Log in

No account? Create an account
09 May 2016 @ 06:05 pm
Setting the record straight: N.A., M.E. and N.E. Who What Where  

I made this a post as the character limit in the comment where I first mentioned the article series meant the revelations about the Cameron regime-instigated destruction of Libya, including the degree of Qatari involvement, went unadvertised.

Op-Edge: The Gulf monarchies: Made in Britain (for a purpose): Part two
Dan Glazebrook
RT 5 May, 2016

The Gulf monarchies are the main facilitators of Britain’s support for sectarian death squads in the Middle East. This should be no surprise because Britain brought them to power precisely because of their sectarianism.

"What we want is not a united Arabia: but a weak and disunited Arabia split up into little principalities so far as possible under our suzerainty, but incapable of coordinated action against us” - so claimed a memorandum written by the Foreign Department of the British Government of India in 1915.

A more succinct summary of British policy towards the Arab world – both then and now - would be hard to find.

As we outlined in the first piece in this series, Britain’s weapon of choice in its attempt to destroy the independent regional powers of West Asia and North Africa in recent years has been its sponsorship of violent sectarianism. Its support for racist death squads in Libya not only achieved the destruction of the Libyan state, but also brought terrorism to every country in the region from Egypt, Tunisia and Algeria to Chad, Nigeria and Cameroon; whilst its training and equipping of death squads in Syria has been directly responsible for the rise of ISIS.

These forces, by setting Sunni against Shia, Muslim against Christian, and Arab against Black, are helping to bring about precisely that “weak and disunited Arabia” that the British officials in India dreamed of one hundred years ago.

Alongside the direct support and recruitment provided by British intelligence and the British government, one of the main conduits for arms and fighters has been the gulf monarchies: Qatar and Saudi Arabia in particular. That the Gulf States should play this role should, of course, be no surprise – as they were very largely the creations of the same British Government of India that wrote that memo in the first place.

In 1857, British colonial rule of India was challenged as never before, as what started as a mutiny rapidly spread across the country to become a mass insurgency, the first war of Indian independence. One of the reasons it was so potent is that Hindus and Muslims had joined forces – leading to what became the biggest anti-colonial uprising of the nineteenth century. Britain learned the lessons - and began to cultivate sectarian divisions more assiduously than ever before.

As Mark Curtis notes in Secret Affairs: “After 1857 the British promoted communalism, creating separate electorates and job and educational reservations for Muslims. 'Divide et imperia [divide and rule]’ was the old Roman motto, declared William Elphinstone, the early nineteenth-century governor of Bombay, ‘and it should be ours’. This view pervaded and became a cornerstone of British rule in India”.

MI6 and ‘overseas terrorism’: A special relationship (Op-Edge by Dan Glazebrook) https://t.co/vrga44fHoQpic.twitter.com/pMIgbeNQC7
— RT (@RT_com) January 16, 2016

Curtis quotes one document after another to demonstrate just how pervasive this view became: one Secretary of State advising the governor general that “we have maintained our power in India by playing off one part against the other and we must continue to do so. Do all you can, therefore, to prevent all having a common feeling”; another informing the Viceroy that “this division of religious feeling is greatly to our advantage”; a senior civil servant writing that “the truth plainly is that the existence side by side of these hostile creeds is one of the strong points in our political position in India. The better clashes of Mohammedans are already a source to us of strength and not of weakness”, and so on, ad nauseam. Yet, Curtis notes, it was not in India but in the Middle East that this divide and rule strategy “reached its apogee”.

The British Government of India began cultivating alliances with family clans in the Arabian peninsula from around the late eighteenth century, formalizing these relationships through official treaties over the course of the next hundred and fifty years. Even before the discovery of oil, the region was deemed strategically important as part of the land route from India, as well for its surrounding sea routes, and the Indian government took steps to ensure that it be placed firmly under British control.

By the nineteenth century, Britain was already the pre-eminent naval power in the region, and had become powerful enough to make or break the fortunes of those to whom it lent (or withdrew) its ‘protection’. So it is interesting to note that those families which Britain did choose to turn into ruling classes of the new states that were being carved out – the Al Saud, the Al Thani, the Al Khalifa and others – all seemed to have two things in common: a history of regular warring with their neighbours; and an, at best, shaky control of the territories they claimed to rule. These factors were not coincidental – for what they produced was a dependence on British protection that effectively turned them into little more than vassals of Empire.

The al-Khalifa clan, for example, today’s rulers of Bahrain, originally hailed from Umm Qasr in Iraq, from where they were expelled by the Ottomans due to their regular attacks on trade caravans. They first seized control of Bahrain in 1783 after Persian rule began to crumble, but lost control two decades later falling out with the Wahhabis with whom they were briefly allied. It was only after signing a treaty with the British in 1820 that their rule was consolidated. This treaty, and the others that followed, effectively placed foreign policy in the hands of the British in exchange for Britain propping up the al Khalifa’s rule of the country – an arrangement that has continued, to all intents and purposes, right up to the present day.

Being effectively an alien force in the country, the al Khalifa were permanently at risk from the population they sought to rule, especially given their persecution of the Shia majority. This made British protection that much more important, and increased British leverage accordingly; whenever any particular Khalifa emir began to act too independently, the British would simply replace them.

Lieutenant Colonel Trevor, the Deputy Political Agent in Bahrain after the First World War, put it bluntly when, after receiving a series of demands from the new crown prince he noted that "The Shaikh forgets that he and his father were made Shaikhs by the British government.” Shortly afterwards, the British sent warships to the gulf to force the Shaikh to sign an agreement ceding all powers to his other son - a British protégé.

Formal independence was granted in 1971, but given that power was being handed over to the same family that had ruled Bahrain on Britain’s behalf for the past century and a half, this changed little. The most notable difference was perhaps the flags on the foreign warships at the country’s naval base, which changed from British to US.

Fast forward to the present day, and it is clear that the essence of the 1820 treaty – al Khalifa rule propped up by Western armaments, with foreign policy in the hands of the West – is still very much in place. Whilst David Cameron was proclaiming democracy (a euphemism for state collapse) for Libya and Syria, he was in Bahrain selling weapons to the Khalifas to suppress their own ‘Arab Spring’; whilst three years later the US fifth fleet would be firing hellfire missiles into Syria from its Bahraini base.

But British support for the al Khalifas has never been absolute; rather they built up the al-Thani clan as a ‘counterweight’ to the Khalifa in order to guarantee their continued dependence on the British. Up until 1867, Qatar had been essentially a semi-autonomous province of Bahrain, its government effectively ‘sub-contracted’ to the Al Thanis. In that year, however, a war between the Al Thanis and the Al Khalifas broke out; Britain intervened on the side of the Al Thanis, carving out Qatar out as a separate political entity and recognising the Al Thanis as its rulers. The border between the two countries was left devilishly ambiguous, and remained a running sore in Qatari-Bahraini relations right up until 2001; a “weak and disunited Arabia” indeed.

Further agreements were signed with the Al Thanis in 1935, offering them protection against internal and external threats in exchange for oil concessions. Qatar too gained formal independence in 1971, but the deep links forged during the period of the protectorate remain; indeed both the Emirs that have ruled since then were educated at Sandhurst Military Academy, with the current Sheikh educated at elite English private school Sherborne before that.

The relationship between Britain and the ruling families of Bahrain and Qatar continues to follow that same basic principle forged centuries ago, and now also extended to the US: whilst the ruling families act as regional agents of Western imperial policy, their rule is maintained by Western weaponry. Nothing illustrates this more clearly than the events of the so-called ‘Arab Spring’. The protests breaking out across the Arab world in early 2011 soon spread to Bahrain, where angry crowds demanded an end to the monarchy’s policies of discrimination and exclusion against the Shia majority. Cameron’s immediate response was to head to the region to sell the embattled regime the weapons it needed to crush the movement. The following year, the country’s interior minister, Rashid bin Abdulla al-Khalifa, visited the Foreign Office to gather “lessons learnt from our experience in Northern Ireland”, according to a British government statement. This experience was particularly relevant; the problem faced by the British in the North of Ireland was, after all, broadly analogous to that faced by the Bahraini monarchy: how to maintain an oppressive sectarian rule and crush movements calling for equality. The sight of British APCs in the street shooting down demonstrators, now common in the Bahraini capital, will be familiar to Belfast’s nationalist communities; and so too will the latest human rights reports coming out of Bahrain describing “detainees being beaten, deprived of sleep, burned with cigarettes, sexually assaulted, subjected to electric shocks and burnt with an iron”, all common practices in British army barracks in 1970s Ireland. Britain’s Bahraini students are quick learners. The US Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain and used to fire missiles into Syria and Libya, is in safe hands.

Qatar, meanwhile, was a lynchpin in not only the militarization of the ‘Arab Spring’ and its capture by violent sectarian forces, but also its ideological whitewashing. The Al Jazeera TV channel was established by the Qatari government in 1996, effecting to what amounted to a ‘brown-facing’ of the BBC Arabic channel, which was closed down the same year before transferring a large chunk of its staff to the ‘new’ station. Al Jazeera built its credibility across the region – and, indeed, the world – with its critical coverage of Western and Israeli attacks on Iraq and Gaza. But in 2011 it would use this credibility to serve as NATO’s propagandist-in-chief, amplifying and disseminating every lie it could get its hands on – from African mercenaries, to mass rape, to ‘bombing his own people’, to ‘impending massacre’ – in order to demonize Gaddafi and sell the case for war. It would be a war in which Qatar would play a major role.

[Cc emphasised] In the early days of the West’s attack on Libya, anti-Gaddafi rebel forces (led by the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, Al Qaeda’s Libyan franchise), even with NATO air support, proved spectacularly ineffective at capturing and holding territory from the Libyan government. For the first few months, most of the towns they ‘captured’ thanks to NATO incineration of government soldiers would simply be retaken by the Libyan army days later. But NATO countries were wary of risking a domestic political backlash by openly committing too many of their own troops or resources to tip the balance. The solution found was to let Qatar and the Gulf states carry out its dirty work. They played a leading role in training and equipping rebel fighters, allowing NATO to be pretending to observe the arms embargo to which UN resolutions committed them. As the Royal United Services Institute noted, “the UAE established a Special Forces presences in the Zawiyah district and started to supply rebel forces in that area with equipment and provisions by air. Qatar also assumed a very large role; it established training facilities in both Benghazi, and, particularly the Nafusa Mountains on May 9 and acted as a supply route and conduit for French weapons and ammunition supplies to the rebels (notably in June), including by establishing an airstrip at Zintan.” They added that, “Western special forces could have confidence in the training roles undertaken by Qatar and the UAE, because the special forces in those countries have in turn been trained by the UK and France over many years”.

In addition to this major training and arming role, Qatari jets also joined NATO in pounding Libya, and the country issued $100million of loans to the rebel groups. But most important was the Qatari ground invasion of Tripoli.

As Horace Campbell has documented in his book 'Global NATO and the Catastrophic Failure in Libya', by the summer of 2011, NATO were nearing a crisis-point: the 60-day period in which the US president could engage in hostilities without Congressional support was over, and the UN mandate for military intervention was to expire in September. Calls were growing within the AU and the UN for a negotiated settlement, and rivalry between militias continued to dog the rebels’ progress. NATO needed to take Tripoli quickly if their regime change operation was not to be stalled in its tracks.

So in mid-August, NATO massively stepped up its bombing of Tripoli. Checkpoints, manned by citizens pledged to defend the capital were repeatedly targeted, and Obama sent the last two training drones left in the US to the Libyan front-line. That paved the way for what Campbell called “NATO’s triple assault – by air, land and sea”; not a ‘people’s uprising’ but rather a ground invasion to crush the people who had risen to defend their city. Troops were shipped in and disguised as ‘rebel fighters’, with, according to Le Figaro, five thousand Qatari troops chief amongst them. It was they who, finally, captured Tripoli for NATO, installing Abdul Hakim Bel Haj, now suspected leader of ISIS in Libya, as the new military chief of the conquered city.

Bahrain and Qatar are just two examples of the enduring alliances that the British government has cultivated over centuries as it groomed handpicked ruling families for their anointed role as agents of imperial policy. In exchange for a British guarantee of their absolute power domestically, they have provided military bases and have acted as willing agents for those tasks their patron was either unwilling or unable to carry out itself. Today, that means acting as an ‘arms-length’ distributor of both BBC propaganda and British violence, in far more ways than have been possible to articulate here (Qatar’s role in managing the various Muslim Brotherhood offshoots that have been destabilizing Syria, Egypt and elsewhere, for example, would need a full article in its own right). But even more significant than the British alliance with the al Khalifas and al Thanis is that that was established with the al-Saud family, the subject of our next piece. For it is this relationship, forged during the slow decline of the Ottoman Empire, that ultimately created a new multinational fighting force of fighters in the 1980s – the ‘database’ – that has been doing Britain’s bidding in Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria ever since.

This is Part Two of Sukant Chandan and Dan Glazebrook’s series on British collusion with sectarian violence.

Read Part One here.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Original article https://www.rt.com/op-edge/341964-gulf-monarchies-britain-middle-east/

I'm looking forward to part 3.

clothcapclothcap on May 9th, 2016 05:14 pm (UTC)
Will the Cameron regime repeat its aggression in Libya?
Muammar Gaddafi Accused of Genocide? NATO Invasion Underway.
keith harmon snow *
3 March 2011 (Revised & updated 4 March 2011 with slight additional revisions 19 March.)
Are events unfolding in Libya, Tunisia and Egypt more about petro-terrorism or about freedom and democracy? How much oil is there in North Africa? Who is in control of that oil? What is the relationship between the West and Muammar Gaddafi? Is he really the terrorist we've all been led to believe he is? Who is the Libyan "opposition" and who are the "rebels" we read about?
Presented with this story are petroleum industry concessions maps ** for North Africa that people might want to ponder in between the Western propaganda on Libya. Amidst the full-court press of propaganda presented by the western media and State Department disinformation apparatus we find that Muammar Gaddafi is even accused of committing genocide against his own people. Are there double standards at work?
From the Halls of Montezuma to the Shores of Tripoli
Here http://www.consciousbeingalliance.com/2011/03/petroleum-empire-maps-for-north-africa/
h/t https://twitter.com/drebha
clothcapclothcap on May 9th, 2016 05:15 pm (UTC)
Will the US regime repeat its aggression in Libya?
From: Sidney Blumenthal
To: Hillary Clinton
Date: 2011-09-15 21:00
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05782501 Date: 01/07/2016
September 16, 2011
For: Hillary
From: Sid
Re: France, UK, et al, jockeying in Libya/oil
During mid-September 2011 French President Nicolas Sarkozy and British Prime Minister David
Cameron traveled to Tripoli to meet with and express support for the leaders of the new
government of Libya under the National Transitional Council (NTC). According to
knowledgeable individuals, as part of this effort, the two leaders, in private conversations, also
intend to press the leaders of the NTC to reward their early support for the rebellion against
Muammar al Qaddafi. Sarkozy and Cameron expect this recognition to be tangible, in the form of favorable contracts for French and British energy companies looking to play a major role in the Libyan oil industry. According to this source, Sarkozy feels, quite strongly, that without French support there would have been no revolution and that the NTC government must demonstrate that it realizes this fact. For his part, Cameron appears most concerned that despite British support for the rebels during the fighting, certain members of the NTC remain focused on the fact that the British government and oil industry had good relations with the Qaddafi regime, particularly the firm British Petroleum (BP).
At the same time, this source indicates that the government of France is carrying out a concerted program of private and public diplomacy to press the new/transitional government of Libya to reserve as much as 35% of Libya's oil related industry for French firms, particularly the major French energy company TOTAL. Sources with access to the highest levels of Libya's ruling NTC, as well as senior advisors to Sarkozy, stated in strict confidence that while much of this pressure is being exerted at very senior diplomatic and political levels, the French external intelligence service (Direction Generale de la Securite Exterieure/General Directorate for
External Security --DGSE) is using sources with influence over the NTC to press the French position. At present, as NTC leaders are consolidating their positions in Tripoli, they are attempting to balance the interests of the new government and the Libyan people against the need to recognize the support provided to them by France and other major powers in their struggle with Muammar al Qaddafi.
These same sources indicate that NTC President Mustafa Abdul Jalil and the NTC leadership
continue to be highly suspicious of the activities and goals of the governments of China and
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05782501 Date: 01/07/2016
Russia in Libya. According to these sources, representatives of the Emir of Qatar have privately warned that while both countries pursue foreign economic policies that work to the disadvantage of the host government, it is somewhat easier to deal with firms associated with Russia. With this in mind the NTC has entered into an agreement with the Amsterdam base energy firm of GUNVOR International BV, which has close ties to the Russian government and the Russian oil industry. The NTC has also entered into an initial agreement, allowing TOTAL, to purchase and ship Libyan oil. This individual believes that this agreement does not set aside any specific portion of the Libyan oil industry for TOTAL, as Sarkozy would like.
More https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/12900
h/t https://twitter.com/drebha
clothcapclothcap on May 9th, 2016 05:20 pm (UTC)
Some from RT

V-Day provocation? US-NATO hardware forced out of Moldova’s capital after public outrage
May 8, 2016
NATO military vehicles with American flags that were put on display in a central square of Chisinau, Moldova’s capital, had to withdraw before Monday’s V-Day march and retreat outside the town after the show-off sparked fierce opposition from the locals.

Protests erupt in Athens as parliament adopts new austerity measures
Greek MPs have voted in favor of new austerity measures, including pension cuts, tax hikes, and new taxes on internet and TV. Clashes with police broke out as thousands in Athens protested the moves that Greece’s creditors have been demanding.

Claims tax havens ‘distorting’ global economy, and Britain controls one-third of them
Tax havens “serve no useful economic purpose,” a group of 300 leading economists has said in a letter urging world leaders to bolster financial transparency ahead of London’s anti-corruption summit this week.
clothcapclothcap on May 9th, 2016 06:01 pm (UTC)
The “King Rats”

THROUGHOUT ALL OF history, small groups of official and economic elites belonging to the mystical Brotherhood network have profited from the conflicts generated by the network. If ancient Mesopotamian, American and biblical writings are correct, then those human elites are really only at the top of a prisoner hierarchy. We might label those elites the “King Rats” of Earth.
The term “King Rat” comes from a James Clavell novel which was later made into a Hollywood movie starring George Segal. The story King Rat concerns a group of American and British soldiers being held captive in a Japanese prisoner-of-war camp during World War II. Through clever bargaining and organization, one of the American prisoners, Corporal King, manages to amass a wealth of material goods desperately craved by the other prisoners of war.
As a result, he sits at the top of the prisoner hierarchy and is often able to buy loyalty with a cigarette or fresh egg. The other prisoners simply call him King, for that is what he is inside the prison. When he embarks on a venture to breed rats as food, he earns the title “King Rat,” which somehow seems to fit him.
King Rat enjoys every luxury craved by the other prisoners, yet the fact remains that he is still a prisoner himself. King Rat can only remain at the top of the pecking order so long as everyone remains imprisoned. At the end of the film, when the war is over and the camp is liberated, he no longer has the prison environment he relied on to stay on top. In freedom, he is lost, wondering if he really welcomes the liberation. In the final scene of the movie we see him being driven off in a truck, just another corporal. We sense, however, even if King Rat does not, that he is better off liberated since the fragile fiefdom he had built could have been easily toppled at any time by the Japanese prison keepers. King’s life as a liberated corporal is far more secure than his precarious existence at the top of an oppressed prison population.
The King Rat of cinema was ultimately a sympathetic character. Those whom we might label the “King Rats” of Earth are not so endearing for we will use the term to describe only those individuals who acquire their profits and influence not by breeding rats, but by helping to breed war and suffering for human consumption.
For thousands of years, Earth has had endless successions of “King Rats.” In this chapter, we will look at a particularly interesting group of them: the petty princes of 18th-century Germany. They and their relationship to Brotherhood mysticism provide a fascinating look at a curious element of 18th-century politics—politics which have done much to shape the social, political and economic world we live in today.
Germany became the center of Templar Freemasonry on continental Europe. The Knight degrees took on a unique character in the German states where the degrees were made into a system of Freemasonry called the “Strict Observance.” The “Strict Observance” was so named because every initiate was required to give an oath of strict and unquestioning obedience to those ranking above him within the Order. The vow of obedience extended to a mysterious figure known as the “Unknown Superior,” who was said to be the secret leader of the Strict Observance and who was reportedly residing in Scotland.
Members of the Strict Observance first passed through the Blue Degrees before they were initiated into the higher degrees of “Scottish Master,” “Novice,” “Templar,” and ”Professed Knight.” The “Unknown Superior” went by the title “Knight of the Red Feather.” Although secrecy in the Strict Observance was very strong, several leaks revealed that the Strict Observance was true to the Scottish degrees by agitating against the House of Hanover in favor of the Stuarts.
The Strict Observance spread quickly throughout the German states and became the dominant form of Freemasonry there for decades. It also became influential in other countries such as France, which was the second largest center of Freemasonry in Europe. (Germany was the largest.) In all nations, Strict Observance members pledged obedience to the “Unknown Superior” of Scotland.
Continues http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vida_alien/godseden/godseden10.htm#The%20King%20Rats
clothcapclothcap on May 9th, 2016 09:58 pm (UTC)
Thought provoking 1
Chemtrails – Implanting Artificial Intelligence to Prevent Human Expansion of Consciousness
VANCOUVER, BC – Alfred Lambremont Webre interviews Alex Hunter a Vancouver activist known as “Captain Chemtrail” because of his command of the full range of the covert technology of chemtrails to terraform Earth and humanity into a remote controlled species commanded by a Controller Matrix and in turn by AI Artificial Intelligence.

A Planetary Emergency “MayDay” Call
Key points if you don’t have the time to listen to the 2 hour + interview:
32:00:00 – Chemtrail truth activists are not telling the brutal truth and at 1:32:00
51:00:00 – Hunter is thwarted by main stream chemtrail activists
Chemtrails - Implanting Artificial Intelligence to Prevent Human Expansion of Consciousness
Alex Hunter’s advanced military oral biochip
1:05:00 – Talks about the advanced biological military pathology in roof of his mouth which is frequency activated
1:20:00 – DNA terraforming agent in chemtrails is Morgellons, transforming DNA – RNA for AI (artificial intelligence) entrainment by super computers with Chemtrail Nanobots.
1:45:00 – In discussing solutions during the interview, Alex Hunter and Host Alfred Lambremont Webre discuss how the US Department of Defense intervened after Oct. 2001 to force the evisceration of HR 2977, introduced by former Rep Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) and designed to ban chemtrails and all new physics principles DEW weaponry of Transhumanist Agenda and AI Artificial Intelligence.
In this exclusive May Day [May 1, 2016] interview with NewsInsideOut.com’s Alfred Lambremont Webre, Alex Hunter issues a planetary emergency “MayDay” call and launches a new community-based and globally aware program to halt chemtrails and in the process save help Earth and humanity from DNA extinction to an AI Artificial Intelligence DNA-based, Soul-less species.
Chemtrail – Nano Detox Bucket & Bath – http://www.aircrap.org/chemtrail-nano-detox-bucket-bath/
Among the topics Alex Hunter covers in this interview showing that Chemtrails play a vital role in technetronic, genetic, AI Artificial Intelligence, and planetary terraforming warfare in that Chemtrails:
“deploy ‘smart’dust/nanotech which enables the criminally insane cabal to target political people, groups, populations or any combination therein via the technetronic/’smart’grid
“deploy trace amounts of chemical, biochemical, biological, advanced biological and genetic warfare which can then be triggered and/or exacerbated/multiplied to a near fatal or fatal level in the desired target(s) in whichever combinations they so choose.
“the aggressively accelerated and upgraded deployment of chemtrails, ‘smart’dust. ‘smart’meter, ‘smart’grid and biochemically addictive ‘smart’ technologies worldwide
“the role of weaponised mediSIN, Vaccinations of mass destruction (see drcarley.com), the medical mafia and the techniques used to weaponise our family members, clan and coiuntryfolk against us via the pre and particularly the post secondary educational system including but in no way limited to self entitlement, indoctrination/entrainment, brainwashing, vocational compartmentalisation, mind control and in many cases blackmail and terrorisation to keep the minions playing their respective vocational roles in the machine currently culling and controlling Humanity.
“the development and transfer of the MK Ultra behavioural sciences, techniques and technologies into the GWEN, TETRA, WiFi, telecommunications, ‘smart’meter and electrical power ‘smart’grid
“Delphi Technique, Consensus Creation, Tavistock/Common Purpose and other such constructs and techniques of social control which exploit our tribal instincts to be “popular” and to belong to the majority and how I have been subsequently labelled “negative, apocalyptic, depressing and (now) pushy” for telling the Brutal Truth about the diabolical NWO Agenda and all of these subsequent mechanisms, technologies and techniques that get all of us/those around us targeted and processed for reporting on them
More http://www.aircrap.org/2016/05/04/chemtrails-implanting-artificial-intelligence-to-prevent-human-expansion-of-consciousness/

Edited at 2016-05-10 07:01 am (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on May 10th, 2016 07:01 am (UTC)
Re: Thought provoking 1
Chemtrail – Nano Detox Bucket & Bath

What on earth are they spraying us with?



I haven't seen any compelling evidence of alien interference. It can all be explained with insane wealth, psychopathy, megalomania, human ingenuity and compartmentalisation.
Let's hope it doesn't take another generation (30 years) to get to grips with the perpetrators of the evil.

Another con still in the making is our introduction to aliens. More and more "alien" programmes on TV and websites are being used to condition us. Lucifer's UN has an alien reception committee. Holographs, engineered humans and Ronald Macdonald rejects will be the most likely source of 'extra-terrestrials'.

Edited at 2016-05-10 09:47 am (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on May 9th, 2016 10:02 pm (UTC)
2: Cabalist Jews are Their Own God (Egregore)
Cabalist Jews are Their Own God (Egregore)
Soon they will be yours.
Does the "egregore" explain the mysterious affinity shared by Illuminati (Satanist) Jews?
Feb. 16, 200
By Henry Makow Ph.D.
Last week I noted that the Soviets razed thousands of churches but spared synagogues.
If Communists considered religion "the opium of the masses," why didn't they include Judaism? Do Christians and Jews worship the same God? Is there an affinity between Communism and Judaism? Perhaps the Jewish elite has a different God.
A reader, "George," knew the heiress of a rich Jewish banking family "not the Rothschilds, although her family lived in a palace neighbouring the Rothschilds."
"Leah was one of my classmates in the Geneva University (Switzerland) where I was studying psychology ...She was an attractive blue-eyed blond lady. ...As she was wearing a Star of David, I asked if she was a believer. She answered "yes and no" and added that she believed in a god of the Jews who was serving the Jews rather than served by them. I immediately asked whether she was speaking of an egregore ...Her only response was "yes" and she broke that conversation. Never again did we mention the subject."
According to Wikipedia, "egregore" is an occult concept representing a "thought form" or "collective group mind", an autonomous psychic entity made up of, and influencing, the thoughts of a group of people. The symbiotic relationship between an egregore and its group has been compared to the more recent, non-occult concepts of the corporation (as a legal entity) and the meme."
George speculates that elite Jews created the Jewish God as their "egregore," i.e. an instrument of their collective will, i.e. their desire to vanquish the heathens and rule supreme.
"Could it be possible that the ancient Levite priests found a way to create a supernatural entity from the collective mind of the tribe of Judah? An entity born from a collective mind the Levites were shaping into self-isolationism and segregationist a.k.a, extreme ethno-centrism? ...An entity designed to help the "chosen people" destroy the "alien" nations and provide it with material rewards? An entity resulting from the black magic of the Levite priests who, as the first indoctrinated atheists, were denying the universal God of Moses because they didn't want to submit to a "Lord and Master" but rather become themselves "Lords and Masters" through their slavish "egregorious" god?"
This "egregore" is Lucifer, and elite Jews have made him the master meme of the New World Order.
The Soviets didn't raze synagogues because Communism was an expression of the Jewish "egregore." Christians and Jews apparently do not worship the same God. The Christian God represented by Jesus is universal love and brotherhood. The Jewish God has been supplanted by a Cabalistic egregore that "serves" elite Jews. It represents their ruthless sociopathic urge for world dominion. The same egregore--the desire to
supplant God-- animates the New World Order.
The average Communist Jew or non-Jew was an idealistic dupe. Marxism, equality etc. were just window dressing to hide the real agenda: the destruction of race, religion, family and nation; the accumulation of all wealth and the enslavement of mankind. The methods have changed but the agenda has not.
The average Zionist is also an idealistic dupe. As many now realize, "the Jewish Homeland" was simply a step toward world government, "an incident in a far reaching plan" to use banker Louis Marshall's words. The goal of this plan is to enslave humanity mentally if not physically. Christian Zionists are the biggest dupes of all.
The same ersatz idealism infuses the world government movement, which is full of pious opportunists who have sold their heritage for a seat at the globalist banquet.
In many cases, the charge of "anti Semitism" and "hate" are devious attempts to outlaw opposition to Tyranny. Let's not kid ourselves. We are facing a diabolical Evil, ruthless, vicious and cunning as well. Jews and non-Jews must join hands to banish Lucifer and declare that only God is God, He is Moral and we serve Him.
More http://henrymakow.com/001924.html
clothcapclothcap on May 9th, 2016 11:56 pm (UTC)

Activist Post
Did Goldman Sachs' Latest Move Into Main Street Banking Just Give Us A Warning About The Coming Financial Crisis?
Goldman now intends to aggressively pursue retail depositors whose accounts they will then tap to help fund their investing and trading operations
The Dethroning of Cash: Discouraged, Penalized, Even Banned?

7,000 airlifted out of Alberta inferno as officials warn blaze could double in size (VIDEOS)
Putin: 'We must defeat terrorism, and Russia is open to join forces with all countries'
[We must defeat Imperialist > White House > NATO > assymetric warfare by terrorism. Demand your zio-controlled regime supports Putin]

Robina Creaser Retw
David R. Evans
EuroJew invadrs hav no more right to Palestine than Mormons hav right to Micronesia
Paul Dutton Retw
Chris Winslow- Great Barrier Reef: Report warns next term of government will seal its fate, Climate Council says
[Agents for the zio OWG don't give up on the MMGW by CO2 bullcrap.]
-Original Joker
-Well played, book store. Well played.
David Allison Apr 26
-Hillsborough lies revealed. Migrant children turned away. Junior Doctors smeared. A reminder of everything the Tories stand for in one day.

Lisa Karpova Retweeted
@moscow_ghost 6h6 hours ago
It's hard to read between the lines of #Russia's actions in #Syria
But then, there's this

halil drebbi Retweeted
Iman Abdo
@MrProudLibyan was wondering your thoughts of the mena tweet that Daesh 'claims' Werfelly, Awalid Sulieman , Gaddafa tribes had joined them
@imanlibya anyways it isn't true. #IS approached Bani Walid from Al-Sdada and conducted an attack against Misrata forces
[Perhaps Putin could arrange a symphony orchestra in Tripoli for a time in the not too distant future?]
EPA data reveals “sharp spike in radiation level” around US nuclear site
Obama: TTIP Necessary To Protect Megabanks From Prosecution
Panama Papers Leak: Saudi King Funded Netanyahu’s Rise To Power
[Now which rag will front-page that?]
clothcapclothcap on May 10th, 2016 09:49 am (UTC)
Know the enemy
Club of Rome
[& -Budapest, -Madrid]
(Committee of 300 subversive body)
This group was organized in 1968 by the Morgenthau Group for the purpose of accelerating the plans to have the New World Order in place by the year 2000. The Club of Rome developed a plan to divide the world into ten regions or kingdoms.
In 1976, the United States Association of the Club of Rome (USACOR) was formed for the purpose of shutting down the U.S. economy gradually. The Technetronic Era Henry Kissinger was then, and still is, an important agent in the service of the Royal Institute for International Affairs, a member of the Club of Rome and the Council on Foreign Relations.
Kissinger's role in destabilizing the United States by means of three wars, the Middle East, Korea and Vietnam, is well known, as is his role in the Gulf War, in which the U.S. Army acted as mercenaries for the Committee of 300 in bringing Kuwait back under its control and at the same time making an example out of Iraq so that other small nations would not be tempted to work out their own destiny. The Club of Rome, acting on Committee of 300 orders to eliminate General ul Haq, had no compunction in sacrificing the lives of a number of U.S. servicemen on board the flight, including a U.S. Army Defense Intelligence Agency group headed by Brigadier General Herber Wassom. General ul Haq had been warned by the Turkish Secret Service not to travel by plane, as he was targeted for a mid-air bombing. With this in mind, ul Haq took the United States team with him as "an insurance policy," as he commented to his inner circle advisors.
Club of Rome and its financiers under the title of the German Marshall Fund were two highly-organized conspiratorial bodies operating under cover of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and that the majority of Club of Rome executives were drawn from NATO. The Club of Rome formulated all of what NATO claimed as its policies and, through the activities of Committee of 300 member Lord Carrington, was able to split NATO into two factions, a political (left wing) power group and its former military alliance. The Club of Rome is still one of the most important foreign policy arms of the Committee of 300, and the other being the Bilderbergers. It was put together in 1968 from hard-core members of the original Morgenthau group on the basis of a telephone call made by the late Aurellio Peccei for a new and urgent drive to speed up the plans of the One World Government now called the New World Order. Peccei's call was answered by the most subversive "future planners" drawn from the United States, France, Sweden, Britain, Switzerland and Japan that could be mustered.
During the period 1968-1972, The Club of Rome became a cohesive entity of new-science scientists, Globalist, future planners and inter- nationalists of every stripe. As one delegate put it, "We became Joseph's Coat of Many Colors." Peccei's book "Human Quality" formed the basis of the doctrine adopted by NATO's political wing. Peccei headed the Atlantic Institute's Economic Council for three decades while he was the Chief Executive Officer for Giovanni Agnellis' Fiat Motor Company. Agnelli, a member of an ancient Italian Black Nobility family of the same name, is one of the most important members of the Committee of 300. He played a leading role in development projects in the Soviet Union.
The Club of Rome is a conspiratorial umbrella organization, a marriage between Anglo-American financiers and the old Black Nobility families of Europe, particularly the so-called "nobility" of London, Venice and Genoa. The key to the successful control of the world is their ability to create and manage savage economic recessions and eventual depressions. The Committee of 300 looks to social convulsions on a global scale, followed by depressions, as a softening-up technique for bigger things to come, as its principal method of creating masses of people all over the world who will become its "welfare" recipients of the future.
The committee appears to base much of its important decisions affecting mankind on the philosophy of Polish aristocrat, Felix Dzerzinski, who regarded mankind as being slightly above the level of cattle.
More http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/clubofrome.htm

Edited at 2016-05-10 09:49 am (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on May 10th, 2016 10:00 am (UTC)
Fear is a tool

"Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar." (Julius Caesar)
clothcapclothcap on May 10th, 2016 11:52 am (UTC)
Luciferian whacko

Moon Predicts One-World Religion - Denied Divinity Of Christ
From America's Survival, Inc.
United Nations Supporter Rev.Sun Myung Moon Claimed to be the Messiah; Claims to Have Succeeded Where Jesus Christ Failed; Predicts One-World Global Religion
Moon Denies the Divinity of Jesus Christ
The Reverend Sun Myung Moon, founder of The Washington Times, abandoned anti-Communism and fully embraced the United Nations. According to the Times, which uncritically highlighted Moon's remarks in a page two story on January 28, Moon called the U.N. "a temple of peace" and said religions should work with it to "solve global problems."
Moon received a "Universal Peace Award" at the U.N., has called for a U.N.-based religious body, and has declared, "As long as America sticks with its nationalistic pride it will never be able to embrace the world." On January 12, Moon spoke of how U.N. non-governmental organizations "can represent all humanity -- through which God can come and reign."
Moon's turn toward the U.N. could reflect his belief that the U.N. could help protect his global business dealings in China, North Korea and Vietnam. "The Moon connection to North Korea is most striking," Cliff Kincaid of America's Survival, Inc. said. "Moon met with and was extremely close to North Korean dictator Kim Il-Sung, whose successor and son, Kim Jong-Il, gave Moon a birthday gift." (30)
What follows is an AP story about Moon's claim to be the true Messiah:

Wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Myung_Moon

The UN, IMF, EU Commission and the central bank cabal are NGO facets of the zio-luciferian organisation.
clothcapclothcap on May 10th, 2016 07:11 pm (UTC)
Drone ‘kill list’ could leave MPs, military & spies ‘facing murder charges’

[Under an honest justice system the title would read ...Will Leave MPs, military & spies ‘facing murder charges’]
10 May, 2016
Britain’s drone ‘kill list’ could leave politicians, pilots and intelligence personnel facing murder charges unless rules of engagement are quickly clarified, a parliamentary report has warned.
The joint committee on human rights warned on Tuesday that killing with drones outside warzones could lead to “criminal prosecution for murder or complicity in murder.”
The report also warned that the widely-used term “targeted killing” sounded “uncomfortably close to assassination“ and took the view that the UK pursues an active policy “to use lethal force abroad outside armed conflict” under the banner of “counter-terrorism.”
The committee acknowledged the likelihood of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) pursuing a case is slim, but said authorities in other countries may if their citizens are killed.
Chaired by Labour‘s Harriet Harman, the committee also said the UK owed it “to all those involved in the chain of command for such uses of lethal force to provide them with absolute clarity about the circumstances in which they will have a defense against any possible future criminal prosecution.”
The investigation began in August 2014 after it was announced a UK targeted drone strike had killed British Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) fighter Reyaad Khan in Syria.
More, vids https://www.rt.com/uk/342465-drone-report-murder-charges/
clothcapclothcap on May 10th, 2016 07:13 pm (UTC)
The EU was HITLER'S idea and it proves Germany WON the Second World War, claims new book

THE 'fascist' EU was inspired and designed by the NAZIS and is proof Hitler won the Second World War, an outrageous new book is claiming.
By Owen Bennett - Political Reporter
Apr 17, 2014
Adolf Hitler orginally came up with the plan for the EU, the book says[GETTY]
'The EU: The Truth About The Fourth Reich - How Hitler Won The Second World War' argues the single currency, the free market and even the phrase "United States of Europe" were all dreamt up by high ranking Nazis, including the Fuhrer himself.
It also claims the only country which benefits from the EU is Germany - just as Hitler planned.
A spokesperson for the Liberal Democrats - which its leader Nick Clegg describes as the "party of in" when it comes to the EU - dismissed the authors of the book as "peddling outlandish myths".
The book, co-written by Daniel J Beddowes and Falvio Cipollini, says: "What is the EU for? Who really benefits? And the answer is of course Germany.
More http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/470967/The-EU-was-HITLER-S-idea-and-it-proves-Germany-WON-the-Second-World-War-claims-new-book
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
clothcapclothcap on May 10th, 2016 09:46 pm (UTC)
A brief survey of The History of the Kurds

Kendal NEZAN
President of the Kurdish Institute of Paris
Who Are the Kurds?
Brushing over a depiction of 25 centuries of history in half an hour is obviously a tough task. That means about one minute per century! In this quick skimming through 1 can limit myself to merely pointing out a few major landmards and mentioning facts likely to help in the understanding of the present situation of the Kurds. 1 hope the specialists present here won't hold this approach of reducing and simplifying against me and, in response to questions raised during the discussion, I'd be happy to consider any aspect, which seems to you to have been insufficiently covered, in more depth.
The first question which comes to mind is that of the origins of the Kurds. Who are they? Where do they come from? Historians generally agree to consider them as belonging to the Iranian branch of the large family of Indo-European races. In prehistoric times, kingdoms called Mitanni, Kassites and Hourites reigned these mountainous areas, situated between the Iranian plateau and the Euphrates. In VII BC, the Medes, the Kurds' equivalent of the Gauls for the French, founded an empire which, in 612 BC, conquered the powerful Assyria and spread its domination through the whole of Iran as well as central Anatolia. The date 612, is moreover, considered by Kurdish nationalists as the beginning of the 1st Kurdish year; for them we are at present in 2601!
The political reign of the Medes was to end towards the end of 6 BC, but their religion and civilization were to dominate Iran until the time of Alexander the Great. From this date right until the advent of Islam, the fate of the Kurds, who geographers and Greek historians call Karduchoi, was to remain linked to that of the other populations of the empires which succeeded one another on the Iranian scene: Seljuks, Parthes and Sassanids.
Having put up fierce resistance to the Arabo-Muslim invasions, the Kurds ended up joining Islam, without, as a result, becoming Arabized. This resistance continued for about a century. The Kurdish tribes resisted the Arab tribes for social rather than religious reasons. All methods were used to coax the Kurds and convert them to Islam, even, for example, the matrimonial strategy, the mother of the last Omayyad caliph, Marwan Hakim, was Kurdish.
Due to the weakening of the caliphs' power, the Kurds, who already had a key role in the arts, history and philosophy fields, begin to assert, from the middle of the IXth century onwards, their own political power. In 837, a Kurdish lord, of the name Rozeguite, founds the town of Akhlat on the banks of Lake Van and makes it the capital of his principality, theoretically vassal of the caliph, but in actual fact virtually independent. In the second half of the Xth century Kurdistan is shared amongst 4 big Kurdish principalities. In the North, the Shaddadids, (951-1174), in the East, the Hasanwayhids (959-1015) and the Banu Annaz (990-1116) and in the West the Marwanids (990-1096) of Diyarbakir. One of these dynasties would have been able, during the decades, to impose its supremacy on the others and build a state incorporating the whole Kurdish country if the course of history hadn't been disrupted by the massive invasions of tribes surging out of the steppes of Central Asia. Having conquered Iran and imposed their yoke on the caliph of Baghdad, the Seljuk Turks annexed the Kurdish principalities one by one. Around 1150, the sultan Sandjar, the last of the great Seljuk monarchs, created a province from Kurdistan.
Continues http://www.institutkurde.org/en/institute/who_are_the_kurds.php
clothcapclothcap on May 10th, 2016 10:19 pm (UTC)
The Forbidden Secret with Dr Stanley Monteith 2007

Abel Danger Dec 8, 2013
This is Dr. Stanley Monteith's mindblowing video lecture The Forbidden Secret, which reveals the source of the power that has been utilized by sages, adepts, witch doctors, shamans, priests, prophets, wise men, diviners, and mediums down through the ages.
More http://tapnewswire.com/2014/09/dr-stan-monteith-passes/

Secret societies have existed since the dawn of civilization, and they exist today. What is their purpose? Adepts claim they possess secret knowledge that provides fame, power, and prosperity. Is that true? Why are some people fabulously wealthy while most people struggle to make a living? Why do almost half of the people in the word live in abject poverty? Where does the secret knowledge come from?
(Anonymous) on May 11th, 2016 10:19 pm (UTC)
Re: The Forbidden Secret with Dr Stanley Monteith 2007
"Diagnosis: Your typical paranoid rightwing religious fanatic. Old, cranky, and in possession of internet access and an arid shortage of critical thinking skills. Monteith’s influence is probably (and hopefully) limited."

Re: The Forbidden Secret with Dr Stanley Monteith 2007 - (Anonymous) on May 12th, 2016 09:32 am (UTC) (Expand)
clothcapclothcap on May 11th, 2016 08:06 am (UTC)
Op-Edge: David Cameron's moral sickness

RT 10 May, 2016
Associating Russia with ISIS when it comes to identifying global threats surely adds new meaning to perverse. To his ignominy and shame Britain’s David Cameron has done exactly that, thus reflecting the moral sickness that afflicts his government.
It says much about his desperation to forestall a growing tide of popular support within Britain for the country’s exit from the EU that its Prime Minister should talk up the threat of a “newly belligerent Russia” as the countdown to the country’s June referendum on EU membership continues. However, desperation gives way to disgrace when we consider the quote in full: “We see a newly belligerent Russia, the rise of the Daesh (ISIS) network to our east and to our south the migration crisis," Cameron said during a speech in London on behalf of the Remain campaign.
Making Cameron’s outrageous and deeply insulting comparison between Russia and ISIS even more significant is that it came just as Russia was marking its annual Victory Day commemoration, when the nation stops to remember the epic struggle the country and its people waged against the Nazi onslaught. It was a struggle won at huge, almost unbearable cost, attested to by the 27 million who lost their lives and the countless villages, towns, and cities left decimated.
More https://www.rt.com/op-edge/342515-brexit-russia-cameron-belligerent-isis/
When the sick of mind lead the healthy the healthy become sick of mind. The objective and the reason why British representatives are preselected. Preselected through the Freemasonry system that is headed by the Crown and the bank cabal. Representatives represent corporations, banks, the Crown and themselves. You are at the very bottom of the list.