Log in

No account? Create an account
It is lipstick on the face of our greatest enemy.

Christopher Story - EU Corruption
Filmed at the 3rd Lawful Rebellion Conference, London, 31st October 2009 by BBC5.tv.
Youtube on 14 Nov 2009

dailyalternativenews published on 1 Mar 2013

Perhaps after listening to Mr Story's (Edward Harle's) story the reason why we have been oppressed for so long will be sufficiently plain for anyone to understand.

"These populist nationalists, stupid nationalists, they are in love with their own countries"
Junker speaking from his false jewish heart.

Conversationally, cutting through the crap.

I think we need a revolution for me to resume being unencumbered British.
Thoughts passing thru my mind.
Is Robin Tilbrook a fictional entity or has he reclaimed control of his estate?
If he is knowingly working inside Admiralty Law, why?
Why not Common Law? Adm Law is for non living entities, a fraud perped on humans. Our condition is of living entities rather than corporation stock. Or is he just playing us along by sustaining the system and giving the illusion of being a living entity when he is just another cog in the wheel?

If a majority of brits reclaim control of their estate from  the Vatican and the unincorporated Crown (the other one is a City corporation) then the non living entity called the European Union surely has no claim beyond what we decide under their rules.

All the treaties with the I JEU have never had legal force because Heath and the then Queen committed treason in signing the first treaty. Heath is on public record admitting he lied to get us in.
Regardless of opinion, all subsequent treaties were derived from the 1st. The 1st is null and void. Membership is an illusion, a deception.
In effect, piracy under laws written by pirates, others call them parasites and they admit that too.
If I can work that out, why can't Mr Tilbrook? Is he an entertaining distraction?

Also, UKC has been remarkably reticent on the subject of the treason of Heath and HMQEII and the invalidity of the first treaty on which membership has depended. Why the foot-dragging? Were enough people to learn of the jiggery pokery being played on us, the occupation regime would flee before millions of figurative pitchforks.

Worth a look.
Questions for Boris Johnson and Jeremy Hunt
by Lord James of Blackheath
UKC 27th June 2019
If we do get to Brexit on 31 October will this truly achieve “taking back control”, as the original referendum intended?
Without contravening Admiralty Law of course.
The Constitution applies to living entities. I would venture to suggest there is no benefit to the Establishment's good Lord having a truly free Britain ergo his interests lie in maintaining the fraud of Cestui Que regardless of the Brexit outcome.
In the same way, Mr Tilbrook is a solicitor that earns his living maintaining the Vatican-Crown Cestui Que.

Regardless that the French Revolution was designed and funded by Weishaupt (jesuit KJ) and cabalist M Rothschild, the peasants had the right idea. A guillotine in Trafalgar Square, I'm sure would speed up public awareness that no negotiations are needed, just awareness that our membership has never been real and we have paid thru the nose to feed a false jew scam.

The continuing farce of "we left on March 29" case that got booted can be viewed here
Jump in here:
Sharks protecting the shoal?
07 July 2019 @ 10:35 am
I don't disagree that external forces, be they locally sourced or more ethereal, steer our actions.

Here's me, a local source saying get political ambitions, demonisation of CO2, plant food and a cure for deforestation due to palm oil (that unfortunately makes the tastiest chips) out of the Archers.

As soon as profits are dependent on politicians, banks and the zBBC the subject becomes our enemy. The Archers' script got politically propagandised. Perhaps the readers could object on behalf of humanity. We need more CO2 for increased crop yields because we still obey the primitive philosophy (that was right at the time) that said go forth  and multiply.

Why did I turn on the radio at just the time the propaganda was being broadcast?
02 July 2019 @ 07:05 pm
[Informed common sense and honest information from an MP. Most unusual. Hasn't played the treason card yet. Party doctrine comes first?]

How likely is No Deal?

No Deal is a misnomer, like much of the rest of the Brexit debate. No deal means leaving without signing the Withdrawal Agreement, but with a number of other agreements in place governing trade facilitation, aviation, haulage and government procurement. It would also mean using the extensive rules and regulations of the WTO to govern our trade with the rest of the EU just as our trade with the rest of the world is governed today.  The Withdrawal Agreement was not of course allowing exit any time soon, as it was a decision to delay exit for 21 to 45 months, with uncertainty about how to get out thereafter.

The Withdrawal Agreement has been three times rejected by Parliament, and overwhelmingly defeated in the European elections with only 9% supporting the party that proposed it. It is possible a new Prime Minister will be able to negotiate enhanced arrangements before October 31 that add to the various agreements available for exit then without the Withdrawal Treaty. The new Prime Minister should offer a comprehensive free trade agreement, with a text based on EU/Canada and EU/Japan. We could then proceed to leave without imposing tariffs if the EU agrees to negotiate such an agreement.

Some say Parliament can block leaving without signing the Withdrawal Agreement. That would be very difficult for Parliament to do. If the new Prime Minister wishes just to leave he need not ask for a further delay to our exit after 31 October, so we will just leave. How would Parliament be able to make a Prime Minister seek a delay when he does not wish to do so? Parliament anyway cannot legislate to require a delay, because a delay not only needs a Prime Ministerial request of the EU but also a positive response by the EU. Mrs May decided she wanted a delay and asked for it regardless of the view of Parliament last time this arose. European law is superior to UK law all the time we stay in, and under EU law we are out on 31 October unless something else happens.

In this issue the PM is central. If the PM is determined to leave without the Withdrawal Agreement and keen to keep to the specified date, it would be very difficult for Parliament to find a way to stop him.

The chilling silence about our money

One of the oddest things about this out of touch Parliament is the refusal of most MPs to talk about how we should spend the windfall from leaving the EU without signing the Withdrawal Agreement. Worse still the Opposition parties rush to tell us we must go on paying large sums to the EU come what may, and even some in the government seem to be dreaming up ways to go on funding the EU after we have left. Given how central to the Leave case saving the money was, this is denying us our democratic decision. There is no legal basis to justify payments to the EU after we have left. The origins of the large £39bn Treasury forecast, itself an underestimate, comes from Mrs May’s wish to delay  our exit for 21-45 months  which of course would lead to big additional payments, and her wish to dilute Brexit so we could remain entangled with new financial commitments thereafter.

Margaret Thatcher recognised that the UK had a bad deal on financial contributions, and got a substantial improvement to our deal as PM. Mr Blair gave away some of that improvement on the promise of a thorough reform of the Common Agricultural Policy which never happened. Many UK taxpayers and fed up with having to pay more tax to send to rich countries on the continent. These contributions give us no benefit at home, and add to the deficit on the balance of payments.

At a time when the world economy is slowing, and when Mr Draghi of the European Central Bank recommends some government reflation from tax cuts or spending rises, the UK needs a growth budget. Using the substantial money we save from October 31 if we just leave could give us the boost we need. We can spend all of the net contribution we save, whilst paying the same level of farm grants and other sums that the EU sends us from the high gross contributions we make to the EU.

The deliberate misinformation about EU grants throughout the referendum campaign sought to persuade voters that we would lose these payments when we left. They should have pointed out that as we sent them the money in the first place to pay these grants, we can simply pay them direct. More importantly, we save all the money we send and do not get back  as well. We can boost the UK economy by 1% of GDP out of the savings and the tax overshoot this government has gone in for.
My emphasis. Thanks.

Not often mentioned by the kleptocratic europhiliac political class;
Our trade with the IJ EU is heavily biased in favour of the imposed union. Trade with the US is the reverse. Simply switching all trade done with the IJ EU would benefit us substantially, especially if competent negotiators can be found to make deal..
The deplorable IJ EU commissioners know this. The deplorable europhiliacs keep mum.

The whole point of the IJ EU and the IJ OWG coup regimes is to create laws far away from those that are afflicted by them and to give the provinces' (GB being 9) leadership the ability to say, "it's not us imposing austerity," for example, passing the buck for the laws the treasonous bastards rubber stamp.

Boris must bring down taxes on small businesses by dropping VAT to a level where businesses can survive and the customers can afford their purchases. Otherwise there will be a tidal wave of closures and bankruptcies in line with globalist corporation policy, as applied by successive occupation regimes.

As We Face Armageddon the Western World Is Leaderless

The Duran June 25, 2019
We have to face the fact that as we face Armageddon the Western World is leaderless.
Authored by Paul Craig Roberts:

According to news reports, the validity of which cannot be ascertained by the general public, a crazed US government came within 10 minutes of igniting a general conflagration in the Middle East, the consequences of which could have been catastrophic for all.

The moronic warmongers in high office—Bolton, Pompeo, and Pence—and their Israel Lobby masters are determined, and they have not abandoned their campaign for war with Iran.  Of course, the liars say that Iran will just accept its punishment for defending its territory and there will be no war.  But this is not what Iran says.  I believe Iran.

Some of the tiny percentage of people in the Western World who are still capable of thought regret that Trump called off the insane plan.  They think the consequences would have been the destruction of the Saudi and Israeli governments—two of the most evil in history—and the cut-off of oil to the US and Europe, with the resulting depression causing the overthrow of the Western warmonger governments.  They believe that catastrophic American defeat is the only way peace can be restored to the world.
In other words, it is not clear whether Trump calling off the attack saved us or doomed us.
The Israel Lobby and their neoconservative agents have not been taught a lesson.  Trump has not fired Bolton and Pompeo for almost igniting a conflagration, and he has not dressed down his moronic vice president.  So, it can all happen again.
And likely will.  The lesson that Bolton and Israel have learned is that the fake news about an Iranian attack on a Japanese freighter, denied by the Japanese, was not sufficient to lock Trump into “saving face” by attacking Iran.  So be prepared for a larger orchestrated provocation. Bolton and Israel know that the Western presstitutes will lie for them.  Watch for a provocation that allows Trump no alternative to an attack.

Washington’s use of fake news and false flag attacks to launch military attacks goes back a long way.  In the 21st century we have had a concentrated dose—Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction, Assad’s use of chemical weapons, Iranian nukes, Russian invasions, Maduro starving his own people, the endless lies about Gaddafi.  Yes, I know there are more.  I am writing an article, not an encyclopedia.
Washington has grown accustomed to attacking countries on false pretenses and getting away with it.  Therefore, there is nothing to discourage the Israel Lobby and its Washington puppets from continuing to set-up Iran for an attack.  Success breeds incaution.  The attack on Iraq was stage-managed by a credible US Secretary of State before the UN.  The attack on Libya was stage-managed by a UN resolution that a deceived Russia and China failed to block.  In situations such as these, Washington arranged a green light for its war crimes.  However, Washington has failed to stage-manage a green light for an attack on Iran. Moreover, Iran is a more powerful military force than Iraq and Libya, and the extent of the depth of Russian and Chinese support for Iran is unknown to Washington.
If Israel succeeds in having its Washington puppet attack Iran, Israel and its neoconservative agents will not welcome failure of their objective.  They will fight against failure with more dangerous moves.  I can easily imagine the fanatics having Trump “save face” by destroying the world and issuing some kind of ultimatums to Russia and China or resorting to the use of nuclear weapons against Iran.

The insouciant American—indeed, Western—people are kept unaware by design.  It is the function of the presstitutes to control the explanations given to the people.  The US Congress is bought and paid for by the Israel Lobby, as are most important politicians in the UK and Europe.  What I am telling you is that it is very easy for fanatics to produce Armageddon.
Stephen Cohen and I, and a few surviving others, lived through the 20th century Cold War. In recent years we both have reported on numerous occasions that the threat of nuclear war today is far higher than during the Cold War.  One reason is that during the Cold War US and Soviet leaders worked to defuse tensions and to build trust.  In contrast, since the Clinton regime the US has worked consistently to build tensions.  Both Cohen and I have listed on many occasions the tension-building activities pursued by all post-Reagan/George H.W. Bush administrations.

The Russians no longer trust Washington, and neither do the Chinese.  Washington has lied to, and about, Russia so often in the 21st century that Russian trust of Washington is exhausted.  No matter how earnestly the Russian government wants to trust Washington, it dare not do so.
Therefore, it takes very little miscalculation for the morons in Washington to cause a threat-ending response from Russia as Washington has convinced the Russian government that the US intends to destroy them.
The orchestration of Russiagate by the Democratic Party, military/security complex, and their media whores has, as Stephen Cohen has emphasized, forced President Trump in an act of self-preservation to adopt the neoconservative attitude toward Russia and other “non-compliant” governments.  This attitude is dangerous enough in the best of times.  It is extremely dangerous after trust has been destroyed by years of lies and false accusations.

Perhaps there is someone in the Trump administration who has the intelligence to understand the dangerous situation and who has Trump’s confidence.  But I do not know who that person is.
We have to face the fact that as we face Armageddon the Western World is leaderless

Source: https://theduran.com/as-we-face-armageddon-the-western-world-is-leaderless/
There is no shortage of leaders. Everybody wants to pretend to rule the world. The problem is they are all hitched to the fabio-zionist in$tilled philosophy of destructive imperialism for corporate and agenda objectives. Break up and ban corporations, tax think tanks to death and change inheritance laws so that trans-generational plots to subvert humanity and its common laws and cultures founder with the death of plotters such as Saxe-Coburg-Gothas, Astors, Bundys, Rothschilds, Rockefellers etc,
May 31, 2007
(Updated: 09/23/08)
For those who ask:
"Why would the government fake crashing planes into the WTC towers and thereby also having to fake all the crash videos when it would be much easier for them to crash real planes into them?
Here is why they didn't use real planes to crash into the WTC and used TV fakery instead:


On the day when aluminium planes with hollow wings can fly through high performance concrete and steel reinforced columns instead of going SPLAT we'll see car drivers killed by moths and flies penetrating windscreens.

September Clues is still up, surprisingly.
From the front page:

Source: https://youtu.be/cF0-nslm3j0

Was NASA, now famous for its fakery of everything from "need another seven astronauts" to technicians servicing the Mars lander... on Mars, involved in the 9-11 fakery?

Perhaps a staunch defender of the faith (satanism) could enlighten us as to how the official story as promoted by the BBC is 100% genuine?
Here's a sample:
Nvidia Debunks Conspiracy Theories About Moon Landing

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syVP6zDZN7I

Whilst back on planet Earth;
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4

Zionists, masons, fabians, the City, the throne and corporation advertising control media and publishing that includes such as the bible and school text books like history that show what the aforementioned want us to believe. It is normally far from factual and most history books deserve the title, "fictionalised." The victor gets to write history. We didn't realise that those behind the rise of naziism and eco-fascism are of the same brood that produced the eco-fascist IJ EU. Their rent-a-rep, finance a floater philosophy produced the stealth abolition of sovereignty (self-determination) in favour of an unelected, foreign  dictatorship that was supposedly completed with Cameron's IJ EU financed signature on the Lisbon Treaty, except the traitors, so confident their con had worked, held a referendum. The rest is real history (so far).

From the infamous interview:
"It is an established rule to destroy all members of pre-existing government, their families and relatives, but never Jews. They destroy all members of the police, state police, army officers and their families but never Jews. You see, we know when a government begins to search for the Communists within its borders they are really attempting to uncover Jews in their area. We'er not fooled! The invisible rulers in the Communist countries have a world control over the propaganda and the governments in free countries. We control every media of expression including newspapers, magazines, radio and television. Even your music! We censor the songs released for publication long before they reach the publishers. Before long we will have complete control of your thinking."
"The American people have been easily ruled through our propaganda that the pen is mightier than the sword. We virtually get away with murder, and all the goy do is to talk about it, which is ineffective since we, the masters of propaganda, always publish a contradicting account. If the Aryan would review history and apply those lessons of the past, then the pen will be thrown down in disgust and the sword wielded in the heat of passion. (A recurrence to history would edify our minds and show us that the European countries solved their Jewish problem only by use of force.) Thus far, we have escaped the sword, when the only reprisal is some periodical of no repute, or some pamphlet with limited circulation. Their pen is no match for ours, but our constant fear is that they may open their eyes and learn that no change was ever brought about with a pen. History has been written in blood, not with ink. No letter, editorial or book has ever rallied the people or stopped tyranny. We understand this principle and are continually propagandizing the people to write letters to the President, to Congress and to their local media. We are safe to continually exploit, intimidate and disenfranchise the white American as long as they are preoccupied with the illusion of educating the masses through printed material. Woe be unto us if they ever see the futility of it, lay down the pen and employ the sword.
He also mentioned, "
When the specimen of full spectrum indoctrination mentioned judaism as a philosophy, he meant the satanic, talmudic cabalistic version as adopted by many in western governments, masonry and the Vatican when the illuminati took over.
Ask honest George jr.

The Society of Jesus is illuminated too, an overburden of masonry. NASA is a jesuit org.
All male western astronauts are alleged to have been mason.
The parasites believe social memory lasts between 15 and 25 years. Backing off from suppression of 9-11 info should have been implemented in 2016. Perhaps psychopathic PNAC's misanthropic replacement should make the value atrocity size related.
The magic mushroom mason
All Masons go through the first 3 degrees of the "Blue Lodge", and must then decide whether they want to enter either the Scottish or York Rites (Capitular Degrees). Albert Pike explained in Morals and Dogma:
"The Blue Degrees are but the outer court or portico of the Temple. Part of the symbols are displayed there to the Initiate, but he is intentionally misled by false interpretations. It is not intended that he shall understand them; but it is intended that he shall imagine he understands them. Their true explication is reserved for the Adepts, the Princes of Masonry ... It is well enough for the mass of those called Masons, to imagine that all is contained in the Blue Degrees; and whoso attempts to undeceive them will labor in vain."
From Final Warning : A History of the New World Order
Illuminism and the master plan for world domination by: David Allen Rivera, 1994
It's called compartmentalisation.

09 June 2019 @ 08:52 pm

Israel’s Attack on The USS Liberty: An Act of War, A False Flag, A Gross Betrayal

What We Should Have Learned from the Attack on USS Liberty

By Craig McKee
Global Research, June 09, 2019
Region: ,
Theme: ,

It is one of the greatest lies that most Americans – in fact most people around the world – have never heard of. And it reveals much about the true relationship between the United States and one of its “closest allies,” the State of Israel.

This was an act of war — a false flag attack, a mass execution, a war crime, a gross betrayal, and the beginning of an exercise in deception and propaganda that continues to this day.

It was 50 [52] years ago that Israel launched a shocking and brutal attack on an American intelligence ship, the USS Liberty, as it cruised in international waters near the Sinai Peninsula and the coast of Gaza. In the intervening years, the governments of the two countries — as well as the mainstream media — have maintained a grotesque and transparent cover-up in support of the lie that the incident was a simply a “tragic accident,” a case of “mistaken identity.”

But the survivors know that this was no accident.

Over a span of close to two hours on the afternoon of June 8, 1967, under clear blue skies, the Israeli military did all it could do to sink the Liberty and kill all 294 on board, three of those civilians. This did not succeed, but at the end of the attack, 34 crew members were dead and between 171 and 174 were injured (depending on which source you use). The ship had been positively identified by Israeli planes as an American ship as early as 6 a.m. that day, eight hours before the attack began.

The assault on the Liberty, which flew a large American flag (as confirmed by every surviving member of the crew) and clear identification on its hull as a non-combat ship, took place on the fourth day of Israel’s Six Day War against Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. The NSA spy ship looked like no other in the region as it carried all manner of sophisticated surveillance equipment.

The Liberty had been ordered into the Mediterranean Sea to monitor communications related to the Arab/Israeli conflict (although its precise mission remains classified). At 2 p.m., it was hit by a rocket attack launched from fighter jets travelling at high speed. The nightmare was just beginning.

The ship was hit with rockets, cannon fire, and even napalm. Eight sailors were killed in this initial assault. The Liberty was unable to contact the Sixth Fleet for help because its emergency frequency had been jammed and communications equipment badly damaged or destroyed. But sometime later, one brave crew member risked his life to make temporary repairs, and as a result, a distress signal was sent to two aircraft carriers in the region, the USS Saratoga and the USS America.

Planes were immediately dispatched to aid the Liberty. The pilots were authorized at that time to destroy the attacking planes and ships. But before they could arrive, new orders were given recalling them — even though the attack was still ongoing.

About 35 minutes into the attack, three Israeli ships reached the scene and began launching torpedoes. One hit the Liberty, killing another 26 crewmen and created a nearly 40-foot hole in the hull. In addition, a steady spray of machine gun fire targeted firefighters and rescue workers who were carrying stretchers with the wounded. The Israeli boats even fired upon life rafts that had been lowered into the water in an effort to save the most seriously hurt. An order to abandon ship had to be rescinded.

In 2005, the USS Liberty Veterans Association sent a report entitled, “A Report: War Crimes Committed Against U.S. Military Personnel, June 8, 1967,” to the Secretary of the Army. In that report, we learn how the attack came to an end while the Liberty was still afloat.

“Shortly after the Sixth Fleet transmission of the rules of engagement to its dispatched rescue aircraft, the Israeli torpedo boats suddenly broke off their attack and transmitted messages asking if USS Liberty required assistance. At the same time, an Israeli naval officer notified the US Naval Attaché at the American Embassy in Tel Aviv that Israeli forces had mistakenly attacked a United States Navy ship and apologized. The Naval Attaché notified the United States Sixth Fleet and the rescue aircraft were recalled before they arrived at the scene of the attack.” P.8

Most Americans are completely unaware of this act of war by one ally against another. The main reason for this is that the American media have almost completely suppressed any mention of the event. Statements by high-level military and civilian officials have received virtually no attention. Researcher Alison Weir, who has written extensively about the history of Palestine and Israel, wrote an article on the web site If Americans Knew about the media silence that is well worth reading:

“Whatever the reason, until American news media start being conscientious enough to get their reports on Israel right, Americans are going to continue being disastrously misinformed about one of the globe’s most destabilizing, tragic, and potentially calamitous areas of conflict.”

An article on Washington’s Blog from February 2015 sums up the evidence that the Israelis knew full well that they were attacking an American ship.

“Recently-declassified radio transcripts between the Israeli attack forces and ground control show that — at least 3 times — an Israeli fighter jet pilot identified the craft as American, and asked whether ground control was sure he should attack. Ground control repeatedly said, yes, attack the vessel.”

The article also explains how the aim of this for Israel was to make it look like Egypt had been responsible for the attack, potentially bringing the U.S. into the war.

An exception to the general media blackout of this subject is a 2007 article in the Baltimore Sun, which deals in some detail with the question of how the Israelis had to know they were attacking an American ship and how this has been confirmed by declassified government documents.

“[The documents] strengthen doubts about the U.S. National Security Agency’s position that it never intercepted the communications of the attacking Israeli pilots — communications, according to those who remember seeing them, that showed the Israelis knew they were attacking an American naval vessel.

“The documents also suggest that the U.S. government, anxious to spare Israel’s reputation and preserve its alliance with the U.S., closed the case with what even some of its participants now say was a hasty and seriously flawed investigation.”

Report findings changed in Washington

A U.S. Navy Court of Inquiry was ordered immediately after the attack but only given a week to assess what had happened. For 37 years, the senior legal counsel to the Inquiry, Capt. Ward Boston Jr., kept his feelings about that attack and the hasty investigation to himself. But after a book supporting the official cover-up was written by Jay Cristol called The Liberty Incident, Boston felt compelled to speak out.

He reveals that Admiral John S. McCain (father of former presidential candidate John McCain), who was Commander-in-Chief of U.S. Naval Forces in Europe, refused the request by Boston and the Inquiry’s president, Admiral Isaac C. Kidd, that they be allowed to travel to Israel to interview those who participated in the attack. A request that they be able to interview wounded crew members who could not physically attend the hearings was also denied.

In his statement, dated Jan. 9, 2004, Boston makes some incredible charges, including that the Inquiry’s final report was changed in Washington to absolve Israel:

“The evidence was clear. Both Admiral Kidd and I believed with certainty that this attack, which killed 34 American sailors and injured 172 others, was a deliberate effort to sink an American ship and murder its entire crew.

I am certain that the Israeli pilots that undertook the attack, as well as their superiors, who had ordered the attack, were well aware that the ship was American.

“I am outraged at the efforts of the apologists for Israel in this country to claim that this attack was a case of “mistaken identity.”

“Admiral Kidd told me, after returning from Washington, D.C. that he had been ordered to sit down with two civilians from either the White House or the Defense Department, and rewrite portions of the court’s findings.

“Admiral Kidd also told me that he had been ordered to “put the lid” on everything having to do with the attack on USS Liberty. We were never to speak of it and we were to caution everyone else involved that they could never speak of it again.

“I have no reason to doubt the accuracy of that statement as I know that the Court of Inquiry transcript that has been released to the public is not the same one that I certified and sent off to Washington.

He concludes:

“Contrary to the misinformation presented by Cristol and others, it is important for the American people to know that it is clear that Israel is responsible for deliberately attacking an American ship and murdering American sailors, whose bereaved shipmates have lived with this egregious conclusion for many years.”

It must be noted that the incident has actually been condemned by some very high-profile people, including then Secretary of State Dean Rusk and Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, who was named chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shortly after the Liberty attack.

In a diplomatic note from June 10, 1967, Rusk wrote to the Israeli ambassador:

The subsequent attack by Israeli torpedo boats, substantially after the vessel was or should have been identified by Israeli military forces, manifests the same reckless disregard for human life. . . . The U.S.S. Liberty was peacefully engaged, posed no threat whatsoever to the torpedo boats, and obviously carried no armament affording it a combat capability. It could and should have been scrutinized visually at close range before torpedoes were fired.”

Moorer, who passed away in 2004, published this statement in 1997:

“Israel knew perfectly well that the ship was American. After all, the Liberty’s American flag and markings were in full view in perfect visibility for the Israeli aircraft that overflew the ship eight times over a period of nearly eight hours prior to the attack. I am confident that Israel knew the Liberty could intercept radio messages from all parties and potential parties to the ongoing war, then in its fourth day, and that Israel was preparing to seize the Golan Heights from Syria despite President Johnson’s known opposition to such a move. I think they realized that if we learned in advance of their plan, there would be a tremendous amount of negotiating between Tel Aviv and Washington.

“And I believe Moshe Dayan concluded that he could prevent Washington from becoming aware of what Israel was up to by destroying the primary source of acquiring that information the USS Liberty. The result was a wanton sneak attack that left 34 American sailors dead and 171 seriously injured. What is so chilling and cold-blooded, of course, is that they could kill as many Americans as they did in confidence that Washington would cooperate in quelling any public outcry.”

A deliberate act of murder

Before his death, Moorer participated in the “Independent Commission of Inquiry into the Israeli Attack on USS Liberty, the Recall of Military Rescue Support Aircraft while the Ship was Under Attack, and the Subsequent Cover-up by the United States Government,” a blue-ribbon commission formed to study the events of that day. Other members included General Raymond G. Davis, Rear Admiral Merlin Staring, and Ambassador James Akins (former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia).

Among the Commission’s most explosive findings were:

  • That there is compelling evidence that Israel’s attack was a deliberate attempt to destroy an American ship and kill her entire crew;

  • That in attacking USS Liberty, Israel committed acts of murder against American servicemen and an act of war against the United States;

  • That fearing conflict with Israel, the White House deliberately prevented the U.S. Navy from coming to the defense of USS Liberty by recalling Sixth Fleet military rescue support while the ship was under attack;

  • That although Liberty was saved from almost certain destruction through the heroic efforts of the ship’s Captain, William L. McGonagle (MOH), and his brave crew, surviving crew members were later threatened with ’court-martial, imprisonment or worse’ if they exposed the truth; and were abandoned by their own government;

  • That due to the influence of Israel’s powerful supporters in the United States, the White House deliberately covered up the facts of this attack from the American people;

  • That due to continuing pressure by the pro-Israel lobby in the United States, this attack remains the only serious naval incident that has never been thoroughly investigated by Congress; to this day, no surviving crew member has been permitted to officially and publicly testify about the attack;

  • That there has been an official cover-up without precedent in American naval history; the existence of such a cover-up is now supported by statements of Rear Admiral Merlin Staring, USN (Ret.), former Judge Advocate General of the Navy; and Captain Ward Boston, USN, (Ret.), the chief counsel to the Navy’s 1967 Court of Inquiry of Liberty attack;

  • That the truth about Israel’s attack and subsequent White House cover-up continues to be officially concealed from the American people to the present day and is a national disgrace

  • That a danger to our national security exists whenever our elected officials are willing to subordinate American interests to those of any foreign nation, and specifically are unwilling to challenge Israel’s interests when they conflict with American interests.

The USS Liberty Veterans Association report mentioned earlier sums up the events from the perspective of the survivors. It tells a powerful story. From the report’s conclusion:

“The failure of the United States government to undertake a complete investigation of the Israeli attack on USS Liberty has resulted in grievous harm to the surviving victims, as well as to the families of all crew members.

Equally serious, this failure has resulted in an indelible stain upon the honor of the United States of America. It has sent a signal to America’s serving men and women that their welfare is always subordinate to the interests of a foreign state. The only conceivable reason for this failure is the political decision to put the interests of Israel ahead of those of American servicemen, employees, and veterans.” P.32

It also tells the story of how the veterans continue to be viciously attacked by Israel and its supporters. On page 20 of the report, we read of how the victims of the attack are still victimized to this day:

“As a result of the public relations campaign undertaken on behalf of Israel, the USS Liberty survivors have been vilified for their assertions that the attack was deliberate and for their ongoing quest for justice. They are characterized as “neo-Nazis”, “anti-Semites”, and “conspiracy theorists” for wanting nothing more than an honest, open investigation of the attack on their ship and themselves.”

While monetary compensation was paid to the survivors and the families of those killed, no one in the Israeli military has even been reprimanded for their part in the attack.

The Jewish Virtual Library web site has an article that sums up the growing questions that Israel carried out the attack with intent and premeditation. But just when you think you might be reading a fairly even-handed assessment of the evidence comes this:

“The picture that emerges is not one of crime at all, nor even of criminal negligence, but of a string of failed communications, human errors, unfortunate coincidences and equipment failures on both the American and Israeli sides – the kind of tragic, senseless mistake that is all too common in the thick of war.”

An Israeli court of inquiry into the Liberty attack amounted to nothing more than an official cover-up. The inquiry concluded that the ship had no flag at all identifying it, which was contradicted by everyone on board (the ship initially flew a 5 x 8 foot flag but that became damaged in the attack, it was replaced with a second much larger one. The inquiry also concluded that a report that a ship had been shelling Israeli positions in the Sinai Peninsula led to confusion and errors.

What have we learned?

I understand that many of you reading this article will feel you already understand the implications of this event. In addition to perhaps having read all about the USS Liberty, you may have educated yourselves about geopolitics, false flags, and how power is wielded within a fog of lies and propaganda. You may also know the history of Israel and Zionism and what has been done to the Palestinian people over the past seven decades.

But if you do understand all of this, you are part of a very small minority. Most have never heard of this terrible act of barbarity and therefore have no idea what its implications are. Nevertheless, there are some serious lessons we must all learn from this event (and I’m sure readers could contribute more):

  1. Israel is capable of attacking its allies, and especially the U.S., to further its Zionist agenda. One can’t help but think about 9/11 in this regard.

  2. Israel will lie to America to draw it into a war under false pretenses. It also has no problem blaming a third party like Egypt for an atrocity it did not commit.

  3. Israel wields sufficient power within American circles of power that the U.S. government is more concerned about not embarrassing Israel than it is about defending its own people.

  4. The American media will participate in a cover-up of an act of war against America rather than point the finger at Israel.

  5. Israel uses the same attacks against the Liberty survivors that governments and mainstream media use to marginalize “conspiracy theorists.”

  6. Israel will also play the “anti-Semitic” and “neo-Nazi” cards against American servicemen who were victimized in the attack and who are continuing to demand accountability.

  7. Even half a century later, the American government will continue to protect this lie and allow the victimization of the survivors to continue.

Israel cultivates the image of a country and a people who are victims, constantly under threat. But one thing that this horrifying event really makes clear is that Israel threatens anyone or any country — even supposed “friends” — that get in the way of its political objectives.

Some observers have claimed that the USS Liberty attack was a false flag intended to implicate Egypt and draw the U.S. into a war that it did not want to be part of. Certainly Israel’s determination to sink the ship and kill all aboard supports this idea. Others believe Israel was afraid the Americans would learn through the Liberty’s surveillance efforts that Israel was planning to initiate hostilities with Jordan or Syria, which it had been urged not to do by Lyndon Johnson. Perhaps both are true.

But whatever the specific goals, this dark moment in history clearly reveals much that we should be talking about today. And like 9/11, it is one of those events that shows us how our world really functions and how what we see on the TV news and in newspapers is more about hiding the truth than explaining it.


Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

This article, posted originally on Truth and Shadows in June 2016, has been updated for the 50th anniversary of the attack on the U.S.S. Liberty (June 8, 2017).

Source: https://www.globalresearch.ca/what-we-should-have-learned-israels-attack-uss-liberty/5680016

USS Liberty vids

Israel’s Crimes Against Humanity – A History Of Corruption

Israel: 50 Years of Occupation Abuses

List of Israeli assassinations

Israel's Central Role in JFK Assassination, Who's Who in JFK

The Hidden History of the Incredibly Evil Khazarian Mafia ...


02 June 2019 @ 09:26 pm


by Arif Jamal
26 February 2015

from TheWashingtonBookReview Website

Spanish version

Review of Paul L. Williams Book

After the Second World War ended,

...forged an alliance to fight the Cold War against the former Soviet Union and the rising pro-Soviet governments in Europe and the rest of the world.

In a new book (Operation Gladio - The Unholy Alliance between the Vatican, the CIA, and the Mafia), Paul L. Williams offers new and disturbing evidence to expose what he calls the unholy alliance.

Operation Gladio is likely to be a controversial book and may even be contested by several quarters. However, it would be difficult to reject the evidence author Paul L. Williams has provided.

Paul L. Williams is a journalist and author of,

  • The Vatican Exposed

  • Crescent Moon Rising

  • The Day of Islam

  • Osama's revenge

  • The Al-Qaeda Connection

He has written articles for,

  • The Wall Street Journal

  • USA Toda

  • The Counter-Terrorist

  • NewsMax

  • National Review

He is the winner of three first-place Keystone Press Awards for journalism. He has also served as a consultant for the FBI and as an adjunct professor of Humanities at the University of Scranton and Wilkes University.


The story started as early as 1942 with the formation of the Vatican Bank. The same year ONI (Office of Naval Intelligence) recruited Lucky Luciano, a pre-eminent drug lord.

The Swiss director of the US Office of Strategic Services (OSS) Allen Dulles came to the conclusion,

"We're fighting the wrong enemy."

Schutzstaffel (SS) sent Dulles a message through the Vatican that the Nazi government wanted to establish a separate peace with the United States; they wanted to fight the Soviets.

Dulles met Prince Max von Hohenlohe in Bern. Hohenlohe found Dulles in agreement with him. Later, Dulles also met other Nazi officials to forge the new alliance. Chief of Special Intelligence for the OSS in China Col. Paul E. Helliwell thought of another unholy alliance between the US intelligence community and organized crime groups.

Consequently, the US intelligence agencies got drug lord Lucky Luciano released from jail, allowed him to build his narcotic empire, and simply watched the flow of drugs into the largely black ghettos of New York and Washington.

The unholy alliance of the American spies and criminals was replicated everywhere, from Laos and Burma to Marseilles and Panama.

After Richard Nixon became president in 1969, the strategy of tension gained more impetus. National Adviser Henry Kissinger issued orders to Licio Gelli to carry out terror attacks and coup attempts.

The United States and the Vatican channeled millions of dollars for these operations. Most of the money was raised in questionable ways.

The first major attack in Europe took place on December 12, 1969 when a bomb went off in the lobby of Banca Nazionale Dell' Agricoltura in Milan, Italy. Seventeen people died in the explosion. Within an hour, three bombs exploded in Rome.

According to official figures, 14,591 acts of violence with a political motivation took place between January 1, 1969 and December 31, 1987.

In these terror attacks, 491 people died and 1,181 were injured. A large number of terror attacks took place in other European countries from 1965 to 1981. After a series of assassination attempts to kill French President De Gaulle failed, he denounced "the secret warfare of the Pentagon" and expelled the European headquarters of NATO.

In Latin America, the CIA and the Vatican launched Operation Condor as the Latin American version of the Operation Gladio.

The label was applied very liberally by the US intelligence agencies that,

"any government risked being so labeled if it advocated nationalization of private industry (particularly foreign-owned corporations), radical land reform, autarkic trade policies, acceptance of soviet aid, or an anti-American foreign policy."

The CIA and the Vatican started Operation Condor in the early 1970s when Opus Dei elicited support from Chilean bishops for the overthrow of the government of President Allende.

The Catholic group was closely working with the CIA-funded organizations such as the Fatherland and Liberty, which was later turned into the dreaded Chilean secret police.

"In 1971, the CIA began shelling out millions to the Chilean Institute for General Studies (IGS), an Opus Dei think tank, for the planning of the revolution."

Many members of the IGS joined the government after the coup.

Hernan Cubillos became the foreign minister. He was the founder of Que Pasa, an OPUS Dei magazine, and publisher of El Mercurio, the largest newspaper in Santiago which was subsidized by the CIA.

Williams shows that the Vatican was fully involved in Operation Condor. The Pope was fully behind the purging of the left wing clerics; leaders of the military junta were devout Catholics.

The Vatican did not abandon General Pinochet even when he was arrested in Britain for the murder of thousands of Chileans.

Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Angelo Sodano wrote to the British government on behalf of the Pope to demand his release.

Under Pinochet, hundreds of thousands Chileans had disappeared while more than four thousands had died. More than fifty thousand Chileans were tortured in the name of Catholic god.

CIA's dirty war was perpetuated in many Latin American countries with the help and blessing of the Vatican.

Williams quotes FBI whistle blower Sibel Edmonds who said,

"Between 1996 and 2002, we, the United States, planned, financed, and helped execute every major terrorist incident by Chechen rebels (and the Mujahideen) against Russia.

Between 1996 and 20002, we, the United States, planned, financed, and helped execute every single uprising and terror related scheme in Xinjiang (aka East Turkistan and Uyhurstan).

Between 1996 and 2002, we, the United States, planned and carried out at least two assassination schemes against pro-Russian officials in Azerbaijan."

Operation Gladio is a highly well-researched book with some 1,100 endnotes and footnotes. This work is highly rich in details. It is an estimable scholarly and intellectual accomplishment which is unrivaled.

His scholarly work fills a major lacuna in the study of the US foreign policy which was left by scholars such as,

  • Alfred McCoy

  • Peter Dale Scot

  • Martin A. Lee

  • Dale Yallop

  • Sibel Edmonds

30 May 2019 @ 09:50 pm
Deceit and incompetence drive CO2 demonisation

Couple of quotes from the vid:
"If you can demonstrate that those models are not working, you can take down the endangerment finding..."
"...that's sufficient to kill the endagerment finding."
Then the EPA has no basis for regulation, so no basis for taxation, licences, credits, (religious indulgences) no excuse for demonisation and no reason to put the CO2 drives warming hypothesis anywhere but the dustbin along with the "ran for it as an excuse to tax for the love of global communism" politicians.
Look at the video date. Why are we still being taxed via energy bills and the knock-on effect of price hikes due to companies being wrongly taxed?
Some compensation is due across the board.
Don't forget it was the IJ EU criminal's carbon tax imposed by deceitful politicians that drove industry from Britain to China and elsewhere. Who benefits? Ask Mr Cameron. There's an open arrest warrant posted for him,
"Cameron, David of the organization Bilderberg (Group/Club/Meetings)regarding actively and knowingly conspiring in well-planned efforts and constructions to consolidate power and resources – with the intention to establish a world government which would provide him/her with full immunity from any form of prosecution regarding his/her past and future crimes – and is therefore, according to Round-op Alpha, guilty of crimes against the sovereignty of his/her nation and against humanity as a whole, i.e.:High-level brigandage: Looting of public wealth; oppressing of populations; attacking the rights to good health, education, personal/national sovereignty and real security; the murdering in name of corporate profits; democide; psychological warfare; (eco-)terrorism – which deliberately jeopardizes any attempts for world peace and causes regional, cultural tensions, armed conflicts, forced poverty and the decay of the public’s health, the public order and society as a whole".
The warrant didn't specify 'dead or alive'. The difference between humans and psychopathic megalomaniac stooges.

The truth about global warming
Fox News
Youtube on Oct 21, 2018
Dr. Patrick Michaels, director of the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute, provides insight into the debate over climate change and the political games played to create policy.


FOX News Channel (FNC) is a 24-hour all-encompassing news service dedicated to delivering breaking news as well as political and business news. The number one network in cable, FNC has been the most watched television news channel for more than 16 years and according to a Suffolk University/USA Today poll, is the most trusted television news source in the country. Owned by 21st Century Fox, FNC is available in more than 90 million homes and dominates the cable news landscape, routinely notching the top ten programs in the genre.

Subscribe to Fox News!  https://bit.ly/2vBUvAS
Watch more Fox News Video: http://video.foxnews.com
Watch Fox News Channel Live: http://www.foxnewsgo.com/

Watch full episodes of your favorite shows
The Five: https://video.foxnews.com/playlist/longform-the-five/
Special Report with Bret Baier: https://video.foxnews.com/playlist/longform-special-report/
The Story with Martha Maccallum: https://video.foxnews.com/playlist/longform-the-story-with-martha-maccallum/
Tucker Carlson Tonight https://video.foxnews.com/playlist/longform-tucker-carlson-tonight/
Hannity https://video.foxnews.com/playlist/longform-hannity/
The Ingraham Angle: https://video.foxnews.com/playlist/longform-the-ingraham-angle/
Fox News @ Night: https://video.foxnews.com/playlist/longform-fox-news-night/

Follow Fox News on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FoxNews/
Follow Fox News on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FoxNews/
Follow Fox News on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/foxnews/

Source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fA5sGtj7QKQ
Thanks Dr. Patrick Michaels for making it blatantly obvious and Life Liberty and Levin for making the show.
We need a general strike against the occupation regime. Multi national would be good.

Are the trade unions treasonously supporting the traitors, not just by blatant inaction?

Have the trade unions been subverted, controlled by the same items from planet Toss that control the occupation regime, working against the nation, humanity and democracy? If so we'll need to get the support of those in the military and police that haven't sold their soul and turned  traitor through ignorance, (e.g. fabian, zionist and EU supporters) for the love of Monopoly money or out of fear.

We have had a treasonous occupation government from Heath to May and before that has aided criminal traitors in abolishing sovereignty and has got us involved in wars of aggression targetting regime change and plunder via destruction and chaos, all to aid the expansion of the illegal satanic georgian "jewish" zio terrorist state, Israel that is owned by the Rothschild family, signified by the 6 point star. Some say Israel is the epicentre of the satanic jewish mafia's movement to conquer and rule the world or destroy it in the effort. These are demented tossers with only self-gratification and total control their ambition at any cost, so long as it is not theirs. There are those amongst them. Adelson for one, that would happily make the surface uninhabitable while his kind, like maggots skulk in secret underground bunker cities built with taxpayer funds.

Netanyahu-Wall St's puppy Trump and the band of crazy neocon jerkoffs the americans call government are at the precipice of world war III. The craven UK regime is its cheer leader. It could be started on any of the fronts the Pentagon enemies of humanity have created in China, Iran, Syria, Iraq, Venezuela or via its proxy of proxies, NATO that has created a front on Russia's doorstep with UK occupation regime assistance.

The mass deception media is still telling you what happened in last night's soap opera, or showing the meat of the prettiest scrubbers to grace the casting couch with details of their latest shag.

Read more...Collapse )

Seemingly arrogant parasites demented by inbred insanity.

Myths of Babylonia and Assyria, 1 (Legends from Babylon, Sumeria, etc.)
Intellectual Exercise
Youtube on 16 Nov 2013

Donald Alexander Mackenzie (1873 -- March 2, 1936) was a Scottish journalist and prolific writer on religion, mythology and anthropology in the early 20th century. His works included Indian Myth and Legend, Celtic Folklore and Myths of China and Japan. As well as writing books, articles and poems, he often gave lectures, and also broadcast talks on Celtic mythology. This volume deals with the myths and legends of Babylonia and Assyria, and as these reflect the civilization in which they developed, a historical narrative has been provided, beginning with the early Sumerian Age and concluding with the periods of the Persian and Grecian Empires. Over thirty centuries of human progress are thus passed under review. (Summary extracted from Wikipedia and the Preface of this book)

[8:27:18. Probably listening to a couple of chapters at a time is best. Young readers, focus on the narrative not the delivery. It improves.]
Read more...Collapse )
17 May 2019 @ 11:32 am
Are the Pilgrims, the International Jews, the Illuminati Jesuits and the Black Nobility's 4th Reich craven scum indistinguishable from each other?

The corruption of every facet of bureaucracy and perversion of society exposed

If the Brexit party is not just another con job, a plan B for the (batshit crazy power addicted megalomaniacal and psychopathic Pilgrims - IJ - Black Nobility - 4th Reich with its illegal) global coup government to continue its control of UK governance, finance and reality, then perhaps expert satirist and comic Nigel Farage will appreciate some 'wooden stakes and silver bullets' for use by the Brexit party in the 'execution' of the filth occupying bureaucracy and government and other formerly public services.

Footnote from the end of the report below, with ref. to traitors Heath, Rippon, Jenkins, Blair and many others not yet named:
"DVD: This is the ultra-secret German Nazi continung ‘Black Operations’ intelligence organisation based, appropriately enough, in Dachau, near Munich. Intelligence concerning the existence of this organisation was passed to the Editor of International Currency Review by a British intelligence source.
The Editor then had its existence checked out by high-level US intelligence contacts, who confirmed the entity’s existence and importance. There is some uncertainty about what the initials DVD stand for – alternatively Deutsche Versicherungs Dienst [German Insurance Agency] or else Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst [German Defence Agency] – the context here being that DVD is the Abwehr-linked intelligence continuum of the Nazi International, originally established by the Nazi Abwehr as the German Geopolitical Centre in Madrid in 1942. Therefore, in this context, ‘insurance’ would mean ‘insuring the continuity of Nazi global hegemony strategy for the establishment of the controlling thousand-Year Reich’; while ‘defence’ in this same context would mean ‘defending’ the continuing covert Nazi global hegemony strategy. DVD is not funded by the German Government and taxpayer, since it operates its own covert sources of giga-finance, but its main operations and strategy are routinely approved by the German Chancellery. Any offcial denial of this fact is a lie."
Read more...Collapse )
10 May 2019 @ 11:37 pm

Brexit's Downsides Are Caused by Our Own Government

by Tyler Durden

Authored by George Pickering via The Mises Institute,

Of all the many failures of Theresa May’s management of Brexit so far, none is so symbolic as the fact that the UK is currently preparing to participate in EU Parliament elections on May 23rd, even though Britain was originally scheduled to leave the European Union in March. This very public symbol of the failure of May’s Brexit strategy — to which she agreed as a condition of the current ‘flexible extension’ of the UK’s EU membership until at least October 31st — has not only caused a near-total breakdown of support for May’s leadership from within her own party, but has also led to a widespread surge of public interest in third parties.

Read more...Collapse )

Tags: ,
Heath was an asset of a foreign agency.  Blair and Jenkins are claimed to be assets of the same foreign agency too. Would Mrs May take a lie detector test on TV, live?

Screencap 35:00 Click to enlarge.

UK Column News - 3rd May 2019

UK Column
Streamed live on May 3, 2019

Brian Gerrish and Mike Robinson are joined by David Scott for today's news update from the UK Column.

If you would like to support UKC, please consider joining the community here: https://www.ukcolumn.org/community
Read more...Collapse )
01 May 2019 @ 05:40 pm

Youtube on Apr 15, 2019
The British, Australian, Ecuadorian and US Governments have made an ad about Julian Assange’s arrest and it’s surprisingly honest and informative!

-- Produced by Patrons of the Juice Media
-- Written & created by Giordano for The Juice Media
-- Performed by Ellen x Voice by Lucy and Maria Paula (Ecuador)
-- Thanks to Lizzie, Micah, Scott, Clinton and Dbot for expert advice
-- Thanks to Adso, Damian and Matt-N for script feedback
-- Soundtrack by TwoMountains https://audiojungle.net/item/acoustic...
-- Outro beat by Mozart x Eric Parsons https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6JBB...
-- US Charging Document: https://www.justice.gov/usao-edva/pre...
-- Excellent overview here by Glenn Greenwald and Micah Lee: “The U.S. Government’s Indictment of Julian Assange Poses Grave Threats to Press Freedom” https://theintercept.com/2019/04/11/t... -
- Also excellent: Matt Taibbi, “Why the Assange Arrest Should Scare Reporters” https://www.rollingstone.com/politics...
-- Trevor Timm, “The Case Against Julian Assange Is a Threat to Journalists Everywhere” https://medium.com/s/oversight/the-ca...
-- Guy Rundle: “Assange is in the dock, but it’s investigative journalism on trial” https://www.crikey.com.au/2019/04/12/...
-- Statement by Assange’s lawyer: https://www.democracynow.org/2019/4/1...
-- French by Julie
-- Dutch by Jonas Maebe
-- Serbian by Tamara
-- Dutch by Jonas Maebe
-- Turkish by Antigone09
-- Danish by Mabeli
-- Czech by Jaromír Karmazín
-- Finnish by Max L
-- Farsi by Bruce
Caption author (Italian) Soft
Caption author (Portuguese (Brazil)) ErickSoares3
Caption author (Slovenian) Aljaž Tepej
Caption author (Hungarian)  Solinu
Source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1efOs0BsE0g
28 April 2019 @ 05:47 am
Lord James:

Remaining in the EU will constitute perjury by the Queen

byApril 2019
Lord James of Blackheath, the man who spotted the first lead that revealed British and Israeli involvement in the Iraqi Supergun affair and who in 2010 became just about the only peer of the realm to raise the issue of the national debt in proper terms in the House of Lords, has released this paper, which calls upon the Lords to prevent the Crown shattering the Constitution by acting in breach of the Monarch's oath of office to uphold the Declaration of Rights 1689.

A constitutional initiative to override political deadlock

Public anxiety and dismay as to Brexit political arguments reflects the similar mood and confusion in the House of Commons, which makes it extremely difficult for the public, poorly served by the media, to understand the critical issues — which in turn will make it more difficult to gain wide acceptance to find any kind of solution.  In particular, it is noticeable that the Parliamentary discussions are failing to address significantly critical Constitutional problems, which may vary according to which solution is the outcome.  It may be helpful to win public support if these are now more clearly explained and understood, yet only the Daily Express last Friday has made any significant move toward this.

Nothing would help more to achieve public understanding of the Constitutional hazards than to initiate urgently a direct appeal to the United Nations seeking their support for bringing the European Commission into strict conformity with the requirements of Clause 46.1 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969.  Serving this Notice would also provide immediately justifiable cause for an extension to the Chapter 50 timetable and would demonstrate a firm and legally justified Government initiative.

In line with that application to the UN, the Government should then explain to Parliament, and in the media, the different constitutional hazards arising from the alternative solutions available.  For example, remaining in the EU — whether temporarily or indefinitely — may well see the UK embroiled in the coming move to Qualified Majority Vote in 2020 and beyond.

This is contrary to the popular vote and that which our Government has promised to deliver. It is utterly inimical to our constitution. It will involve the creation of a European standing army and loss of control of our defence forces. We have been warned of very significant consequent damage to our intelligence services, there will be a loss of control of fiscal [tax] independence and currency, and loss of diplomatic independence to make international treaties. A full destruction of our constitutional autonomy and sovereign independence could, and most probably will, rapidly follow any arrangement that does not recover sovereignty, which was originally breached in the Lisbon Treaty. We must exit by initiating a supra-party-political consensus confirming our constitution.

The way forward from this is to:-

1. Make an immediate appeal to the United Nations making reference to a potential breach of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaty Making 1969 under Article 46.1, with a view to seeking an adjudication that the EU is attempting to force us to agree a treaty based upon fundamentally unconstitutional arrangements unacceptable to the British Crown.  I repeat my earlier contention that the Attorney General previously discouraged this initiative because he had addressed the wrong clause in the Treaty.  The correct clause states that no trading agreement may be entered into which significantly compromises the constitutional integrity of the responding nation, which is surely an accurate description of the European Commission's exit position.

2. If the application could be supported by Her Majesty, it would add significant force. This application to the UN could surely be assembled by a Government legal team within a single working day and be ready to be presented by the UK’s Ambassador to the UN on behalf of Her Majesty within 48 hours.  Media coverage would immediately raise the entire public perception of the Brexit issue; put into perspective political loyalties; and engender, hopefully, a public patriotic response.

3. In the meantime, we must begin to educate the public and electorate as to the relative risks of both a Remain strategy and the reasons why a No Deal exit may be the only means to preserve our national independence and our continuity of our proud sovereign status.  We must also show how this sovereign status will only be placed in ever greater risk unless we are set free and clear from the European Commission’s qualified majority strategy due to commence in 2020.  If the UN do not uphold our complaint, then only the Leave without a Deal solution will achieve this.

4 The dire constitutional consequences of remaining will very likely force an abdication by the Monarch. She would either have to accept a state of perjury or maintain the Crown's honour by abdication. Her oaths of office will have become entirely corrupted such that no successor could undertake them, thus the total demise of the Crown is a very real and inherent risk in remaining.

Failure to terminate the membership of the European Union will continue to lead us all deeper into a treasonous liability arising from placing our governance subject to a foreign Potentate. That Potentate is unelected by the UK's electorate, is unaccountable to them and irremovable by them.

This is an absolute affront to the Dignity and Majesty of the Crown. It could foreshadow the total demise of the Monarchy.

When Brexit is finally done, Parliament must be shown to have discharged its absolute responsibility not to have reduced its own omnipotence.

In summary, the British public must be brought to an understanding that Brexit is a vital precondition for the maintenance of our sovereignty and independence and that our political forces are acting responsibly and with great integrity on behalf of the whole community.  In passing, it will do no harm to remind all levels of Parliament in this process.

Lord James of Blackheath CBE

Source https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/lord-james-remaining-eu-will-constitute-perjury-queen
26 April 2019 @ 04:12 pm

Place holder for any brexit developments.

Whilst waiting for May to ask for a 50th and final vote on the same package, ("are you sure?") here is a game changer and possibly tinder for a revolutionary eye-opening.

Planet Flat Earth | 2019 Documentary II
ODD Reality
Youtube on Feb 20, 2018

Thanks ODD REALITY and TV. Well done.

My question is why NASA hasn't been closed down yet? Is Mr Trump a jesuit too?
Assuming he didn't know, he must do now (and to allow the outfit to continue sucking the public funding teat is criminal) how many previous regimes did know?
Or is Trump under Vatican guidance?
Now, the Russians had this live vid of the globe...
All that has proven is that all the "space" agencies are in on it.
The british and euro "space" agencies should be told to pack their deception along with their effects and get lost.
BBC? They're still propagandising the CO2 con, don't expect any diffent with the "space" agencies poop.
Now, about that tax refund. A full confession, the main responsibles in jail for fraud and the closure of the BBC should do, for now. Failure of the government to act must inevitably lead to the conclusion they are all in on defrauding joe public.

The jesuit gang must be brought to account. All of it.
24 April 2019 @ 11:42 am
by debunkified
Youtube on 5 Apr 2019

A full length documentary by Sacha Stone exposing the 5G existential threat to humanity in a way we never imagined possible!
Please SHARE this as widely as you feel drawn...use it to target your local bureaucrats, technocrats, health practitioners, local and federal government agencies and more than anything else...your family and friends. Featuring in this film: weapons development experts, biologists, molecular & cellular biologists, blood microscopists, activists, as well as good leaders out there on the frontline. We know what this technology is - we know how it was conceived and we know where it is intended to take people and planet. We are drawing the line here....and we are doing so with the full fire of consciousness. Arise Homo sapiens!

Thanks for watching. Please LIKE, SHARE, COMMENT and SUBSCRIBE at Youtube.
Video Attribution Information:
Source video - This video was used to create You Must See - 5G APOCALYPSE - THE EXTINCTION EVENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol3tA... by New Earth Project
Science & Technology
Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)

Petition to Canada’s House of Commons: Stop the Implementation of 5G Technology!

Global Research, April 21, 2019


  • Wi-Fi systems and 5G technology have very harmful effects on human, animal and environmental health;

  • Wi-Fi systems and 5G technology seem to be especially harmful to newborns, children, people who are ill and seniors;

  • 5G technology is similar to, but worse than, the problems that have already been linked to early generations of telephones because it uses pulses of waves;

  • On January 1, 2019, 247 scientists in 42 countries recommended a moratorium on the deployment of 5G technology in the telecommunications sector;

  • A major study by the National Toxicology Program in the United States showed that rats exposed to waves developed cancers;

  • The International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) opposes the installation of cellular towers and antennas on their firehalls for health reasons;

  • The precautionary principle is not implemented seriously or rigorously; and

  • Since 5G technology was deployed in New York City, a number of people and their pets have fallen ill.

We, the undersigned, concerned citizens and residents of Canada, call upon the House of Commons to enact a moratorium, or temporary halt, on implementation of 5G communication technology across Canada until an independent House of Commons-mandated team of qualified researchers has proven that the dangers of 5G technology to human, animal and environmental health are in fact minimal and have no serious consequences.

Link to the petition. It is open for signature until August 16, 2019, at 3:04 p.m. (EDT).

Note to readers: please click the share buttons below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Richard Bernier is a retired teacher and local lecturer on environmental issues.

Featured image is from End of the American Dream

Is british wealth still being funnelled to the I-JEU commission and or council of crooks by the House of Crooks called Parliament?
Personal accountability would end that.

New Chartist Movement

The British Constitution Group realises that the austerity-suffering people of Britain are being scammed and deceived by our political class on a truly massive scale. We are not being told the truth about our Common Law constitutional rights and protections, nor about how money is actually created… and by whom.

But it is also our combined ignorance, stupidity and apathy that have allowed all this to happen… and if we don’t get off our backsides quickly to peacefully confront all of this, a life of debt servitude, a completely cashless society and an Orwellian future of centrally-controlled Artificial Intelligence (AI) high surveillance and SMART micro-management (not to mention the prospect of being micro-chipped) awaits us all. And when all this happens, we will only have ourselves to blame!

Realising, that as a small and virtually unknown campaigning group, we would struggle to get the provable truth out in time for the nation to do something about it, we decided to go back to our history books.

It’s not about starting yet another political party – there are already well over one hundred of them in Britain, all competing to be noticed by the electorate. No, what is needed is a mass grassroots movement right across the political and social spectrums that can’t be ignored, even by the mainstream media! Remembering the Chartist Movement of the early Victorian era – where the ordinary people came together peacefully to demand that Parliament should be more transparent, accountable and representative of their interests - it seems only right to pay our respects to their epic struggle for justice and fairness by starting a new Chartist Movement, only this time the ‘charge sheet’ against Parliament is a lot, lot more serious.

We, at the British Constitution Group (BCG), want to create a campaigning alarm clock to quickly wake up the people of this country before it all becomes too late. The research is almost completed – we very largely know what is being done to us and how. Unlike the usual rhetoric of empty or implicated politicians who can only offer you ‘hope’ and ‘change’, we now have real solutions based on provable truth and actual history with which to completely transform the lives of the British people for the better. Our new movement is not about promoting new ego-driven personalities – we are about exposing and collapsing a completely unlawful and treasonous system of control and governance by simply getting essential and unknown information out to the people in the most effective way possible. It is only then that we, as sovereign people, can make decisions to free us all from the sleaze, treason and criminality which currently pervades the governance of our country at all levels and so thereby restore the rule of Common Law.

When you’ve read the evidence on this website, you will realise just how important it is that the New Chartist Movement succeeds. We can only do this if we have the level of public support that gives us the resources and the wherewithal to do the job properly. Please click here to support us in our work and, if you can, please set up a local Chartist support group where you live and tell your friends, neighbours and work colleagues, not just what is really happening to all of us, but what the provable and actual solutions are. Thank you and we hopefully will look forward to hearing from you and to campaigning with you very soon.

Justin Walker, Brian Gerrish and Eddy Alder
BCG and New Chartist Movement campaign co-ordinators

Home page: https://www.newchartistmovement.org.uk
Please visit to give them incentive.

Nigel Farage calls on EU to investigate George Soros funding, collusion
RT 14 Nov, 2017
Edited 15 Nov, 2017
Nigel Farage says while Russia is accused of funding Britain’s ‘Leave’ campaign, financier George Soros’ recent $18 billion donation to pro-EU charity Open Society has escaped scrutiny. “This is where the real international political collusion is,” Farage says.
Speaking to the European Parliament in Strasbourg on Tuesday, Farage told fellow MEPs he believes that when it comes to international collusion, “we are looking in the wrong place.” He says Soros’ influence in Brussels is “truly extraordinary,” adding: “I fear we could be looking at the biggest level of international, political collusion in history.”
Farage, the leader of the Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy Group, believes Soros has spent billions in the EU to undermine the nation state. “When we are talking about offshore money, when we are talking about political subversion, when we are talking about collusion, I wonder if we are looking in the wrong place.
“And I say that because George Soros recently gave Open Society, which of course campaigns for freedom of movement of people and supranational structures like the European Union, $18 billion. And his influence here and in Brussels is truly extraordinary.”

More recently:
REVEALED: George Soros hands Gina Miller campaign £400,000 in desperate bid to STOP Brexit
BILLIONAIRE investor George Soros has handed £400,000 to a campaign group founded by Gina Miller which is trying to overturn Brexit with a nationwide advertising campaign and Momentum style rallies, it has been reported.
Daily Express Feb 8, 2018

The Soros witches involved in the MENA insurgencies were the Clinton woman, Power and Rice. Who is he using for the I-JEU campaign? Speculating, Merkel, May and Macron's nanny.

Were the question to be asked, Judge Anna might call the I-JEU upper hierarchy deists. I prefer using a more widely understood adjective, satanists.
A quote from the good lady's PDF:
Those in back of the Georgia Guide Stones are Deists, not Satanists.They find the idea of an absolute Evil as childish as the idea of absolute Good, and they revel in illusions and fraud schemes that take advantage of our dualistic educational system — using “good” and “evil” choices as a means to “herd the sheep”. As long as we can be “suckered in” by dualistic thinking, they have ready means to control us. They believe in “a” God, a supernatural “Force” which orders the Universe, but they are not “Christian” and they are not aligned with any other major religion, either. In philosophy and religious practice and belief they are closer to the Founders—Franklin, Washington, et alia–and formally recognize only two “Laws” apart from the “Natural Laws”— the Law of Freewill, stated as “And so long as it harms none, do what ye will.”
and the Law of Love, stated as “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” They are more closely aligned to the ancient Druids than anything else— nature worshippers, practicioners of “natural magick”, and yes, blood sacrifices of various kinds. They are not “nice people”, but they are very diligent and serious-minded and they are enemies of the “unsympathetic” world religions— they purposefully set the Jews and Christians and Muslims to fighting each other so that they kill off and diminish their enemies.

Apparently the DVD supplies children. One wonders about the british spy agencies, OHMS.
The UN is a failed gang of crooks controlled by another gang of controlled crooks that works with the private IMF and World Bansters to defraud nations via war damage rebuild loans. The SDR is just another forged currency ponzi that has no intrinsic value beyond the signature of an employee.
The IMF racket  works to deprive natives from their future earnings by means of a loan taken out by complicit crooked regime leaders and dictators and secured in favour of corporations by mineral and hydrocarbon rich land. The loan invariably gets misspent. Britain participates in the racket by funding the IMF with British public funds that the public pays interest on, that goes to bank shareholders, the Crown Ltd (City) and the Vatican. Borrowers are likely obliged to use globalist owned corps for the rebuild, such as Haliburton.
SDRs are fraudulent intruments that bear interest. A pretend debt currency.
The UN was closed down as a failed corporation. It is now a zombie fictional entity.

From Zero Hedge, posted by Tyler Durden
It Begins: Former UN Under-Secretary-General Calls For One World Currency

Authored by José Antonio Ocampo, formerly United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs, via Project Syndicate,

This year, the world commemorates the anniversaries of two key events in the development of the global monetary system. The first is the creation of the International Monetary Fund at the Bretton Woods conference 75 years ago. The second is the advent, 50 years ago, of the Special Drawing Right (SDR), the IMF’s global reserve asset.

When it introduced the SDR, the Fund hoped to make it “the principal reserve asset in the international monetary system.” This remains an unfulfilled ambition; indeed, the SDR is one of the most underused instruments of international cooperation. Nonetheless, better late than never: turning the SDR into a true global currency would yield several benefits for the world’s economy and monetary system.

The idea of a global currency is not new. Prior to the Bretton Woods negotiations, John Maynard Keynes suggested the “bancor” as the unit of account of his proposed International Clearing Union. In the 1960s, under the leadership of the Belgian-American economist Robert Triffin, other proposals emerged to address the growing problems created by the dual dollar-gold system that had been established at Bretton Woods. The system finally collapsed in 1971. As a result of those discussions, the IMF approved the SDR in 1967, and included it in its Articles of Agreement two years later.

Although the IMF’s issuance of SDRs resembles the creation of national money by central banks, the SDR fulfills only some of the functions of money. True, SDRs are a reserve asset, and thus a store of value. They are also the IMF’s unit of account. But only central banks – mainly in developing countries, though also in developed economies – and a few international institutions use SDRs as a means of exchange to pay each other.

The SDR has a number of basic advantages, not least that the IMF can use it as an instrument of international monetary policy in a global economic crisis. In 2009, for example, the IMF issued $250 billion in SDRs to help combat the downturn, following a proposal by the G20.

Most importantly, SDRs could also become the basic instrument to finance IMF programs. Until now, the Fund has relied mainly on quota (capital) increases and borrowing from member countries. But quotas have tended to lag behind global economic growth; the last increase was approved in 2010, but the US Congress agreed to it only in 2015. And loans from member countries, the IMF’s main source of new funds (particularly during crises), are not true multilateral instruments.

The best alternative would be to turn the IMF into an institution fully financed and managed in its own global currency – a proposal made several decades ago by Jacques Polak, then the Fund’s leading economist. One simple option would be to consider the SDRs that countries hold but have not used as “deposits” at the IMF, which the Fund can use to finance its lending to countries. This would require a change in the Articles of Agreement, because SDRs currently are not held in regular IMF accounts.

The Fund could then issue SDRs regularly or, better still, during crises, as in 2009. In the long term, the amount issued must be related to the demand for foreign-exchange reserves. Various economists and the IMF itself have estimated that the Fund could issue $200-300 billion in SDRs per year. Moreover, this would spread the financial benefits (seigniorage) of issuing the global currency across all countries. At present, these benefits accrue only to issuers of national or regional currencies that are used internationally – particularly the US dollar and the euro.

More active use of SDRs would also make the international monetary system more independent of US monetary policy. One of the major problems of the global monetary system is that the policy objectives of the US, as the issuer of the world’s main reserve currency, are not always consistent with overall stability in the system.

In any case, different national and regional currencies could continue to circulate alongside growing SDR reserves. And a new IMF “substitution account” would allow central banks to exchange their reserves for SDRs, as the US first proposed back in the 1970s.

SDRs could also potentially be used in private transactions and to denominate national bonds. But, as the IMF pointed out in its report to the Board in 2018, these “market SDRs,” which would turn the unit into fully-fledged money, are not essential for the reforms proposed here. Nor would SDRs need to be used as a unit of account outside the Fund.

The anniversaries of the IMF and the SDR in 2019 are causes for celebration. But they also represent an ideal opportunity to transform the SDR into a true global currency that would strengthen the international monetary system. Policymakers should seize it.

*  *  *

We are being primed and propagandized to desire this inevitability! Coming just a day after the Saudis threatened to end the Petrodollar, Ocampo's op-ed is well-timed to say the least.

As we noted previously, nothing lasts forever.

Source https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-05/it-begins-former-un-under-secretary-general-calls-one-world-currency
Just another con job to finance the failed I-J World Gov coup, eh Cameron? If the UN, WB, IMF, G7 got nuked tomorrow the world would be a better place.
Except Mossad never attacks its own.