Log in

29 September 2016 @ 10:06 pm

U.S. Corporations Side With Saudi Arabia Against the American People Over 9/11 Victims Bill

Michael Krieger | Posted
Tuesday Sep 27, 2016

Shortly after the release of the infamous 28-pages earlier today, the White House issued a statement dismissing allegations of Saudi involvement in the attacks of 9/11. I believe such assurances are intended to prevent people from reading it in the first place, because if you actually read them, your mouth will be wide open the entire time in disbelief.

There are only two conclusions any thinking person can come to after reading the 28-pages.

1. Elements within the Saudi government ran the operations behind the 9/11 attack.

2. The U.S. government covered it up.

– From July’s post: The 28-Pages Are Way Worse Than I Thought

If you want to know just how insignificant the interests of the American people are when they happen to conflict with the profit margins of multinational corporations, the following article should leave little doubt.

Politico reports:

Expand or click the title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )

26 September 2016 @ 04:59 pm

For the attn of any non misanthropists, non thugs, non gangsters, non junkies, non paedos, non errand boys, non alchos, non thieves, non traitors in parliament.
Oh  damn. That last gets all of them. All traitors, as well as enemies of humanity, the country and nature.
There are the lowest form of life in charge of this country. It seems to be a qualification requirement.

Libya War Was Based on Lies, Bogus Intelligence,
NATO Supported and Armed the Rebels.

British Parliamentary Report

By Washington's Blog
Global Research, September 25, 2016
Washington's Blog 23 September 2016

Parliamentary Report Confirms What the Alternative Media Has Been Saying for Years
The UK Parliament just confirmed what the alternative media has been saying for years.
Specifically, a new report from the bipartisan House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee – based on interviews with all of the key British decision-makers, review of documents, and on-the-ground investigations in Africa – found that Libyan war was based on lies, that it destroyed the country, and that it spread terrorism far and wide.

The War Based On Bogus Intelligence … Like the Iraq War
Initially, the report finds that the threat to civilians from Libyan  government forces was dramatically overstated:
Former French Foreign Minister Alain Juppé, who introduced Resolution 1973 [imposing a no-fly zone over Libya, and laying the groundwork for overthrowing the government], asserted in his speech to the Security Council that “the situation on the ground is more alarming than ever, marked by the violent re-conquest of cities”. He stressed the urgency of the situation, arguing that “We have very little time left—perhaps only a matter of hours.” Subsequent analysis suggested that the immediate threat to civilians was being publicly overstated and that the reconquest of cities had not resulted in mass civilian casualties.
The proposition that Muammar Gaddafi would have ordered the massacre of civilians in Benghazi  [which was the basis for the West’s war to overthrow Gaddafi] was not supported by the available evidence. The Gaddafi regime had retaken towns from the rebels without attacking civilians in early February 2011 ….Gaddafi regime forces targeted male combatants in a civil war and did not indiscriminately attack civilians. More widely, Muammar Gaddafi’s 40-year record of appalling human rights abuses did not include large-scale attacks on Libyan civilians.

Expand or click the title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )
Current Location: Shangri La
13 September 2016 @ 11:17 am

I Am A Syrian Living in Syria:
“It was Never a Revolution nor a Civil War. The Terrorists are sent by your Government”
American People, Please Help Us

By Mark Taliano
Global Research, September 07, 2016

Two years ago, “Majd” wrote these words on a Facebook posting:
“ I am Syrian… living in Syria in the middle of everything. We have seen horrors. It was never a revolution nor a civil war. The terrorists are sent by your goverment. They are al Qaeda Jabhat al Nusra Wahhabi Salafists Talibans etc and the like extremists jihadists sent by the West and the Saudis and Qatar and Turkey. Your Obama and whoever is behind him or above him are supporting al Qaeda and leading a proxy war on my country. We thought you are against al Qaeda and now you support them.
The majority here loves Assad. He has never committed a crime against his own people…the chemical attack was staged by the terrorists helped by USA and UK etc..everyone knows that here. American soldiers and people should not be supporting barbarian al Qaeda terrorists who are killing Christians, Muslims in my country and everyone. Every massacre has committed by them. We were all happy in Syria= we have free school and university education available for everyone, free healthcare, no GMO, no fluoride, no chemtrails, no Rothschild IMF- controlled bank, state owned central bank which gives 11% interest, we are self-sufficient and have no foreign debt to any country or bank.
Life before the crisis was so beautiful here. Now it is hard and horrific in some regions.
I do not understand how the good and brave American people can accept to bomb my country who has never harmed them and therefore help the barbarian al Qaeda . These animals slit throats and behead for pleasure… they behead babies and rape young kids.
They are satanic. Our military helped.by the millions of civilian militias are winning the battle against al Qaeda..but now the usa want to bomb the shit out of us so the al Qaeda can get the upper hand .
Please help us American people. They are destroying the cradle of civilization. Stop your government.
Expand or click on the title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )


by craig

Theresa May’s disgraceful quoting with approval at Prime Minister’s Questions an anti-Corbyn twitter user has been grossly under-reported – and that under-reporting is itself part of what makes this of enormous signficance. But first just consider this sample of the account from which the UK’s Prime Minister quoted:








Collins right wing laddism crosses the line into the grossly offensive and unacceptable. It is a puerile display of sexist, racist and anti-disabled hatred.

May’s folly in quoting Collins is extremely important for two reasons.

Firstly, if either Nicola Sturgeon or Jeremy Corbyn had done this they would be under simply colossal pressure from the mainstream media. Tarring by association has been the backbone of the mainstream media campaigns against both Corbyn and the SNP, and pages after page and headline after headline have been concocted around the slightest association of Corbyn, Sturgeon or Salmond with people a great deal less vile than Collins, over just single intemperate social media entries.

Will anybody attempt to deny it is true that if Corbyn or Sturgeon quoted a twitter account as offensive as this one it would be massive front page headlines?

Secondly, it is important because May’s tactic at Prime Minister’s Questions is to ignore the question asked, but reply with a pre-arranged jibe about Jeremy Corbyn. That is precisely what happened here. The “joke” quoting Lewis Collins by name was written by one of May’s political advisers – paid by the taxpayer – and then read out by her. May claimed that “Lewis’s” comment had been selected from replies to a Corbyn social media tweet canvassing public opinion. It seems to me massively improbable that this is true. Tory advisers are not sifting through tens of thousands of public social media replies to Jeremy Corbyn, and then happening to hit on this Tory commenter.

The truth is rather that Collins’ gross Tory laddism appeals to Tory professionals, and that May’s adviser who wrote the question is almost certainly a follower or fan of Lewis Collins’ output. And that seems to me to tell us something very significant indeed about this Tory government.

May needs not only to apologise profoundly for having quoted Collins, she needs to identify who wrote this answer for her. And sack them.


Thanks Craig. It seems not to matter what title education for the masses is given, it has been infiltrated by freemason fascist schooled sleepers aka Common Purpose graduates. As in the Police, local councils and political parties. The number of semi illiterate school leavers is evidence of a globalist activists' agenda target, degeneration of quality in education. Kids are, for example brainwashed into believing the lie that CO2 drives the climate and is a harmful pollutant. Reminds me of the days in school when Internet wasn't even a gleam in someone's eye, how we were taught the WWII propaganda and brainwashed with the lies by such as John Wayne.
Waking up is like suddenly finding yourself in a sewer.


Erdoğan and the West's PTB suffer from PCD addiction, power, control, $$$. The addiction often afflicts those with other disorders such as paedophilia, homosexuality, sadism, low IQ, absence of morals, absence of humanity, over compensation of an inferiority complex, compulsion to lie. These conditions are seen as normal in oligarchs, neocon politicians and especially zionists in leading positions. The reason for this is that the freemason grand master selection of candidates to offer the public prefers those of a socio- psychopathic nature. This is also seen in military and police leadership and reflected in the rank and file. It is also being spread to the classroom and local politics by Common Purpose, a freemason gang. It is a culture that is imposed on Israelis through education and media lies, e.g. establishment incitement of hatred of jews across the world, the holocaust, eviction of ne'er do well jews from various countries, and so on.

Turkish Invasion Of Syria Reveals Vortex Of Interests
Author Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post August 30, 2016

As Turkey deepens its push into Syrian territory, numerous geopolitical interests are now colliding with one another in what appears to be a war worthy of the reputation the Middle East has for political and geopolitical complexity.

syria safe zone Having had its immediate expedition across the Turkey-Syria border condemned by the Syrian government, Turkey is now facing some public criticism from the United States in regards to its military efforts against Kurdish forces east of the Euphrates who are themselves aligned with the United States, partially against ISIS and the Syrian government as well as staunch enemies of the Turkish government.

The United States is stating publicly (although public statements do not always mirror behind-the-scenes agendas) that fighting between Turkey, Turk-supported “rebels” (aka ISIS, al-Qaeda, FSA), and Kurdish forces is “unacceptable” and that the clashes must stop. The U.S. envoy to the anti-ISIS coalition, Brett McGukr, stated that fighting in areas where ISIS was not present is “a source of deep concern.”

Expand or click on the title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )


T May brex.jpg

We would like reassurance that the plot to merge Britain with a Europe of united states reduced to county status with England broken up into small city regions like Greater Manchester, London etc. will be terminated and the coup agents arrested and tried. That would be every PM since the war and those in their parliaments that supported the surrender of sovereignty. And the present incumbent and her parliament if any treaty made with foreign Bilderberg agents in the EU regime since Heath is not torn up.
EU UK regions.jpg

Each PM and politicians as Bilderberberg participants also committed treason in colluding with foreign agents to determine Britain's foreign policy. Is Mrs May a Bilderberg participant? Boris is. Boris may not be a freemason but he is a Bilderberg with strong zionist connections, an enemy of the nation as with most politicians.

World government – the EU’s objective
By Professor Alan Sked.
The original article appeared in the Daily Telegraph. With thanks to Robert Henderson.
December 4, 2015

Expand or click the title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )
04 September 2016 @ 02:10 pm

CO2 Absorption Spectrum

There is no Valid Mechanism for CO2 Creating Global Warming

Proof: Laboratory measurements show that carbon dioxide absorbs to extinction at its main peak in 10 meters under atmospheric conditions.* This means there is no radiation left at those frequencies after 10 meters. If then humans double their 3% input of CO2 into the atmosphere, the distance of absorption reduces to 9.7m.
A reduction in distance is not an increase in temperature.
Convectional currents stir the heat around removing any relevance for distance.
Scientists who promote the global warming hype try to work around this fact by claiming something different happens higher in the atmosphere, which they claim
involves unsaturation. The difference due to height is that the absorption peaks get
smaller and sharper, so they separate from each other. Near the earth's surface, the absorption peaks for water vapor partially overlap the absorption peaks for CO2.
Supposedly, in some obfuscated way, separating the peaks creates global warming. There is no real logic to that claim. It is nothing but an attempt to salvage global warming propaganda through obfuscation of complexities.
What it means is that climatologists admit there is no mechanism at lower levels of the atmosphere, and their rationalization for higher up is phony.
It's important to realize that radiation from the sun does not greatly heat the atmosphere, because the sun must give off high frequency radiation in the area of visible light, which goes through the atmosphere. Something as hot as the sun cannot give off low frequency radiation, called infrared. This means that the sun's radiation heats the surface of the earth, and then the heat moves from the earth's surface into the atmosphere through conduction, convection, evaporation and infrared radiation. The infrared radiation can be absorbed by so-called greenhouse gasses.

The Absorption Peaks

Carbon dioxide absorbs infrared radiation (IR) in three narrow bands of frequencies, which are 2.7, 4.3 and 15 micrometers (µM). This means that most of the heat producing radiation escapes it. About 8% of the available black body radiation is picked up by these "fingerprint" frequencies of CO2.

Expand or click on the title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )


Over 30,000 scientists say 'Catastrophic Man-Made
Global Warming' is a complete hoax and science lie

NaturalNews August 31, 2016
By Daniel Barker

The highly-politicized climate change debate rages on as we approach the crucial 2016 U.S. presidential election, despite an ever-growing body of evidence revealing the fact that "catastrophic man-made global warming" is nothing more than an elaborate hoax.

And the November election may prove to be a victory for the hoaxers, according to experts who happen to be among those who dare to challenge the spurious climate change narrative.

One of these experts is Weather Channel founder John Coleman, who is now warning that the election could prove to be a "tipping point" in favor of people like Al Gore, who continue to amass vast fortunes based on the global warming scam.

In a recent interview with Climate Depot, Coleman said:

"Al Gore may emerge from the shadows to declare victory in the 'global warming' debate if Hillary Clinton moves into the White House. Yes, if that happens and the new climate regulations become the law of the land, they will be next to impossible to overturn for four to eight years."

Climate change proponents remain undeterred in their mission, ignoring numerous recent scientific findings indicating that there has been no warming trend at all for nearly two decades.

Al Gore's dire predictions of the melting of polar ice on a massive scale have proved to be completely false. In fact, in 2014 - a year that was touted as being "the hottest ever" in the Earth's history - there were record amounts of ice reported in Antarctica, an increase in Arctic ice, and record snowfalls across the globe.

Debunking the "97 percent" lie
Expand or click on the title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )

Current talks on TTIP deal with US should be halted – French foreign trade minister

Russia Today News 30 Aug, 2016

Current talks between the EU and the US on the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) should be halted and new ones should be started, Minister of State for Foreign Trade Matthias Fekl told French media.
“There is no more political support in France for these negotiations,” and “France calls for an end to these negotiations,” Fekl told RMC radio.

La France demande l'arrêt des négociations du #TAFTA#TTIPMatthias Fekl (@MatthiasFekl) August 30, 2016

One of the problems of the deal lies in the US attitude towards the negotiations, he said.

“The Americans give nothing or just crumbs… That is not how negotiations are done between allies,” Fekl said. “We need a clear and definitive halt to these negotiations in order to restart on a good foundation.”

France “demands a halt to TAFTA [Transatlantic Free Trade Area] and TTIP [Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership],” he tweeted.

Fekl said that France will raise the case at a meeting of EU foreign trade ministers in Bratislava, Slovakia, in September.

#TTIP negotiations between EU and US have de facto failed’ – German economy minister https://t.co/maHHdSUcUk
— RT (@RT_com) August 28, 2016
Expand or click on comments or the title to go to the pageCollapse )
27 August 2016 @ 09:06 am

Hit the ATM: The Ankara-Tehran-Moscow coalition

Op-Edge: Pepe Escobar
RT Shows 25 Aug, 2016

So Turkish President, a.k.a. Sultan Recep Tayyip Erdogan is about to make a high-profile visit to Tehran – the date has not yet been set - to essentially kick start the ATM (Ankara-Tehran-Moscow) coalition in Syria.
Anyone as much as hinting at such a massive geopolitical tectonic shift a few weeks ago would be branded a madman. So how did the impossible happen?
A major strategic game-changer – Russia using an airfield in Iran to send bombers against jihadis in Syria – had already taken place, with its aftermath spectacularly misreported by the usual, clueless US corporate media suspects.

Then, there’s what Turkey’s Prime Minister, Binali Yildirim, said last Saturday in Istanbul: “The most important priority for us is to stop the bloodshed [in Syria] as soon as possible.” The rest are irrelevant “details.”
Yildirim added Ankara now agrees with Moscow that Bashar al-Assad “could” – and that’s the operative word – stay in power during a political transition (although that’s still highly debatable). Ankara’s drive to normalize relations with Moscow had an ‘important share’ in this ‘policy shift’.
The ‘policy shift’ is a direct consequence of the failed military coup in Turkey. Russian cyber-surveillance aces – in action 24/7 after the downing of the Su-24 last November – reportedly informed Turkish intelligence a few hours before the fact. NATO, as the record shows, was mum.

Expand. Click title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )

By Leif Elinder, Anders Romelsjö and Martin Gelin
First posted in Göteborgsposten in Swedish, translated by Siv O'Neall.
Title in Swedish: "Vi måste fjärma oss från Nato om vi vill slippa krig"
Information Clearing House August 20, 2013

The risk of nuclear war has never been greater and it is partly because of NATO rearmament of European countries bordering on Russia. However, these countries will also be targeted if Putin decides to strike back. Thus write three Swedish doctors in an article in Göteborgsposten on Friday August 12.
During the Cuban missile crisis, President Kennedy discussed with his advisors the various options available. One involved a limited attack on Soviet missile bases. Moscow was supposed to accept such a response rather than fight back in a way that would result in the devastation of both the U.S. and the Soviet Union.
During the years from 1950 into the 1980s there was a doctrine of military strategy and national security policy known as MAD (mutual assured destruction). MAD means that if a great power attacks first, it will always be possible for the attacked nation to retaliate. The ability to strike back served as a sufficient deterrent.
The relative security that the MAD doctrine created no longer exists. The U.S. and Russia now mutually accuse each other openly of constituting an "existential threat". The military-strategic balance is becoming increasingly uneven.
The U.S. nuclear rearmament and NATO's encirclement of Russia have created a highly insecure and dangerous world situation. The advantages of having the "first strike" becomes harder to resist. With the support of NATO, Romania and Poland are now installing a new American "defense" robot system called "Aegis Ashore". President Putin has warned the two countries that in case of a military conflict, they will now become the primary objectives. Russia's concern for a disarming first attack appears to be genuine. Whether the concern is well-founded, we can not know. What is crucial to our security are the actual thoughts and plans of each superpower.
The risk has never been greater
Former US Defense Secretary William Perry has warned that the risk of a nuclear war is now greater than ever. The reasons are, among other things, the following:
>  The breaking of the agreement after the dissolution of the Soviet Union (1990) not to expand NATO. The number of NATO nations has since increased from 13 to 28.
>  NATO's illegal intervention in Yugoslavia (1999) with the separation of Kosovo.
>  The termination of the ABM Treaty (Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty) in 2001.
>  The establishment of anti-missile bases in Romania and Poland (see above) – bases that can easily be reprogrammed to serve for attack robots.
>  The upgrading of the US nuclear weapons system at a cost of a trillion (12 zeros) dollars.
>  The illegal US-backed coup (2014) in Ukraine.
>  NATO strategic military superiority in terms of ability to strike first.
>  The demonization of Putin, including comparisons to Hitler. (A "Hitler" is not someone you can negotiate with – but someone who has to be eliminated).

Independent American security analysts such as VIPS (Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity) consider NATO war games in Russia's neighborhood as extremely provocative and dangerous. More and more European politicians are publicly distancing themselves from NATO's aggressive policies – such as the Greek Prime Minister Tsipras, the German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier and French President François Hollande.
Opposite effects
NATO is strong globally. Compared to Russia, NATO spends ten times more money on weapons. Many countries assume that becoming a member of NATO provides protection. But when there is an asymmetric military balance, the logical consequence will be the opposite. Should US/NATO strike from bases bordering on Russia, the Russian military leaders will not have time to react.
Russia has made it clear that such a situation will not be tolerated. Therefore, Russia currently applies a nuclear doctrine that allows for a nuclear strike with restrictions ("The Concept of De-escalation"). The intention of this doctrine is that with a limited first attack, the strike will make continued warfare less likely. By not fighting back, the U.S. will avoid the risk of an extension of the conflict to its own territory. Would an American president be willing to devastate his own country in order to retaliate against a Russian strike on bases in Europe?
The military-strategic situation is thus extremely unstable. Countries bordering on Russia that have allowed the installation of NATO bases are at an increasingly greater risk of becoming prime objectives. The outcome of the US presidential election brings no relief – whatever will be the outcome.
Cause and effect
When Western politicians do not distinguish between "cause and effect", provocation and reaction, the consequences can be devastating. Russia now faces three choices, in terms of dealing with NATO:
>  Giving up, and accepting the role of an American vassal
>  Waiting for NATO to strike first and thus be neutralized
>  Strike first with tactical nuclear weapons against European missile bases which constitute a direct threat and expect the U.S. not to retaliate, risking a counter-attack on its own territory. (Donald Trump has already implied that the United States will not unconditionally retaliate militarily to protect its NATO allies.)

President Putin has indicated that it is the third military scenario that Russia is now considering. The only question is when. The loser, in whichever case, will be Europe.
Sweden's rapprochement to NATO has increased the risk of our country being drawn into a war. Therefore, it is particularly important to Sweden and other European countries to support all initiatives aimed at détente and disarmament – and thus create a public opinion that will distance us from NATO.

Doctors active in the peace movement - Leif Elinder, Anders Romelsjö, Martin Gelin

Written by Daniel McAdams
Ron Paul Institute August 22, 2016

Reading between the lines in today's Pentagon press briefing, a bombshell US policy shift is becoming more apparent: Syrian forces and their Russian partners are being told that conducting military operations in some parts of Syrian airspace opens them up to being shot down by the US military.
Pentagon Spokesman Peter Cook was asked numerous times in numerous ways whether this amounts to a US "no fly zone" over parts of Syria. His first response was vague but threatening:

We will use our air power as needed to protect coalition forces and our partnered operations. ...We advise the Syrian regime to steer clear of [certain] areas.

The policy shift was so apparent that, one-by-one, the press corps asked for clarification. Does this mean that the US would shoot down Russian or Syrian planes if they attacked any US-backed partners even if they were engaged against Syrian government forces? Are those "coalition forces" and "partnered operations" receiving US protection against attack from the air always in receipt of that protection, or only when they are actively engaged in military operations? What are the rules of engagement?
There was no clear answer from the Pentagon spokesman.

"Is this a 'no-fly' zone, then," asked another reporter. It's not a "no-fly zone" Cook responded.
Another journalist tried to get some clarity:

How is telling Syria not to fly in certain areas not a 'no fly' zone?

"Call it what you will," Cook eventually said.
Another journalist asked, "Do you think the Syrian regime has the right to fly over its own territory?"
Same answer: "We will use our air power as needed to protect coalition forces and our partnered operations."
Expand. Click title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )

Daesh-Gate: The Scandal That Could End Hillary Clinton's Campaign

Sputnik International 21.08.2016

Russian-Israeli journalist and political analyst Israel Shamir offers his insights on why Trump's comments about Obama and Clinton being 'the founders of ISIS' may just put an end to Hillary Clinton's White House ambitions.

"Hillary Clinton, the candidate from the Democratic Party for the US presidency, is on easy street, or so it would seem," Shamir wrote, in a recent op-ed analysis for Svobodnaya Pressa.
"She has the reigning president on her side. She has the New York Times and the Washington Post on her side, along with the national television networks. It might seem that she's got this election locked up. And that might have been the case, a few years ago; no one would have even heard about her rival, Donald Trump. But now, in the age of networking technologies, things aren't as easy for her."

"The gadfly in her Garden of Eden turned out to be Julian Assange, the Australian hacker who has been locked up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London for four years now. First he published the Democratic Party's email correspondence, showing that its leaders had conspired to get rid of Bernie Sanders. The chair of the party had to resign, and the man who appeared to leak the materials was found dead on a street in Washington. But Clinton proved capable of coming to an agreement with Sanders. He received good money, bought a new house, published a book, and joined with Clinton, calling on his supporters to vote for her."

"Then," the journalist noted, "Julian Assange unveiled more of Clinton's correspondence, declaring that it was Madame Clinton – during her time as Secretary of State, who supplied arms to Daesh (ISIL/ISIS), listed as a terrorist organization both in the US and in Europe. Furthermore, Assange said, she lied under oath when she told the Senate that she does not know anything about the supply of weapons to the terrorists."
"Assange's statements could have been silenced, but they were picked up on by Donald Trump. He accused Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama of creating Daesh, of being sympathetic to Daesh and its aims, of leading a phony war against the terrorist group, costing the American taxpayer a great deal of money, and bringing a tidy sum for Mrs. Clinton and her foundation."

Expand. Click title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )

World Socialist Web Site 19 August 2016

Photographs and video of five-year-old Omran Daqneesh have rapidly become ubiquitous in the media in the US and Western Europe after being distributed by a group aligned with the CIA-backed Islamist “rebels” in Syria.
The toddler is shown sitting somewhat dazed in the orange seat of a new and well-equipped ambulance, his face covered in dust and tinged with what appears to be dried blood from what was reportedly a cut to his scalp. Video shows him waiting unattended as a number of photographers and videographers record his image to be broadcast around the world. Clearly, those in charge sensed that the boy, with a mop of hair covering his brow and a cartoon t-shirt, provided a marketable image.
CNN proclaimed the child “the face of Syria’s civil war,” while the anchor-woman theatrically burst into tears recounting his story. The New York Times called him “a symbol of Aleppo’s suffering,” while USA Today published a short editor’s note reading, “This Syrian boy is Omran. Will you pay attention now?”

More direct in its approach was the British daily Telegraph, which headlined an article: “For the sake of Aleppo’s children, we must try again to impose a no-fly zone in Syria.”

Expand. Click title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )


Perhaps for 10 years. Presumably to get the globalists' trans ocean trade agreements into force against public interest.

How to exit from the EU.
After Parliament illegally acted against our wishes for 43 years, we won!
With our current politicians, Brexit may be done disastrously.  If done well, our future will be superb.
So many senior British politicians and civil servants are bribed, accepting patronage, or salaries to be pro-EU, the government will do what it can to block Brexit.
An example is the 454 MP's the Conservative and Labour parties illegally selected because they were pro-EU. They have a parliamentary majority, which they have already said can block Brexit.
The British Constitution only allows MP’s to implement the wishes of the people. Two thirds of Conservatives voted Leave, so the results prove the Conservative Party's pro-EU MPs have been illegally acting against their voters' wishes.
They voted for the pro-EU Teresa May, so will we still have a Conservative party that doesn't represent its members?
She has said Brexit means Brexit. That’s excellent, but as Home secretary she implemented the EU’s communist Investigatory Powers Bill (snoopers charter, where the government spies on our phone calls and emails), and continued the EU’s flooding us with immigrants, so she is probably a Bilderberger.

There are 4 ways to leave the EU
Expand. Click title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )

When your government is the enemy.
NATO-CIA zionist controlled regimes - UK (MI6) Saudi, US (CIA) Turkey, FR (DGSE) Jordan(?) are those most involved in the unwarranted destruction of ME and African countries through the creation and support of terrorist organisations, illegal ground ops and illegal bombing. If this isn't about 'greater' Israel, then what?
Prosecute your government for breaching UN regs and international law on numerous occasions.

Who Created ISIS? The Enemy-Revealing Question That De-masks the Empire’s Facade For Good

Activist Post August 14, 2016


By Bernie Suarez

With this being a time of escalating tension, fear and chaos in America due to corruption, State-engineered events and propaganda, we need to apply sound reason and logic to help us first recognize and then reconcile the meaning of these events. This will allow us to live our lives in a prosperous and mentally healthy manner. Both physical and mental health as well as a sense of warmth, safety and security must be fought for in order to maintain (or achieve) a climate where one can thrive as a human being. This overall wellness is now being redefined as the world around us changes for the worse. And as I’ve stated in the past I believe true mental health is now being objectively defined by your ability to see beyond the narrow spectrum of mainstream media and into the massive pool of freely available information today — an era properly called the Information Age.

Expand. Click title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )


12.08.2016 Author: Phil Butler

Emerging reports from Syria suggest United States naval and special warfare elements may be assisting extreme jihadists break out of embattled Aleppo. Unconfirmed reports of US warships sharing intelligence with the group Jeish al-Fatah, also suggest US Special Forces elements may be trapped within the surrounded city. If confirmed, these reports would not be the biggest surprise to objective observers. Al Nusra and Al Qaeda, along with ISIL having changed identities a dozen times supersedes any adamant amazement by now. As the Syrian civil war seems to be winding down, we must begin to question America’s real role in this catastrophe.

I was reading earlier today a report FARS News Agency, about alleged assistance being rendered by US forces to a group inside Aleppo. According to this report;

“Syrian army and Hezbollah said the terrorists in Aleppo are both receiving logistical aid and intelligence support from the western states, specially the US warships deployed in the Mediterranean Sea.”

While FARS may not be the most credible source given the Iranian agency’s past record of sensationalist diatribe, these days every news source needs to be scanned and scrutinized, to find the actual truth of matters. If Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal can provide puzzle pieces, then certainly the most one sided media on Earth can render puzzle pieces. As to US collaboration with Al Nusra and Al Qaeda, there is already a mountain of proof. But US warships forwarding intel? Green Berets or Seals embedded in terrorist units? I had to investigate. [Company for the SAS presence. Cc]

Expand. Click title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )

09 August 2016 @ 05:44 pm
Palestine Urges Arab League to help Sue Britain over 1917 Balfour Declaration which Established A “Homeland for the Jewish people.”

UK Column News - 9th June 2016
START    #EUReferendumPsyOp software failures distort Brexit vote
2:30        Blair & John Major appeal for Remain in Northern Ireland
4:40        William Hague : Brexit could ‘Fragment the Western World’
7:40        MI6 exempt from the law over rendition of innocent Libyans
10:00      Facebook & Google feign resistance over Federal surveillance
11:40      state entrapment stings dominate incidents of domestic terror
13:50      various factions utilise Turkish alliance to stoke flames of war
16:20      Saudi Arabia placed on U.N. blacklist over Yemeni atrocities
19:40      NATO expansionism via its subjugated Polish vassal domain
22:50      negligence of US poses immense dangers to the entire world
25:00      BALTOPS theatre escalates European standoff with Russia
31:00      Royal Navy intercepts the ‘potential threat’ of Russian sub
34:30      Japanese and German megabanks break from central banks
44:30      Tim Berners Lee works towards distributed Web
Vid https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-9th-june-2016

UK Column News - 10th June 2016
Expand. Click title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )

11 May 2013. Keep an eye on the long game.
Britain introduces new ploy to arm terrorists in Syria

The British government has been circulating a discussion paper to EU member states in Brussels in yet another attempt to arm terrorists fighting the popular government of president Bashar al-Assad in Syria.
Britain has been pushing desperately to help topple Bashar Assad government, which enjoys the backing of Syrian people, since more than two years ago, when a peaceful call for change in the country was hijacked by foreign-backed terrorists and mercenaries funded by certain regional states including Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey.
The desperate attempts by an alliance of Western governments and al-Qaeda affiliated terrorists to occupy Syria in favor of Zionist regime of Israel and its regional allies have so far failed to bear results.
For the same reason, Britain and the U.S. have been conspiring to send heavy weaponry to armed terrorists on the pretext of helping so-called moderate forces in Syria to end the bloodshed they have created and sponsored in the country.
The UK government argues that by lifting an arms embargo against insurgents in Syria they will compel the Syrian government to enter negotiations on a political solution.
This is while that the government of Syria has been calling for a national reconciliation and negotiations from the very beginning of the conflict and has always dismissed foreign intervention in the country.
Source (more) http://www.presstv.ir/detail/302588.html
All UK in-power political posts should carry a mandatory prison sentence, where trials are held the pre-assumption of guilt should apply.

Nusra Front Claims Responsibility for at Least 600 Terror Acts in Syria

ExpandCollapse )
More of yesterday's news the MSM couldn't handle (because it wasn't in their best interests) in comments.

Mac Slavo
June 30th, 2016

In perfect order out of chaos fashion, the elite are now showing their hand.
Problem. Reaction. Solution.
What will come out of the vote for Britain to leave the European Union, and who will benefit from it?
There is considerable reason to think that it will be the very billionaire elite class who created the EU in the first place.
If the push for Brexit was fueled by the European anger against unlimited migration and its side effects of extreme culture clash, terrorism and sensational incidents of rape, then it was the very crisis that the likes of the Davos elite, and in particular, the Bilderberg elite having been playing upon.

The Problem: Europe is on the verge of collapse
You break it, you buy it.”
We’ve all heard the maxim above, meant to be cautionary warning to clumsy shoppers that the store will not pay for any losses. But on the global scale, it is a recipe to buy up the broken pieces of nations, businesses and entire continents (or at least their most valuable assets) for pennies on the dollar.
It is this type of maneuver that should be considered when looking at the true impact of Brexit, as well as the true reasons for the intense migrant crisis that hit Europe like a wave during the past couple of years.
For instance, the UN Migration Chief Peter Sutherland, who happens to be non-executive chairman of Goldman Sach International and a steering member of the Bilderberg committee, literally called for migration as a weapon in order to “undermine” the homogeneity and sovereignty of European nations:
In 2012 Mr Sutherland was quizzed by the House of Lords EU home affairs sub-committee about what the EU should do about evidence from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that employment rates among migrants were higher in the US and Australia than EU countries.
Mr Sutherland, who has attended meetings of The Bilderberg Group, told the committee: “The United States, or Australia and New Zealand, are migrant societies and therefore they accommodate more readily those from other backgrounds than we do ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others.
“And that’s precisely what the European Union, in my view,  should be doing its best to undermine.”

That was in 2012, as the Syrian refugee migrant crisis was yet to unfold in a huge way.

The Reaction: Market panic, predictable to keen observers
The entire sequence events played upon fear for effect, a catalyst making the strength of the reaction more intense, in turn giving greater momentum to the solution.
Brexit was played up in the media, not just in Europe where its effects would be most felt, but in the United States and globally as well. The shocking death of a Member of Parliament by a deranged killer proclaiming sovereignty for Britain seemed almost calculated to heighten the divisive spirit. There were months of scaremongering and warnings about the fianancial doom a “leave” vote would usher in, in attempt to scare away support for the referendum – or perhaps as prelude to the events to come in the aftermath.
Its causes have been attributed to a swell of populism, fueled by anger over the compounding disasters from migrants being driven from Syria and the Middle East. Years of Greek debt crisis, enormous sums of money for bailouts and a relinquishment of power to centralized bureaucrats made the EU increasingly distasteful.
All that only made disobeying the wishes of the ruling establishment all the more tempting. Nervous money switched hands, and the vote was too close to call. On the eve of the actual vote, there was biblical storm with dramatic flashing lightning, and floods that kept people from the poles.
And, surprise a victory, and quite a reaction there was.

But what does it mean?
Expand- click title to go to the pageCollapse )