Log in

No account? Create an account
26 September 2016 @ 04:59 pm
Can we lock Dave up yet?  

For the attn of any non misanthropists, non thugs, non gangsters, non junkies, non paedos, non errand boys, non alchos, non thieves, non traitors in parliament.
Oh  damn. That last gets all of them. All traitors, as well as enemies of humanity, the country and nature.
There are the lowest form of life in charge of this country. It seems to be a qualification requirement.

Libya War Was Based on Lies, Bogus Intelligence,
NATO Supported and Armed the Rebels.

British Parliamentary Report

By Washington's Blog
Global Research, September 25, 2016
Washington's Blog 23 September 2016

Parliamentary Report Confirms What the Alternative Media Has Been Saying for Years
The UK Parliament just confirmed what the alternative media has been saying for years.
Specifically, a new report from the bipartisan House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee – based on interviews with all of the key British decision-makers, review of documents, and on-the-ground investigations in Africa – found that Libyan war was based on lies, that it destroyed the country, and that it spread terrorism far and wide.

The War Based On Bogus Intelligence … Like the Iraq War
Initially, the report finds that the threat to civilians from Libyan  government forces was dramatically overstated:
Former French Foreign Minister Alain Juppé, who introduced Resolution 1973 [imposing a no-fly zone over Libya, and laying the groundwork for overthrowing the government], asserted in his speech to the Security Council that “the situation on the ground is more alarming than ever, marked by the violent re-conquest of cities”. He stressed the urgency of the situation, arguing that “We have very little time left—perhaps only a matter of hours.” Subsequent analysis suggested that the immediate threat to civilians was being publicly overstated and that the reconquest of cities had not resulted in mass civilian casualties.
The proposition that Muammar Gaddafi would have ordered the massacre of civilians in Benghazi  [which was the basis for the West’s war to overthrow Gaddafi] was not supported by the available evidence. The Gaddafi regime had retaken towns from the rebels without attacking civilians in early February 2011 ….Gaddafi regime forces targeted male combatants in a civil war and did not indiscriminately attack civilians. More widely, Muammar Gaddafi’s 40-year record of appalling human rights abuses did not include large-scale attacks on Libyan civilians.

On 17 March 2011, Muammar Gaddafi announced to the rebels in Benghazi, “Throw away your weapons, exactly like your brothers in Ajdabiya and other places did. They laid down their arms and they are safe. We never pursued them at all.” Subsequent investigation revealed that when Gaddafi regime forces retook Ajdabiya in February 2011, they did not attack civilians. Muammar Gaddafi also attempted to appease protesters in Benghazi with an offer of development aid before finally deploying troops.
An Amnesty International investigation in June 2011 could not corroborate allegations of mass human rights violations by Gaddafi regime troops. However, it uncovered evidence that rebels in Benghazi made false claims and manufactured evidence. The investigation concluded that
much Western media coverage has from the outset presented a very one-sided view of the logic of events, portraying the protest movement as entirely peaceful and repeatedly suggesting that the regime’s security forces were unaccountably massacring unarmed demonstrators who presented no security challenge.
In short, the scale of the threat to civilians was presented with unjustified certainty. US intelligence officials reportedly described the intervention as “an intelligence-light decision”.
Just like the ginned up intelligence used to justify the Iraq war. And the “humanitarian wars” waged over the last couple of decades.

The Libyan Government Was Fighting Terrorists
The report also notes that the Libyan government really was – as Libyan dictator Gaddafi claimed at the time – fighting Islamic terrorists:
Intelligence on the extent to which extremist militant Islamist elements were involved in the anti-Gaddafi rebellion was inadequate.
Abdelhakim Belhadj and other members of the al-Qaeda affiliated Libyan Islamic Fighting Group were participating in the rebellion in March 2011.
Secret intelligence reports from 2011, written before and during the illegal US-led attack on Libya and recently obtained by the Washington Times, state:
There is a close link between al Qaeda, Jihadi organizations, and the opposition in Libya…
Indeed, the Libyan rebel commander admitted at the time that his fighters had links to Al Qaeda.  And see this.
We reported in 2012:
The U.S. supported opposition which overthrew Libya’s Gadaffi was largely comprised of Al Qaeda terrorists. According to a 2007 report by West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center’s center, the Libyan city of Benghazi was one of Al Qaeda’s main headquarters – and bases for sending Al Qaeda fighters into Iraq – prior to the overthrow of Gaddafi:

The Hindustan Times reported last year:
“There is no question that al Qaeda’s Libyan franchise, Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, is a part of the opposition,” Bruce Riedel, former CIA officer and a leading expert on terrorism, told Hindustan Times.
It has always been Qaddafi’s biggest enemy and its stronghold is Benghazi.
(Incidentally, Gaddafi was on the verge of invading Benghazi in 2011, 4 years after the West Point report cited Benghazi as a hotbed of Al Qaeda terrorists. Gaddafi claimed – rightly it turns out – that Benghazi was an Al Qaeda stronghold and a main source of the Libyan rebellion.  But NATO planes stopped him, and protected Benghazi.)
The Daily Mail reported in 2014:
A self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn’t been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier.
‘The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,’ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline.
She blamed the Obama administration for failing to stop half of a $1 billion United Arab Emirates arms shipment from reaching al-Qaeda-linked militants.
‘Remember, these weapons that came into Benghazi were permitted to enter by our armed forces who were blockading the approaches from air and sea,’ Lopez claimed. ‘They were permitted to come in. … [They] knew these weapons were coming in, and that was allowed..
‘The intelligence community was part of that, the Department of State was part of that, and certainly that means that the top leadership of the United States, our national security leadership, and potentially Congress – if they were briefed on this – also knew about this.’
‘The White House and senior Congressional members,’ the group wrote in an interim report released Tuesday, ‘deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler [Muammar Gaddafi] who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress al-Qaeda.’
‘Some look at it as treason,’ said Wayne Simmons, a former CIA officer who participated in the commission’s research.

The West and Its Allies Directly Supported and Armed the Rebels
The UK report confirms that the West and its allies directly supported and armed the rebels:
The combat performance of rebel ground forces was enhanced by personnel and intelligence provided by states such as the UK, France, Turkey, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. For example, Lord Richards told us that the UK “had a few people embedded” with the rebel forces.
Resolution 1973 called on United Nations member states to ensure the “strict implementation of the arms embargo”. However, we were told that the international community turned a blind eye to the supply of weapons to the rebels. Lord Richards highlighted “the degree to which the Emiratis and the Qataris … played a major role in the success of the ground operation.” For example, Qatar supplied French Milan anti­tank missiles to certain rebel groups. We were told that Qatar channelled its weapons to favoured militias rather than to the rebels as a whole.

The REAL Motivation for War
The real motivation for the war?  The Parliamentary report explains:
A further insight into French motivations was provided in a freedom of information disclosure by the United States State Department in December 2015. On 2 April 2011, Sidney Blumenthal, adviser and unofficial intelligence analyst to the then United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, reported this conversation with French intelligence officers to the Secretary of State:
According to these individuals Sarkozy’s plans are driven by the following issues:
A desire to gain a greater share of Libya oil production,
Increase French influence in North Africa,
Improve his internal political situation in France,
Provide the French military with an opportunity to reassert its position in the world,
Address the concern of his advisors over Qaddafi’s long term plans to supplant France as the dominant power in Francophone Africa.
The sum of four of the five factors identified by Sidney Blumenthal equated to the French national interest. The fifth factor was President Sarkozy’s political self-interest.

Gaddafi Tried to Step Down … But the West Insisted On Violent Regime Change
Gaddafi had offered to hand over power, but the West instead wanted violent regime change. (The British report notes: “By the summer of 2011, the limited intervention to protect civilians had drifted into an opportunist policy of regime change.”)
The Parliamentary report notes that Gaddaffi may have been attempting to flee the country when he was killed:
Muammar Gaddafi might have been seeking an exit from Libya in February and March 2011. On 21 February 2011, for example, Lord Hague told reporters that he had seen credible information that Muammar Gaddafi was on his way to exile in Venezuela. Concerted action after the telephone calls conducted by Mr Blair might have led to Muammar Gaddafi’s abdication and to a negotiated solution in Libya. It was therefore important to keep the lines of communication open. However, we saw no evidence that the then Prime Minister David Cameron attempted to exploit Mr Blair’s contacts.
Political options were available if the UK Government had adhered to the spirit of Resolution 1973, implemented its original campaign plan and influenced its coalition allies to pause military action when Benghazi was secured in March 2011. Political engagement might have delivered civilian protection, regime change and reform at lesser cost to the UK and to Libya. If political engagement had been unsuccessful, the UK and its coalition allies would not have lost anything. Instead, the UK Government focused exclusively on military intervention. In particular, we saw no evidence that it tried to exploit former Prime Minister Tony Blair’s contacts and influence with the Gaddafi regime.
The U.S. and France were also hell-bent on regime change.  And the New York Times confirms that Hillary Clinton is largely responsible for the violent regime change in Libya.

Why Should We Care?
Why should we care?
Well, the House of Commons report confirms that the Libyan war has wrecked the country:
The Libyan economy generated some $75 billion of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2010. This economy produced an average annual per capita income of approximately $12,250, which was comparable to the average income in some European countries. [The former Indian representative to the U.N. notes that, before the war, Libya had less of its population in poverty than the Netherlands.  Libyans had access to free health care, education, electricity and interest-free loans, and women had great freedoms that were applauded by the U.N. Human Rights Council]. Libyan Government revenue greatly exceeded expenditure in the 2000s. … The United Nations Human Development Report 2010—a United Nations aggregate measure of health, education and income—ranked Libya as the 53rd most advanced country in the world for human development and as the most advanced country in Africa.
In 2014, the most recent year for which reliable figures are available … the average Libyan’s annual income had decreased from $12,250 in 2010 to $7,820.  Since 2014, Libya’s economic predicament has reportedly deteriorated. Libya is likely to experience a budget deficit of some 60% of GDP in 2016. The requirement to finance that deficit is rapidly depleting net foreign reserves, which halved from $107 billion in 2013 to $56.8 billion by the end of 2015. Production of crude oil fell to its lowest recorded level in 2015, while oil prices collapsed in the second half of 2014. Inflation increased to 9.2% driven by a 13.7% increase in food prices including a fivefold increase in the price of flour. The United Nations ranked Libya as the world’s 94th most advanced country in its 2015 index of human development, a decline from 53rd place in 2010.
In 2016, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs estimated that out of a total Libyan population of 6.3 million, 3 million people have been impacted by the armed conflict and political instability, and that 2.4 million people require protection and some form of humanitarian assistance. In its World Report 2016, Human Rights Watch stated that Libya is
heading towards a humanitarian crisis, with almost 400,000 people internally displaced and increasing disruption to basic services, such as power and fuel supplies. Forces engaged in the conflict continued with impunity to arbitrarily detain, torture, unlawfully kill, indiscriminately attack, abduct and disappear, and forcefully displace people from their homes. The domestic criminal justice system collapsed in most parts of the country, exacerbating the human rights crisis
People-trafficking gangs exploited the lack of effective government after 2011, making Libya a key transit route for illegal migration into Europe and the location of a migrant crisis. In addition to other extremist militant groups, ISIL emerged in Libya in 2014, seizing control of territory around Sirte and setting up terrorist training centres. Human Rights Watch documented unlawful executions by ISIL in Sirte of at least 49 people by methods including decapitation and shooting. The civil war between west and east has waxed and waned with sporadic outbreaks of violence since 2014. In April 2016, United States President Barack Obama described post-intervention Libya as a “shit show”. It is difficult to disagree with this pithy assessment.
The Parliamentary report confirms that the Libyan war – like the Iraq war – has ended up spreading terrorism around the globe:
Libyan weapons and ammunition were trafficked across North and West Africa and the Middle East.
The United Nations Panel of Experts appointed to examine the impact of Resolution 1973 identified the presence of ex-Libyan weapons in Algeria, Chad, Egypt, Gaza, Mali, Niger, Tunisia and Syria. The panel concluded that “arms originating from Libya have significantly reinforced the military capacity of terrorist groups operating in Algeria, Egypt, Mali and Tunisia.” In the 2010-15 Parliament, our predecessor Committee noted that the failure to secure the Gaddafi regime’s arms caches had led to “a proliferation of small arms and light weapons, and some heavier artillery, across North and West Africa”. It identified that Libyan small arms had apparently ended up in the hands of Boko Haram militants.
In January 2014, Egyptian Islamist insurgents used an ex-Libyan MANPAD to shoot down an Egyptian Army helicopter in the Sinai.
The FCO told us that “Political instability in Libya has led to a permissive environment for terrorist groups in which to operate, including ISIL [i.e. ISIS] affiliated groups”.  Professor Patrick Porter, Professor of Strategic Studies at the University of Exeter, agreed with the FCO analysis, stating that “a lack of effective government is creating opportunities for the Islamic State.”
ISIL has used its presence in Libya to train terrorists. For example, Sefeddine Rezgui, the gunman who killed Western holidaymakers in Tunisia in June 2015, was trained by ISIL at its base in Sabratha along with the two gunmen who killed 22 tourists at the Bardo museum in Tunis. ISIL’s plans may extend beyond terrorism. Vice-Admiral Clive Johnstone, a Royal Navy officer and NATO commander, commented that
We know they [ISIL] have ambitions to go offshore … There is a horrible opportunity in the future that a misdirected, untargeted round of a very high quality weapons system will just happen to target a cruise liner, or an oil platform, or a container ship.
And the UK report confirms that the Libyan war has created a tidal wave of refugees:
The International Organization for Migration (IOM) estimated that some 1 million migrants were present in Libya in June 2016. This estimate comprised 425,000 internally displaced Libyans, 250,000 non-Libyan migrants and 250,000 returnees. Most non-Libyan migrants travelled from West Africa, the Horn of Africa, South Asia and the Middle East. The most common countries of origin for non-Libyan migrants were Niger, Egypt, Chad, Ghana and Sudan. Between 1 January and 31 May 2016, 47,851 migrants arrived in Italy after crossing the Mediterranean from Libya. A similar number of migrants attempted the crossing over the same period in 2015. Despite the increased resources committed to Operation Triton, however, crossing the Mediterranean is becoming increasingly hazardous for migrants transiting through Libya. The IOM recorded 2,061 migrants as dead or missing between 1 January and 31 May 2016, which showed a 15% increase in fatalities compared with the same period in 2015.
In other words – just like the Iraq war – the Libyan war was based on fake intelligence, was carried out for reasons having little to do with national security or protecting civilians, destroyed a nation and created a “shit show”, spread terrorism far and wide, and created waves of refugees.

The original source of this article is Washington's Blog
Copyright © Washington's Blog, Washington's Blog, 2016


Thanks George, and GR
Current Location: Shangri La
clothcapclothcap on September 26th, 2016 04:40 pm (UTC)
Bilderberg's assault on Libya, captained by dodgy Dave
Bilderberg is a freemason gang,

Gaddafi's plan to have an African central bank owned by the African public and to trade oil tied to the planned African gold dinar threatened the petro dollar and the West's hegemony plans.

Public owned central banks are anathema to the Rothschilds and the bank cartel families. Most of the countries attacked had public owned banks.

Thr Fed Res was desperate for gold to satisfy pledges to return gold they were storing that had been sold, the Fed has no gold. (Ironic that the gold was given to the thieves for safety from thieves.)

The British intelligence services had been trying to kill Gaddafi for over 3 decades, mostly for trying to help people fighting for freedom.

Much was for the hydrocarbon corp's, to secure oil at a low price.

Attacking NATO-CIA's terrorist training grounds compromised plans for the terrorists to attack Israeli and Bilderberg selected target countries, the so-called Yinon plan for a greater Israel.
The plan was for the MENA region to be destabilised so the Israeli zionists could exert control over an area from the Nile to the Euphrates, part of the OWG zionist plan.
The minority Kurds were given Israeli help to become a fighting force as part of that plan.
Jailed by Gaddafi, human, child, sex, drugs and body parts traffickers were the first to be released from Benghazi jail by NATO-CIA's terrorists when the illegal destruction of Libya commenced. Israel is a hub for the body parts and sex traffick trade.

The CIA is a major drugs trafficker from Afghanistan. British forces protect their growers from other drug gangs. Gaddafi's success in minimising trade through Libya was a problem.

Basically GOD. Gold, oil, drugs.

Gaddafi had evidence of Sarkozy's duplicity against the French people and their law. Sarkozy was responsible for Gaddafi being murdered.

Sarkozy was making oil deals with the terrorists before the bombing had subsided.

French planes allegedly flown by Yanks bombed civilians that were protesting against the humanitarian bombing and terrorism in Benghazi.

Regime change and the elimination of the Gaddafi dynasty were the principle objectives.

More later.

Edited at 2016-09-26 04:53 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on September 26th, 2016 07:39 pm (UTC)
Who are the politician whisperers?
Bankers are Behind the Wars
Posted on April 18, 2014 by WashingtonsBlog
by Terry Robinson

All Wars Are Bankers’ Wars
Former managing director of Goldman Sachs – and head of the international analytics group at Bear Stearns in London (Nomi Prins) – notes:
Throughout the century that I examined, which began with the Panic of 1907 … what I found by accessing the archives of each president is that through many events and periods, particular bankers were in constant communication [with the White House] — not just about financial and economic policy, and by extension trade policy, but also about aspects of World War I, or World War II, or the Cold War, in terms of the expansion that America was undergoing as a superpower in the world, politically, buoyed by the financial expansion of the banking community.
In the beginning of World War I, Woodrow Wilson had adopted initially a policy of neutrality. But the Morgan Bank, which was the most powerful bank at the time, and which wound up funding over 75 percent of the financing for the allied forces during World War I … pushed Wilson out of neutrality sooner than he might have done, because of their desire to be involved on one side of the war.
Now, on the other side of that war, for example, was the National City Bank, which, though they worked with Morgan in financing the French and the British, they also didn’t have a problem working with financing some things on the German side, as did Chase …
When Eisenhower became president … the U.S. was undergoing this expansion by providing, under his doctrine, military aid and support to countries [under] the so-called threat of being taken over by communism … What bankers did was they opened up hubs, in areas such as Cuba, in areas such as Beirut and Lebanon, where the U.S. also wanted to gain a stronghold in their Cold War fight against the Soviet Union. And so the juxtaposition of finance and foreign policy were very much aligned.
So in the ‘70s, it became less aligned, because though America was pursuing foreign policy initiatives in terms of expansion, the bankers found oil, and they made an extreme effort to activate relationships in the Middle East, that then the U.S. government followed. For example, in Saudi Arabia and so forth, they get access to oil money, and then recycle it into Latin American debt and other forms of lending throughout the globe. So that situation led the U.S. government.
Indeed, JP Morgan also purchased control over America’s leading 25 newspapers in order to propagandize US public opinion in favor of US entry into World War 1.
And many big banks did, in fact, fund the Nazis.
The BBC reported in 1998:
Barclays Bank has agreed to pay $3.6m to Jews whose assets were seized from French branches of the British-based bank during World War II.
Continues http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/04/wars-bankers-wars.html
clothcapclothcap on September 26th, 2016 07:48 pm (UTC)
The illuminati Exposed By Muammar Gaddafi
Scorpilingus88 Feb 13, 2012

The truth is here! FULL LENGTH
Muammar Gaddafi was fighting against the illuminati and the reason why he was killed is here!


There is a reasonable fair use disclaimer there.

"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."

Because google just let me know they are watching me, probably how the cia, mi56, gchq and nasa know where i am.
Google is cia, as is AQ e.g. al Nusra.
clothcapclothcap on September 26th, 2016 08:01 pm (UTC)
The illuminati Bilderberg Group Documentary
boundbytruth Nov 23, 2013


Bilderberg Meeting 2016, Brexit, and the Death of Capitalism with Tony Gosling
Enter The Buzzsaw Jun 17, 2016

The 2016 Bilderberg meeting is taking place, and (coincidentally?) mass shootings and major crimes are happening. We explore the agenda of the Bilderbergers, the media manipulation of the world’s elite, and impact of the Brexit vote on the meeting. Will there be any impact for the presidential election in America? How much time do we have before a complete financial collapse? And what about those suspicions of false flag events happening in 2016? We talk to investigative journalist Tony Gosling on this uncensored Buzzsaw interview hosted by Sean Stone.

clothcapclothcap on September 26th, 2016 08:03 pm (UTC)
The Black Child Aug 4, 2016

Full list of 2nd -3rd degree level Freemasons, witches, warlocks, Confirmed Illuminatists, and globalists in attendance of the 2016 BILDERBERG conference, in DRESDEN GERMANY. This is "SHADOW GOVERNMENT" in your face!!!

clothcapclothcap on September 26th, 2016 08:20 pm (UTC)
Before the US-NATO Sponsored Dirty War, Syria was an Oasis of Civilization
A Secular Pluralist Nation
Syria’s victory will be everyone’s victory
By Mark Taliano
Global Research, September 25, 2016

Before the externally-orchestrated dirty war on Syria started with the externally-orchestrated “Arab Spring” psy op; before the “peaceful protestors” shot the unarmed Syrian security forces; and before the West armed, trained and funded the international mercenary cannibals who loot, rape, and plunder; Syria was an oasis of civilization surrounded by imperial puppet states.
Syria was prosperous, with a growing economy (link). It had food sovereignty, with a “strategic” stock of millions of tons of high quality wheat , not the “Franken-food” bio-tech variety; it had a strong central bank with no usurious IMF loans; it had a popular, reformer President; it had a mostly well-educated, secular, pluralist, forward-looking population; and it was the fourth safest country in the world.
After almost six years of illegal war launched by some of the most militarily advanced countries, and years of illegal sanctions imposed by these same criminal governments – including Canada’s puppet government – Syria is still standing strong. It still has a popular, elected President and government. And it is still a beacon of civilization.
Despite the collective punishment of sanctions and the terror of war, Syrians remain defiant. Arabi Shaher exemplified this defiance when he said,” Do whatever you like, this is our country; it will remain our country.” He, like many Syrians, sees through the lies. And his appraisal of the root cause of the war is openly shared by many Syrians: Israel.
Israel and its allies “benefit” from a balkanized and destroyed Syria. Even conflicting pipeline interests are subordinated by Israel’s perceived needs as presaged by the Oded Yinon plan. Syrians commonly report that Israel first and foremost, and its allies, are the number one agents driving the current holocaust. These interests are said to subordinate the “oil” interests. Same in Iraq.
Not surprisingly, Syria, ranked among the top five countries in terms of safety before the war, is now a war zone on about 2,000 fronts, but life goes on for all Syrians.
Despite the Western assaults on Syria, Syria still provides free health care and schooling for all in government –controlled areas, even as terrorists teach children to be “child soldiers”, and to adopt the degenerate Wahhabi ideology that violently excludes all other ideologies and religions.
All of the violence, including the daily exposure to bombings, is currently being “normalized”. Outsiders report that when a mortar bomb strikes nearby, Syrian pedestrians barely notice, and continue on their way. The trauma of the war will present challenges for years to come.
Despite, or maybe because of its challenges, Syria treats all of its inhabitants – regardless of their country of origin – as Syrians.
“Wesam”, a man born to Palestinian refugees, explains that Palestinian refugees have the same rights as Syrians. They can buy a home, they can buy land, and they can legally work in Syria. In contrast, he explains that Palestinian refugees have no rights in neighbouring Lebanon; they cannot work legally, and they cannot buy a home outside of the refugee camp.
clothcapclothcap on September 26th, 2016 08:23 pm (UTC)
Who are The Illuminati and What Do They Want? Full Explanation
† WAKE UP ‡ Oct 11, 2014

The Illuminati (plural of Latin illuminatus, "enlightened") is a name given to several groups, both real and fictitious. Historically, the name refers to the Bavarian Illuminati, an Enlightenment-era secret society founded on May 1, 1776. The society's goals were to oppose superstition, prejudice, religious influence over public life and abuses of state power, and to support women's education and gender equality. The Illuminati—along with other secret societies—were outlawed by the Bavarian ruler, Charles Theodore, with the encouragement of the Roman Catholic Church, and were permanently disbanded in 1785.[1] In the several years following, the group was vilified by conservative and religious critics who claimed that they had regrouped and were responsible for the French Revolution.
In subsequent use, "Illuminati" refers to various organisations which claim or are purported to have links to the original Bavarian Illuminati or similar secret societies, though these links are unsubstantiated. They are often alleged to conspire to control world affairs, by masterminding events and planting agents in government and corporations, in order to gain political power and influence and to establish a New World Order. Central to some of the most widely known and elaborate conspiracy theories, the Illuminati have been depicted as lurking in the shadows and pulling the strings and levers of power in dozens of novels, movies, television shows, comics, video games and music videos.
The Illuminati movement was founded on May 1, 1776 in Ingolstadt, Upper Bavaria as the Order of the Illuminati, and had an initial membership of five.[2] The founder was the Jesuit-taught Adam Weishaupt (d. 1830),[3] who was the first lay professor of canon law at the University of Ingolstadt.[1] The Order was made up of freethinkers as an offshoot of the Enlightenment and seems to have been modelled on the Freemasons.[4] Illuminati members took a vow of secrecy and pledged obedience to their superiors. Members were divided into three main classes, each with several degrees, and many Illuminati chapters drew membership from existing Masonic lodges.
The goals of the Illuminati were to eliminate superstition, prejudice and the domination of government, philosophy and science by the Roman Catholic Church, to reduce oppressive state abuses of power, and to support the education of women and encourage their treatment as intellectual equals.[1] Weishaupt's original plan was for the Order to be named the "Perfectibilists".[2] The group has also been called the Bavarian Illuminati and its ideology "Illuminism".
Many influential intellectuals and progressive politicians counted themselves as members, including Ferdinand of Brunswick and the diplomat Xavier von Zwack, who was the Order's second-in-command.[5] The Order had branches in most European countries and reportedly had around 2,000 members over a span of ten years.[1] It attracted literary men such as Johann Wolfgang von Goethe and Johann Gottfried Herder and the reigning dukes of Gotha and Weimar.
In 1777, Karl Theodor became ruler of Bavaria. He was a proponent of Enlightened Despotism and his government banned all secret societies including the Illuminati. Internal rupture and panic over succession preceded the society's downfall.[1] A government edict dated March 2, 1785 "seems to have been deathblow to the Illuminati in Bavaria". Weishaupt had fled and documents and internal correspondence, seized in 1786 and 1787, were subsequently published by the government in 1787.[6] Von Zwack's home was searched and much of the group's literature was disclosed.[5]

Links https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r97Z94xNYsk
clothcapclothcap on September 26th, 2016 08:26 pm (UTC)
Banned in Britian : The Zionist Conspiracy and the UK Government
by: matt kyle of the family: Wilks Jan 20, 2014

Link download from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEDPOPr7qiY
Thank you Peter for the knowledge.

clothcapclothcap on September 26th, 2016 08:29 pm (UTC)
And there's more
Copy of VIDEO BLOCKED WORLDWIDE + NWO Plans To Kill Billions of People + ILLUMINATI 2016 Compilation
TheHippie Moderne Apr 8, 2016

Anti Hillary Shirts http://bit.ly/HillaryforPrisonShirts
Look at the skies, at a certain volume of aluminium, the air become increasingly toxic and more deadly. Some scientists are still claiming it is to improve fuel efficiency. Just stupid scientists getting rich quick or are they really totally ignorant? It lowers the octane. And it is pollution on a massive scale.
Nagalase in vaccines has no purpose other than harm. Aluminium and mercury salts in vaccines, it is claimed they are to stimulate the immune system. Why is it given to babies that haven't developed one? Some places still put the poisonous fluoride in drinking water. Toothpaste is still toxic, the chemical is of no benefit to teeth. Scientists again, getting rich for lying? Aluminium pans are still legal.
And our traitors in government either complacently go along with the NWO plans or are actively supporting the cabal.
Feigned ignorance should not be acceptable.
clothcapclothcap on September 26th, 2016 09:17 pm (UTC)
In Britain banks don't lend currency
What happens is they pretend. The give a check and the private BoE adds the amount to the so-called national debt. With the full approval of whichever enemy regime occupies the seat of power.
clothcapclothcap on September 26th, 2016 11:03 pm (UTC)
Will Dave be asked about Syria if he isn't in SA already?
As the Syrian Ceasefire Collapses
By Tony Cartalucci
Global Research, September 26, 2016
New Eastern Outlook 25 September 2016

When Liz Sly of the Washington Post published her latest deceptive and particularly biased piece titled, “A ferocious assault on Aleppo suggests the U.S. may be wrong on Syria,” she intended to give the impression that the United States sought peace in Syria. Never mentioned were open admissions by the US that it intended for years before the conflict even began to overthrow the government in Damascus and to specifically use sectarian extremists underwritten by US ally Saudi Arabia to do so.
Nor was it mentioned that so-called “moderates” fighting in Syria have long been tied directly to designated terrorist organizations, including Al Nusra with many groups openly aligning themselves under the Al Qaeda affiliate’s banner just before a large-scale offensive was launched against Syria’s northern city of Aleppo – a battle that continues even now.
Sly and other commentators among the Western media establishment cite Syrian and Russian planes carrying out airstrikes across Aleppo as a failure of the so-called Syrian ceasefire – a ceasefire in which the US carried out a sustained attack on Syrian forces in the eastern city of Deir ez-Zor, “accidentally” giving forces of the self-proclaimed “Islamic State” (ISIS) an edge, allowing them to seize valuable strategic territory. It was also a “ceasefire” armed militants refused to honor, including groups openly armed and backed by the United States and its allies.
Current bombing in Aleppo then, is not a “failure” for the US’ attempts to mediate a ceasefire, rather a failure for the US’ attempts to perpetuate a destructive war aimed toward achieving “regime change” merely under the guise of mediating a ceasefire.
The US State Department itself admits that Al Nusra, a US State Department-designated foreign terrorist organization, is indeed operating in and around Aleppo. Even as early as April of this year, the Business Insider in its article, “The Defense Department has a new line that helps Putin and Assad in Syria,” would admit that:
US Army Col. Steve Warren, the spokesman for Operation Inherent Resolve in Iraq, was asked whether Russian airstrikes on Aleppo, the current epicenter of the war, meant that Moscow was preparing to end the cessation of hostilities (CoH) agreement between government forces and the opposition signed on February 29.
Warren responded that it was “complicated” because al-Nusra “holds Aleppo” and is not party to the agreement.
Ceasefire or not, the US, Syria, and Russia agreed that Al Nusra – along with other designated terrorist organizations – would not be spared. This fact was cited by the US itself as a pretext for why it too was carrying out airstrikes – including at Deir ez-Zor – during the supposed ceasefire.
Continues http://www.globalresearch.ca/as-the-syrian-ceasefire-collapses/5547830
clothcapclothcap on September 27th, 2016 12:38 am (UTC)
Battle for Aleppo, A Treacherous Ceasefire, and the Deir Ezzor Bombing
By Hugo Turner
Global Research, September 26, 2016
The war in Syria has reached a new level of intensity recently with a roller coaster series of events these past weeks. The SAA and their allies won a brilliant victory in Aleppo recapturing important areas that had been lost in the terrorist counter-offense at Ramouseh (See my August 2016 article Syria Libya Crimea Turkey) This meant trapping what was left of the massive terrorist force that had carried out this offensive and suffered huge losses in the process. Suddenly and unsurprisingly the American’s decided to suggest a ceasefire which the Russians foolishly accepted and which would have sacrificed many of the gains the Syrians have won on the battlefield during the epic battle of Aleppo.
In exchange all they would have received were empty promises to separate the non-existent “moderate” rebels from Al Nusra. Making deals with the lame duck Obama administration is of course completely pointless at this late stage. Hillary the Queen of Chaos will soon begin her reign and the imperialist rampage she has planned will not be restrained by any empty promises Obama and Kerry make to Russia in order to save their terrorist proxies.
This was made abundantly clear days later when someone at the pentagon (or the CIA) decided to sabotage the whole rotten deal by treacherously bombing the heroic SAA troops defending Deir Ezzor and it’s 300,000 civilians from the ISIS forces that surround them. Deir Ezzor is a symbol both of the heroism of Syria fighting on despite being surrounded by enemies as well as a guarantee that Syria will not be balkanized. Plans to turn eastern Syria into an independent terrorist state will never be successful so long as Deir Ezzor remains in government hands. This is no doubt why someone decided to bomb Deir Ezzor’s defenders just as ISIS was about to launch a major offensive. This is the second time the US has done exactly the same thing last December they also bombed Deir Ezzor just as ISIS was about to attack. Thus the american claim that this was an accident is laughable especially since this time they returned to the scenes of their treacherous crime and bombed the SAA again as they were trying to evacuate the wounded. They killed 62-80 SAA troops including a general and injured hundreds more. The brief and treacherous Ceasefire ended and now the Battle for Aleppo is being fought with renewed intensity and the SAA hope to finally be able to end the terrorist siege of the city that has starved and terrorized the cities residents for years.
The Battle for Aleppo has been dubbed the “Mother of All Battles.” Ironically the current chapter began months back when it was decided to take back the territory lost thanks to the ceasefire agreed upon last spring. The Axis of Chaos (US-NATO-Israel-GCC) took the opportunity of that “Ceasefire” to massively rearm their terrorist proxies and to flood them with anti-tank missile launchers and other new weapons. This enabled the NATO death squads to launch a major offensive in Aleppo seizing vital supply route and reversing the gains made by the SAA earlier in the year. That earlier ceasefire should have ended right then but the Russians refused to face reality holding out hope that the US would ever honor their promise to separate their smaller terrorist groups from (I refuse to call them “moderates” since there is zero difference between them and ISIS and Al Nusra) Al Nusra aka Al Qaeda in Syria. Anyways that is the charitable explanation for Russia’s behavior since in reality they know full well that the “moderates” are terrorists and the US is only interested in destroying Syria not in a peaceful settlement. Eventually they were forced to abandon this charade when it became obvious the US was only using diplomacy to buy time for their terrorist proxies to regroup.

Continues http://www.globalresearch.ca/battle-for-aleppo-a-treacherous-ceasefire-and-the-deir-ezzor-bombing/5547841
clothcapclothcap on September 27th, 2016 05:34 pm (UTC)
Not just Libya was-is an illegal war of aggression commissioned by Bilderberg
RTP is a right used by NATO-CIA, the US, Britain and Cameron knows who-else to piss on the UN, international law and taxpayers beyond the murder of civilians for the benefit of private interests and the megalomaniacs. E.g.

Report: Syrian Government Says It Has Audio Recording Of
U.S. Conversation With ISIS Before Attack On Syrian Military

By Brandon Turbeville Activist Post
Posted at Washington's blog September 27, 2016

According to a report from Russian news agency, Sputnik, Syrian intelligence possesses an audio recording of a conversation that took place between the United States military and ISIS fighters shortly before the U.S. airstrikes on Syrian government positions in Deir el-Zour.
Likewise, the speaker of the People’s Council of Syria stated as much on Monday.
“The Syrian Army intercepted a conversation between the Americans and Daesh before the air raid on Deir ez-Zor,” said Hadiya Khalaf Abbas as quoted by Al Mayadeen.
These statements appear to suggest that the conversation recorded by the Syrian government will definitively show coordination between the U.S. and ISIS against the Syrian military.
Indeed, during her visit to Iran, the head of the Syrian Parliament stated that, after the coalition airstrikes on Syrian government troops, the U.S. military directed the ISIS attack on the Syrian army that saw the terrorist organization temporarily gain territory surrounding Deir el-Zour.
If the claims of the Syrian officials quoted above are true, then we strongly encourage Syria to release the audio recordings for the world to hear.
That the United States has been responsible for the creation, support, direction, arming, and facilitation of ISIS has long been known in informed circles. However, an audio recording of cooperation between the U.S. and ISIS would effectively drive the last nail in the coffin of American credibility any semblance of honesty and logic in is “war on terror” that is, in reality, nothing but a “war of terror” against the world’s people.
Keep reading http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/09/report-syrian-government-says-audio-recording-u-s-conversation-isis-attack-syrian-military.html#more-61516

Edited at 2016-09-27 06:24 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on September 27th, 2016 07:22 pm (UTC)
Aiding terrorists. From the mouth of devil's spawn

After Being Named Terrorists, Syrian “Al Qaeda” Group Says America Still Helps, But Not Enough

Moon of Alabama by Baran Hines
Activist Post September 27, 2016

A battlefield leader for the “Syrian Al Qaeda” terrorist group Jahbat al-Nusra claimed the United States is still helping the group fight against Syrian government forces, in an interview with major German newspaper Kölner Stadtanzeiger. Abu al-Ezz, a jihadist commander fighting in the strategic city of Aleppo, said that “the Americans stand on our side” because the US and its allies still support the group with weapons, money, and logistics. The candid statements were quoted by reporter Jürgen Todenhöfer who traveled to Syria for the seventh time during the proxy war which has raged since 2011.
Al Nusra, commonly known as Syria’s branch of Al Qaeda, was declared a terrorist group by the US, United Nations and others in November 2012 after 1 year of terrorist operations. Before this terrorist designation, al-Nusra was supported by the United States as part of what American officials called the legitimate opposition groups fighting against the government of President Bashar al-Assad.
Abu al-Ezz specifically mentioned the group receives money from US allies including Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait. Al-Ezz also said Israel supports al-Nusra because Israel is at war with Syria and Hezbollah.
Al-Ezz then noted that al-Nusra and Islamic State (IS) were allies but IS was then used for political and strategic purposes by western countries. “It became clear to us that most of their leaders work with secret security services,” said al-Ezz. Similar suspicions are also widely believed in Iraq as reported last year by the Wall Street Journal. The rise of al-Nusra and Islamic State was a consequence predicted by a 2012 intelligence report leaked to the media in 2015.
When asked how the US supports al-Nusra, al-Ezz first said it was indirect because it was through the support of US allies Saudi Arabia and Qatar in the form of cash payments, weapons, and supplies. However, he then confirmed that al-Nusra received American-made TOW missiles directly from Western intelligence officials including Turkey, Israel, and the United States.
“It is through the American ‘TOW’ that we have the situation in some regions under control,” al-Ezz noted. He then said this is not enough, and that more advanced weaponry is needed.
“We will fight until the downfall of the regime. We will fight Russia and the West because the West does not stand on our side. The West only sends us mujahedin, it facilitates the way of those fighters. Why doesn’t the West support us properly? We have many fighters from Germany, France, Great Britain, America, from all western countries,” al-Ezz said.
The Syrian war ceasefire negotiated by the US and Russia is being ignored by some of the major opposition groups and those groups are allied with al-Nusra, according to al-Ezz. He also confirmed that the ceasefire has been used by the groups to recover and prepare for the remaining battles of the war.
Click here to see the full interview translated in English or view.
Baran Hines writes for ActivistPost.com. He is the founder of WTFRLY.com, where you can read more of his work. This article may be reposted in part or in full with author attribution and source link.

Brits are backing the US in Syria. Or vice versa.

Now the al Nusra have a lobbyist. Is he a Langley graduate?

Edited at 2016-09-28 03:35 am (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on September 28th, 2016 03:15 am (UTC)
Watch Samantha Power Defend Al Qaeda and ISIS in Syria During her Security Council Speech
By Alex Christoforou
Global Research, September 26, 2016
The Duran 26 September 2016

The internationally recognized, legitimate government of Syria is on the verge of freeing Aleppo from ISIS and Al Nusra. This would be a decisive blow to the US/Saudi/Qatar plan to overthrow Assad, and would constitute a near final nail in the coffin of Obama’s disastrous regime change policy in Syria.
As defeat of Al Qaeda and ISIS in Aleppo nears, the US government, and its controlled main stream media is on a propaganda information war offensive of unprecedented nature, directed at discrediting Russia.
Yesterday The Duran reported that Russia has called the US’s bluff on Syria, and with no other option aside from all out war with Russia, America has resigned itself to information warfare, that Russia and Syria will surely brush aside.
It is this US awareness of its own impotence as its Jihadi proteges in Aleppo face total defeat which accounts for all the angry rhetoric and cranking up of atrocity stories we have been seeing over the last week. These have now culminated in some typically furious denunciations of Russia by US ambassador Samantha Power on Sunday’s 25th September 2016 at the UN Security Council, over the course of which she actually accused Russia of “barbarism”.
Make no mistake about it, the Syrian army (with support from Russia and Iran) are close to a military victory in Aleppo. The simple fact that Power has given the below speech of lies and hypocrisy during an emergency UN Security Council session, is a clear indication that Al Qaeda is close to defeat, and ISIS is about to be crushed…and this crushes Power, and her neo-liberal/neocon gods of war.
The hypocrisy in Power’s speech is laughable as it is predictable. Listening to Power is listening to diplomacy at its worst.

Here are a few selected lines delivered from a US diplomat, who is seeing her ISIS fueled war go up in smoke, and our corrections to the inaccuracies stated.
“Instead of pursuing peace, Russia and Assad make war.”
Let us fix this statement for Power: “Instead of pursuing peace, The US and its ISIS/Al Qaeda jihadists make war.”
“White Helmets are first responders.”
We refer Power to the “White Helmets Hoax” post on The Duran. White Helmets is definitely not a first responder. Think of White Helmets as Al Qaeda PR in Syria.
“A month ago the world was shocked by the dazed stare of five-year-old Omran Daqneesh, as he sat at the back of an ambulance as his home was bombed. He was rescued by White Helmets.”
Is Power referring to the infamous picture taken by photojournalist Mahmoud Raslan who, aside from being associated with White Helmets, is connected to Al Nusra / Al Qaeda, and was part of the band of “moderates” who beheaded a Palestinian boy days before snapping the Aleppo boy photos.
“Russia has consistently said one thing and done the other.”
Let us fix this statement for Power: “The United States has consistently said one thing and done the other.”
Like saying for over eight months that they would seperate “moderate” rebels from jihadists…we are still waiting.
Russia on the other had has been nothing but consistent. It was invited by the UN internationally recognized, legitimate government of Syria (unlike the US), and has stated time and again that it sees no difference between America’s shades of terrorists, and will do what it must to keep Syria in one piece, without a black flag over damascus.
I couldn't watch more than 7 minutes. She made my stomach lurch.
clothcapclothcap on September 28th, 2016 04:19 am (UTC)
Deutsche Bank Plunge Sparks Talk of “Lehman Moment”
By Nick Beams
Global Research, September 27, 2016
World Socialist Web Site 27 September 2016

Shares in Deutsche Bank plunged yesterday in the wake of reports in a German news magazine that Chancellor Angela Merkel had ruled out assistance to the bank following the imposition by the US Department of Justice (DoJ) of a $14 billion fine over its dealings in the sub-prime mortgage market leading up to the financial crisis of 2008.
On Friday Focus, a weekly magazine based in Munich, reported that Merkel had categorically stated the government would not step in, citing unidentified government officials and that the chancellor had made her views known in discussions with the bank’s CEO, John Cryan.
Deutsche Bank shares plunged 7 percent, falling to their lowest level since 1983 despite a statement by Cryan that the bank had not sought government assistance in its negotiations with the DoJ. Shares in Deutsche Bank, which has been troubled by persistent reports about its financial ill health, have fallen 55 percent over the past year.
According to a report in the Financial Times, on a market capitalisation basis it now ranks 78th among global banks, “just below Malaysia’s Public Bank and Brazil’s Itausa Investimentos Itau.”
Last month, the International Monetary Fund described Deutsche Bank as the weakest link in the global financial system and its position has only worsened since then with the imposition of the DoJ fine.
The fine imposed on it was triple the amount that Deutsche Bank had put aside for that purpose. If paid in full it would, in the words of a BBC report, “put the bank’s finances under life-threatening pressure” as it is only worth $18 billion. Even if the amount were half it would still pose a “serious problem.”
The problems for Deutsche Bank have been growing all year and its financial position raised concerns during the period of market turbulence in January and February, when bank shares fell sharply worldwide. In February, Cryan issued a statement to reassure staff and investors that its position was “rock solid.”
Since then, however, its position has only got worse as efforts to restore profitability by cutting costs have proved unsuccessful. Then came the DoJ fine. It has sparked fears that businesses that were supposed to provide it with a boost will not go ahead because counterparties will be reluctant to deal with the bank and it will start to lose revenue because of the bad news surrounding it.
As the British Daily Telegraph commented, if the German government does not stand behind the bank, then other banks and financial institutions will start to be very nervous in dealing with it. “As we know from 2008, once confidence starts to evaporate, a bank is in big, big trouble” and “if Deutsche goes down, it is looking increasingly likely that it will take Merkel with it – and quite possibly the euro as well.”
Like a flock of vultures, hedge funds have been circling with a number of them shorting Deutsche Bank shares in the expectation they will rapidly fall.
Read on http://www.globalresearch.ca/deutsche-bank-plunge-sparks-talk-of-lehman-moment/5548069
No good smiling over spilt milk. 'They're' a done job. The question was always, since the can was first kicked, whom will be first?

What must not be allowed to happen is for them to retain control of currency issuance in any form. . Politicians must be forced to abstain from giving them one penny of public's funds. Nor gold.
The pols cannot be trusted. None of them.
clothcapclothcap on September 28th, 2016 05:21 am (UTC)

The only way the banksters, arms dealers, oilies and megalomaniac agenda drivers can lose is if there is no war.
Except there's such a thing as a people's court. There's one in Belgium that reclaimed some land from the occupiers in Canada, forced the Queen to abstain from going there. Forced the last pope to resign and lit a fuse across Canada and the US. With just a few people and local support and of course common law. Time grows short. The zio's and the freemason illuminati are losing badly, their options are close to ground zero.
They're trying to goad Putin into a pre-emptive strike.

Edited at 2016-09-28 05:33 am (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on September 28th, 2016 10:46 am (UTC)
Russia Publishes Radar Data Implicating Ukraine in MH-17 Shoot-Down
By Alexander Mercouris
Global Research, September 27, 2016
The Duran 26 September 2016

During what was apparently a joint presentation by the Russian missile manufacturer Almaz Antey and the Russian military in Moscow, raw radar data was apparently released which allegedly disproves Ukrainian claims that MH17 was shot down by a BUK missile launched from militia controlled territory, and specifically from the town of Snizhnoe from where the Ukrainians claim the BUK missile was launched.
The data thereby supposedly confirms that only the Ukrainians could have shot down MH-17.
Apparently the data does not identify the missile launch point or make it possible to identify the type of missile that shot MH17 down.
However Almaz Antey has previously identified the missile as an early generation BUK missile of the sort it says is no longer used by the Russian military, and it claims to have identified the launch point by scientific tests as the village of Zaroshchenskoe.
Satellite data previously published by the Russian military shows a BUK missile launcher belonging to the Ukrainian military near Zaroshchenskoe shortly before MH17 was shot down. The authenticity of this data has been repeatedly challenged, but it has up to now consistently stood up to independent examination.
There is an exhaustive investigation undertaken by someone who identifies himself merely as “Andrew”, but who appears to be based in the US, on the basis of Ukrainian television reports, satellite data and contemporaneous social media messages.
Andrew has confirmed beyond reasonable doubt that on the day of the tragedy Zaroshchenskoe was under Ukrainian military control, and that there is a high probability that a Ukrainian BUK missile launcher was indeed located there.
Vid, map, photo, more
The Russians effectively say so long and thanks for all the fish. Bilderberg and fascist zio luciferians etc are left to assign blame to each other. Of course the lying sub humans will just turn off media coverage, victims' families will be left uncompensated all for the sake of profit and revenge.
Soros is approx 86. Why doesn't he do the decent thing? Perhaps if enough David Icke types could wish hard enough...

Edited at 2016-09-28 10:53 am (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on September 28th, 2016 10:54 am (UTC)
9/11 Truth 15 Years Later: The Toxic Content of WTC Dust and Debris
Part Three. Jenna Orkin on EPA Lies and the Legacy of 9/11 Investigator Michael Ruppert. Global Research News Hour Episode 152
By Michael Welch
Global Research, September 27, 2016

“Results from our monitoring of air quality and drinking water conditions in both New York and near the Pentagon show that the public in these areas is not being exposed to excessive levels of asbestos or other harmful substances… Given the scope of the tragedy from last week, I am glad to reassure the people of New York and Washington, D.C., that their air is safe to breathe and their water is safe to drink.” -statement from then EPA Administrator Christine Whitman (September 19, 2001) [1]
“In that cloud of dust people were breathing all sorts of stuff. I spat stuff like oatmeal, full of silica and glass fibers…I think this is criminal…When you keep this information from the public and the workers, you lie to them. The government should be ashamed of themselves for not telling us what we were exposed to.” Israel “Izzy” Miranda, New York firefighter and EMS union leader, who arrived at Ground Zero shortly after the first tower collapsed. (source: Sierra Club) [2]
On the weekend of September 11, 2016 Christine Todd Whitman, head of the Environmental Protection Agency during the 9/11 attacks and the weeks that followed, admitted in an interview with the Guardian that the information she relayed about the air around Ground Zero being safe to breathe was mistaken and offered an apology to all the victims who were sick and dying as a result of that advice.
“I’m very sorry that people are sick…I’m very sorry that people are dying and if the EPA and I in any way contributed to that, I’m sorry. We did the very best we could at the time with the knowledge we had.”
She added:
“Every time it comes around to the anniversary I cringe, because I know people will bring up my name, they blame me, they say that I lied and that people died because I lied, [they say] people have died because I made a mistake.”[3]
So the former EPA head admitted she was wrong but denied she deliberately lied to the public.
There is however overwhelming evidence that this government agency had reason to suspect the air in the vicinity of the World Trade Center following the attacks was not only toxic, and deliberately misled the public about the quality of the air.
More http://www.globalresearch.ca/911-truth-15-years-later-jenna-orkin-on-epa-lies-and-the-legacy-of-911-investigator-michael-ruppert/5548047
clothcapclothcap on September 28th, 2016 11:15 am (UTC)
More from GR
Video: Lawsuits against the Neocons: Class Action against Hillary’s DNC, War Crimes Civil Lawsuit against George W. Bush Et Al…
Lawsuits Challenge American Status Quo
By James Corbett
Global Research, September 27, 2016

The Neocon war hawks have embroiled the United States in illegal wars of aggression around the globe, and with the possibility of a Clinton presidency, that reign of terror looks set to continue.
But a series of lawsuits are challenging the neocons in the courts and threatening to derail that agenda. This is the GRTV Backgrounder on Global Research TV.

US-Russia Diplomacy in Crisis: “Something Very Serious Transpired” Over Syria, “Behind the Scenes”
By Sputnik
Global Research, September 27, 2016
Sputnik 27 September 2016

The current “level of violence in verbal attacks” on Russia at the UN is unprecedented,” Gilbert Doctorow, European Coordinator for the American Committee for East West Accord told Radio Sputnik, adding that this seems to indicate that something grave must have happened between the two countries with regard to Syria behind the scenes.
The United States and Russia have lashed at each other over the Syrian conflict, with Washington and Moscow trading blows at the urgent UN Security Council meeting on Sunday.
US Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power, who has never been known “for her diplomatic talent,” as Doctorow put it, accused Russia of “barbarism” in Syria. She added that Moscow and Damascus ostensibly “make war” instead of “pursuing peace.” She also blamed both governments for “bombing the humanitarian convoys, hospitals and first responders who are trying desperately to keep people alive.”
“We reached a new low,” the analyst said.
Doctorow described the US’ behavior at the UN as “rude.” He also noted that such rhetoric has been absent from the UN Security Council meetings for decades. We have not seen “this level of open hostility and direct name calling” since 1985.
More http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-russia-diplomacy-in-crisis-something-very-serious-transpired-over-syria-behind-the-scenes/5548073

Dangerous Crossroads: Both Russia and America Prepare for Nuclear War?
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, September 27, 2016

Barely acknowledged by the Western media. both Russia and America are “rearming” their nuclear weapons systems. While the US is committed to a multibillion dollar modernization project, Russia is largely involved in a “cost-effective” restructuring process which consists in decommissioning parts of its land-based ICBM arsenal (Topol) and replacing it with the more advanced Yars RS-24 system, developed in 2007.
While a new arms race has “unofficially” been launched, the US modernization process pertains to the all three legs of the triad system, -i.e land based airborne and submarine launched atomic missiles. It is also coupled with the development of the B61-12 tactical bomb to be deployed in Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Belgium and Turkey.
Rest assured, the B61-12 is a “mini-nuke” with an explosive capacity of up to four Hiroshima bombs. It is categorized as a “defensive” (peace-making) weapon for use in the conventional war theater. According to scientists on contract to the Pentagon, the B61-11 and 12 (bunker buster bombs with nuclear warheads) are “harmless to civilians because the explosion is underground”.
The nuclear triad modernization project is at the expense of US tax payers. It requires the redirection of federal revenues from the financing of “civilian” expenditure categories (including health, education, infrastructure etc) to the “war economy”. It’s all for a good cause: “peace and security”.
War is “Good for Business”
More http://www.globalresearch.ca/dangerous-crossroads-both-russia-and-america-prepare-for-nuclear-war/5548074
clothcapclothcap on September 28th, 2016 11:18 am (UTC)
US-NATO is Reviewing ‘Nuclear Playbook’ to Deter ‘Terrible Attacks’ by Russia – Pentagon Chief
By RT News
Global Research, September 27, 2016
RT News 27 September 2016

The Pentagon chief put Russia on par with North Korea when he spoke about threats faced by the US and its allies, and the need to invest billions into refreshing NATO’s nuclear playbook to integrate conventional and unconventional deterrence methods.
Addressing US servicemen, missile units and B-52 crews at Minot Base, Defense Secretary Ash Carter stated that the US and its allies had not built any new nuclear weapons or delivery systems in the last 25 years – and said that American nuclear forces must be ready to engage in a possible nuclear confrontation with Russia.
“Russia has long been a nuclear power, but Moscow’s recent saber-rattling and building of new nuclear weapons systems raises serious questions about its leaders’ commitment to strategic stability, their regard for long-established accords of using nuclear weapons and whether they respect the profound caution that Cold War era leaders showed in respect to brandishing their nuclear weapons,” the Pentagon chief claimed.
More http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-nato-is-reviewing-nuclear-playbook-to-deter-terrible-attacks-by-russia-pentagon-chief/5548059

Russia Prepares for War, Plans to Move Thermonuclear ICBMs to Border
By Kurt Nimmo
Global Research, September 27, 2016
Another Day in the Empire 25 September 2016

Last week TASS reported Russia’s western-most ICBM division will be rearmed with the RS-24 Yars missile system. Yars is a MIRV-equipped, thermonuclear, intercontinental ballistic missile that can reportedly carry up to 10 independently targetable warheads. The ICBM RS-24 Yars constitutes the backbone of Russia’s strategic missile force.
“The westernmost strategic missile force division in the Tver region will soon begin to be rearmed with the missile system Yars. It will be a sixth strategic missile division where the newest mobile ground-based missile complexes will replace the intercontinental ballistic missile Topol,” Sergey Karakayev, the commander of Russia’s Strategic Missile Force told the news agency.
The Russians claim the deployment is in response to NATO installing a US anti-missile system in Eastern Europe in violation of previous Russian-US arms treaties. The United States has made the outrageous claim its missile system is designed to respond to threats from Iran.
“Now, after the deployment of those anti-missile system elements, we’ll be forced to think about neutralizing developing threats to Russia’s security,” Russian President Vladimir Putin said in May.
Putin added that the US anti-missile systems currently in place in Romania and soon in Poland can be easily repurposed to fire short and mid-range missiles.
clothcapclothcap on September 29th, 2016 07:45 pm (UTC)
Talking of war beneficiaries
These 13 Corporations Are “Big Pharma”: Their History, Crimes, and Products
Activist Post September 26, 2016
By Cassius Kamarampi

This is a preview to the Era of Wisdom documentary “Toddlers on Adderall: History of “Big Pharma” and the Major Players,” to be released December 28, 2016.
Written and directed by Cassius Kamarampi, narrated by Josh Mur. Music by Cassius Kamarampi.
Transcript (video below):
In our society, we often correlate legality with safety. We use household products, spray pesticides, and religiously consume drugs such as ritalin, adderall, oxycontin, and prozac.
We consume all of this, but how many know who made the drugs, and where the corporations came from? Who produces the chemicals we trust on a daily basis?
These 13 corporations tend to be a blind spot in our understanding of history.
Tens of thousands of American toddlers are being prescribed Amphetamine; a result of this blind spot.
Neos Therapeutics is responsible for candy flavored children’s Amphetamine, sold as Adzenys. Shire created Adderall.
An understanding of Big Pharma is conducive to a big picture understanding of the world and power itself: it is an essential puzzle piece in understanding disease, hegemony, and health.
For instance, we
Purdue Pharma was created in 1892 New York. They are arguably responsible for the epidemic of opioid addiction in the United States, producing hydrocodone, OxyContin, fentanyl, codeine, hydromorphone, and oxycodone.
Novartis is the world’s largest pharmaceutical corporation by revenue, headquartered in Basel, Switzerland, a 1996 merger between Ciba-Geigy and Sandoz.
Novartis is responsible for many drugs, from Ritalin to LSD.
Novartis has a long criminal record. They are known for animal cruelty, from drilling the heads of cats open, to experimenting on primates.
Sandoz polluted the Rhine River in the 1986 Sandoz Chemical Spill.
Novartis owned Syngenta, one of the world’s largest producers of pesticides and GM seeds. Recently. Syngenta was sold to the Chinese government. State-owned “Chem-China” is now one of the world’s largest producers of pesticides and GM seeds.
Novartis coerces entire countries into banning cheaper, generic versions of their cancer drugs: namely Colombia. Leaked letters revealed Novartis’ control over the Senate Finance Committee, as Colombia was warned their 450$ million dollars in “Peace Colombia” money would be in jeopardy if they did not crack down on generic versions of the cancer drug “Gleevec.”
Eli Lily was created in 1876 Indianapolis. They are responsible for Prozac, anti-psychotics, cancer causing bovine growth hormones in cows, and cancer drugs to treat the cancer they may have given people through IGF-1, a product of rBGH-treated cows.
Created in 1849 New York, Pfizer is responsible for Zoloft, Xanax, SSRI antidepressants, Viagra, Advil, Chapstick, Robitussin, and more. In 2014, Pfizer spent 2.6 million dollars paying off politicians.
The Nuremberg Trials of Nazi Germany produced three corporations on this list: German chemical cartel IG Farben was split into Bayer, BASF, and Hoechst (currently Sanofi). IG Farben was Hitler’s largest financial backer, and was vital to the extermination of millions in Auschwitz, supplying the poison gas and more.
Bayer was founded in 1863 Germany. They invented mustard gas and pioneered chemical weapons for Germany. This painting of chemical warfare was commissioned for the breakfast hall of Bayer’s Carl Duisberg: he ate breakfast looking at a painting of chemical warfare.
Bayer merged into IG Farben Trust in December 1925, to become Bayer again after the Nuremberg trials.
Today, Bayer is known for giving thousands of children AIDS through tainted hemophiliac medicine, while internal documents prove they knew it was contaminated.
Bayer bought Monsanto in 2016 to create the world’s largest seed and pesticide company.
Oh, and they also made aspirin.
Sanofi, who absorbed Hoechst from IG Farben, is the world’s largest manufacturer of vaccines. They also produce the allergy medicine Allegra.
Severe psychosis in a BBC reporter following Sanofi’s Yellow Fever vaccine is just the tip of the iceberg with this corporation.
More http://www.activistpost.com/2016/09/13-corporations-big-pharma-history-crimes-products.html
clothcapclothcap on September 29th, 2016 07:52 pm (UTC)
Russia Today
Moscow says US failed to separate rebels from terrorists in response to US ultimatum over Syria

Int’l investigators allowed Ukraine to fabricate MH17 evidence – Russia

MH17 shot down by rebels using Buk system brought from Russia – int’l investigators

600 more US troops to be deployed to Iraq to recapture Mosul – Pentagon chief

News line
Senate poised to override Obama’s veto of 9/11 legislation
clothcapclothcap on September 29th, 2016 08:05 pm (UTC)
[KR972] Keiser Report: Houdini’s Magic Tricks in Modern Economy & Politics
Posted on September 28, 2016 by Stacy Herbert
We discuss what Houdini could teach us about the modern economy and politics, from the totally fake vanishing acts like the Libor charity funds in the UK to the very real entertaining extravaganzas like the Trump campaign. In the second half, Max and Stacy talk to Karl Gray (@paradimeshift) about his investments in Aid:Tech and how the blockchain is actually being deployed in the real world to solve transparency issues.

Read more at http://www.maxkeiser.com/2016/09/kr972-keiser-report-houdinis-magic-tricks-in-modern-economy-politics/
clothcapclothcap on September 29th, 2016 08:06 pm (UTC)
Op-Edge: Who is rattling ‘nuclear saber’ in Europe? Ambassador's view
Dr Alexander Yakovenko, Russian Ambassador to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Deputy foreign minister (2005-2011). Follow him on Twitter @Amb_Yakovenko
RT 27 Sep, 2016

Some in the West have recently ratcheted up their rhetoric about Russia’s “nuclear saber-rattling” in Europe. Indeed, the USSR did deploy nuclear weapons in the then countries of the Warsaw Pact.
However, it was in response to the deployment of similar US arms in NATO countries, and later the Soviet nukes were completely withdrawn from Europe. Moreover, Russia has reduced its arsenal of non-strategic nuclear weapons (NSNW) by three-quarters, transferred them back home and stored within its own territory.
And what was the US’ answer to such unprecedented operation? Not only have the US continued keeping its NSNW in Europe, but have also engaged actively in their modernization with an eye on expanding their offensive capabilities. American B61 nuclear bombs have obtained a completely new capacity as precision nuclear weapons capable of striking underground targets more effectively.
Under the pretext of limiting the “collateral damage” the capacity of modernized nuclear weapons will be somewhat reduced, which might indicate the intention to use these weapons in densely populated areas. It is also planned to update delivery vehicles in Europe by purchasing new American F-35 fighter jets that are “invisible” to radar systems and capable of striking targets in Russian territory. In general, the modernization would mean a qualitative change in the characteristics of the US nuclear arsenal in Europe that is fraught with a dangerous lowering of the “nuclear threshold.”
Read more
U.S. Air Force technicians perform an electrical check on an LGM-30F Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile in its silo at Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri. © Tech. Sgt. Bob Wickley / USAF NATO is reviewing ‘nuclear playbook’ to deter ‘terrible attacks’ by Russia – Pentagon chief
As to the so-called NATO’s “joint nuclear missions,” including joint nuclear planning and regular exercises on rehearsing the use of nuclear weapons. These drills involve non-nuclear states providing aircraft carriers, crews, airfields and other ground infrastructure. Such acts flagrantly violate key articles 1 and 2 of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
The NATO Strategic Concept, adopted at the summit in Lisbon in November 2010, consolidates the nuclear backbone of the alliance’s military policy. At the summit in Chicago, in May 2012, NATO officially declared itself a “nuclear alliance”, which will remain so “as long as nuclear weapons exist.” There is no such thing in international law, which recognizes only nuclear states.
The Europeans are subjected to a propaganda campaign over a “Russian nuclear threat”, although the Russian military doctrine clearly states that nuclear weapons can hypothetically be used only in response to an attack with weapons of mass destruction or to a large-scale aggression that would threaten the very existence of our country. None of these scenarios implies any “aggression” on our part. So, who is actually rattling one’s saber in Eastern Europe?
clothcapclothcap on September 29th, 2016 08:14 pm (UTC)
Russia Insider
Syria: Conflicting Reports, Dubious Witnesses Challenge Convoy Attack Case
Moon of Alabama (Moon of Alabama) Mon, Sep 26

Sure There Is a 'Military Solution' to Syrian War
Patrick Lang (Sic Semper Tyrannis) Mon, Sep 26

How 'The Syrian Campaign' Faked Its '70% Fleeing Assad' Refugee Poll
Tim Anderson (Global Research) Mon, Sep 26

Latest Syria Trainwreck Shows the Obama Administration Is in a State of Confused Agony
The Saker (The Vineyard of the Saker) Mon, Sep 26

Lavrov Draws a Line: No More Unilateral Concessions From Russia and Syria (Video)
Dean Parker No More Mr. Congeniality Mon, Sep 26

Rebels Switch off Water for 1.5 Million People. Media: 'Aleppo Without Water After Syrian, Russian Strikes'
Adam Hill Mon, Sep 26

Excellent Weekly Audio Podcast About EU Migrant Crisis (Europa Report - Fash The Nation)
Richard Brandt Mon, Sep 26

Samantha Power: Russians Are Barbarians, Do Not Deserve a Seat at the UNSC
Mark Nicholas Diplomacy Harvard-Style Mon, Sep 26

'Bellingcat' Just Proved Russians Didn't Hit the UN Convoy in Syria
Patrick Armstrong (Sic Semper Tyrannis) Tue, Sep 27

Washington Post Thinks Russian Radio, Not NATO Bombing, Turned Serbs Against the Alliance
Bryan MacDonald (RT) Tue, Sep 27

War on Syria Is Libya War Redux. No Wonder US Press Is Ignoring Evidence the Original Was Built on Massive Lies
James Carden (Consortium News) Tue, Sep 27

Syria Tells UN Its Peace Plan Is Winning the War
Edith M. Lederer (Associated Press) Tue, Sep 27

US-Backed 'Moderate' Aleppo Rebels Film Themselves Beheading a Boy
Jason Ditz (Antiwar.com)

Having Saved Syria, Putin Now Looking to Do the Same to Libya
Azeem Ibrahim (Al Arabiya) 18,280

Soros Leaks: The Most Important Story You're Not Hearing
Hannibal Bateman (Radix)

US Press Would Rather Decry 'Russia Today' Than Render It Irrelevant by Doing Its Job
Adam Johnson (The Nation)

U.S. Invades Syria, And Warns Russia
Eric Zuesse

The Russians Have Already Shot Down Numerous US Drones Violating Crimean Airspace (Video)
Moses Birch

Ex-Russian Colonel: Why Moscow Has Not Succeeded in Syria After 1 Year of Involvement
Mikhail Khodarenok (Gazeta.ru - Russian news site) Tue, Sep 27
clothcapclothcap on September 29th, 2016 08:15 pm (UTC)

PR Firms, Social Media and Fake Rescuers: How Propaganda for War on Syria Works
Rick Sterling (Consortium News) Tue, Sep 27 3,22325

Not Your Typical VP: Biden Has Been a Key Architect of the Ukraine Mess, the New Cold War
Brian Cloughley (CounterPunch) Tue, Sep 27

The Coming Russian Jihad: Why Moscow Needs ISIS, al-Qaeda Defeated Yesterday
Leon Aron (War On the Rocks) Tue, Sep 27

5th Episode of MH-17 Inquiry: 'It Was a MiG' (Video)
Enrico Braun

Russian Foreign Ministry Responds to US Accusations: 'The Real Barbarism Is What You Did In Libya and Iraq'
(Zero Hedge) Wed, Sep 28

MH-17 All Over Again: Kerry Rushes to Judgment on Syria Aid Convoy
Robert Parry (Consortium News) Wed, Sep 28

US Propaganda Machine Now in Overdrive to Fight Russia in Syria
Joachim Hagopian (LewRockwell.com) Wed, Sep 28

Why Again Is the American Empire the 'Good Guys'?
Neil Clark (Sputnik - Russian news agency) Wed, Sep 28

BREAKING: India Bombs Pakistan in Retaliation for Uri Terror Attack
Matthew Allen 9 hours ago

Russia's 'Flying Tank' May Be Back in Action in Syria -- Now With a Nifty MANPAD Jammer
Mark Nicholas The Su-25 Wed, Sep 28
All those US tax dollars wated.

US Deep State Threatens Russia: Back Down or We Flood Syria With MANPADs
Dean Parker Best Idea Ever Wed, Sep 28

Did Hillary Just Threaten to Attack Russia?
Justin Raimondo (Antiwar.com)

Four Reasons Why Russian Cooperation with the USA in Syria Fails
Mikhail Demurin (RIA Novosti) 8 hours ago

The New MH-17 Report Is Troubled by Gaps, Selective Use of Evidence, Questionable Interpretations
Robert Parry (Consortium News) 7 hours ago

US and EU Sanctions Are Punishing Ordinary Syrians and Crippling Aid Work, UN Report Reveals
Rania Khalek (The Intercept) 7 hours ago

US Sends Its Maidan Hitman Geoffrey Pyatt to IMF-Ravaged Greece
Phil Butler (New Eastern Outlook)

MH17 Inquiry's Final Episode: 'Who Benefits?' (Video)
(Off Guardian)

'Nobody Believes in It. Everyone on the Ground Knows They Are Jihadis.' -- US Special Forces Hate Their Syria Mission
Dean Parker

US Outcry Over Syria... Tears Followed by NATO Bombs
Finian Cunningham (Strategic Culture Foundation)

Samantha Power: Russians Are Barbarians, Do Not Deserve a Seat at the UNSC
Mark Nicholas