?

Log in

No account? Create an account
 
 
23 September 2010 @ 02:55 pm
UN - EU banditti, Future CO2 Fiction  
Where angels fear to tread.



Living under european commission legislature is akin to living in Italy when the Mafia bandits openly ruled, it is unsurprising that Kinnock was a member. It is on the toss of a coin to decide which is more corrupt, the EU's EC or the UN. Cameron will give the UN bandits 1 billion sterling of the public purse this year, much will vanish to fraud. Cameron will illegally give the EC something like 8 billion just as a membership fee, much will vanish to fraud. Illegal because the EC accounts have not been closed for 14 years due to fraud and the EC except for Banditarrosso has remained in office despite their term passing. Giving comfort and aid to crooks is illegal in the UK. It is fraud to transfer VAT receipts to the EC. That would make the Con eu party as crooked as the EC. Well, Cameron is a Bilderberger and the EC is a Bilderberg run outfit.

Let's hope the revelations of climategate, the demonstration that the IPCC assessment was a political fiction, not a scientific doc, CRU, GISS, NOAA, GHCN being shown to "prefer" certain data, and now the biased funding by the EU conspires to bring the whole eco fascist edifice to the ground.

Climate scientists involved in the CO2 alarm deception have been accused of starting with a predetermined result and making the data fit. My thinking is that the EU's EC started with a set of objectives the Bilderberg Group wanted to attain and then spent public funds to create the circumstances where policy supporting the objectives could be introduced, principally a climate scare. Reminiscent of false flag actions by a third country to get the US into a war. I believe carbon credits (print your own monopoly money), "green" energy company investments and a 50 lane unregulated highway for EU funds to be siphoned off into an unofficial bank (TERI?) for the world gov project were the objectives. I also believe a very small number of people were at the head of the rotten pile. Rockefeller and Rothschild are behind the Bilderberg Group that runs the EU and CoR that runs the UN. Freemasonry looks to be their main means of control, especially of the media.

Rothschild should be invited to leave the UK, stripped of any connection with banks in the UK, not just UK banks - without the cash and assets he has stripped the country of. Freemasonry should be outlawed (along with Common Purpose) and Bilderberg sycophants Blair, Brown and Cameron called to account. Thatcher should be excused due to age.

I believe that funding should be withheld from the UN until UNEP and its eco fascist spawn such as the IPCC is shut down and the incumbents banned from working at or with the UN, a signed pledge is made to have no further dealings under any pretence with Strong, Soros, Rockefeller, Rothschild, the Clubs of Rome, Madrid, Budapest and their spin-offs, WWF and its spin-offs, Greenpeace and a credible independent investigation into fraud is carried out along with an independent audit of accounts, it separates itself from political aspirations. That would effectively free the UK of commitment to the criminal outfit. Alternatively put a barbed wire fence around the UN building and guard it with warders, cut off their electricity. Let no one out for ten years.

The EU is a problem. It costs the UK the equivalent of the national debt each year due to EC legislation. The best idea is to get far away from the Bilderberg Group controlled cesspit of corruption.

Association with organisations that want to remove the UK's sovereignty must be made a treasonable offence if it is not already. The EC and the UN are both organisations that want to remove the UK's sovereignty.

See
http://euro-med.dk/?p=17055
http://clothcap.livejournal.com/21978.html
http://euro-med.dk/?p=13656
http://clothcap.livejournal.com/21664.html
http://drjn.co.uk/cp.htm
http://www.wiseupjournal.com/
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Commentary/Proof.htm

And just for fun:
http://www.illuminati-news.com/index.htm
The original illuminati probably vanished when the Bavarian gov closed it down in 1785. Weishaupt, financed by Rothschild, had already infiltrated the continental order of freemasons with illuminati doctrine, my view is why the need for 2 secret societies? What is seen today as "illuminati" is probably groups established "in the spirit of" the original order. Rothschilds have a long history of association with the pinny brigade.
Weishaupt's methodology:

Use monetary and sex bribery to obtain control of men already in high places, in the various levels of all governments and other fields of endeavour. Once influential persons had fallen for the lies, deceits, and temptations of the Illuminati they were to be held in bondage by application of political and other forms of blackmail, threats of financial ruin, public exposure, and fiscal harm, even death to themselves and loved members of their families.
The faculties of colleges and universities were to cultivate students possessing exceptional mental ability belonging to well-bred families with international leanings, and recommend them for special training in internationalism, or rather the notion that only a one-world government can put an end to recurring wars and strife. Such training was to be provided by granting scholarships to those selected by the Illuminati.
All influential people trapped into coming under the control of the Illuminati, plus the students who had been specially educated and trained, were to be used as agents and placed behind the scenes of all governments as experts and specialists.  This was so they would advise the top executives to adopt policies which would in the long-run serve the secret plans of the Illuminati one-world conspiracy and bring about the destruction of the governments and religions they were elected or appointed to serve.
To obtain absolute-control of the press, at that time the only mass-communications media which distributed information to the public, so that all news and information could be slanted in order to make the masses believe that a one-world government is the only solution to our many and varied problems.

Which smacks very strongly of the zionist federation's Mossad methodology along with that of other zionist federation controlled secret services such as those in the US and UK.

The zionist federation controlled org our dear leadership subscribes to: (irrelevantly, Bilderberger Cameron, from a banking background, has Ashkenazi jewish in his ancestry, he is also a freemason: "From: Allan Parkinson Date: Thurs, Jul 3 2003 11:53 pm Email: "Allan Parkinson" llanparkinso...atyahoo.co.uk Groups: alt.freemasonry
I'd like to congratulate my local Masonic lodge member, David Cameron MP for Witney, on his promotion to Deputy Speaker for the Conservative Party. As an extremely young MP (thirties) I expect him to be party leader by the end of his political career... 
In my opinion, association with Bilderberg and Rothschild should be enough to exclude him from office, however some see that as something good but frreemasonry means his allegiance is to that society, not the country and unless he is head honcho, he under the authority of another that he has sworn to obey.)
http://www.bilderberg.org
http://www.allaboutcults.org/freemasonry.htm

If you enjoyed reading this, copy it, it may not last long.

Bonus: http://www.liebreich.com/LDC/HTML/Europe/01-Britain.html

Next, more damnation of the immaculately bent IPCC:

Future CO2 Fiction (D.L. Hoffman Sept. 2010)
With all of the hype over CO2 emissions, one fact that is not usually addressed is where all the CO2 is supposed to come from. Most assume that, in order to avoid the ravages of global warming, we need to shut down all our fossil fuel electric plants, park our cars and take to planting trees 24x7. But the assumptions used in the IPCC scenarios are seldom examined in detail. In reality they are based on projected changes in population, economic growth, energy demand, and the estimated carbon intensity of energy over time. A new study in the journal Science calculated cumulative future emissions based on existing infrastructure and found a surprising result. The investigators concluded that sources of the most threatening emissions have yet to be built. In other words, they made the whole thing up—the IPCC's models are making predictions based on a future that will never happen.

In “Future CO2 Emissions and Climate Change from Existing Energy Infrastructure,” published in the September 10, 2010, issue of Science, Steven J. Davis, Ken Caldeira, and H. Damon Matthews present a revealing new analysis of current and future CO2 emissions. Noting that, if current greenhouse gas (GHG) emission rates remain constant, the IPCC's wonky climate models predict several centuries of increasing global mean temperatures and sea level rise, such predictions lead to the conclusion that near-elimination of anthropogenic CO2 emissions would be required to stabilize global temperatures. Yet long-lived energy and transportation infrastructure now in place can be expected to contribute substantial CO2 emissions over the next 50 years. Taking this into account, the authors' explain the difference in their approach:

Emissions scenarios such as those produced by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) rely on projected changes in population, economic growth, energy demand, and the carbon intensity of energy over time. Although these scenarios represent plausible future emissions trends, the infrastructural inertia of emissions at any point in time is not explicitly quantified. Here, we present scenarios reflecting direct emissions from existing energy and transportation infrastructure, along with climate model results showing the warming commitment of these emissions.

Rather than blindly accepting the Malthusian scenarios so favored by the IPCC, this more reality based analysis produces some rather different answers about future CO2 levels and predicted temperatures. “What if no additional CO2-emitting devices (e.g., power plants, motor vehicles) were built, but all the existing CO2-emitting devices were allowed to live out their normal lifetimes?” ask the authors. “What CO2 levels and global mean temperatures would we attain?”
/continues - link