?

Log in

No account? Create an account
 
 
09 April 2015 @ 09:57 am
Eurasian emporium or nuclear war?  
April 6, 2015 Author: Asia Times [Cat. Empire of Chaos]

A high-level European diplomatic source has confirmed to Asia Times that German chancellor Angela Merkel’s government has vigorously approached Beijing in an effort to disrupt its multi-front strategic partnership with Russia.
Beijing won’t necessarily listen to this political gesture from Berlin, as China is tuning the strings on its pan-Eurasian New Silk Road project, which implies close trade/commerce/business ties with both Germany and Russia.
The German gambit reveals yet more pressure by hawkish sectors of the U.S. government who are intent on targeting and encircling Russia. For all the talk about Merkel’s outrage over the U.S. National Security Agency’s tapping shenanigans, the chancellor walks Washington’s walk.  Real “outrage” means nothing unless she unilaterally ends sanctions on Russia. In the absence of such a response by Merkel, we’re in the realm of good guy-bad guy negotiating tactics.
The bottom line is that Washington cannot possibly tolerate a close Germany-Russia trade/political relationship, as it directly threatens its hegemony in the Empire of Chaos.
Thus, the whole Ukraine tragedy has absolutely nothing to do with human rights or the sanctity of borders. NATO ripped Kosovo away from Yugoslavia-Serbia without even bothering to hold a vote, such as the one that took place in Crimea.
Watch those S-500s
In parallel, another fascinating gambit is developing. Some sectors of U.S. Think Tankland – with their cozy CIA ties – are now hedging their bets about Cold War 2.0, out of fear that they have misjudged what really happens on the geopolitical chessboard.
I’ve just returned from Moscow, and there’s a feeling the Federal Security Bureau and Russian military intelligence are increasingly fed up with the endless stream of Washington/NATO provocations – from the Baltics to Central Asia, from Poland to Romania, from Azerbaijan to Turkey.
This is an extensive but still only partial summary of what’s seen all across Russia as an existential threat: Washington/NATO’s intent to block Russia’s Eurasian trade and development; destroy its defense perimeter; and entice it into a shooting war.
A shooting war is not exactly a brilliant idea. Russia’s S-500 anti-missile missiles and anti-aircraft missiles can intercept any existing ICBM, cruise missile or aircraft. S-500s travel at 15,480 miles an hour; reach an altitude of 115 miles; travel horizontally 2,174 miles; and can intercept up to ten incoming missiles. They simply cannot be stopped by any American anti-missile system.
Some on the U.S. side say  the  S-500 system is being rolled out in a crash program, as an American intel source told Asia Times. There’s been no Russian confirmation. Officially, Moscow says the system is slated to be rolled out in 2017. End result, now or later: it will seal Russian airspace. It’s easy to draw the necessary conclusions.
That makes the Obama administration’s “policy” of promoting war hysteria, coupled with unleashing a sanction, ruble and oil war against Russia, the work of a bunch of sub-zoology specimens.
Some adults in the EU have already seen the writing on the (nuclear) wall. NATO’s conventional defenses are a joke. Any military buildup – as it’s happening now – is also a joke, as it could be demolished by the 5,000 tactical nuclear weapons Moscow would be able to use.
When in doubt, bully
Of course it takes time to turn the current Cold War 2.0 mindset around, but there are indications the Masters of the Universe are listening – as this essay shows. Call it the first (public) break in the ice.
Let’s assume Russia decided to mobilize five million troops, and switch to military production. The “West” would back down to an entente cordiale in a flash. And let’s assume Moscow decided to confiscate what remains of dodgy oligarch wealth. Vladimir Putin’s approval rate – which is not exactly shabby as it stands – would soar to at least 98%. Putin has been quite restrained so far. And still his childishly hysterical demonization persists.
It’s a non-stop escalation scenario. Color revolutions. The Maidan coup. Sanctions; “evil” Hitler/Putin; Ukraine to enter NATO; NATO bases all over. And yet reality – as in the Crimean counter coup, and the battlefield victories by the armies of the People’s Republics of Donetsk and Lugansk – has derailed the most elaborate U.S. State Department/NATO plans. On top of it Merkel and France’s Francois Hollande were forced into an entente cordiale with Russia – on Minsk 2 – because they knew that would be the only way to stop Washington from further weaponizing Kiev.
Putin is essentially committed to a very complex preservation/flowering process of Russia’s history and culture, with overtones of pan-Slavism and Eurasianism. Comparing him to Hitler does not even qualify as a kindergarten prank.
Yet don’t expect Washington neo-cons to understand Russian history or culture. Most of them would not even survive a Q&A on their beloved heroes Leo Strauss and Carl Schmitt. Moreover, their anti-intellectualism and exceptionalist arrogance creates only a privileged space for undiluted bullying.
A U.S. academic, one of my sources, sent a letter to Nancy Pelosi copied to a notorious neo-con, the husband of Victoria, the Queen of Nulandistan. Here’s the neo-con’s response, via his Brookings Institution email: “Why don’t you go (expletive deleted)  yourself?” Yet another graphic case of husband and wife deserving each other.
At least there seem to be sound IQs in the Beltway driven to combat the neo-con cell inside the State Department, the neo-con infested editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post, an array of think tanks, and of course NATO, whose current military leader, Gen. Breedlove/Breedhate, is working hard on his post-mod impersonation of Dr. Strangelove.
Russian “aggression” is a myth. Moscow’s strategy, so far, has been pure self-defense. Moscow in a flash will strongly advance a strategic cooperation with the West if the West understands Russia’s security interests. If those are violated – as in provoking the bear – the bear will respond. A minimum understanding of history reveals that the bear knows one or two things about enduring suffering. It simply won’t collapse – or melt away.
Meanwhile, another myth has also been debunked: That sanctions would badly hurt Russia’s exports and trade surpluses. Of course there was hurt, but bearable. Russia enjoys a wealth of raw materials and massive internal production capability – enough to meet the bulk of internal demand.
So we’re back to the EU, Russia and China, and everyone in between, all joining the greatest trade emporium in history across the whole of Eurasia. That’s what Putin proposed in Germany a few years ago, and that’s what the Chinese are already doing. And what do the neo-cons propose? A nuclear war on European soil.

Asia Times http://atimes.com/2015/04/eurasian-emporium-or-nuclear-war-pepe-escobar/

14 Comments



Tags: Merkel, Eurasian emporium or nuclear war?

 
 
 
clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2015 11:16 am (UTC)
Humanitarian Imperialism: The New Doctrine of Imperial Right
by Noam Chomsky
Jean Bricmont’s concept “humanitarian imperialism” succinctly captures a dilemma that has faced Western leaders and the Western intellectual community since the collapse of the Soviet Union. From the origins of the Cold War, there was a reflexive justification for every resort to force and terror, subversion and economic strangulation: the acts were undertaken in defense against what John F. Kennedy called “the monolithic and ruthless conspiracy” based in the Kremlin (or sometimes in Beijing), a force of unmitigated evil dedicated to extending its brutal sway over the entire world. The formula covered just about every imaginable case of intervention, no matter what the facts might be. But with the Soviet Union gone, either the policies would have to change, or new justifications would have to be devised. It became clear very quickly which course would be followed, casting new light on what had come before, and on the institutional basis of policy.
The end of the Cold War unleashed an impressive flow of rhetoric assuring the world that the West would now be free to pursue its traditional dedication to freedom, democracy, justice, and human rights unhampered by superpower rivalry, though there were some—called “realists” in international relations theory—who warned that in “granting idealism a near exclusive hold on our foreign policy,” we may be going too far and might harm our interests.1 Such notions as “humanitarian intervention” and “the responsibility to protect” soon came to be salient features of Western discourse on policy, commonly described as establishing a “new norm” in international affairs.
The millennium ended with an extraordinary display of self-congratulation on the part of Western intellectuals, awe-struck at the sight of the “idealistic new world bent on ending inhumanity,” which had entered a “noble phase” in its foreign policy with a “saintly glow” as for the first time in history a state is dedicated to “principles and values,” acting from “altruism” and “moral fervor” alone as the leader of the “enlightened states,” hence free to use force where its leaders “believe it to be just”—only a small sample of a deluge from respected liberal voices.
Several questions immediately come to mind. First, how does the self-image conform to the historical record prior to the end of the Cold War? If it does not, then what reason would there be to expect a sudden dedication to “granting idealism a near exclusive hold on our foreign policy,” or any hold at all? And how in fact did policies change with the superpower enemy gone? A prior question is whether such considerations should even arise.
There are two views about the significance of the historical record. The attitude of those who celebrate the “emerging norms” is expressed clearly by one of their most distinguished scholar/advocates, international relations professor Thomas Weiss: critical examination of the record, he writes, is nothing more than “sound-bites and invectives about Washington’s historically evil foreign policy,” hence “easy to ignore.”
Continues http://monthlyreview.org/2008/09/01/humanitarian-imperialism-the-new-doctrine-of-imperial-right/
clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2015 12:03 pm (UTC)
Toxic national debt increase bloated by...
More than half of tax paid in the US goes on killing people abroad while a sizable proportion goes on keeping the public repressed and misinformed to protect the elite spending their taxes.
Elite = (zios, KJs, freemasons) black nobility, banking families, weapons, oil, pharmaceutical and GM agri corporations.
As in the US so in the UK.
How much goes to funding NATO in its covert and overt wars of aggression and terrorism?
How much goes to national military participating in NATO's wars and terrorism?
How much goes to the private bank, the IMF that funds regimes oppressing their public?
How much goes to regimes oppressing their public via gang green loans?
How much goes the EC to "govern" the UK?
How much goes to mercenary providers?
How much goes to the zio NWO's UN with its aggressive "peacekeepers?"
And so on.
clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2015 03:14 pm (UTC)
NEO – Truth Gone Bad – How 9/11 Activists Have Failed
April 7, 2015 By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
The “9/11 truth movement” is a thoroughly controlled and infiltrated “clan”
[...]
There is increasing evidence that the “9/11 truth movement” is, in actuality, a thoroughly controlled and infiltrated “clan” tasked with suppressing truth, not spreading it.
Experts in counter-intelligence who have researched both materials and key individuals involved have found evidence that the “dead in the water” groups continue year after year for one purpose only, to represent a “point of focus” away from leaked materials that have, in actuality, entirely solved “the 9/11 mystery.”
As 9/11 is exposed in a wider context, not only as a preliminary to the War on Terror, but a decade of staged “color revolutions” and false flag terrorism, of phony insurgencies and “cardboard Lothario” bad guys, it has become clear that activist groups and the “alternative media” are nearly all run by police and intelligence organizations with ties to Israel and the “compromised” governments of the West.
Cameron
On September 24, 2104, British Prime Minister David Cameron spoke before the United Nations. His topic was extremism and how it threatened what he believes to be “security.”
However, the cause for his speech wasn’t a terror threat, not ISIS, not Al Qaeda or even Iran. Cameron was attacking an American-based military publication, Veterans Today.
This is what Cameron said:
“As evidence emerges about the backgrounds of those convicted of terrorist offences, it is clear that many of them were initially influenced by preachers who claim not to encourage violence, but whose world view can be used as a justification for it. We know this world view.
The peddling of lies: that 9/11 was a Jewish plot or that the 7/7 London attacks were staged. The idea that Muslims are persecuted all over the world as a deliberate act of Western policy. The concept of an inevitable clash of civilisations.
We must be clear: to defeat the ideology of extremism we need to deal with all forms of extremism – not just violent extremism.
For governments, there are some obvious ways we can do this. We must ban preachers of hate from coming to our countries. We must proscribe organisations that incite terrorism against people at home and abroad. We must work together to take down illegal online material…”
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/BBC.jpg
BBC News announced that Bldg. 7 had fallen 15 minutes before it fell. It is still standing as the announcement was made. WTC Bldg. 7 is seen in the background as the announcement is made on BBC News that the building has fallen… David Cameron feels it best we lock down The Press, but not because of incompetence.

Cameron is advocating a complete press lock down, overturning the remaining platforms of free speech and using police and intelligence agencies to war on investigative journalists through criminalizing those exposing treason and treachery.
The Murdoch/News of the World scandal, the Chilcott Inquiry, the Saville investigation — all suppressed as they built a mosaic of treason, ritual child sexual abuse and complicity in espionage and terrorism on the part of a government under the control of a Masonic cult.
The number of whistleblowers arrested or assassinated grows daily. This is the legacy of Cameron, following Tony Blair’s example, as British complicity in terrorism against the Ukraine becomes increasingly apparent.
Cameron’s speech is a direct challenge to the harmless conspiracy theory peddlers, who were undermined when knowledge of real 9/11 investigations – citing a US government nuclear demolition conspiracy – were leaked, published and broadly-confirmed.
Cameron spoke of “Jews” being blamed but, in truth, his own government is just as involved, not only in 9/11, but in terrorism, war crimes and broad corruption at home. This is what drove Cameron to mention the heretofore unmentionable “Jewish 9/11.”
Continues with "Able Danger Leak"
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/04/07/neo-truth-gone-bad-how-911-activists-have-failed/
clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2015 03:43 pm (UTC)
When there are elections or referendums does anyone compare the number of people voting to the vote count total?

Edited at 2015-04-10 08:19 am (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2015 04:04 pm (UTC)
Not executed, murdered in cold blood
ISIL militants kill 10 doctors south of Mosul
Members of the Takfiri ISIL terrorist group have executed ten doctors south of Iraq’s violence-scarred northern city of Mosul, as they continue to wreak havoc in the areas under their control.
A local source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said ISIL members executed the victims in Hammam al-Alil area, located some 25 kilometers (15.5 miles) south of Mosul, on Wednesday after the men refused to treat the wounded members of the terrorist outfit, Iraq’s al-Sumaria satellite TV network reported.
Local official Mowaffaq Hamid al-Azawi has described Mosul as a big open-air prison, where residents are subjected to various kinds of torture and are suffering at the hands of ISIL. He added that some scholars in the city even distort religious principles to serve ISIL’s interests.
Meanwhile, ISIL extremists have executed more than 60 members of al-Karableh, Albu Ubaid, Albu Mahal and Albu Salman tribes in the western sector of al-Anbar Province, on the alleged ground that they were in collaboration with Iraqi security forces.
More http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2015/04/09/405387/ISIL-executes-10-doctors-south-of-Mosul
clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2015 06:06 pm (UTC)
May get suspended for this.
If I do, I'll resume ops at the existing blog at googlecia.
--------

The Color of David Cameron’s Underwear (updated)
February 8, 2015 by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor on
If Cameron was "dirty" at age 25, could he be filthy now?
Editor’s note: Seldom do we get a video that has everything right. Whether you work your way through the story, do take time to view the video. We have confirmations on the information there as well as our own sources that go considerable further.
I am looking for comment board participation from the UK and South Africa from those with information we need to move this project forward. This is a critical story that has to be brought back to the forefront.

British Prime Minister David Cameron has taken an aggressive stance advocating the silencing of anyone who refuses to stick to his version of what he likes to tell others are “facts.” We have something to say about that. In 1989, Cameron, only 25 years old but a rising star in Britain’s dirty political game, traveled to Africa on a trip that would lead to election fraud in Britain, stolen nuclear weapons and a war in the Middle East.
Let us supply some background. Cameron has equated challenging his long proven fabrications as acts of terrorism and is threatening to use British security services to silence honest journalists the way Dr. David Kelly was silenced. He seems to have appointed himself “god.”
Sanction Busting, Israel, Britain and South Africa
In 1975, South Africa signed a top secret accord which allowed Israel to build and test, not only nuclear weapons but chemical and biological weapons as well. The deal was “build and test,” not just nukes but gas and bioweapons as well, conveniently done in Africa where mass slaughter doesn’t matter so much.
This was done, covered up by the Reconciliation Commission, but the facts are there, BX gas, VX gas, ebola, anthrax, small pox among others, released in Angola and against other non-white populations across Africa.
On September 22, 1979, one of ten nuclear devices to be created through this partnership was exploded. American satellites picked up the 80 millisecond double flash while sonic detectors, part of the worldwide anti-submarine network, picked up the signature of a nuclear explosion, this one on a barge off Prince Edward Island. (See Figure 1)


As explained in the video, which gets everything right, the remaining 9 nuclear weapons were sold to the US and Britain. David Cameron was part of the delegation that purchased 3 of the weapons. This deal was an 11th hour scam, worked out between politicians and arms dealers.
It involved stealing at least $50 million for a political slush fund but there was something far more sinister involved. The deal Cameron was a part of along with Dr. David Kelly and John Bradenkamp, the quite famous arms trafficker, involved stealing nuclear weapons.
Cameron’s visit violated UN sanctions against South Africa and UN treaties covering nuclear non-proliferation as well. These facts are clearly in evidence.
clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2015 06:14 pm (UTC)
FIG 1

Britain Simply Gave 3 Nukes to Terrorists
This operation, to steal 3 nuclear weapons from South Africa, weapons supposedly bought by Britain to be disassembled, according to sources directly involved in the sale and transport of the weapons themselves, interviewed at length, began at the Pelendaba nuclear facility in South Africa.
There, the bombs were loaded onto Blatchford cradles and moved into blue 20 foot containers. VT personnel were along for the ride to Durham where they were put on a ship for Oman, a ship arranged for by John Bradenkamp, a Rhodesian/Zimbabwean arms trader only recently off the terrorist lists.
This represented David Cameron’s “blooding” as a real “insider.” In Britain we know what that generally entails.
His good friend on the trip, Dr. David Kelly, has been murdered in 2003, over threats to expose the dirty deal cut with arms traders to steal nuclear weapons. Did Cameron know the details of the deal he helped negotiate? We suggest yes.
What was the nature of that deal? Britain was to simply unload the weapons in Oman, leave them unguarded and walk away. They never mentioned them again, never looked for them and never asked questions even when one of the bombs supposedly belonging to Britain was exploded by North Korea on May 25, 2009.
Britain was quickly informed that one of the “Saddam nukes” had exploded in North Korea. American satellites or ground teams can detect the origin of nuclear material and the specifics of bomb design. Pelandaba for North Korea and Hanford for 9/11, two of nearly 50 unexplained post World War 2 nuclear explosions according to sources at the IAEA.
This is when liability under the UK’s Nuclear Explosion Act of 1998 which was carried over into the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act of 2001 become a reality. The following provision within the expanded 2001 act applies:
The Act explicitly declares that to knowingly cause the detonation of a nuclear weapon, for a test or any other reason, will be an offence, and punishable by life imprisonment and confiscation of anything relating to the offence. The only exception is where the explosion is deemed to have been carried out in the course of an armed conflict – if a question arises over this then the Secretary of State for Defence decides and issues a certificate of his determination. The Act will apply to any weapon used within the United Kingdom, or used elsewhere by British nationals or corporations.
Two British prime ministers are in danger from this act, Tony Blair who received nearly $5 million in political payoffs. later returned, laundered through a source tied to Formula One racing. Blair’s cash came from Bradencamp and is assumed to have been his cut for keeping quiet about the source of what he was told were Saddam’s nukes. The Chilcott Inquiry was tasked specifically with tracking down those involved in “misplacing” these nuclear weapons.
The defining language in the act and those with full knowledge and access to conclusive proofs of violations, the Bradenkamp group, Murdoch’s “News of the World” spy operation and its affiliate, Israeli military intelligence, have gained and clearly exercised broad leverage over these two prime ministers and, through a decades old sex and murder scandal now rocking Britain, key ministries and members of parliament as well.
The other is Cameron. Both are assumed to have information tied to the Korean nuclear explosion and that, either through failure to act while in office or complicity in the transfer, they are culpable and potentially liable under provisions of the 2001 Security Act that apply to nuclear weapons. Enforcement of these provisions is “non judicial.”

Edited at 2015-04-09 06:15 pm (UTC)
clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2015 06:35 pm (UTC)
How This Changed History
The weapons have played several roles in recent history:

*Britain and the US invaded Iraq to seize these weapons stating: “There are 3 nuclear weapons in Iraq, only 45 minutes from assembly and use, which we believe are being transported to Syria via ambulances.
*Later Israeli intelligence said the bombs were in a Beirut hospital, kept in the X-ray room to hide them.
*Then Israel claimed they were transported to Turkey and placed on the Mavi Marmara, under the hull to shield radiation. Israel gave the US this reason for their attack on the Gaza convoy.
*Two weapons are believed to have been transported to the US inside vending machines sent from Israel. This was the plot of the Israeli financed Sum of All Fears, a film that blamed Syria for what US intelligence believed Israel had done.
*Alexander Cockburn of CounterPunch, a suspected Israeli backed “alternative news” outlet, in 2005 penned an article titled “Lost Nuclear Warheads in Iran.” (quoted and linked below) The article is believed to have been written to not only to push for an attack on Iran but to cover an Israeli nuclear material smuggling operation to North Korea using Dolphin submarines supplied by Germany.
*On July 13, 2010, the Delta Force hit a warehouse outside Indianapolis, “The Loft,” a company that sells furniture for college dorm rooms. They believed one of the nukes was there. We can’t confirm that one was recovered.
*In 2012 and American NES-Team (Nuclear Emergency Security) was dispatched to Essex to recover what was believed to be a nuclear weapon meant to threaten the London Olympic games. Russian intelligence had leaked a story about a midget submarine moving the weapon up the Thames estuary. We have confirmations that a weapon was recovered.

Starting around this time, according to investigators for the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) and the Able Danger teams in the US, nuclear material in the forms of W-54 pits began disappearing from the Pantex facility in Amarillo, Texas.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/2_israel-saagreement_page_11-478x640.jpg
Similarly, on February 3, 1991, a B 52 flying a secret mission near Iraq, armed with crashed off Somalia. Its 3 SRAM nuclear warheads were believed to have been recovered by South African Special Forces and transported through Mombasa. Several “Broken Arrow” missions were dispatched. It is not known if these weapons were recovered.
Peter Eyre and Gordon Bowden

Much of the original work on this story was done by Peter Eyre who has consistently gotten it right.
Do the people fully understand that vital evidence is being withheld from the Chilcot Inquiry regarding the Conservative Party being implicated in illegal arms to Iraq prior to the war and as a direct result of their actions put our own troops at great risk?
Do the public fully understand just how much of this deplorable, under the table dealing, Dr. David Kelly knew and that he was about to expose it?
You may ask why Dr. Kelly? It’s very simple really because he was the only man that could be trusted into making sure the three nuclear weapons that were shipped out of South Africa arrived safely in Oman prior to the British Government releasing the money!!
Dr David Kelly physically checked the three “battlefield ready” nuclear bombs, after they arrived in standard sea containers in Oman by checking the internal core temperature via a concealed inspection panel.
Don’t you just find it incredible that these weapons were purchased illegally and in violation of the UN Sanctions on South Africa, were illegally shipped to Oman without any security and then were stored in an insecure private compound in Oman?

This under the table deal was all done using British Taxpayers money via a notorious arms dealer named John Bredenkamp, and who later stole them back knowing that our government could do nothing about it……..this man who graces the shores of the United Kingdom, living a life of luxury, then sold them on the black market…..one of which was test fired by North Korea two year ago…….such is the level of trust we bestow on the Conservative Party who currently are running our country with the very man at the helm who was part of this conspiracy!!
clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2015 06:40 pm (UTC)
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/gg_087-640x473.jpg
The Mossad Cover Operation Exposed
There are reports that the smaller plutonium pit from one of the SRAM warheads was detected in a failed nuclear test in North Korea on October 9, 2006, a “fizzle.” Still, however, intelligence sources tried to cover up the North Korean role, one that strongly supports a hypothesis that North Korea only has access to black market nuclear material and has no domestic production capability of its own.
Alexander Cockburn, now deceased, of Counterpunch, included this very suspicious language in a 2005 article cleverly titled “Lost Nuclear Warheads in Iran:”
As the three warheads entered international arms-smuggling loops, the Bush-One and subsequently Clinton administrations dispatched various covert units to recover them, with no success.
As possible substantiation that the warheads may have ended up in Iran, CounterPunch’s informant cites a hour-long BBC-TV Channel-2 documentary, broadcast on May 3, 2005,titled “Iran’s Nuclear Secrets” in which they showed their TV-cameraman with UN weapons inspectors in Iran.
During those searches the inspectors found radiation traces in rooms left by the previous presence of weapons-grade uranium, with an enrichment of 40% to 60%.
The BBC program suggested that as local enrichment had not started then the Iranians must have held non-local black-Market material. The BBC concluded that with this material Iran was already perceived as a threat by Israel and the Scott Ritter’s forecasted raids were a likely possibility.
If the US or Israel does launch an aerial attack on the suspected depository of the three warheads, or of uranium from them, the consequences could be lethal in more ways than one, if a “bunker busting ” raid simply dispersed the nuclear materials into the atmosphere, with unpleasant consequences for all in the wind path.

CounterPunch has long been on our radar, fronting for Assange in his push toward war with Iran, moving in and around Libya and Syria, while putting out “chickenfeed.”
Conclusion
What we do know is this, David Cameron has knowledge of missing nuclear weapons. This can be proven. We know he was involved in the theft, in what manner we can’t prove but we are sure others have and have used this leverage to get Cameron to make a fool of himself over and over as he is doing in his Ukraine policy and as he did before the UN General Assembly on September 24, 2014 in his “declaration of war” against the world’s independent media.
As an ally, we simply don’t trust David Cameron.
No telling of this story should fail to credit the work of Peter Eyre.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/02/08/the-color-of-david-camerons-underwear/
clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2015 06:47 pm (UTC)
Addendum I
Correspondence from Gordon Bowden to the Attorney General, Dominic Grieve:
From: gordon bowden <rafbowden@yahoo.co.uk>
To: dominic.grieve@beaconsfieldconservatives.co.uk
Cc: scotlandp@parliament.uk; john.healey.mp@parliament.uk; chris.williamson.mp@parliament.uk; beckettm@parliament.uk; feedback@peterlilley.co.uk; reportingafraud@sfo.gsi.gov.uk; info@derbyconservatives.co.uk; info@derbylabourparty.co.uk; info@libdems.org.uk; fife_office@mingcampbell.org.uk
Sent: Fri, 10 June, 2011 14:12:30

Subject: DR DAVID KELLY
Dear Rt Hon Dominic Charles Robert Grieve.
You will refer the forwarded reply from your official office below, dated Sunday 22 August 2010 timed at: 15:42:08. I make and hold on record this further legal communication to you and the added list of Cc Recipients, forwarded to you via your Constituency address.
As a Duty of Care: Given the recovered Documents of Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON I hold, duplicated, forwarded and held safe by others.
I make accusation that you have, as Attorney General committed Treason, lied and conspired with others in perverted the course of Justice, using your respected and trusted Public Office as Attorney General to refuse a new inquiry into the conspired Death of Dr David Kelly.
I make legal accusation. You have used your legal, trusted and public Political position, to criminally protect those who hold high Conservative Government Office, current and Past from facing Criminal prosecution (Under the Nuclear Explosions Act) and Deliberate criminal Fraud involving an Overcharge to the Treasury of £17.8 Million to Purchase covertly 3 Nuclear Bombs from ARMSCOR, the £17.8 million laundered into the “EMPTY” Tory accounts as recorded in HANSARD via a front UK registered Company of Rhodesian John Arnold Bredenkamp.

Addendum II
Recorded in Parliament
HANSARD JUNE 22 1993 starting from Column 197
Statements regarding these facts entered and recorded by LORD DOUG HOYLE and Derby South MP MARGARET BECKETT.
I make record in this legal communication, that these Conservative Government Corruption Facts were disclosed and exposed in “Classified” Document form to the then Labour Party leadership by a senior civil servant, Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON then an ARMS to IRAQ Investigator who went on to be Senior INTELLIGENCE ADVISOR to the Select Committee of the Department of Trade and Industry under Kenneth Warren and MP Peter Lilley.
From my research:
Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON ex Sister-in-Law of MP Peter Lille and one of Four Daughters of Senior Conservative SIR JOHN BIGGS-DAVISON
That you have further used your respected official position as Attorney General to protect those involved, by covering up the official involvement of DR DAVID KELLY, who was ordered by the then Conservative Government to oversee this covert Nuclear WMD operation that turned into a CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL disaster when John Bredenkamp and his ex SAS Group stole the Nuclear Weapons in OMAN and sold at least One Nuclear Bomb to North Korea.
To use your Office to further protect the expose of those MP’s, Grandees and VIP’s involved in the Criminal Covert government / Private finance purchase in 1991 of 3 x Pelindaba Pretorea, Battlefield Ready 20kt Nuclear Bombs.
I include as an attachment the one page article disclosure and accusations of Conservative Government Corruption by:
Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON.
One page of over 400 “Classified” I recovered without copyright from the personal web blog of Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON on the Internet before they were removed.
I make record:
Given Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON gives clear statement in the attachment, that the Derbyshire Police have acted beyond their official remit and acted as a Conservative Political Party agent, to seize and withhold vital criminal evidence required by the “PUBLIC” CHILCOTT IRAQ Inquiry.
I also understand, that you replaced MP Tim Smith in the Constituency of Beaconsfield
I am also informed, it was Tim Smith who had inside information regarding the LAUNDERING of the deliberate criminal overcharge to the Treasury of £17.8 Million (A theft of TAX PAYERS assets) via a front Company of John Arnold Bredenkamp into the “EMPTY” 1991 Tory accounts to fight the 1992 General Election: HANSARD JUNE 22 1993 from Column 197
I await your official reply.
Mr Gordon Bowden
clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2015 06:49 pm (UTC)
Addendum II
Recorded in Parliament
HANSARD JUNE 22 1993 starting from Column 197
Statements regarding these facts entered and recorded by LORD DOUG HOYLE and Derby South MP MARGARET BECKETT.
I make record in this legal communication, that these Conservative Government Corruption Facts were disclosed and exposed in “Classified” Document form to the then Labour Party leadership by a senior civil servant, Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON then an ARMS to IRAQ Investigator who went on to be Senior INTELLIGENCE ADVISOR to the Select Committee of the Department of Trade and Industry under Kenneth Warren and MP Peter Lilley.
From my research:
Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON ex Sister-in-Law of MP Peter Lille and one of Four Daughters of Senior Conservative SIR JOHN BIGGS-DAVISON
That you have further used your respected official position as Attorney General to protect those involved, by covering up the official involvement of DR DAVID KELLY, who was ordered by the then Conservative Government to oversee this covert Nuclear WMD operation that turned into a CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL disaster when John Bredenkamp and his ex SAS Group stole the Nuclear Weapons in OMAN and sold at least One Nuclear Bomb to North Korea.
To use your Office to further protect the expose of those MP’s, Grandees and VIP’s involved in the Criminal Covert government / Private finance purchase in 1991 of 3 x Pelindaba Pretorea, Battlefield Ready 20kt Nuclear Bombs.
I include as an attachment the one page article disclosure and accusations of Conservative Government Corruption by:
Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON.
One page of over 400 “Classified” I recovered without copyright from the personal web blog of Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON on the Internet before they were removed.
I make record:
Given Ms TARA ANDREA DAVISON gives clear statement in the attachment, that the Derbyshire Police have acted beyond their official remit and acted as a Conservative Political Party agent, to seize and withhold vital criminal evidence required by the “PUBLIC” CHILCOTT IRAQ Inquiry.
I also understand, that you replaced MP Tim Smith in the Constituency of Beaconsfield
I am also informed, it was Tim Smith who had inside information regarding the LAUNDERING of the deliberate criminal overcharge to the Treasury of £17.8 Million (A theft of TAX PAYERS assets) via a front Company of John Arnold Bredenkamp into the “EMPTY” 1991 Tory accounts to fight the 1992 General Election: HANSARD JUNE 22 1993 from Column 197
I await your official reply.
Mr Gordon Bowden

Addendum III
—– Forwarded Message —-
From: Dominic Grieve <grieved@parliament.uk>
To: GORDON BOWDEN <rafbowden@yahoo.co.uk>
Sent: Sun, 22 August, 2010 15:42:08
Subject: Thank you for contacting Dominic Grieve MP
Here is a copy of your message:
This is not a Constitutional Matter.
It is a NATIONAL MATTER.
I make record of this web site Communication and it’s total written contents.
DR DAVID KELLY.
You ask for Motive into his MURDER:
He was the appointed Conservative Nuclear Weapon Scientist entrusted in 1991 to oversee the covert purchase of 3 ex Stock Pelindaba, Pretoria Battlefield Bombs.
On a request UOR From ASTRA via the DTI, the UOR Signed by Stephan Kock for ASTRA and Peter Lilley for the DTI to purchase from ARMSCOR 3 “CYLINDERS”
The Operation, a deliberate Conservative Fraud to overcharge the Treasury by £17.8 Million to top up their EMPTY Coffers to fight the 1992 General Election.
As uncovered by the Labour Party
HANSARD JUNE 22 1993 From Col 197.
The 3 Nuclear Weapons purchased along with 6 others with a logged Destination of Chicago USA for de commissioning.
The 3 Conservative Nukes, diverted to OMAN for retaliatory use against Saddam if he used Chemical or Bio Weapons against UK or Coalition Forces in the Retake of Kuwait (Gulf WAR 1)
In effect, the Weapons were held over in OMAN until all military action ceased.
Somehow, the weapons broker, JOHN ARNOLD BREDENKAMP with a group gained access to the Weapons in OMAN and Stole them.
He sold at least one of the Nuclear weapons on the OPEN Market.
NORTH KOREA Detonated it on 25 MAY 2009
Under the NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS ACT
There are many MP’s and VIP’s to face Prosecution.
That is why Dr David Kelly was MURDERED.
He knew the identity of ALL those involved in this criminal act….end of Gordons email

clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2015 06:49 pm (UTC)
Addendum IV: Nuclear explosion in Ukraine; they got it wrong.
Based on release of video claiming Russian nuclear weapons use in Ukraine, we posting the video of a real nuclear attack, one by Israel on the outskirts of Damascus from May 2013.


Now for the Ukraine explosion video from February 8, 2015, one that has no ball lightning.
clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2015 08:42 pm (UTC)
Robb March 8, 2015
“could he be filthy now?”
1994 – 2001 Director of Corporate Affairs, Carlton Communications Plc
***https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxDos7-_t_w
clothcapclothcap on April 9th, 2015 08:43 pm (UTC)
Argentine Foreign Office presents key evidence to ratify deal with Iran
Apr 9, 2015 Manoel Giffoni
Press TV, Buenos Aires
The Argentine Government is fighting a tough legal battle against the two main Jewish organizations in the country. AMIA and DAIA had challenged in court the Memorandum of Understanding signed by Tehran and Buenos Aires to jointly probe the bombing of a Jewish community center in 1994. The same organizations hold Iran accountable for the incident despite they could never submit to the court any evidence to prove the allegations.
The Israeli entities filed a lawsuit against Argentina days after the deal was approved by the Parliament arguing that the agreement was unconstitutional. On Wednesday the Foreign Office presented in the Federal Appeals court conclusive evidence to rebut what the Foreign Minister called "groundless accusations"
The Foreign Office also provided the Federal Appeal Court with detailed particulars about the thorough legal proceedings carried out in Iran and Argentina before signing the bilateral agreement. Those include hearings with international legal experts and the families of the victims. Local Zionist organizations ignored the evidences and upheld the lawsuit against Argentina.
Even though the Memorandum of Understanding between Argentina and Iran was passed into law by the Argentine Parliament with an overwhelming majority, the Israeli organizations challenged its lawfulness at a lower court. Prominent jurists criticized the move and said that bilateral agreements between two sovereign nations have constitutional status and cannot be revoked by any court.
The Federal appeal court will now have up to 20 days to analyze the evidences presented the Foreign Office and is expected to rule its decision in the coming weeks.
Vid http://www.presstv.com/Video/2015/04/09/405362/Argentine-Foreign-Office-presents-key-evidence-to-ratify-deal-with-Iran
clothcapclothcap on April 10th, 2015 07:32 am (UTC)
Uri Avnery – Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Bomb?
April 5, 2015 by Uri Avnery, with Gush Shalom
Israel's new German sub can travel undetected and deliver a nuclear cruise missile strike
Editor’s note: Uri comes out of the closet today… big time! “If Iran has a bomb, so what,” he says. The Russians have lots of them. Has that stopped US aggression moving NATO over from defense to an offensive tool?
Has it made working on a color revolution in Russia to overthrow Putin too dangerous a provocation? Apparently not.
The Baltic countries have lined up to be tripwire cannon fodder in WWIII via their NATO deployment provocation, with a life expectancy of a few days after a war trigger would be pulled.
Did the EU fear that getting involved in the Kiev coup would risk the national security of the European people… or that their taking aggressive action on Russia’s border in a country with a huge Russian population, plus Moscow with all of those nukes, would have no possible repercussions? Apparently not.
So the old Cold War “mutually assured destruction” theme, which proved such a reliable brake on the pedal for the end of the world in the height of the Cold War, seems to have morphed into the current “game of chicken” in the New Cold War.
Uri is not only talking Israeli nukes and their numbers in the same paragraph… in the next one he is talking about Germany delivering another offensive first-strike advanced Dolphin submarine platform to Israel… without a mention in the world press.
This will replace the old sub sunk off the coast of Syria by a helicopter-dropped torpedo, which triggered the tactical nuke strike soon thereafter on the weapons storage and Syrian command center outside Damascus.
VT was the only media to break the story about the “ball lightning” in the fireball — a dead giveaway of a nuclear weapon. Thank you dear anonymous people who shot the video footage and loaded it on YouTube.
Uri drops another bomb today, corroborating what VT’s late nuclear expert Clinton Bastin briefed us on extensively — that even with weapons grade material, it would take years to develop the actual bomb technology, which no one has ever done without testing, unless another party supplied the finished design.
Uri says below, ten years to do it… exactly what Clinton Bastin said. Now Clinton of course was talking about a large plutonium bomb in a little package… not the large antique uranium ”gun type” bombs of the past, which many countries could produce if they so chose.
Left out of the Dolphin sub delivery news is anything about what an offensive threat they are, due to their small size and ability to run undetected for long periods on batteries. They can close in on a target silently to fire a mini-nuke tipped cruise missile and escape the same way, silently.
Pakistan has nukes, and India is not sweating bullets. Saudi Arabia has them too, and no one says a word, just as with Israel, although that seems to be changing.
But of these four nuclear nations, only Israel has used them on a number of occasions, and still “almost nothing” is said about that, another story broken only by VT — a story the corporate media would not touch with a ten-foot pole. Have a Happy Easter… Jim W. Dean