Log in

No account? Create an account
01 May 2016 @ 07:39 am
Anti Semitic Semites? No. Anti Zionist Semites  
Anti zionism is not ant semitism.

The Ultra-Orthodox Will Never Surrender to the Zionist Idea

True Torah Jews 02/09/2016

The Jerusalem Post recently published an article declaring that ultra-Orthodoxy has surrendered to the Zionist idea.

This declaration sure is news to the hundreds of thousands of ultra-Orthodox Jews who want nothing to do with the Zionist State. The Post offers no concrete evidence to back up their claim; the evidence they do bring is circumstantial at best. Let's look at a couple of the mistakes on which the author of the Post article bases his conclusions.

First, he mistakenly classifies religious Jews who join the IDF as ultra-Orthodox. As ritually observant as these young men may be, that doesn't make them ultra-Orthodox. In fact, these boys are often viewed as pariahs in their old neighborhoods. There have been numerous demonstrations across the globe with hundreds of thousands of participants, decrying the Israeli government's attempt to draft ultra-Orthodox boys into their army. Surely, one cannot classify the boys who do break off as ultra-Orthodox. And if there are any truly ultra-Orthodox Jews there, one certainly cannot judge the vast majority based on the few who were unable to withstand the challenge and joined the army to improve their financial situation.

Next, the Post cites the fact that there has been an increase of ultra-Orthodox participation and influence in the government. While we at True Torah Jews are opposed to any participation in the Israeli government, still, one cannot paint with a broad brush and label everyone who does participate as having surrendered to Zionism.

Rabbi Reuven Grozovsky, head of Agudah’s Moetzes Gedolei Hatorah, wrote at the time the state was established that participating in its government was, strictly speaking, a sin, and he classified the Agudah’s approach of participating as "aveirah lishmah" - a sin done with good intentions.

Rabbi Shneur Kotler, the late dean of the largest yeshiva in the United States, conceded that the ideal approach is to refrain from participating in the Israeli government. “The Satmar Rav proves in Vayoel Moshe that opposition to Zionism and non-participation in the state is the position that the Talmud and all Jewish legal authorities once held. On the contrary, our Agudah approach is a new approach: that in today’s environment, we have to commit a sin with good intentions and salvage whatever we can, choose the lesser of two evils and so on.”

And of course Rabbi Elazar Shach, despite his advocacy of participation in the Israeli government, is quoted extensively in this very same Jerusalem Post article as being strongly anti-Zionist.

Therefore, it should be clear that those who participate, even when they go a step further and take on more responsibility, do not mean to do anything more than a further “sin with good intentions.”

But the time has come for a wake-up call: the sin may not have been done with good intentions, and it certainly did not have a good result. Those who participate in the Israeli government would do well to remember the famous analogy, given by one of the rabbis who permitted participation, to someone who is attacked by a band of robbers and negotiates with the robbers to see if he can salvage at least some of his possessions. No one would misconstrue his negotiation as approval for the robbers. In the early days of the state, when the ultra-Orthodox community was small and under attack, this analogy made sense to many as a rationale for participation. But today, as the Post article rightly points out, the boundaries are becoming blurred, many Orthodox are benefiting from the state, and some people are beginning to forget what exactly is wrong with Zionism.

And this very point was made by the Satmar Rav years ago: joining the government and taking their money is truly a Faustian bargain, because once the Orthodox community becomes dependent on the Zionists, it will eventually fall under Zionist control. As the Torah says, the bribe blinds the eyes of the wise.

The Post conveniently ignores the fact that there is a large contingent in the Holy Land represented by the Eidah HaChareidis. Members of this group refrain from participating in the government altogether. These pious Jews do not vote in Israel's elections, nor do their schools accept funding from the Israeli government. In fact, for decades, another well known anti-Zionist group, the Satmar Hasidic dynasty, has helped to support schools that refuse Israeli government support through an organization called Keren Hatzolah, which distributes money to these schools several times throughout the year. If all ultra-Orthodox Jews have given into the Zionist idea, who does the Eidah HaChareidis represent? For whom does Keren Hatzolah raise millions of dollars every year?

The Post also gives the impression that increasing trend of ultra-Orthodox men in the State of Israel working for a living instead of pursuing Talmudic studies has something to do with surrender to Zionists. It does not. On the contrary, working for a living is a healthy feature of any Jewish community and, in this case, it enables the ultra-Orthodox to become less dependent on the Zionist state.

Don't let the Zionist media fool you. There are hundreds of thousands of fervently anti-Zionist ultra-Orthodox Jews throughout the world, and we will never surrender to the Zionist idea.

True Torah Jews http://www.truetorahjews.org/ultra-orthodox-will-never-surrender-zionist-idea
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2016 06:43 am (UTC)
Zionists Who Supported Hitler And Nazis

Zionist Radio Oct 26, 2015
Lehi : Lohamei Herut Israel – Lehi, "Fighters for the Freedom of Israel – Lehi"), commonly referred to in English as the Stern Gang was a Zionist paramilitary organization founded by Avraham ("Yair") Stern in Mandatory Palestine Its avowed aim was to evict the British authorities from Palestine by resort to force, allowing unrestricted immigration of Jews and the formation of a Jewish state, a 'new totalitarian Hebrew republic' It was initially called the National Military Organization in Israel upon being founded in August 1940, but was renamed Lehi one month later
Lehi split from the Irgun militant group in 1940 in order to continue fighting the British during World War II. Lehi initially sought an alliance with Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany, offering to fight alongside them against the British in return for the transfer of all Jews from Nazi-occupied Europe to Palestine Believing that Nazi Germany was a lesser enemy of the Jews than Britain, Lehi twice attempted to form an alliance with the Nazis. During World War II it declared that it would establish a Jewish state based upon "nationalist and totalitarian principles

clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2016 07:41 am (UTC)
Livingstone muddies history to support claims on Hitler and Zionism

Former London mayor confuses agency with intention, with fatal consequences for his garbled argument
Peter Beaumont in Jerusalem
30 April 2016
Ken Livingstone persists in mangling facts to suit his argument in his continued attempt to defend his comments on Hitler and Zionism.
He took swipes at both “old Blairites” and the media on Saturday, and cited comments made by Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, at the World Zionist Congress, seeming to suggest the comments had been made in recent days and had gone unnoticed by the media.
Livingstone seemed unaware that Netanyahu’s remarks, which he cited selectively in his defence, were made in October and caused a storm of controversy both in Israel and internationally. The Israeli prime minister was roundly criticised for suggesting that the grand mufti of Jerusalem, a Palestinian, had persuaded Hitler to exterminate and not just expel Europe’s Jews.
His comments were so controversial, in fact, that Netanyahu felt compelled to clarify them: “Contrary to the impression that was created, I did not mean to claim that in his conversation with Hitler in November 1941 the Mufti convinced him to adopt the Final Solution. The Nazis decided on that by themselves.”
The reality is that Livingstone’s latest attempt to defend his comments that “Hitler supported Zionism” in 1932 before going “mad and killing six million Jews” is in line with his previous controversial remarks, invoking dubious history to support his claims.
The problem, as others have pointed out, is that Livingstone appears to conflate multiple mistaken notions to suggest Hitler “supported” Zionism – as if at some stage he had felt positively towards a strand of Jewish political thought which even in the 1930s encapsulated different and competing ideas and individuals.
The reality is that Hitler had harboured hostile views towards Jews since the 1920s, which coalesced first in the antisemitism of Mein Kampf, published in the middle of the decade.
There is a twisted kernel of truth at the heart of Livingstone’s claims when he alludes to the so-called Haavara (transfer) Agreement, although it took place in 1933 not 1932 as Livingstone suggests.
Deeply controversial amid a Jewish European boycott of German trade, it saw an agreement between Germany and German Zionists to facilitate the emigration of Jews to British Mandate Palestine – not Israel as Livingstone states, which did not exist until 1948 - by ensuring would-be Jewish emigrants could transfer part of their property.
As Yf’aat Weiss explains in an essay for the Holocaust Memorial centre at Yad Vashem in Jerusalem, the Haavara agreement allowed “German Jews emigrating to Palestine to retain some of the value of their property in Germany by purchasing German goods for the Yishuv [the Jewish settlement in Mandatory Palestine], which would redeem them in Palestine local currency”.
Its context, as Weiss points out, was as a deal forged under the threat of Nazi persecution. Following the end of Jewish emancipation in Germany, she writes: “German Jewry had to formulate survival tactics vis-à-vis the Nazi government of their own country.”
The interest of some in the Zionist movement was to flee the rampant and increasingly dangerous antisemitism of the National Socialists, but the German interest in the Haavara agreement was both fear that the Jewish boycott of Germany might have wider economic effects - ultimately a misplaced anxiety - and a desire to push German Jews to flee.
The Haavara agreement was designed to encourage the emigration of Jews from Germany in line with National Socialist policies, but it did not have in mind the foundation of a Jewish state in Palestine, a key tenet of Zionism.
Continues http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/30/livingstone-muddies-history-to-support-hitler-and-zionism-claims
Poor Ken. All that zionist funding... poof.
Will the zionist controlled media brainwash the public into believing anti zionist organisation, anti zionist org agenda (global hegemony) is anti semitism?
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2016 07:45 am (UTC)
The Israeli zionist regime is misanthropic

Israel’s History of Chemical Weapons Use
By Elias Akleh
Global Research, September 29, 2013
Israel’s Chemical WeaponsThe UN chemical weapons inspectors, who went to Syria to investigate the use of chemical weapons, should have stopped on their way at Occupied Palestine (Israel), where Israeli government has the largest stockpile of chemical and other WMD in the entire Middle East. They would have found a lot of evidence and witness accounts of Israeli use of chemical, as well as biological and nuclear, weapons against the Palestinians and their Arab neighbors. The attacks started in May 1948 and are still going on in one form or another.
The Zionist gangs under the directive and leadership of David Ben-Gurion, who became the first Israeli Prime Minister, had adopted a military policy of genocide, extermination and total destruction of the indigenous Palestinian inhabitants and their towns in order to evacuate the land for outsider Zionist Jewish occupiers. The first WMD they used was biological weapons as documented by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).
More http://www.globalresearch.ca/israels-history-of-chemical-weapons-use/5352003
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2016 08:57 am (UTC)
Re: The Israeli zionist regime is misanthropic

Evidence Israel Using Chemical Warfare On Palestinians
By James Brooks Contributing Writer
Online Journal 7-10-4
"On June 10th, 2004, the two clinics in Al-Zawiya treated 130 patients for gas inhalation. The patients were children, women, old people and young men. Dr. Abu Madi related that there was a high number of cases of [tetany], spasm in legs and hands, connected to the nervous system. Pupils were dilated . . . Other symptoms included shock, semi-consciousness, hyperventilation, irritation and sweating." [1]
Thus reads a report by medical units serving the West Bank village of Al-Zawiya, where nonviolent resistance to Israel's impending wall has been extraordinarily resolute. According to the medical report (procured by the International Middle East Media Center - IMEMC), "the gas used against the protestors is not tear gas but possibly a nerve gas."
The following day, Israel's 'Peace Bloc,' Gush Shalom, began a press release with the following quote from Al-Zawiya: "What the army used here yesterday was not tear gas. We know what tear gas is, what it feels like. That was something totally different . . . When we were still a long way off from where the bulldozers were working, they started shooting things like this one (holding up a dark green metal tube with the inscription 'Hand and rifle grenade no.400' in English). Black smoke came out. Anyone who breathed it lost consciousness immediately, more than a hundred people. They remained unconscious for nearly 24 hours. One is still unconscious, at Rapidiya Hospital in Nablus. They had high fever and their muscles became rigid. Some needed urgent blood transfusion. Now, is this a way of dispersing a demonstration, or is it chemical warfare?" [2]
The incident in Al-Zawiya appears to be the tenth attack by Israeli soldiers using an "unknown gas" against Palestinian civilians since early 2001. We have photographs of the canisters. We have film of victims suffering in the hospital. We have interviews with Palestinian and European doctors who have treated the victims. And we presumably have hundreds, perhaps thousands, of survivors. But we know nothing of their fate. Despite the evidence, we have not inquired.
Though it is a state secret, Israel's development of chemical and biological weapons has been known and analyzed for decades. From the typhoid poisoning of Palestinian wells and water supplies in 1948 [3,4] to the conversion of F-16s into nerve gas 'crop dusters' in 1998 [5], Israel has always demonstrated a strong interest in developing CBW agents and methods for their dispersal.
In 1992 an El Al 747 flying nerve gas ingredients from the US to Israel crashed into an Amsterdam apartment building. [6] According to Salman Abu-Sitta, president of the Palestine Land Society, the respected Dutch daily NRC Handelsblad followed up the crash with an in-depth investigation of the Israel Institute for Biological Research (IIBR), Israel's CBW complex in Nes Ziona. The paper reportedly found "strong links" with several US CBW and medical research centers, "close cooperation between IIBR and the British-American biological warfare programme," and "extensive collaboration on BW research with Germany and Holland." [7]
At IIBR, doctors publish world-class research in acetylcholine, the mother lode of nerve gas design. The Nes Ziona complex is reputed to have invented an "undetectable" poison-needle gun for "clean" assassinations. [8] In September 1997, two days after Jordan's King Hussein told Israeli PM Netanyahu that Hamas was seeking negotiations, Mossad agents in Jordan attempted to kill Hamas leader Khaled Misha'al with a lethal dose of fentanyl. [9]
For years, rumors persisted that Israel was using or testing unknown chemical agents on Palestinian civilians. The rumors began to reveal their substance February 12, 2001, when Israel began a six-week campaign of "novel gas" attacks in the Gaza Strip and West Bank. By chance, American filmmaker James Longley arrived in Khan Younis, Gaza in the middle of the first attack. That afternoon he began filming the victims.
More http://www.samliquidation.com/noahidenews35.htm
(Scroll down ~a quarter of the page)
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2016 08:11 am (UTC)
Did Hitler's Fascist Regime support Zionism?

Zionism and the Third Reich
Mark Weber
Early in 1935, a passenger ship bound for Haifa in Palestine left the German port of Bremerhaven. Its stern bore the Hebrew letters for its name, "Tel Aviv," while a swastika banner fluttered from the mast. And although the ship was Zionist-owned, its captain was a National Socialist Party member. Many years later a traveler aboard the ship recalled this symbolic combination as a "metaphysical absurdity." Absurd or not, this is but one vignette from a little-known chapter of history: The wide-ranging collaboration between Zionism and Hitler's Third Reich.
Common Aims
Over the years, people in many different countries have wrestled with the "Jewish question": that is, what is the proper role of Jews in non-Jewish society? During the 1930s, Jewish Zionists and German National Socialists shared similar views on how to deal with this perplexing issue. They agreed that Jews and Germans were distinctly different nationalities, and that Jews did not belong in Germany. Jews living in the Reich were therefore to be regarded not as "Germans of the Jewish faith," but rather as members of a separate national community. Zionism (Jewish nationalism) also implied an obligation by Zionist Jews to resettle in Palestine, the "Jewish homeland." They could hardly regard themselves as sincere Zionists and simultaneously claim equal rights in Germany or any other "foreign" country.

Theodor HerzlTheodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of modern Zionism, maintained that anti-Semitism is not an aberration, but a natural and completely understandable response by non-Jews to alien Jewish behavior and attitudes. The only solution, he argued, is for Jews to recognize reality and live in a separate state of their own. "The Jewish question exists wherever Jews live in noticeable numbers," he wrote in his most influential work, The Jewish State. "Where it does not exist, it is brought in by arriving Jews ... I believe I understand anti-Semitism, which is a very complex phenomenon. I consider this development as a Jew, without hate or fear." The Jewish question, he maintained, is not social or religious. "It is a national question. To solve it we must, above all, make it an international political issue. ...." Regardless of their citizenship, Herzl insisted, Jews constitute not merely a religious community, but a nationality, a people, a Volk. Zionism, wrote Herzl, offered the world a welcome "final solution of the Jewish question."
Six months after Hitler came to power, the Zionist Federation of Germany (by far the largest Zionist group in the country) submitted a detailed memorandum to the new government that reviewed German-Jewish relations and formally offered Zionist support in "solving" the vexing "Jewish question." The first step, it suggested, had to be a frank recognition of fundamental national differences:

Zionism has no illusions about the difficulty of the Jewish condition, which consists above all in an abnormal occupational pattern and in the fault of an intellectual and moral posture not rooted in one's own tradition. Zionism recognized decades ago that as a result of the assimilationist trend, symptoms of deterioration were bound to appear . . .
Zionism believes that the rebirth of the national life of a people, which is now occurring in Germany through the emphasis on its Christian and national character, must also come about in the Jewish national group. For the Jewish people, too, national origin, religion, common destiny and a sense of its uniqueness must be of decisive importance in the shaping of its existence. This means that the egotistical individualism of the liberal era must be overcome and replaced with a sense of community and collective responsibility . . .
We believe it is precisely the new [National Socialist] Germany that can, through bold resoluteness in the handling of the Jewish question, take a decisive step toward overcoming a problem which, in truth, will have to be dealt with by most European peoples ...

/continues under

Edited at 2016-05-01 08:16 am (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2016 08:28 am (UTC)
Re: Did Hitler's Fascist Regime support Zionism?
Our acknowledgment of Jewish nationality provides for a clear and sincere relationship to the German people and its national and racial realities. Precisely because we do not wish to falsify these fundamentals, because we, too, are against mixed marriage and are for maintaining the purity of the Jewish group and reject any trespasses in the cultural domain, we -- having been brought up in the German language and German culture -- can show an interest in the works and values of German culture with admiration and internal sympathy ...
For its practical aims, Zionism hopes to be able to win the collaboration of even a government fundamentally hostile to Jews, because in dealing with the Jewish question not sentimentalities are involved but a real problem whose solution interests all peoples and at the present moment especially the German people ...
Boycott propaganda -- such as is currently being carried on against Germany in many ways -- is in essence un-Zionist, because Zionism wants not to do battle but to convince and to build ...
We are not blind to the fact that a Jewish question exists and will continue to exist. From the abnormal situation of the Jews severe disadvantages result for them, but also scarcely tolerable conditions for other peoples.

The Federation's paper, the Jüdische Rundschau ("Jewish Review"), proclaimed the same message: "Zionism recognizes the existence of a Jewish problem and desires a far-reaching and constructive solution. For this purpose Zionism wishes to obtain the assistance of all peoples, whether pro- or anti-Jewish, because, in its view, we are dealing here with a concrete rather than a sentimental problem, the solution of which all peoples are interested." A young Berlin rabbi, Joachim Prinz, who later settled in the United States and became head of the American Jewish Congress, wrote in his 1934 book, Wir Juden ("We Jews"), that the National Socialist revolution in Germany meant "Jewry for the Jews." He explained: "No subterfuge can save us now. In place of assimilation we desire a new concept: recognition of the Jewish nation and Jewish race."
Active Collaboration
On this basis of their similar ideologies about ethnicity and nationhood, National Socialists and Zionists worked together for what each group believed was in its own national interest. As a result, the Hitler government vigorously supported Zionism and Jewish emigration to Palestine from 1933 until 1940-1941, when the Second World War prevented extensive collaboration.
Even as the Third Reich became more entrenched, many German Jews, probably a majority, continued to regard themselves, often with considerable pride, as Germans first. Few were enthusiastic about pulling up roots to begin a new life in far-away Palestine. Nevertheless, more and more German Jews turned to Zionism during this period. Until late 1938, the Zionist movement flourished in Germany under Hitler. The circulation of the Zionist Federation's bi-weekly Jüdische Rundschau grew enormously. Numerous Zionist books were published. "Zionist work was in full swing" in Germany during those years, the Encyclopaedia Judaica notes. A Zionist convention held in Berlin in 1936 reflected "in its composition the vigorous party life of German Zionists."
The SS was particularly enthusiastic in its support for Zionism. An internal June 1934 SS position paper urged active and wide-ranging support for Zionism by the government and the Party as the best way to encourage emigration of Germany's Jews to Palestine. This would require increased Jewish self-awareness, Jewish schools, Jewish sports leagues, Jewish cultural organizations -- in short, everything that would encourage this new consciousness and self-awareness -- should be promoted, the paper recommended.
More http://library.flawlesslogic.com/zionism.htm

Edited at 2016-05-01 09:41 am (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2016 08:45 am (UTC)
Anti semitism is promoted by zionists
Zionists The Enemies Of Jews
Rabbi Joseph Dershowitz TrueTorahJews.org
Bold Jewry is looking for brave statements from open-minded journalists who could help defend us from our tragic enemies, camouflaged as our spokesmen, our defenders and friends: the Zionist so-called "state of Israel" and their sympathizers abroad.
Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of modern Zionism, recognized that anti-Semitism would further his cause, the creation of a separate state for Jews. To solve the Jewish Question, he maintained "we must, above all, make it an international political issue." Herzl wrote that Zionism offered the world a welcome "final solution of the Jewish question." In his "Diaries", page 19, Herzl stated "Anti-Semites will become our surest friends, anti-Semitic countries our allies."
Zionism was supported by the German SS and Gestapo. Hitler himself personally supported Zionism. During the 1930's, in cooperation with the German authorities, Zionist groups organized a network of some 40 camps throughout Germany where prospective settlers were trained for their new lives in Palestine. As late as 1942 Zionists operated at least one of these officially authorized "Kibbutz" training camps over which flew the blue and white banner which would one day be adopted as the national flag of "Israel".
The Transfer Agreement (which promoted the emigration of German Jews to Palestine) implemented in 1933 and abandoned at the beginning of WWII is an important example of the cooperation between Hitler's Germany and international Zionism. Through this agreement, Hitler's Third Reich did more than any other government during the 1930ís to support Jewish development in Palestine and further the Zionist goals.
Hitler and the Zionists had a common goal: to create a world Jewish Ghetto as a solution to the Jewish Question.
The Zionist so-called "World Jewish Congress" declared war on the country of Germany, knowing that it would affect their Jewish brothers residing in that country who would be left without protection. When others tried to help them escape to other countries, the Zionist movement took actions which caused those countries to lock their doors to Jewish immigration (read more in the books, "Perfidy" and "Min Hametzer"). As a result of the Zionist influence five ships of Jewish refugees from Germany arriving in the United States were turned back to the gas chambers.
The fundamental aim of the Zionist movement has been not to save Jewish lives but to create a "Jewish state" in Palestine.
On December 7, 1938, Ben Gurion, the first head of the Zionist 'state of Israel' declared "If I knew it was possible to save all the children in Germany by taking them to England, and only half of the children by taking them to Eretz Israel, I would choose the second solution. For we must take into account not only the lives of these children but also the history of the people of Israel."
On August 31, 1949, Ben Gurion stated: "Although we have realized our dream of creating a Jewish State, we are only at the beginning. There are still only 900,000 Jews in Israel, whereas the majority of the Jewish people still remains abroad. Our future task is to bring all the Jews to Israel."
Of the two and a half million Jews seeking refuge from the Nazis between 1935 and 1943, less than 9% went to settle in Palestine. The vast majority, 75%, went to the Soviet Union. In the mid-70's, more people emigrated out of 'Israel' than came in. The only surges of immigration to the Zionist state have occurred during anti-Semitic threats and persecution in foreign countries. It follows that for the Zionist state to achieve its goal of a Jewish world ghetto anti-Semitism must be promoted and encouraged, and as we have seen, by acts of violence if necessary.
"To attain its practical objectives, Zionism hopes it will be able to collaborate with a government that is fundamentally hostile to the Jews". "A Holocaust Reader", p. 155.
The use of anti-Semitism as a tool to coerce immigration to the Zionist state continues to the present day:
More http://rense.com/general54/zins.htm

Edited at 2016-05-01 09:16 am (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2016 11:27 am (UTC)
Anti zionism is akin to anti luciferianism or anti satanism
The zionists' religion is luciferian.

This from a deeply superstitious religious opposer of Babylon luciferianism.

Babylonian Talmudic Mother Harlot of the Earth, Mystery Babylon
April 11, 2016 robertpickle
I have decided to republish this mainly in rebuttal to Pastor Steve Anderson’s Babylon video.
I am in hope that maybe one more will come to Christ and the understanding of the coming false Christ, their Talmudic flesh Moshiach of Babylon which is that false Christ who will soon come at that whore city jerusalem, “the great city”.
I am in hope to recover his misled sheep who have been taught this fallacy. I am in hope to recover the masses who are led to the same deception.
The Talmudic hasidic pharisaic jews of Chabad Lubavitch set into place HJR 104, PL 102-14 by their Noahide Publican and freemason seditionist and treasonist proselytes in Washington, D.C March 1991, aided by their main stream treasonous Viper Media, owned by these same vipers of hell.
These laws (Codes) are derived from the Babylonian Talmud. The Babylonian Talmud which is the rejection of God’s Laws, are of the Pharisaic ribeyes,(call no man rabbi) replaced by the traditions which make the word of God of none effect, the Mishnah and Gemara. Much like Codes and statutes replaced Natural Law or Common Law, these are “codes” which are not LAW, but secret code of secret cults and sects. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure what global Mystery Babylon is and where the whoredom was derived while the Pharisees were in Bondage in Babylon. Jesus warned of these Vipers and Hypocrites in that bloody whore city jerusalem which is in bond after the flesh of Hagar and spiritual Babylon.Galatians 3-4.
These Babylonian Hasidic Vipers also revived Sanhedrin the beast out of the seas of Revelation 13, at Tiberias Israel Oct. 13, 2004. They brag they are the descendants of the Pharisees and of Babylonian heritage and Devil worship. See the abomination the Sanhedrin did in the Temple of God, Ezekiel 8. They continue until this day. They also brag they will reveal their king, Moshiach also known by Christ believing saints as the “Son of Perdition” who will come as False Christ deceiving the world, whose names are not written in the Lambs Book of Like.
A must read….. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/18692
The Talmud is the Babylonian oral perversion of the WORD of GOD
The Babylonian Talmudic Hasidic anti-Christ jews control the nations of the earth through their central banks. They control all media, Federal Reserve, IRS, Wall Street, most industry, Food supply and commodity speculation. They have all treasonous politicians bribed or coerced by fear and blackmail, through AIPAC and the ADL and media outlets. They control foreign policy and are who are behind all wars for the benefit of Eretz Israel.They have total control over the Vatican and most evangelical Talmudic churches bow to the Babylonian whoredom. Make no mistake whom they serve in their blasphemies, sorceries murders and thefts.For that Great City which whored after the Robber, jerusalem is….The
Who, What, When & Where
The Whore sits upon the Babylon Bull of Nimrod
Nimrod-Baal- Osiris Ra- Mithra-Molech
all the same….
and all was depicted as the Bull. All was derived from Babylon. If you do not reject knowledge so that you will not be destroyed …….(Hosea 4:6) you will find that the Babylonian High Priest himself, Nimrod was known as the Pontifax Maximas, thus
Continues (that statue is not about your liberty)
If you cut through the religious rhetoric, an interesting read.

Edited at 2016-05-01 12:12 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2016 01:41 pm (UTC)

The arguments against Livingstone appear fallacious.
"Hitler" in most contexts refers to the Hitler regime the way "Assad" refers to the Assad government.
The Hitler regime demonstrably supported zionism. Guardian Peter's rebuttal criticising the accuracy of Livingstone's comment is based on Hitler the person.

Why the all the hoo-hah?
Maybe it is in line with the Cameron regime's intent to keep the religious and racial disharmony simmering.
Maybe it is as said above, zionists promoting disharmony to encourage jewish relocation.
Maybe it is to distract from the calls by the public for zionist Cameron's resignation.

Maybe it is all about getting the public to conflate zionism with judaism so that anti zionists can be persecuted in the same way as holocaust debunkers.
Cameron wanted to make a law against conspiracy theorists.

Zionists are afraid the public will become aware of the zionists' true part in all the badness going on unless freedom of speech is suppressed.

I'm curious about the gene research that some claim to demonstrate jewish ancestry. Is it typical of Khazarian descendents?
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2016 02:05 pm (UTC)
There is no profit in curing cancer

The True Cause and Cure for Cancer
So many people have cancer throughout the world today, and yet the people have been deceived into thinking that drugs is the only way. It's not even THE way. Drugs will make you even more sick.


If you are diagnosed with cancer, run for your life from the big pharms industry representatives (doctors) that will try to sell you chemo.

The Truth About Cancer

Home page https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/

Chemotherapy Drugs Cause More Cancer
Video Transcript: Chemotherapy Drugs Cause More Cancer Ty Bollinger: I’m gathering from you, in light of all of the different…

The Power of Hope for Cancer Patients (video)
Can a doctor ever really know for sure when and if a patient will die? You’ll be surprised by this oncologist’s views about the…

"The Cancer Tutor" Reveals How He Would Treat His Own Pancreatic Cancer
How would someone who specializes in helping others beat cancer treat their own pancreatic cancer? “The Cancer Tutor” tells all…

How the FDA Supports Big Food Companies in Selling More Junk Food
Have governments become the puppets of the Big Food industry? Discover how agencies like the FDA are putting corporate interest…

The Danger of a Weak Immune System
Being diagnosed with cancer means you have a weak immune system. Understand why this is so important, and the common treatments…

Chris Wark: Why I Said "No" to Chemo
Cancer survivor Chris Wark shares about the moment he decided to trust his gut and say “NO” to the conventional treatment his…

Why Most People Have a Fear of Cancer
Find out why this M.D. believes that people have a fear of cancer over any other disease and how many doctors aren’t doing their…

Gov’t Interference with Experimental Cancer Treatments
The tragic story of a little boy’s death because the FDA blocked his family from getting him the experimental cancer treatments…

The 2 Best Cancer Treatments of All?
You’ll be totally surprised by what this unorthodox oncologist says are two of the best cancer treatments. What’s even better is…

Nutrition and Cancer: 5 Things Every Cancer Patient Needs to Know
If you have cancer, you need to give extra thought to what you’re eating. Dr. Patrick Quillin reveals 5 important facts about…

11 more pages -
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2016 03:51 pm (UTC)
Is there a pattern?

Jailing of '6 million killed in the holocaust' deniers.
Calls to jail AGW by CO2 deniers.
Cameron calling for the criminalisation of conspiracy theories.
Zionists calling for anti zionism to be included in anti semitic law.

Seems that anything that could interfere with the zionists global hegemony agenda is demonised.
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2016 06:24 pm (UTC)
Casualties mount from bombardment in Syria's largest city

Associated Press
Yahoo 28 April 2016
BEIRUT (AP) -- Airstrikes and artillery killed more than 60 people in the past 24 hours in Aleppo, including dozens at a hospital in a rebel-held neighborhood, as Syria's largest city was turned once again into a major battleground in the civil war, officials said Thursday.
Aid agencies warn that Aleppo is on the brink of a humanitarian disaster with the collapse of a two-month cease-fire and stalled peace talks.
The intensified violence — by far the worst since the partial cease-fire began — coincides with reports of a military buildup outside Aleppo that many fear is a prelude for a government attempt to force a complete siege of the city's neighborhoods.
Battle-hardened residents were shocked by the bloodshed. Opposition activists accused the government of carpet-bombing rebel-controlled areas, while Syrian state media said more than 1,000 mortar rounds and rockets were fired at government-held districts, killing 22 people.
Video posted online by opposition activists showed rescuers pulling bodies from shattered buildings in the rebel neighborhoods of Sukkari, Kallasa and Bustan al-Qasr.
In one scene, a building's staircase hung sideways and old men were sobbing.
"The walls, cupboards, everything fell on top of them," cried one man. In another, a clearly terrified small girl with pigtails wept silently while held by a man.
A blond girl walked from the rubble behind her mother, questioning why they were bombed. "What have we done?" she cried.
In the rebel-held Sukkari neighborhood, 27 people died as a well-known field hospital supported by Doctors Without Borders and the International Committee for the Red Cross was hit overnight, along with nearby buildings, according to opposition activists and rescue workers.
U.N. envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura appealed to the U.S. and Russia to help revive the peace talks and cease-fire, which he said "hangs by a thread."
However, the violence only escalated.
Chief opposition negotiator Mohammed Alloush blamed the government of President Bashar Assad for the violence, saying it shows "the environment is not conducive to any political action."
"What is happening is a crime of ethnic and sectarian cleansing by all means," Alloush told The Associated Press, adding it was an attempt by Assad's government to drive residents from Aleppo.
But a citizen journalist said there was little sign of people fleeing the city.
"Where can they go?" said Bahaa al-Halaby.
A Damascus-based Syrian military official denied the government had hit the hospital. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to the media.
Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Maj. Gen. Igor Konashenkov also denied bombing any hospitals in Aleppo, saying its aircraft have not flown any missions in the region for several days.
Col. Steve Warren, the spokesman for the U.S.-led campaign against the Islamic State group, said fighter jets from the international coalition have not carried out any airstrikes in Aleppo in the past 24 hours.
More https://uk.news.yahoo.com/syria-activists-airstrikes-rebel-held-aleppo-kill-20-063643673.html
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2016 07:36 pm (UTC)
In the Now: End Game (S3E27)

RT 1 May, 2016 06:51
Clintons' dirty money, soldiers high on LSD, KGB dolphins and Canada's black guy. Crazy huh? This is the final episode of In the Now. Starting May 2nd 2016 the show will transform into a digital media project.
Vid https://www.rt.com/shows/in-the-now-summary/341515-dirty-money-kgb-final/
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2016 08:31 pm (UTC)
Russian Video- Highly Graphic: Innocent Children Killed in Aleppo by US Proxy Jihadists
This video is hard to watch. Graphic warning. These videos were attained by the Russian media outlet Anna News directly from the victims on the ground and show the real scope of the devastation being conducted on Aleppo by US proxy forces. These videos feature dead children and adults. Note that these videos show the Syrian Army working with civilians in Aleppo to help the wounded. The Syrian Arab Army are the good guys working with the injured people and are not the ones killing civilians as the US media portrays. These videos prove who the civilian population trusts.
The US government and media narrative on Syria is a complete lie and cover-up. Civilians in Aleppo are under constant bombardment from US/Saudi/Turkish/Qatari backed jihadists. The US State Department portrays the war in a completely different manner than what is actually happening on the ground. It is intentional deception meant to fool the American people.
The people of Aleppo are victims of US aggression and not Russian or Syrian aggression. Russia and Syrian troops are working to help the victims, as is obvious in this video. The terrorists and murderers of these innocent victims are the jihadists that the US is financing and supporting. The US media has completely ignored these killings over the last few days. There is a reason there are no US reporters on the ground in Syria, that is because if the corrupt US media actually sent any reporters then the false narrative might become exposed. Some of their consciences would be unable to handle being deceptive in the face of such unimaginable horror. That is why they use a random individual who calls himself "The Syrian Observatory of Human Rights" in the UK. Y
You will not see videos like these coming from the US or any other western media outlet, simply because they don't want you to see the real truth about the war. They want to lie to you and feed you a false narrative and blatant propaganda.
Vid http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2a8_1462080858
Link to 2nd video showing additional destruction and carnage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6n8gDffRB04
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2016 08:44 pm (UTC)
‘Anti-Zionism = anti-semitism’ is a formal logical fallacy
Mondoweiss Roland Nikles on April 16, 2016
There is a canard going around that anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism. For example, the title of a recent article by Jonathan Sacks, the ex-chief rabbi of Great Britain, makes this into a formal equation: Anti-Zionism is the New anti-Semitism.
Sacks, of course, may not have chosen this title, but the title which makes the formal equation (anti-Zionism = anti-Semitism) is consistent with the tenor of the article. Sacks is saying anti-Zionists are anti-Semites. At the very least, he’s saying if you’re an anti-Zionist you’re automatically suspect for being an anti-Semite.
Peter Beinart takes issue with this. Beinart is very admiring and complimentary of Sacks but suggests that to make a formal equation between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism dehumanizes Palestinians.
Sacks says this:
“Anti-Semitism is a classic example of what anthropologist René Girard sees as the primal form of human violence: scapegoating. When bad things happen to a group, its members can ask two different questions: “What did we do wrong?” or “Who did this to us?” The entire fate of the group will depend on which it chooses.”
And that makes Beinart’s point. Anti-Semitism is scapegoating the Jews for (God knows what?) The point is the scapegoat bears the sin of others: the scapegoat is either innocent, or not the main problem. And that’s very obviously not true about Zionism. It is Zionism that drove 700,000+ from the land and won’t let them come back; it is Zionism that engages in military occupation and oppression of millions for 50 years now. Opposition to that is not scapegoating the Jews. And by Sacks’ own definition that makes anti-Zionism not anti-Semitism.
Now can anti-Zionists also be anti-Semites. Sure. But that’s an entirely different question….it has NOTHING to do with anti-Zionism. The strong claim that anti-Zionism = anti-Semitism is a formal logical fallacy. It is entirely lacking in merit.
What about the weaker, factual claim that many anti-Zionists also happen to be anti-Semites. That weaker claim, of course, is in the prejudiced eye of the beholder…. In order to back it up, you’d have to do studies; and designing objective studies about such a thing would be very tricky. Sacks cites a 2013 European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights study which surveyed the subjective feelings of 5,847 European Jews in an on-line survey. 66% of respondents reported anti-Semitism to be a problem. This included 35% of respondents who perceived any criticism of Israel as anti-Semitic. Gathering data like this is important and necessary, but this study provides no information that would permit a conclusion that anti-Zionists are anti-Semites.
More http://mondoweiss.net/2016/04/anti-zionism-anti-semitism-is-a-formal-logical-fallacy/

Also see Zionism is finally in the news, as officials seek to conflate anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism

Edited at 2016-05-01 08:49 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on May 1st, 2016 09:05 pm (UTC)

Our servitude is sustained and debt enslavement guaranteed by using the occupation regime and Bank of England corp'n usurers' bank notes.