Log in


11 May 2013. Keep an eye on the long game.
Britain introduces new ploy to arm terrorists in Syria

The British government has been circulating a discussion paper to EU member states in Brussels in yet another attempt to arm terrorists fighting the popular government of president Bashar al-Assad in Syria.
Britain has been pushing desperately to help topple Bashar Assad government, which enjoys the backing of Syrian people, since more than two years ago, when a peaceful call for change in the country was hijacked by foreign-backed terrorists and mercenaries funded by certain regional states including Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey.
The desperate attempts by an alliance of Western governments and al-Qaeda affiliated terrorists to occupy Syria in favor of Zionist regime of Israel and its regional allies have so far failed to bear results.
For the same reason, Britain and the U.S. have been conspiring to send heavy weaponry to armed terrorists on the pretext of helping so-called moderate forces in Syria to end the bloodshed they have created and sponsored in the country.
The UK government argues that by lifting an arms embargo against insurgents in Syria they will compel the Syrian government to enter negotiations on a political solution.
This is while that the government of Syria has been calling for a national reconciliation and negotiations from the very beginning of the conflict and has always dismissed foreign intervention in the country.
Source (more) http://www.presstv.ir/detail/302588.html
All UK in-power political posts should carry a mandatory prison sentence, where trials are held the pre-assumption of guilt should apply.

Nusra Front Claims Responsibility for at Least 600 Terror Acts in Syria

ExpandCollapse )
More of yesterday's news the MSM couldn't handle (because it wasn't in their best interests) in comments.

Mac Slavo
June 30th, 2016

In perfect order out of chaos fashion, the elite are now showing their hand.
Problem. Reaction. Solution.
What will come out of the vote for Britain to leave the European Union, and who will benefit from it?
There is considerable reason to think that it will be the very billionaire elite class who created the EU in the first place.
If the push for Brexit was fueled by the European anger against unlimited migration and its side effects of extreme culture clash, terrorism and sensational incidents of rape, then it was the very crisis that the likes of the Davos elite, and in particular, the Bilderberg elite having been playing upon.

The Problem: Europe is on the verge of collapse
You break it, you buy it.”
We’ve all heard the maxim above, meant to be cautionary warning to clumsy shoppers that the store will not pay for any losses. But on the global scale, it is a recipe to buy up the broken pieces of nations, businesses and entire continents (or at least their most valuable assets) for pennies on the dollar.
It is this type of maneuver that should be considered when looking at the true impact of Brexit, as well as the true reasons for the intense migrant crisis that hit Europe like a wave during the past couple of years.
For instance, the UN Migration Chief Peter Sutherland, who happens to be non-executive chairman of Goldman Sach International and a steering member of the Bilderberg committee, literally called for migration as a weapon in order to “undermine” the homogeneity and sovereignty of European nations:
In 2012 Mr Sutherland was quizzed by the House of Lords EU home affairs sub-committee about what the EU should do about evidence from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that employment rates among migrants were higher in the US and Australia than EU countries.
Mr Sutherland, who has attended meetings of The Bilderberg Group, told the committee: “The United States, or Australia and New Zealand, are migrant societies and therefore they accommodate more readily those from other backgrounds than we do ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others.
“And that’s precisely what the European Union, in my view,  should be doing its best to undermine.”

That was in 2012, as the Syrian refugee migrant crisis was yet to unfold in a huge way.

The Reaction: Market panic, predictable to keen observers
The entire sequence events played upon fear for effect, a catalyst making the strength of the reaction more intense, in turn giving greater momentum to the solution.
Brexit was played up in the media, not just in Europe where its effects would be most felt, but in the United States and globally as well. The shocking death of a Member of Parliament by a deranged killer proclaiming sovereignty for Britain seemed almost calculated to heighten the divisive spirit. There were months of scaremongering and warnings about the fianancial doom a “leave” vote would usher in, in attempt to scare away support for the referendum – or perhaps as prelude to the events to come in the aftermath.
Its causes have been attributed to a swell of populism, fueled by anger over the compounding disasters from migrants being driven from Syria and the Middle East. Years of Greek debt crisis, enormous sums of money for bailouts and a relinquishment of power to centralized bureaucrats made the EU increasingly distasteful.
All that only made disobeying the wishes of the ruling establishment all the more tempting. Nervous money switched hands, and the vote was too close to call. On the eve of the actual vote, there was biblical storm with dramatic flashing lightning, and floods that kept people from the poles.
And, surprise a victory, and quite a reaction there was.

But what does it mean?
Expand- click title to go to the pageCollapse )
03 July 2016 @ 09:46 pm

Invoke Article 50 of The Lisbon Treaty immediately.
The British people have spoken. We have voted to leave the EU. We want article 50 of the Lisbon treaty to be invoked immediately. We still have two years to discuss our exit from the EU, but we do not wish to delay it any further.
Sign this petition

41,784 signatures so far
100,000 needed. We don't need Vatican ghost sigs, show them why.

h/t Brexit Now via Tactical Things

Update July 4 over 48,500 and increasing each time I click refresh. I think this may become a record breaker. Please spread the word.

Our enemies' main propaganda dispenser, the BBC is ignoring this.

I can imagine angry words in the enemy camp. "Whose bright idea was it to allow the tax stock the right to petition us?"

The Calm Stroll to Independence
24 Jun, 2016  Craig Murray
The UK was key to the worst elements of TTIP. Now the British people must ensure we never see its like again. This article was first carried by Huffington Post.
In the space of two years, trade – via the secretly negotiated EU-US deal TTIP – has gone from esoteric policy interest, to the heart of the biggest social movement in Europe for a generation, to an often misunderstood feature of a vitriolic referendum campaign.
TTIP and its parallel EU-Canada deal CETA have caused outrage across Europe. TTIP in particular often grabbed headlines during EU referendum campaigning.
And in a post-Brexit UK soon to be shorn of trade deals including its World Trade Organisation country commitments, trade will be front and centre of new policy-making for the foreseeable future.
Many will now rejoice that for the UK TTIP is dead in the water. Indeed, Brexit may be the killer blow to the deal across Europe. But while the UK has escaped TTIP’s corporate clutches as an EU member state, if the deal does survive the big picture will be a little more complex.
Key to understanding why TTIP may still have an impact on the UK is appreciating the extent to which the deal is intended to enable the EU and USA’s neoliberal agenda to be the template for world trade.
Defeated in previous attempts to secure a pro-business but anti-people and planet deal, the EU and USA simply decided to sidestep multilateralism to impose their will on the rest of the world.
As a secret meeting between the European Commission and Exxon Mobil revealed, the Commission has been shamelessly colluding with the world’s biggest corporations to assure them that through TTIP they can force countries outside the deal (“third countries”) to accept its terms: the eradication of social, health and environmental protections, the locked-in privatisation of public services, and a private justice system so corporations can sue governments for any policies hitting their profits.
As the head of policy at the organisation which wrote the official report into TTIP told a House of Lords committee on TTIP: “They [third countries] obey those rules or they do not export [into Europe], just like Switzerland.” And now, the UK.
As for CETA, the danger is still very much clear and present: the European Commission intends for the deal to be sealed and implemented ahead of a formalised Brexit and without any national parliament votes. Crucially, elements of the deal could apply to the UK even after Brexit.
In the EU, the UK was the most neoliberal country in an avowedly neoliberal bloc.
The UK government opposed any reforms being made to the toxic ISDS ‘corporate court’ mechanism in TTIP and CETA and buried research it commissioned showingnegative impacts of ISDS on the UK. It ensured UK MPs could not read the secret texts of the deal when it could have granted them access.
It has led the charge – against the wishes of the Obama administration – for financial deregulation to be included in TTIP.It doesn’t stop there. The UK chose to include the NHS in TTIP when it could have excluded it, and the government then refused to release legal advice it received on threats to the NHS from the deal. And in spite of David Cameron’s “greenest ever government” claims, the UK teamed up with Canada, the US Trade Representative, BP and Shell to demolish rules that prevent high-polluting forms of oil from entering Europe – with profound implications for climate change and consequently the lives of millions in the global South.
It is this neoliberal elevation of corporate profit above democracy, human rights and protection of the environment which the UK is now free to follow unilaterally in trade deals – unless the British people come together to stop.
EU trade policy has been nothing short of devastating for Southern countries. In this regard, TTIP was little more than the same policies that have destroyed lives and livelihoods in the global South being turned onto Europe by its own leaders, with scant regard for any semblance of democratic process.
Brexit has created the potential greater democratic control of trade deals. And we must ensure we use that to craft a trade policy that is geared to justice for the many rather than profits for the few.
Mark Dearn is Senior Trade Campaigner at War on Want.

489 thoughts on “The Calm Stroll to Independence”
Alan June 26  https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/06/calm-stroll-independence/comment-page-5/#comment-606864
The UK was key to the worst elements of TTIP.

ExpandCollapse )


US-NATO Prepares for War against Russia.
Washington’s Objective: Create Divisions between Europe and Russia

By Pravda.ru
Global Research, June 29, 2016
Pravda.ru 28 June 2016
The NATO has increased its presence in Eastern Europe 13 times for the latest years. In order to stop Russia’s revival, the US unwinds military conflicts plots at every possible way.
Colonel General Leonid Ivashov, President of the International Centre of Geopolitical Analysis explained in an interview to KP, that ‘if data on Russia-NATO power balance at the Western direction is analyzed, as well as military activity build-up rate at our borders, scale of combat equipment deployment, if the grade of Russia’s demonization is estimated, one can say that preparation to a real war is taking place. As such acts are usually undertaken at the forefront of a war.’
The expert noted that the Americans do everything possible today to clash Europe and Turkey with Russia and ignite a big military conflict. The problem from the US point of view is that Russia becomes not only a self-sustained state, but a global geopolitical player. Today all the old Soviet military bases are used by the NATO at full capacity.
He reminded that in Romania the NATO has reactivated one of the largest Soviet Air Forces base in Deveselu. In Poland Dutch-German-Polish corps have been deployed at the former military base of the Soviet times with a headquarters in Szczecin. Beside that, an active propaganda on alleged Russia’s intentions to devour Poland and the Baltics is being held.
However, the NATO is significantly ahead of Russia in the numbers of weapons. But the US is preparing for a nuclear conflict, as it is evidenced, Leonid Ivashov pointed out. ‘And here the main players are certainly not the Europeans. The main player is the Americans. Apart from task to stop Russia, they have yet another one here – not to let Europe get out of the US control. The Europeans have tried to carry out independent policy in economy, in politics, they don’t want to sign a colonial Transatlantic deal. And in military field there is a total American control. Even the Supreme Allied Commander Europe is an American. So they keep politicians and business in Europe through military obedience,’ the analyst highlighted.
According to him, the US practices forces build-up at the military stage in the Eastern Europe. ‘The Americans may not even carry out their ‘global strike’, but create an incident, which will generate an armed conflict. And then they will shed a tear that they don’t want to wage war, but are obliged to defend the NATO allies. It is important for them to wage war not in the territory of the US, but in Europe. As Europe is not only an ally for them, but a competitor in economy. They need to weaken Europe, And it is best of all to implement it orchestrating a conflict with Russia in Europe,’ the expert concluded.
Thus, Russia should be ready for provocations of any kind. ‘And we don’t need to conquer the Baltics or Poland for example. Even if they ask us to be our allies, or what is more, part of Russia. We shouldn’t take them. That is another civilization, and it will destruct us from inside,’ Leonid Ivashov added.
‘It should be kept in mind. We should act on equal terms, trade, not trust them regarding security issues in any case. Only balance of power is our guarantee of no war in the future,’ the expert concluded.


The original source of this article is http://www.pravdareport.com/world/americas/28-06-2016/134849-war-0/
Copyright © Pravda.ru, Pravda.ru, 2016
26 June 2016 @ 11:30 pm
RT Op-Edge

Brexit changes nothing

The morning’s headlines proclaiming the unthinkable didn’t make sense: the UK was leaving the EU; Cameron was resigning. The world had ended and been born anew.

I’ll admit it, I was temporarily stunned. Jacob Rothschild had called for a Remain vote. What else was there to talk about? I hadn’t seen that one coming.

For an entire minute it felt as though there was a chance of a return to the halcyon days, an end to the insanity of moral confusion: no more ripping right things from their places and twisting them into troubling, hybrid forms. Children would be able to play safely in the streets again; decency and order would return; Britain would rise phoenix-like from the ashes of a pitiable self-parody in decline; men would wear tweed, and the women would stop walking like nightclub bouncers and swearing at their children in the high street.

The attempt to brand as morally compromised those who want something other than cultural obliteration for the UK seemed to have failed. O, happy days.

Then I had breakfast.

Expand (or click title to go to the page)Collapse )
24 June 2016 @ 09:37 am


A huge part of the massive overburden of deeply corrupt bureacracy is being removed from the British people.

Without the support of the UK regime the less supported white elephant fascist EU dictatorship will collapse to a burnt out core.

Sufficient people overcame their conditioning, the deceit about the EU regime peddled by MPs, Common Purpose, the media (in that the 4th estate have kept us uninformed, misinformed and disinformed of the EU regime's shortcomings and misdeeds) and the zionist infiltrated and corrupted churches, protestant and catholic alike.

A kick in the teeth for the traitors that were happily signing away Britain for personal advantage.

A kick in the teeth for the zionists and their one world government by violence and deceit ambitions of which the EU regime was a big part.

A kick in the teeth for NATO, membership of the EU regime obliges membership, submission to faceless psychopaths.

A kick in the teeth for the currency fraudsters. The inevitable currency pyramid collapse has been hastened.

A kick in the teeth for those that have been destroying the family, the religion, the culture and  distorting education in the once great sceptred Isles.

If the relatively minor increase in people of other cultures arriving swung it, I thank the evil George Soros for paying for the passage (and fake Syrian passports?) of those muli-raced 'Syrians'.

The 2nd most shameful occupation of the Houses of Parliament after the Blair regime is ending. Cameron has resigned but it will take till October for him to shred all the incriminating papers and seal away those that can't be destroyed (?) so we are stuck with the traitor till then.

It's been a long time since 'Proud to be British' has struck a chord in me. Thanks to all that did the right thing from the bottom of my heart.

We'll be punished and then, gods willing, with, for the first time, a government of the people the land will prosper as never before.


The CIA acting on (whose instructions, the League of Nations?) was fundamental in the creation of the creeping cancer EU regime.

If they aren't too hungover UK column should be interesting. 1pm for the show http://www.ukcolumn.org/
21 June 2016 @ 04:55 pm

Britain being owned by the zio bank clerks that run - ruin the EU regime is beneficial for the 1%, politicians, the currency fraudsters in the BoE, for globalist corporations that are destroying the planet, for the OWG nutters and for the zionist gang that controls the EU dictators and assorted other concerns that work on upward wealth transfer that is legalised theft like inflation and the currency fraud.

Despite such tragedy, the case for Brexit remains strong
Liam Halligan
Telegraph Business 18 June 2016

How to write an economics polemic under such circumstances? How to argue about trade and geo-politics when an MP lies dead, her children bewildered, her husband in unspeakable pain?

I’ve written a weekly economics column for more than 20 years now, more than a decade in this newspaper. This one – so soon after Jo Cox’s death, yet just days before the referendum on Britain’s European Union membership – is easily the toughest.

My head is full of reasons I’ll vote Leave, reasons I still believe stand up to scrutiny. As this build up draws to a close, I also have plenty of telling anecdotes “from the campaign trail”.

What I can’t shake off, though, is the sense that, despite the looming vote, the public is utterly sick of this referendum: sick of “Project Fear”, sick of finger-wagging “experts”, sick of the battle between infantile virtue-signaling and feigned offence-taking among our political and media classes.

I’m voting Brexit because, economically speaking, the EU isn’t where it’s at

Yes, the stakes are extremely high. The whole country is like one big general election constituency during a referendum, so every vote counts. The reputations of many ambitious people are at stake on Thursday, to say nothing of the future path of the world’s fifth biggest economy and the broader “European project”.

Despite that, the conduct of our national debate, while robust and often testy, was until last week still just about acceptable. Then, a Yorkshire MP was slain. Ever since, as the public’s appetite for rhetorical knock-about has vaporised, that very knock-about has plumbed new depths of cynicism as the two sides have traded accusations of either “contributing to” or “exploiting for political purposes” this horrific and brutal murder.

ExpandCollapse )

US = At least 51
UK = More

Read This Before The US Government Uses the Orlando Shooting to Start Another War

Global Research, June 19, 2016
Antimedia 17 June 2016

Late Thursday evening, the Wall Street Journal reported, 51 State Department officials signed a statement condemning U.S. policy in Syria in which they repeatedly call for “targeted military strikes against the Damascus government and urging regime change as the only way to defeat the Islamic State.”

“In other words,” as Zero Hedge summarized;
“over 50 top ‘diplomats’ are urging to eliminate [Syrian Pres. Bashar al] Assad in order to ‘defeat ISIS’, the same ISIS which top US ‘diplomats’ had unleashed previously in order to … eliminate Assad.”

Expand -click title to go to the page-Collapse )

WWII based on lies. Iraq based on lies. Libya based on lies. Syria based on lies. Ukraine based on lies. WWIII based on lies.
The EU eco-fascist central dictatorship based on lies.

Make the traitors get us out.
Then we can work on NO MORE WARS.



How might the CIA control NATO and the NATO-run Bilderberg Group?
Witness X2 noted:
"Parties with underage girls in the Cromwel hotel in Knokke.
"Present: Delvoie - Karel - X2 - Lippens - Van Gheluwe - Etienne Davignon.
"The girls knew where to go and with whom.
"Lippens hits the little girls.
"Several meetings between Karel and Davignon in the Memling hotel with the two Lippens."
(Michel Nihoul and other famous Belgians / ISGP - Dutroux case and X-Dossier victim-witnesses)

Etienne Davignon is the Chairman of the Bilderberg Group.

Article, of 9 May 2011, "What you don’t know about the Bilderberg-Group" tells us:

1. The secret Bilderberg group works for NATO. NATO works for the US government.

2. The invitations to Bilderberg's first meeting, in 1954, were signed by Prince Bernhard.
    Bernhard served in the Nazis' SS cavalry until his marriage in 1937 to Princess Juliana of the Netherlands.

ExpandCollapse )
The Amazing Glyphosate Revolt Grows
NEO 23.05.2016 Author: F. William Engdahl

I must make a confession. I never thought it would get this far. There is an absolutely amazing international revolt against the most deadly and most widely used weed killer in world agriculture–glyphosate. Those of you who have followed my earlier writings can detect my feeling of pessimism that mere “democratic” grass-roots protest, combined with a scientific assessment from an agency of WHO that glyphosate was a “probable carcinogen” would be enough to stop the pending, twice-postponed EU Commission renewal of the expiring license for glyphosate in the EU. It almost doesn’t matter at this point what the ultimate vote is when the next EU Commission glyphosate meeting is convened. The genie is out of the bottle. One of the world’s most important eugenics projects to maim and ultimately reduce human population is on the brink of being banned much as DDT decades ago.

On May 19, a revised proposal by the European Commission to re-approve glyphosate for use in Europe for 9 more years (rather than the original 15 years), but with almost no restrictions on use, failed to secure the required qualified majority among EU governments. This is an amazing and very positive development for democratic empowerment against an institution increasingly seen–not only by the British population–as an anti-democratic, even totalitarian structure irresponsive to the most basic concerns for the health and safety of EU citizens.

The agri-chemical industry bigs—Monsanto, Syngenta, Bayer and friends–are stunned at their failure. Corruption in government corridors whether in Berlin or Brussels seems to be losing its efficacy.

The next step for the troubled glyphosate renewal process will be for the EU Commission, those faceless, unelected bureaucrats, to come up with a new revised proposal that will bring Germany to approval by end of June when the old license expires or order glyphosate withdrawn from the entire EU market within six months according to Henry Rowlands’ international GMO watchdog media, Sustainable Pulse.

More http://journal-neo.org/2016/05/23/the-amazing-glyphosate-revolt-grows/

The Moment of Truth Pat Condell
Do we want to live in a sovereign democracy or a federal dictatorship?ExpandCollapse )
01 June 2016 @ 05:49 pm
The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview 1976

Charles A. Weisman June, 1992
What you are about to read should act as a WARNING to all non-Jews throughout the world. It hopefully should open the eyes of many who knew him in Washington government circles. It becomes indeed obvious that what he discloses is not fiction. It is not imagination! He was not pretending as he spoke with knowledge and intelligence. Many things have been said and written about the One World Jewish Conspiracy but never has it been described so openly. It staggers the imagination. Their plans are shocking and many will be astonished at the contents of this document. NOTHING like it has ever been told before. We prefer not to elaborate. You be the judge. Looking back to the time of this interview and having had time to analyze Harold Rosenthal's candidness, we are compelled to think of him as a conceited, boastful yet very knowledgeable person. I would classify him as an egotist and a egoist. At times his cruelty surfaced with a venom, especially as he describes the STUPID CHRISTIANS or "goys" as he so often referred to "us."
This surprised me because the word "goy" is not in our language and he must have known this. His mind was thoroughly immersed in the ONE-WORLD PLAN of World Jewry. With arrogance, he boasted that the Jew's conquest of the world was almost complete thanks to Christian stupidity. When asked if he was a Zionist, Mr.. Rosenthal replied: "That's a hell of a question! At the foundation of the issue the traditional Zionist concept of aliyah, a Hebrew term meaning the 'in gathering' or return of Diaspora L(dispersed Jews) Jews to the Palestine homeland. Ever since 1948 and the creation of the State of Israel, aliyah has become a basic imperative of Israeli government policy." What is aliyah? Will you please spell it for me? He did so and we inquired as to the realistic meaning of aliyah. Mr.. Rosenthal said: "It is a permanent physical migration to Palestine, not just a visit. "We asked, what is Zionism? I've heard Jews define it as anything from permanent migration to financial spiritual support of Israel from around the world.
Mr. Rosenthal replied: "Our first leader, former Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, said that Zionism without a 'return to Zion' is phony. Not many American Jews migrate permanently to Israel. Some say that all Jews, by definition, are Zionists. Others say that a Jew is not a Zionist unless he's a member who pays dues to an actively Zionist organization. Definitions have been tossed everywhere since the Jewish homeland became a reality."
ExpandCollapse )
28 May 2016 @ 04:28 am

Op-Edge: Assault on democracy in Brazil must not succeed
Richard Sudan
RT 20 May, 2016
The attempt to roll back the progress of the Bolivarian revolutions in Latin America is being played out in real time for all of us to see. It is a narrative which we have become all too familiar with.
The latest victim, Brazil, a relatively new democracy following years of military dictatorship supported by the US, is engulfed in a political crisis, underpinned by serious charges of corruption aimed at the government.
At the same time, it is clear, as has been the case in the past, that the influence of the CIA is playing a key role in seizing on the political turmoil to bring about a conclusion that will favor Washington, and also Brazil’s wealthy elite.
The impeachment of Dilma Rousseff is being backed and called for, by precisely the same power brokers who support a return to unconstitutional dictatorship and the rolling back of progress.  Indeed, the scrapping of the constitution would signify a move towards the very same system which once tortured dissidents like the now sidelined and democratically elected Rousseff.
What is happening in Brazil is being dubbed a ‘soft coup’, but for anyone paying attention, the sequence of events have a chilling resemblance to the coup waged against Hugo Chavez, the former Venezuelan leader, in 2002.  During the coup, which was again supported by the US and the CIA, Chavez who introduced many highly successful social reforms since 1998, saw his name dragged through the dirt by an entirely corporate controlled media whose interests were firmly aligned with the wealthy class and power elite in Venezuela.
Rousseff, like Chavez, has been a champion for Brazil’s indigenous population and those who are marginalized.  Rousseff, also like Chavez, is being mocked and patronized by the gutter press in Brazil, who behaved the same way when Lula was in office, highlighting his working class accent as if it were something to be ashamed of.
For too many among the wealthy elite and bourgeoisie in nations like Brazil, socialism is still a dirty word.  Literacy, political empowerment, health, education, and the nationalization of resources, represent social advances which are viewed as a threat to the existing social, political, and economic order, just as they are in Venezuela.  This is the real reason why Rousseff’s political opponents within and without, want to see her removed.
More https://www.rt.com/op-edge/343791-brazil-dilma-us-government/

- José Músico> RT Question
RT Question
Richard Sudan..."if you really defend the corrupt government of Roussef and the dictators of Venezuela...why don't you move there instead of writing this piece of junk from some comfortable apartment London...why don't you put your ass on a plane and go there live with the people that has been suffering this "assault" in their lives by these dictators?"
Dilma is not accused of corruption. Stop spreading your filthy lies. From the 367 MPs who voted for the impeachment, 315 are accused of various crimes. To know: Criminal association (Mafia), drug dealing, extortion, rape etc etc. From the new cabinet, 8 new ministers are accused on the mega inquiry Lava Jato. Michel Temer, the new NOT elected president is also acused on Lava Jato and dozens of other criminal inquires. So...on your bike and GTFOH.

- Liberdade custosa
This new goverment wants to end ambiental licenses, and you all know what it means.
Corporations will be able to destroy the enviroment and there will be nothing we can do.
And this is already enough for a coup, just this ambiental crime is enough to raise interest in those in favour of the coup.
And it's just one of the crimes they intent to allow, there's also police violence to be allowed (they're talking about bringing more powerful guns against protesters).
Facist state means total media control and violent repression of protesters.
Also, they want to take workers rights out of the constitution, illegaly.
So yes, it's a coup and in fact Dilma was just the rock blocking this corrupt politicians path.

[Consume in conjunction with whatever part of the Chilcott Inquiry report the 'establishment' allows to be published. ed]

By Dark Politricks

This is an extract from the book “By Way of Deception” by Victor Ostrovsky and Claire Hoy.

Victor is an ex Mossad spy who has decided to reveal some of the methods that the Mossad employs to accomplish their task. The books title is taken from Mossad’s motto and very accurately describes their methodology of false flag attacks and using false intelligence to get others to do their dirty work.

Revealing the facts as I know them from my vantage point of four years spent inside the Mossad was by no means an easy task.
Coming from an ardent Zionist background, I had been taught that the state of Israel was incapable of misconduct. That we were the David in the unending struggle against the ever-growing Goliath. That there was no one out there to protect us but ourselves – a feeling reinforced by the Holocaust survivors who lived among us.
We, the new generation of Israelites, the resurrected nation on its own land after more than two thousand years of exile, were entrusted with the fate of the nation as a whole.
The commanders of our army were called champions, not generals. Our leaders were captains at the helm of a great ship. I was elated when I was chosen and granted the privilege to join what I considered to be the elite team of the Mossad.
But it was the twisted ideals and self-centered pragmatism that I encountered inside the Mossad, coupled with this so-called team’s greed, lust, and total lack of respect for human life, that motivated me to tell this story.
It is out of love for Israel as a free and just country that I am laying my life on the line by so doing, facing up to those who took it upon themselves to turn the Zionist dream into the present-day nightmare.

The Mossad, being the intelligence body entrusted with the responsibility of plotting the course for the leaders at the helm of the nation, has betrayed that trust. Plotting on its own behalf, and for petty, self-serving reasons, it has set the nation on a collision course with all-out war.
One of the main themes of this book is Victor’s belief that Mossad is out of control, that even the prime minister, although ostensibly in charge, has no real authority over its actions …
The Mossad – believe it or not – has just 30 to 35 case officers, or katsas, operating in the world at any one time. The main reason for this extraordinary low total, as you will read in this book, is that unlike other countries, Israel can tap the significant and loyal cadre of the worldwide Jewish community outside Israel. This is done through a unique system of sayanim, volunteer Jewish helpers.

My first six weeks were uneventful. I worked at the downtown office, essentially as a gofer and filing clerk. But one chilly day in February 1984, I found myself joining 14 others on a small bus. … This course was to be known as Cadet 16, as it was the sixteenth course of Mossad cadets.He walked briskly to the head of the table while the other two sat at the back of the room. “My name is Aharon Sherf,” he said. “I am the head of the Academy. Welcome to the Mossad. Its full name is Ha Mossad, le Modiyn ve le Tafkidim Mayuhadim [the Institute for Intelligence and Special Operations]. Our motto is: ‘By way of deception, thou shalt do war.’

“It’s the old Trojan dick trick.” He lit a cigarette.

ExpandCollapse )

No-one is prosecuted. The justice system is corrupt and broken

Anatomy Of A Propaganda Blitz - Part 1
Post 12 May 2016 By Editor

We live in a time when state-corporate interests are cooperating to produce propaganda blitzes intended to raise public support for the demonisation and destruction of establishment enemies.
Below, we will examine five key components of an effective propaganda campaign of this kind.

1: Dramatic New Evidence

A propaganda blitz is often launched on the back of 'dramatic new evidence' signifying that an establishment enemy should be viewed as uniquely despicable and targeted with 'action'.

The Blair government's infamous September 2002 dossier on Iraqi WMD contained four mentions of the claim that Iraq was able to deploy WMD against British citizens within 45 minutes of an order being given. But senior intelligence officials revealed that the original 45-minutes claim referred to the length of time it might have taken the Iraqis to fuel and fire a Scud missile or rocket launcher. The original intelligence said nothing about whether Iraq possessed the chemical or biological weapons to use in these weapons. The government had turned a purely hypothetical danger into an immediate and deadly threat.

In 2011, it was claimed that the Libyan government was planning a massacre in Benghazi, exactly the kind of action that Gaddafi knew could trigger Western 'intervention'. Investigative journalist Gareth Porter commented:

'When the Obama administration began its effort to overthrow Gaddafi, it did not call publicly for regime change and instead asserted that it was merely seeking to avert mass killings that administration officials had suggested might approach genocidal levels. But the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), which had been given the lead role in assessing the situation in Libya, found no evidence to support such fears and concluded that it was based on nothing more than "speculative arguments".'

In 2013, the Syrian government was said to have launched a chemical weapons attack in Ghouta, Damascus, just as UN chemical weapons experts were visiting the city. It was claimed that Assad had ordered the crossing of Obama's very clear 'red line' for 'intervention' – a war that would have destroyed the Syrian government and quite possibly resulted in Assad's violent death. Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh reported on the Ghouta attack:

'The quick announcement that Bashar al-Assad did it is simply not true.'

ExpandCollapse )


I made this a post as the character limit in the comment where I first mentioned the article series meant the revelations about the Cameron regime-instigated destruction of Libya, including the degree of Qatari involvement, went unadvertised.

Op-Edge: The Gulf monarchies: Made in Britain (for a purpose): Part two
Dan Glazebrook
RT 5 May, 2016

The Gulf monarchies are the main facilitators of Britain’s support for sectarian death squads in the Middle East. This should be no surprise because Britain brought them to power precisely because of their sectarianism.

"What we want is not a united Arabia: but a weak and disunited Arabia split up into little principalities so far as possible under our suzerainty, but incapable of coordinated action against us” - so claimed a memorandum written by the Foreign Department of the British Government of India in 1915.

A more succinct summary of British policy towards the Arab world – both then and now - would be hard to find.

As we outlined in the first piece in this series, Britain’s weapon of choice in its attempt to destroy the independent regional powers of West Asia and North Africa in recent years has been its sponsorship of violent sectarianism. Its support for racist death squads in Libya not only achieved the destruction of the Libyan state, but also brought terrorism to every country in the region from Egypt, Tunisia and Algeria to Chad, Nigeria and Cameroon; whilst its training and equipping of death squads in Syria has been directly responsible for the rise of ISIS.

These forces, by setting Sunni against Shia, Muslim against Christian, and Arab against Black, are helping to bring about precisely that “weak and disunited Arabia” that the British officials in India dreamed of one hundred years ago.

ExpandCollapse )

06 May 2016 @ 11:38 pm


Fast-track Hands the Money Monopoly to Private Banks - Permanently

June 17, 2015 Ellen Brown, Secretary of the Treasury

In March 2014, the Bank of England let the cat out of the bag: money is just an IOU, and the banks are rolling in it. So wrote David Graeber in The Guardian the same month, referring to a BOE paper called “Money Creation in the Modern Economy.” The paper stated outright that most common assumptions of how banking works are simply wrong. The result, said Graeber, was to throw the entire theoretical basis for austerity out of the window.

The revelation may have done more than that. The entire basis for maintaining our private extractive banking monopoly may have been thrown out the window. And that could help explain the desperate rush to “fast track” not only the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), but the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA). TiSA would nip attempts to implement public banking and other monetary reforms in the bud.

The Banking Game Exposed

The BOE report confirmed what money reformers have been saying for decades: that banks do not act simply as intermediaries, taking in the deposits of “savers” and lending them to borrowers, keeping the spread in interest rates. Rather, banks actually create deposits when they make loans. The BOE report said that private banks now create 97 percent of the British money supply. The US money supply is created in the same way.

Graeber underscored the dramatic implications:

Expand (click title to go to the page))Collapse )


Secret TTIP Document Leak: Approval of GMO Food, Farewell EU Farmers…
Global Research, May 02, 2016
War on Want 1 May 2016
The massive leak of secret TTIP negotiating papers due out tomorrow (2 May) will reveal the true extent of the danger posed by the controversial EU-US deal, and early signs are that it will be even worse than already suspected. For the first time, we will be able to see in black and white exactly what the US negotiators are demanding of the EU, and what the European Commission is prepared to sacrifice in order to seal the deal. Here is a sneak preview of just three sections made available this evening – the texts in italics are from the leaked papers:

1. Farewell, European farmers

Any export gains for EU car manufacturers will come at a massive cost to European agriculture, with the European Commission sacrificing the small-scale farmers of Europe in order to force open US markets for major European corporations. Here is the deal:

“The EU proposed a possible package on mechanical devices in Chapter 84 and electrical appliances in Chapter 85 for which both parties share offensive interests. While the US showed an interest, it hastened to point out that it would need to consult with its industry regarding some of the products and that progress on motor vehicle-related parts would only be possible if the EU showed progress in the discussion on agricultural tariffs.”

2. Approval of GM food

TTIP uses the euphemism of ‘modern agricultural technology’ to refer to genetically modified (GM) food, and the US is demanding that all producers of GM food have automatic access to the regulatory procedures of the EU. Not only this, but the European Commission will be required to provide GM producers with full details of what they need to do to get their products approved:

“Where a Party requires a product of modern agricultural technology to be approved or authorized prior to its importation, use or sale in its territory, the Party shall allow any person to submit an application for approval at any time.

Where a Party requires a product of modern agricultural technology to be approved or authorized prior to its importation or sale in its territory, each Party shall make publicly available:

(a) a description of the processes it applies to accept, consider, and decide applications for approval or authorization;

(b) the competent authorities responsible for receiving and deciding applications for approval or authorization.”

3. Business chill on future regulation

One of the key aims of TTIP is to prevent the introduction of any new social, public health or environmental regulations that might represent a burden on business. The leaked documents confirm that TTIP threatens the ‘precautionary principle’ that stands at the centre of all EU regulation. More than this, the US is now demanding that corporations receive prior warning of any new rules or standards to be introduced, and the EU will have to justify its decision to introduce any new rules in future:

“When developing a regulation, a regulatory authority of a Party shall evaluate any information provided in comments by the other Party or a person of the other Party regarding the potential trade effects of the regulation that it receives during the comment period and… provide its views on substantive issues raised.”

In addition to the above three issues, the leaked documents show that the USA has no interest in the EU’s much vaunted ‘investment court system’ – a major blow to the European Commission, which will be unable to ratify TTIP without this element.

John Hilary, Executive Director of War on Want, commented:

The TTIP negotiations will never survive this leak. The only way that the European Commission has managed to keep the negotiations going so far is through complete secrecy as to the actual details of the deal under negotiation. Now we can see the details for ourselves, and they are truly shocking. This is surely the beginning of the end for this much hated deal.

The original source of this article is War on Want
Copyright © War on Want, War on Want, 2016

Via http://www.globalresearch.ca/secret-ttip-document-leak-approval-of-gmo-food-farewell-eu-farmers/5522785
Anti zionism is not ant semitism.

The Ultra-Orthodox Will Never Surrender to the Zionist Idea

True Torah Jews 02/09/2016

The Jerusalem Post recently published an article declaring that ultra-Orthodoxy has surrendered to the Zionist idea.

This declaration sure is news to the hundreds of thousands of ultra-Orthodox Jews who want nothing to do with the Zionist State. The Post offers no concrete evidence to back up their claim; the evidence they do bring is circumstantial at best. Let's look at a couple of the mistakes on which the author of the Post article bases his conclusions.

First, he mistakenly classifies religious Jews who join the IDF as ultra-Orthodox. As ritually observant as these young men may be, that doesn't make them ultra-Orthodox. In fact, these boys are often viewed as pariahs in their old neighborhoods. There have been numerous demonstrations across the globe with hundreds of thousands of participants, decrying the Israeli government's attempt to draft ultra-Orthodox boys into their army. Surely, one cannot classify the boys who do break off as ultra-Orthodox. And if there are any truly ultra-Orthodox Jews there, one certainly cannot judge the vast majority based on the few who were unable to withstand the challenge and joined the army to improve their financial situation.

Next, the Post cites the fact that there has been an increase of ultra-Orthodox participation and influence in the government. While we at True Torah Jews are opposed to any participation in the Israeli government, still, one cannot paint with a broad brush and label everyone who does participate as having surrendered to Zionism.

Expand (click title to go to page)Collapse )