana Officials Expose DHS In Massive 2016 Election Hack
Activist Post February 24, 2017
By Jack Burns
According to a report published by the Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group, the Department of Homeland Security, under the Obama administration, attempted to hack the Indiana State electoral system nearly 15,000 times. The news comes in the wake of months of post-election talk the Russians helped Donald Trump get elected, thwarting any chance of Hillary Clinton to win in November of 2016.
Yet even with the bipartisan parade of politicians, including former president Barack H. Obama, Lindsey Graham, John McCain, and others, the American people have not been presented one shred of evidence to suggest the Russians attempted to meddle with the elections. Free thinkers everywhere are scratching their heads, and asking themselves if they’re supposed to believe the so-called leaders in Washington, without being presented with any proof the Kremlin had anything to do with Clinton’s loss.
The bully in Washington may have used his executive powers to go after states such as Indiana, that “resisted then-President Barack Obama’s attempt to increase federal involvement in state and local election systems by designating them as ‘critical infrastructure’ for national security,” writes DCNF’s Richard Pollack. To better describe the hacking attempt, Pollack described it as a “scanning assault.”
Apparently, the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) aren’t too happy about the intrusive big-brother cyber attacks by the Feds, and are calling on Trump to overturn the measures put in place by his predecessor to increase federal involvement in their election systems. Once again, the states are pushing back against executive overreach by a president who is no longer in office, which may serve to demonstrate just how long-lasting Obama’s rule-based, executive order leadership actually is.
Seemingly miffed by the IT intrusion is Indiana Secretary of State Connie Lawson, who also serves as president of NASS. She told Pollack, “we know that between November 1 and December 16, we were scanned with about 14,800 scans, nearly 15,000 different times,” an action which was traced back to a Department of Homeland Security computer’s IP address, which was the same system used to hack into Georgia’s electoral system as well, making it the second time the federal government has been implicated in attempting to hack into state election systems. She points the finger squarely at the Obama administration’s DHS, saying she believed the scans were possibly retaliatory since the state chose not to allow DHS to get their hands on Indiana’s electoral infrastructure. “We declined their assistance,” she said but added, “our voter registration system was not penetrated.”
More http://www.activistpost.com/2017/02/feds-continue-blame-russia-indiana-officials-expose-dhs-massive-2016-election-hack.html
clothcapclothcap on March 7th, 2017 03:49 am (UTC)
Globalists Interviewed: They Admitted They Controlled The Government
March 2, 2017
By Jon Rappoport
This is a bombshell. It’s a crucial piece of history that has been ignored by mass media.
I’ve published this interview before. Here I want to make new comments.
First of all, David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission was born in 1973, in part because the Globalist plan to ensure “free trade” (no tariffs paid by predatory mega-corporations) had run into a glitch.
That glitch was President Richard Nixon. He began laying tariffs on certain goods imported into the US, in order to level the playing field and protect American companies. Nixon, a substantial crook in other respects, went off-script in this case and actually started a movement to reject the Globalist vision.
After Nixon’s ouster from the White House, Gerald Ford became president, and he chose David’s brother, Nelson Rockefeller as his vice-president. It was a sign Globalism and free trade were back on track.
But David Rockefeller and his sidekick, Brzezinski, wanted more. They wanted a man in the White House whom they’d created from scratch.
That man was a peanut farmer no one had ever heard of: Jimmy Carter.
Through their media connections, David and Brzezinski vaulted Carter into the spotlight. He won the Democratic nomination (1976), spread a syrupy message of love and coming together after the Watergate debacle, and soon he was ensconced in the Oval Office.
Flash forward to 1978, the second year of Carter’s presidency. An interview took place.
It’s a close-up snap shot of a remarkable moment. It’s a through-the-looking-glass secret—in the form of a conversation between a reporter, Jeremiah Novak, and two Trilateral Commission members, Karl Kaiser and Richard Cooper.
The interview concerned the issue of who exactly, during President Carter’s administration, was formulating and controlling US economic and political policy.
The careless and off-hand attitude of Trilateralists Kaiser and Cooper is astonishing. It’s as if they’re saying, “What we’re revealing is already out in the open, it’s too late to do anything about it, why are you so worked up, we’ve already won…”
NOVAK (the reporter): Is it true that a private [Trilateral committee] led by Henry Owen of the US and made up of [Trilateral] representatives of the US, UK, West Germany, Japan, France and the EEC is coordinating the economic and political policies of the Trilateral countries [which would include the US]?
COOPER: Yes, they have met three times.
NOVAK: Yet, in your recent paper you state that this committee should remain informal because to formalize ‘this function might well prove offensive to some of the Trilateral and other countries which do not take part.’ Who are you afraid of?
KAISER: Many countries in Europe would resent the dominant role that West Germany plays at these [Trilateral] meetings.
More http://www.activistpost.com/2017/03/globalists-interviewed-admitted-controlled-government.html
clothcapclothcap on March 7th, 2017 03:58 am (UTC)
Russia Today
The Western media myth of two battles: ‘Aleppo is falling, Mosul liberated’

RAF airman jailed for saying military lets you murder ‘black c**ts without going to prison'

8,000 NATO troops launch exercise near Russian-Norwegian border (PHOTOS, VIDEO)
NATO has no nukes. Russia will respond to a conventional attack with nuclear. Bye bye Europe. These people are effing maniacs on steroids and gods know what other substances.

Senior security official says number of cyberattacks on Russia jumped three-fold in 2016
NATOCIA provoking Russia in cyberspace too?

Greek economy suffers setback ending 2016 worse than expected

China unseats eurozone as world’s largest banking system
Greece could do worse.

EU ministers agree to create joint military command center in NATO footsteps
The British military will become their military and our ability to defend ourselves against NATO and EU military is gone. The zio eco-fascists win.

News Line: 6 March 2017
19:34 GMT Kiev accuses Russia of terrorism and weapon deliveries to Ukraine at UN top court
Kiev accuses Russia of terrorism and weapon deliveries to Ukraine at UN top court
Kiev has started a wide-ranging case against Moscow at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague, claiming that Russia supports terrorism, delivers weapons to Ukraine, discriminates against minorities living in Crimea, “spreads propaganda, carries outs subversive activities, cyberattacks and is politically corrupt,” RIA Novosti reported. The four-day hearing began on March 6 with Ukraine announcing the list of accusations against Russia. The Russian delegation is expected to respond on March 7. On Wednesday, the court will hear more arguments from Ukraine. The hearing will be over after Moscow’s closing remarks on March 9. Moscow believes Ukraine is not trying to settle existing differences, but is looking for a reason to turn to international courts to prosecute Russia.

RT America
March 01, 2017
Tulsi Gabbard on her bill to stop US from arming terrorists in SyriaCongresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) has proposed the “Stop Arming Terrorists Act,” after a fact-finding trip to Syria. RT America's Anya Parampil caught up with Gabbard...

March 02, 2017
EXCLUSIVE: An inside look into the liberation of PalmyraRT's Lizzie Phelan reports from the front lines in Syria as government forces liberate the city.
Debate: Did Sessions lie or is he the latest victim of anti-Russia campaign?US Attorney General...

March 3, 2017
Refugees fleeing Mosul a ‘looming crisis’ – fmr Pentagon official With Russian assistance, Syria has liberated the historic city of Palmyra, wresting it from insurgents’ control. Meanwhile, US-backed coalition forces remain...
clothcapclothcap on March 7th, 2017 05:59 pm (UTC)
Body Organs Of Over 18,000 Syrian Children Sold in Six Years
Abel Danger March 5, 2017
Realities Watch February 22, 2017
(CCN) Director-General of the Syria Coroner's Office Hossein Noufel disclosed that the body organs of thousands of Syrian civilians have been sold in the international black markets over the past six years.
"We have accurate information that over 25,000 surgical operations have been conducted in the refugee camps of the neighboring countries and in the terrorist-controlled areas in Syria since 2011 to take out the body organs of 18,000 Syrians and sell them in the international black markets," Dr. Noufel said.
Vid 18,000 Syrian Children Victim to Organ Harvesting
This is one of the reasons the "1%" make our national armies and their terrorists and NATO wage war, paid for with tax funds.

Can you envision the likes of Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Soros, senior royals, corporation and news owners, other Bilderberg participants and zionists etc., many of the parasites already multiple heart transplant receivers, hooked up to infants?
clothcapclothcap on March 7th, 2017 11:54 pm (UTC)
Complete Original '07 Zeitgeist With 2010 Updates by: Peter Joseph
ExhumedByScryingEyes Aug 14, 2010 1,990,815 views

Be sure to check out this 220 page Source Guide below which sources virtually everything. As requested by Zeitgeist creator Peter Joseph, I have replaced the original Zeitgeist movie with well over 1.25 million views with this updated for 2010 version. The meat and potato's of it are the same, there's some new information and the quality of it is improved upon.
Link to source guide:
As always please share and enjoy.

The followup to the original film by: Peter Joseph w/ focus on money, corruption, scandals & Jacque Fresco / The Venus Project.

TZMOfficialChannel 2011

The zeitgeist movement is globalist?
clothcapclothcap on March 8th, 2017 08:00 am (UTC)


Is the Zeitgeist Movement a UN Lucis creation, an Agenda 21 and 30 movement?

The enemies of humanity want all religions to be supplanted with luciferianism.

If any of Trump's people read this, advise him to take note of the following so he knows what he is up against:
Regardless of the authenticity, it is plain it is what has been and is happening, similar to the Protocols.
clothcapclothcap on March 8th, 2017 10:59 am (UTC)

Here we reveal 5 years of years of Conservative fraud (which took over from a decade of New Labour Genocide: the financial frauds focussed on by Gordon Bowden and George Lees are concomittant with the brutalisation of innocent countries)......the networks take you right to the top of Society. Philip Hammond replaced the disgraced and corrupted william Hague yesterday but here we talk about how the leadership teams have no honest men to choose from when which is why all governments are hand picked to steal from global citizens. George Lees has not heard of HINZE before but his manipulation and greed is unforgettable as Gordon re-affirms on the page above. All of the financial scams are undermining savings, pensions, investments and, of course, all public sector/democratic initiatives. All related to the privately owned issuance of money and the frauds we describe daily.

Lovers Liam Fox & Adam Werritty. Philip Hammond, Links to the Monarchy and Munitions Scandels
John Paterson Jul 24, 2014

Liam Fox, David Cameron, Chinook Killings, Philip Hammond: munitions SCANDALS involving the Cabinet (all parties), the PM, the Rothschilds and the monarchy

More https://sites.google.com/site/profgeorgeleesrevelations/lees-and-bowden-videos-the-fraud-empires-that-have-the-world-in-chaos/paterson-lees-the-archive-on-geopolitical-religious-fraud-central-banking-fascism-narcotics-and-war-crimes
clothcapclothcap on March 9th, 2017 08:14 pm (UTC)

Problem with youtube. Still trying to listen to the above vid.
From the bits I managed to hear the vid seem to be an extended tour of the industry before getting to the product. Not polished, bit of a rambler. I'll try again later and if there's owt worth mentioning that hasn't been repeatedly told in this blog, I'll note the time and the item under the vid.

Passing thought. Mrs May's heart must have stopped when she learnt the brexit result. Whoosh went her 10 million for signing a treaty, or 20 mil for two. How much did, will MPs get for their treason?
Is a treaty involved in giving away Britain's defence forces?
Has she asked anyone that the defence forces are at present supposed to be defending (when not aiding regime change in whichever country du jour) if it's ok to do this?
How much are the moderate terrorists in Syria and Iraq costing the taxpayer over and above the millions the White Helmet terrorist propaganda gang costing?

Is the City of London registered as a separate country I wonder?

Has there ever been a good-for-the-people budget? Have we always had an occupation regime here?

Locally around and about there seems to be deepening concern for disparate reasons as people learn disparate aspects of what is being done to them by and with the consent of consecutive regimes.
I hope the dots connect soon.
clothcapclothcap on March 9th, 2017 11:27 pm (UTC)
The zionists, on board (blood oath) freemasons (much of the regime), the Black Nobility and bank families have decided to by pass the EU and take the UK corporation and its tax stock straight into subsidiary status under a global corporation headed by eco-fascists. The UK corporation will seek to globalise any remaining countries that haven't been incorporated, maybe by bankrupting and then incorporating them by stealth as happened to Britain due to the 2nd WW, and then collecting on the land that was put up as security, tax stock included?
Our land. Us.

WND looks interesting, I signed up, no credit card or cash required so far.

Check out the vid clip at the site, details next.

Edited at 2017-03-09 11:37 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on March 9th, 2017 11:39 pm (UTC)
Sign up to see shocking information on a special report which opens up the pandora's box on the latest unreported developments regarding the Illuminati New World Order and what will happen to America and Europe in 2017 to bring the Illuminati agenda to a climax.......the end result may shock you!
See video sneak preview below and then sign up to preview this shocking 2017 disclosure report and video

Membership Confirmation
Welcome to the The Global Watch Weekly Report, a free, weekly, online publication, focusing on current events which provide evidence of a one world government agenda and the need for us to be aware of the changes taking place around us which may impact our freedoms. With over 200 editions issued, this is by far one of the most insightful disclosure magazines available on the internet (see below the cover pages of the 5 most popular editions as recently voted by our members).
Our complimentary weekly disclosure reports have been voted as some of the best on the internet so be comforted by the fact you are at the right place at the right time. You at any time have immediate access to the last 7 editions.
In addition to these weekly reports which get published every weekend we also launch the following special insider packages which are much more in-depth and intense.
1. New Special Insider Online Reports
2. New Special Insider Instant Audio Documentaries
3. New Special Insider Audio CD/DVD Documentaries
So whether you prefer reading material or something to listen to or something to watch there should be something that grabs your interest each week. We will send you details by email.
Blessings to you and thanks again for signing up today.
Also click here to claim your free gift that we promised which is the new world order architecture of power showing the thousands of organizations worldwide which are contributing to the emergence of the one world government agenda. (Best viewed at 150%).
Click here to go back to the home page.
Daniel Bailey
Chief Editor
Global Watch Weekly
(A production of Rema Marketing)

P.S. There is just one favor I need to ask you. Please let others know about www.globalwatchweekly.com so we can wake more people up. Just send them an email telling them to review www.globalwatchweekly.com and to see whether they can identify with some of the topics.
clothcapclothcap on March 11th, 2017 01:00 pm (UTC)
John Paterson's video playlist


Gordon Bowden Ex RAF Whistleblower and The BBC
1 of 6

2 of 6

3 0f 6

4 0f 6


BBC Paedophile Freemasons

Ex RAF Whistleblower Gordon Bowden Skype John Paterson

BBC Serco Paedophile Elite

David Cameron-DVD-Deutsches Verteidigungs Dienst-Mossad
John Paterson Gordon Bowden

David Cameron's Crimes re-loaded

DAVID CAMERON'S CABAL BUSTED. Freemason's and more.

THE CITY OF CORRUPTION....Awake Radio with Gordon Bowden.

11 th April 2 of 4 Trafalgar Square Houses of Parliament Corruption and BBC cover-up

11 th April 3 of 4 Trafalgar Square Houses of Parliament Corruption and BBC cover-up

John Paterson Patrick Cullinane

URGENT - Thousands at risk "Nuclear Waste Dump Exposed in Wales."

Imagine Lennon A Perfect Circle

Reporting MASSIVE TRILLION POUND Fraud to Sussex Police

Gordon Bowden and John Paterson discuss "change" Agents

£ TRILLION Fraud - David Cameron
John Paterson & Gordon Bowden

Brighton Magistrates Court 1 of 2
John Paterson

John Paterson v SPCC Katy Bourne Bombs Banks & Paedophiles

Everybody Knows about Tony Blair & David Cameron Plc

Royal Courts of Justice Shocker
John Paterson & Gordon Bowden


Sir Winston Churchill Zionist Jew Mass-Murderer

BBC Sussex 3 March 2016
John Paterson


Phone call to Maria Caulfield MP
John Paterson
clothcapclothcap on March 11th, 2017 08:30 pm (UTC)
Twisted Ashkenazi Sisters Albright & May NWO Puppets
John Paterson
Aug 3, 2016

Jewess Theresa May & Jewess Madeline Albright Exposed as Santanist Mass-Murdering Puppets of The New World DisOrder
Was there some hidden agenda by the British Government to take away your privacy?
They say that behind every good man is a good women

Unbelievable Evil and Satanic Manipulation of World Politicians, VIP’s and Senior Executives of many companies

Elements of The New World Order as you have never seen them before

Maybe whilst you were all being brainwashed on events during and after the alleged Woolwich terrorist attack you did not notice what Theresa May was trying to push through Parliament. Just like all the other false flags there is always some hidden agenda or reason for staging such events and this time folks you have again been spoofed… Did any of you notice this going on whilst you were glued to the set or watching your favorite programme on TV?

Theresa May (the bitch from hell) knows the answer as she is a mistress of the New World Order who is one of many trained females to carry out “Man in the middle attacks” using various extortion, blackmail, sex and peodophilia tactics on senior politicians, VIP’s and senior commercial executives

May's Death-Bet Pedophile Cabinet – Serco Clinton 8(a) Server – Zulu Dallas Money Shots
by US Marine Field McConnell July 12, 2016
Plum City Online - (AbelDanger.net)
1. Abel Danger (AD) claims that Theresa May – a former senior advisor in International Affairs at the Association for Payment Clearing Services – has equipped the UK Cabinet Office with death-betting networks for use by blackmailed pedophiles to time victim deaths.
2. AD claims that May's cabinet colleagues ordered a Serco 8(a) protégé company Base One Technologies, to equip the Clinton Foundation with servers so pay-to-play insiders could bet on the time of death of Hillary Clinton's rivals and enemies and whistle-blowers.
3. AD claims that May's death-betting cabinet used Zulu timing signals from a Serco cesium clock to procure the money shot time for the death of alleged sniper Micah Johnson – blown up in Dallas by a robot bomb allegedly designed by DOJ Pride's ATF agents.
4. United States Marine Field McConnell asks James Comey – a former director of Serco's banker HSBC and the current FBI director – to hand over any evidence of the hostile actors (Gary McKinnon 9/11?) who, Comey said, may have exploited Clinton's extreme carelessness in the use of 8(a) servers to the families of police killed in Dallas so they can develop class-action suits for the wrongful death of their relatives.
From http://www.abeldanger.net/2010/01/field-mcconnell

"...take away your privacy" is continuous cross party, Civil Service and Police policy.
clothcapclothcap on March 11th, 2017 08:35 pm (UTC)
May not a jew?
BBC Religious Correspondent Caroline Wyatt investigates a question on the mind of a nation too afraid to ask it
BBC News
Image: Theresa May is photographed holding up a placard which reads ‘Je suis Juif’ (I am Jewish) at a memorial for the victims of the Paris massacre
In rational, post-Enlightenment Europe, religion has long since been relegated to a safe space, with Judaism and Christianity the safe targets of satire in secular western societies.
Not so Islam. It is commonly held and agreed that the primary motive behind the Charlie Hebdo attack was to harm the cartoonists of the Paris based publication. 5 of the total number of victims killed were cartoonists. Only one cartoonist was listed as being Jewish.
The political spin given to the whole affair was one of ‘anti semitism’.
The shooting at the French Kosher Market was linked to the Charlie Hebdo atrocity solely on the grounds that the demands made by the hostage takers related to the perpetrators. And suddenly ‘Je Suis Juif’ placards materialise.
Shortly after, a raft of UK police are patrolling the streets of England among Jewish communities that do not appear to have ever been threatened and Theresa May claims “The UK must redouble its efforts to “wipe out anti-Semitism“.
As confusing as it may seem to any rational onlooker, when you start to analyse the make up of, and the influences exerted upon, the UK government, the Home Secretary’s response starts to make sense. They are the fears of a minority group attempting to maintain control of the majority. They were afraid, so they wished to protect their own.
Read the rest of the article here.

Psychopath UK Prime Minister Theresa May Says "Innocent Civilians" are The Enemy
John Paterson Mar 10, 2017
clothcapclothcap on March 12th, 2017 01:11 am (UTC)
How do false jews control countries and their armies?
The mind-bending power of the masters of the media
The Jewish media-power in Great Britain
Jew Watch
Jewish Occupied Governments: United Kingdom

(Jump to -)
Jews Who Control UK Broadcasting

Jews Who Control UK Entertainment

Jews In Control of UK Advertising

Jews Who Control What UK Reads

Jews Who Control Hollywood

Jews Who Make Deals With UK Royalty

Here follows a lengthy analysis and study of the Jewish media-occupation in Great Britain. Written in 1997, this text describes the present state of affairs when it comes to Jewish media power in Great Britain. It is crucial, in the battle against the Jewish racist totalitarianism, to have a basic knowledge about the Jewish media-dictatorship-monopoly and about the political power the Zionists possess and who are - as Jewish political actors - the leaders of this Jewish Power.

The Power Behind the British Empire....
"Today the film makers are the people who control the most powerful medium in the world, and art that can create ideals, change language or topple governments."
John Baxter in the Daily Mail (28th December 1995)

According to the theory of democracy, "the people" rule. They elect politicians by their own choice, and if and when those politicians fail to act according to their wishes they can be dismissed by the vote of the people. The pluralism of different political parties provides the people with "alternatives"; if one loses their confidence, they can support another. Thus is realized the democratic principle of: government of the people, by the people and for the people.
It would be nice if it were all so simple. But in a medium-to-large modern state things are not quite like that. How do "the people" acquire the information and knowledge necessary for them to use their votes other than by blind guesswork? They cannot possibly witness everything that is happening on the national scene, still less at the level of world events. Only a tiny few of them ever see their political leaders close up and are able to watch and assess their performance of their duties. The vast majority are not students of politics. They don't really know what is happening, and even if they did they would need guidance as to how to interpret what they knew.
"The people" are doctors, lawyers, engineers, clerks, shopkeepers, factory workers, farm workers, small tradesmen, nurses, secretaries, school teachers and a thousand or more other things. They know, or ought to know, something about the occupations in which they are engaged. But only the minutest number can be expected to know the business of politics - one of the most complex of subjects, with its vast range of issues and the many points of view that will be brought to bear on each of these issues. To know what the issues are, and to examine and evaluate these points of view, the people need to have these issues presented to them and the points of view expounded in a form that they can understand.
This is where the "mass media" come in: newspapers; television; radio. And for those with a more studious and enquiring bent there are other media: books; magazines; the Internet. The list is growing as information technology advances.
Continues http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-uk-media.html
"...take away your privacy" is continuous cross party, Civil Service and Police policy.

Think we're riddled with the plague in Britain? Check out the US.
Subverted Nation's Jew Lists
clothcapclothcap on March 12th, 2017 12:42 pm (UTC)
The false jew objective is an OWG. How?
By deceit.

Protocols of Zion
Subverted Nation Sept 2015
Although this copy of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is included in Basic Training for Revolutionaries it is only fitting that it be included in text format here on this website, as yet another reference for everyone to use. It seems when searching for the actual document on different search engines, it can actually be quite difficult to find a complete text version. Instead, one often finds numerous links to jewish sources attempting to debunk the protocols, rather than the document it’s self.
If the document were indeed a “forgery” as the jewish media claims it to be, why is it that one could be shot and killed on sight for mentioning this document in Bolshevik (jew) run Russia? Why is it when the first (abridged) version of the protocols was published by Pavel Krushevan, there was an attempt made on his life? See HERE.
After a homicidal attempt by a P. S. Dashevsky, it was reported that Krushevan lived in constant fear, kept weapons close at hand and was accompanied by a personal cook out of fear to be poisoned.
Another man by the name of Sergei Nilus published the first copy of the protocols in full in Russia in 1905. Some information about him can be found HERE. For this act, he was imprisoned and tortured by the jewish Bolshevik “Cheka”, as per this source HERE.
In 1924 Professor Nilus was arrested in Kiev by the “Cheka”, imprisoned, and then tortured. He was told by the president of the court (who was Jewish) that this treatment was meted out to him for “having done them incalculable harm in publishing the Protocols”. He was freed afterwards, and detained again a few months later, this time in Moscow; he was confined, and later sent to exile, where he died in 1929.
There are many other sources and revelations pertaining to the protocols, but most important is the text contained within them, and for this reason, the same copy contained in my book, will also be archived here. It is my hope that many visitors here will actually take it upon themselves to sit down and read through this disturbing text, because without absorbing this knowledge, one can not be expected to fully understand the enemy and their plans.

Goyim are mentally inferior to Jews and can’t run their nations properly. For their
sake and ours, we need to abolish their governments and replace them with a single
government. This will take a long time and involve much bloodshed, but it’s for a
good cause. Here’s what we’ll need to do:
Place our agents and helpers everywhere
Take control of the media and use it in propaganda for our plans
Start fights between different races, classes and religions
Use bribery, threats and blackmail to get our way
Use Freemasonic Lodges to attract potential public officials
Appeal to successful people’s egos
Appoint puppet leaders who can be controlled by blackmail
Replace royal rule with socialist rule, then communism, then despotism
Abolish all rights and freedoms, except the right of force by us
Sacrifice people (including Jews sometimes) when necessary
Eliminate religion; replace it with science and materialism
Control the education system to spread deception and destroy intellect
Rewrite history to our benefit
Create entertaining distractions
Corrupt minds with filth and perversion
Encourage people to spy on one another
Keep the masses in poverty and perpetual labor
Take possession of all wealth, property and (especially) gold
Use gold to manipulate the markets, cause depressions etc.
Introduce a progressive tax on wealth
Replace sound investment with speculation
Make long-term interest-bearing loans to governments
Give bad advice to governments and everyone else

Eventually the Goyim will be so angry with their governments (because we’ll blame
them for the resulting mess) that they’ll gladly have us take over. We will then
appoint a descendant of David to be king of the world, and the remaining Goyim will
bow down and sing his praises. Everyone will live in peace and obedient order under
his glorious rule.
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
Use the links to easily navigate to each section of the protocols.
Here http://www.subvertednation.net/protocols-of-elders-of-zion/