February 9th, 2011

EPA, Globalism, Temperature

History repeats



Dr Roy. What most people don’t realize is that the vast majority of published research on the topic simply assumes that warming is manmade. It in no way “proves” it.
If the science really is that settled, then this challenge should be easy:
Show me one peer-reviewed paper that has ruled out natural, internal climate cycles as the cause of most of the recent warming in the thermometer record.

While we spend eternity waiting for the warmist community to provide empirical evidence to support their alarmism, I for one shall treat their "warming will toast grand kids" and "warming causes cooling" with equal contempt.

The EPA leaders decided to ignore their own staff findings (Scaffetta
here and paper here) that conflicted with their dogmatic belief in human emissions driven warming and coup bid instead preferring modelled scenario based prediction to data sourced prediction, pretty much in line with IPCC advocacy. Models are right, data is wrong. As a perfect example of the deception such a resolve necessarily obliges, lower mid through to upper tropospheric global humidity (RH) has been observed to be falling since 1948. Models require it to be increasing. Models require a "hot spot" at 10km altitude in tropics. It isn't there. Model scenarios and reality parted company in 1995 despite best efforts to make reality fit assumption. 7 years right 16 years wrong.

Belief in the nonsense that human CO2 emissions as a small fraction of natural emissions drive the climate - or even significantly influence it reveals those proselytising and portraying acceptance of the evidence-absent opinion (that is of benefit only to political agendas such as eco fascist
globalism, socialist nanny government regimes, white elephant ornament business and speculator profit) as either thick or profit driven. In the EPA's case it is becoming increasingly plain that they seek to impose draconian regulation regardless of the justification and success will give the EPA greater control of the economy than the house or the senate, effectively a coup. The the EPA, EC, the UN, CFR, UK government (its 3 siamesed main parties) and more are aligned in this use of fanciful climate alarm to take financial power and self determination from the people in order to clear the path for a non accountable global government of bankers and "elites". They are either self serving traitors or agenda driven traitors. Royalty aligning with the traitors means they are no longer a buffer against freedom and national wealth pillaging bureaucrats and bankers. Perhaps the royals, not just in the UK see themselves as the "elite" part of global government, a retro step and most certainly not in any nation's best interest. Retro goes double for religious bureaucracy's participation.

The people behind globalism are ruthless. They seek population reduction by any means, the UN led DDT scandal was probably one such instance where unscrupulous profit (new mosquito poison) and contemptible idealism backed by significant political influence not just by control of the UN enabled it, biofuel is another mechanism that displays the extreme contempt globalism supporters hold human life. The EPA is raising the obligatory level of biofuel content in petrol and diesel. This can only force corn and wheat prices with institutional speculator support making the murderous policy even more effective in raising the death toll, starvation causing inhuman suffering. The people doing this in full knowledge of the consequences deserve the same fate. That includes past and present EC commissioners. The UN fearing funding impacts and even its very existence is desperately trying to step back from its gung-ho support for assassination due to biofuel. It holds guilt for a major proportion of such deaths by its (continuing) dogmatic insistence that CO2 emitted by humans is harmful.

The globalists' objective is a world population of 500 million. Their blindness to simple facts is unbelievable. Major wars, many of which they have been involved in instigating and or financing show that a population rebound always occurs at the termination of hostilities. It is no different to other occurrences of decimation such as Spanish flu or the black death. If they were aware
of this then the DDT scandal must have been for purely financial reasons. This is the true nature of the real cancer in humanity. It consists of a hard core of around 2000 sick minds and many more that either benefit from following the camp or have been co-opted. Blair, Brown, Cameron, Osborne, Tickell, Houghton to name but a few give every appearance of being camp followers or cult-indoctrinated enablers.

Gore recognised that biofuel is a game loser, the UN followed and the EC is seeing the light. The problem is that their main objective, eco fascist world government remains unaltered. The only way of stopping the evil is by separating their access to funding that arrives in globalist control from government gifts to green banks, the UN, the EC, debt currency and commodity manipulation, medical, chemical and charity scams and the big one, the CO2 scam. It is the use of banks and the loyalty of political parties' upper hierarchy to the globalist cause that gets the nation's earned income from people's pockets into globalist control. If you find globalism, euthenasia and mass murder reasonable, vote for any of the three main parties, it doesn't matter which, and use banks.Don't turn valueless paper money into goods with material value, especially avoid physical gold and silver the purchase of which could cause banks that have sold their holdings 2, 3 or more times over to fail. N.M Rothschilds and JPM appear vulnerable.


Sources -
ITN, Treehugger

CCNet bio-fools, EPA and some science

CCNet – 8 February 2011

The Climate Policy Network


Flawed Climate Policy Is ‘A Crime Against Humanity’

A UN expert yesterday called the growing practice of turning crops into biofuel "a crime against humanity" because it has created food shortages and sent food prices soaring, leaving millions of poor people hungry. Jean Ziegler, who has been the UN's independent expert on the right to food since the position was established in 2000, called for a five-year moratorium on biofuel production to halt the growing "catastrophe" for poor people. Using biofuels instead of gasoline in cars is generally considered to cut carbon dioxide emissions, which cause global warming, although some scientists say greenhouse gases released during the production of biofuel crops can offset those gains. –The Independent, 27 October 2007

Governments should stop promoting biofuels rather than considering curbs on speculation if they want to fight food inflation, the chairman of Nestle, the world's biggest food group, said on Thursday. "There is one very simple solution: no food for fuel," Peter Brabeck said. "It is not about every-day speculations. It's about fixing the fundamentals, which is ... reducing food for biofuels then we can tackle that in a relatively short period of time." --Reuters, 27 January 2011

According to The Wall Street Journal, in 2001, only 7 percent of U.S. corn went to ethanol. By 2010, the ethanol share was 39 percent. So instead of growing wheat, our farmers are growing corn in order to cash in on ethanol subsidies. Egyptians who can't afford to buy bread and have taken to the streets in protest might be very interested to know this. Not even Al Gore still believes that ethanol provides any environmental benefits. -- Lawrence Kudlow, Rasmussen Reports, 2 February 2011

1) Egyptian Revolt Fuelled by Ethanol Subsidies and Biofuel Mandates - Open Market, 4 February 2011

2) Egypt's unrest tied to high food prices - McClatchy-Tribune, 31 January 2011

3) Ethanol Lobby: Fuel Trumps Hunger - Dakota Voice, 2 February 2011

4) Rich Lowry: The Ethanol Idiocy that Will Not Die - When Al Gore drops an environmental fad, it has truly reached its expiration date. In his wisdom, the Goracle recently acknowledged what almost all disinterested observers concluded long ago: Ethanol is a fraud. It has no environmental benefits, and harmful side effects. The subsidies that support its use are an object lesson in the incorrigibility of Washington’s gross special-interest politics. It is the monster that ate America’s corn crop. –Rich Lowry, National Review 2010

5) Bio-Fools: Green-energy plant sucks up subsidies, then goes bust - To turn wood chips into ethanol fuel, George W. Bush's Department of Energy in February 2007 announced a $76 million grant to Range Fuels for a cutting-edge refinery. A few months later, the refinery opened in the piney woods of Treutlen County, Ga., as the taxpayers of Georgia piled on another $6 million. In 2008, the ethanol plant was the first beneficiary of the Biorefinery Assistance Program, pocketing a loan for $80 million guaranteed by the U.S. taxpayers. Last month, the refinery closed down, having failed to squeeze even a drop of ethanol out of its pine chips. --Timothy P Carney, Washington Examiner, 7 February 2011

6) Republican’s Green Energy Lobbyists May Save Obama's Presidency - Many Republicans have their own industry favorites, and such parochial interests could undercut their opposition to Mr. Obama's wider agenda. Even Al Gore now admits that the only reason he supported ethanol in 2000 was to goose his presidential prospects, and the only difference now between Al and Newt is that Al admits he was wrong.—The Wall Street Journal, 7 February 2011

7) And Finally: Paul Krugman Loses Perspective - Roger Pielke Jr Blog, 7 February 2011

Thanks to Dr Peiser, GWPF
(I think political cartoons are a good addition)

Insight into the agenda driven EPA's determination to let no obstacle stand between their ambition to rule the world have absolute control over the US economy and common sense. Rothschildesque, "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws."
EPW Minority staff release Bush administration views on endangerment (CFP)

Humour - Paul Krugman has caused quite a stir with his claims that the riots in Egypt are the result of: global warming > causing bad weather > causing crop failure > causing increased food prices > causing riots. Chastisement dished out here.

Ross McKitrick at Suite 101 - Discussing his latest paper, "Conflict Resolution in Climate Science: Some Preliminary Thoughts from an Outsider" published as a news item (February 7, 2011) on his website, rossmckitrick.weebly,
The public has acquired a dim view of the credibility of climate science, and based on what I have seen, the public is right.”  (skeptic economist in damning assessment of climate consensus)

Pielke Sr. Self Regulation Of The Climate System By Deep Cumulus Convection, link,
[...] Only if the high latitude oceans warm to well above freezing almost everywhere (which means most of the Arctic and Antarctic sea ice disappears) and/or the tropical oceans warm substantially above their current values, will this self-regulation of the climate system change.  The role of human climate forcings would have to be large enough to alter these surface temperatures.
Worth the time to read.
(Also see W. Eschenbach's excellent Thermostat Hypothesis pdf, Energy & Environment (£18) discussed at WUWT here.)

Pielke Sr. The Westerlies Explain The Recent Extreme Winter Weather, Not “Global Warming”
Not much one can add to that. The good doctor's explanation and data here.

A simpler explanation of the phenomenom can be found in the prestigious Browning Newsletter, link
"Since 1995, the rapid flows of the Gulf Stream and other tropical currents have created an unusually warm North Atlantic."

Didn't alarmists tell us the GS must slow down due to global warming driven ice melt stalling the submergence of surface water?

While in the N. hemi the westerlies cool, the S. hemi's equivalent warm the Antarctic peninsula. Isn't that CO2 just amazing? /sarc
Some interesting thoughts on Antarctic peninsula warming
at WUWT.
The stronger westerlies above the Southern Ocean also increase the insulation of the Antarctica. As a result, there is less heat exchange between the tropics and the poles, leading to a cooling of the Antarctica and the surrounding seas. However, the Antarctic Peninsula warms due to a western wind anomaly bringing maritime air onto the Peninsula.

(If you think WUWT is the best science blog, vote here. Click on the round spot in the lower right corner, scroll down and give your email, click on the link in the resulting confirmation mail, done. There isn't a propaganda category so Real Climate isn't featured.)

History Lesson
The real CO2 alarm foundation
Rothschild established the CO2–fraud at the 4. World Wilderness Congress as a “fact”. “It needs money”, he said. In Rio 1992 his friend Maurice Strong made Rothschild´s lie and GEF Bank UN policy. Link (... that was promoted by UNEP, the program itself created by Strong under Kofi with £public and £Rockefeller. Is Strong paid a UN pension? Are such means tested?)
It needs the public's money, the source of ever growing private wealth by stealth and sharp practice, I mean what else are charities useful for? When you are worth enough fiat currency to wallpaper a city or three politicians trip over themselves to please. When you have henchmen in high places majority support is simple. That's politics the Rothschild way. MEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEME

If you don't already know about Bin Laden's origins, this will blow your socks off. Wikileaks: US Embassy Illuminati

And from Daniel Hannan, [...] "One of the most encouraging developments of recent years has been the readiness of philanthropists to purchase millions of acres of endangered ecosystems. When rich people buy rainforests, they make damn sure that no one degrades their property. When, by contrast, Sting made over a chunk of the Amazon to its indigenous population, local chiefs promptly set about reducing their tribes to near-slavery, and started logging and mining on an unprecedented scale. Why? Because, as in the old USSR, the land was owned communally, not privately." Link