Log in


Written by Daniel McAdams
RonPaul Institute August 22, 2016

Reading between the lines in today's Pentagon press briefing, a bombshell US policy shift is becoming more apparent: Syrian forces and their Russian partners are being told that conducting military operations in some parts of Syrian airspace opens them up to being shot down by the US military.
Pentagon Spokesman Peter Cook was asked numerous times in numerous ways whether this amounts to a US "no fly zone" over parts of Syria. His first response was vague but threatening:

We will use our air power as needed to protect coalition forces and our partnered operations. ...We advise the Syrian regime to steer clear of [certain] areas.

The policy shift was so apparent that, one-by-one, the press corps asked for clarification. Does this mean that the US would shoot down Russian or Syrian planes if they attacked any US-backed partners even if they were engaged against Syrian government forces? Are those "coalition forces" and "partnered operations" receiving US protection against attack from the air always in receipt of that protection, or only when they are actively engaged in military operations? What are the rules of engagement?
There was no clear answer from the Pentagon spokesman.

"Is this a 'no-fly' zone, then," asked another reporter. It's not a "no-fly zone" Cook responded.
Another journalist tried to get some clarity:

How is telling Syria not to fly in certain areas not a 'no fly' zone?

"Call it what you will," Cook eventually said.
Another journalist asked, "Do you think the Syrian regime has the right to fly over its own territory?"
Same answer: "We will use our air power as needed to protect coalition forces and our partnered operations."
The anti-Russia rhetoric in Cook's comments was inexplicable as well. According to the Pentagon spokesman, the suffering in parts of Aleppo is not due to its ongoing occupation by al-Qaeda's Nusra Front, but rather by Russian and Syrian government attempts to expel Nusra from the city. Cook's explanation defied logic. Russian actions in Aleppo are...

...only adding fuel to Syria's civil war and [do] nothing to degrade extremist groups, which is Russia's original reason for its military intervention in Syria.

The sentence only makes sense if one accepts the premise that al-Qaeda in Syria is not an extremist group, as it makes no sense to argue that bombing a certain group does nothing to weaken that group. Unless the Pentagon is suggesting that Russia and Syria are only bombing the civilian population, presumably for fun?
Whatever the case, this is a trial balloon. If this de facto "no fly zone" becomes a fact on the ground, it will be expanded beyond Hasakah and may be a US last-ditch effort to prevent Syrian government forces, aided by Russia, from taking back Aleppo and thus breaking the back of the foreign-backed insurgency.

This is endgame time.

Copyright © 2016 by RonPaul Institute

Daesh-Gate: The Scandal That Could End Hillary Clinton's Campaign

Sputnik International 21.08.2016

Russian-Israeli journalist and political analyst Israel Shamir offers his insights on why Trump's comments about Obama and Clinton being 'the founders of ISIS' may just put an end to Hillary Clinton's White House ambitions.

"Hillary Clinton, the candidate from the Democratic Party for the US presidency, is on easy street, or so it would seem," Shamir wrote, in a recent op-ed analysis for Svobodnaya Pressa.
"She has the reigning president on her side. She has the New York Times and the Washington Post on her side, along with the national television networks. It might seem that she's got this election locked up. And that might have been the case, a few years ago; no one would have even heard about her rival, Donald Trump. But now, in the age of networking technologies, things aren't as easy for her."

"The gadfly in her Garden of Eden turned out to be Julian Assange, the Australian hacker who has been locked up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London for four years now. First he published the Democratic Party's email correspondence, showing that its leaders had conspired to get rid of Bernie Sanders. The chair of the party had to resign, and the man who appeared to leak the materials was found dead on a street in Washington. But Clinton proved capable of coming to an agreement with Sanders. He received good money, bought a new house, published a book, and joined with Clinton, calling on his supporters to vote for her."

"Then," the journalist noted, "Julian Assange unveiled more of Clinton's correspondence, declaring that it was Madame Clinton – during her time as Secretary of State, who supplied arms to Daesh (ISIL/ISIS), listed as a terrorist organization both in the US and in Europe. Furthermore, Assange said, she lied under oath when she told the Senate that she does not know anything about the supply of weapons to the terrorists."
"Assange's statements could have been silenced, but they were picked up on by Donald Trump. He accused Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama of creating Daesh, of being sympathetic to Daesh and its aims, of leading a phony war against the terrorist group, costing the American taxpayer a great deal of money, and bringing a tidy sum for Mrs. Clinton and her foundation."

Expand. Click title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )

World Socialist Web Site 19 August 2016

Photographs and video of five-year-old Omran Daqneesh have rapidly become ubiquitous in the media in the US and Western Europe after being distributed by a group aligned with the CIA-backed Islamist “rebels” in Syria.
The toddler is shown sitting somewhat dazed in the orange seat of a new and well-equipped ambulance, his face covered in dust and tinged with what appears to be dried blood from what was reportedly a cut to his scalp. Video shows him waiting unattended as a number of photographers and videographers record his image to be broadcast around the world. Clearly, those in charge sensed that the boy, with a mop of hair covering his brow and a cartoon t-shirt, provided a marketable image.
CNN proclaimed the child “the face of Syria’s civil war,” while the anchor-woman theatrically burst into tears recounting his story. The New York Times called him “a symbol of Aleppo’s suffering,” while USA Today published a short editor’s note reading, “This Syrian boy is Omran. Will you pay attention now?”

More direct in its approach was the British daily Telegraph, which headlined an article: “For the sake of Aleppo’s children, we must try again to impose a no-fly zone in Syria.”

Expand. Click title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )


Perhaps for 10 years. Presumably to get the globalists' trans ocean trade agreements into force against public interest.

How to exit from the EU.
After Parliament illegally acted against our wishes for 43 years, we won!
With our current politicians, Brexit may be done disastrously.  If done well, our future will be superb.
So many senior British politicians and civil servants are bribed, accepting patronage, or salaries to be pro-EU, the government will do what it can to block Brexit.
An example is the 454 MP's the Conservative and Labour parties illegally selected because they were pro-EU. They have a parliamentary majority, which they have already said can block Brexit.
The British Constitution only allows MP’s to implement the wishes of the people. Two thirds of Conservatives voted Leave, so the results prove the Conservative Party's pro-EU MPs have been illegally acting against their voters' wishes.
They voted for the pro-EU Teresa May, so will we still have a Conservative party that doesn't represent its members?
She has said Brexit means Brexit. That’s excellent, but as Home secretary she implemented the EU’s communist Investigatory Powers Bill (snoopers charter, where the government spies on our phone calls and emails), and continued the EU’s flooding us with immigrants, so she is probably a Bilderberger.

There are 4 ways to leave the EU
Expand. Click title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )

When your government is the enemy.
NATO-CIA zionist controlled regimes - UK (MI6) Saudi, US (CIA) Turkey, FR (DGSE) Jordan(?) are those most involved in the unwarranted destruction of ME and African countries through the creation and support of terrorist organisations, illegal ground ops and illegal bombing. If this isn't about 'greater' Israel, then what?
Prosecute your government for breaching UN regs and international law on numerous occasions.

Who Created ISIS? The Enemy-Revealing Question That De-masks the Empire’s Facade For Good

Activist Post August 14, 2016


By Bernie Suarez

With this being a time of escalating tension, fear and chaos in America due to corruption, State-engineered events and propaganda, we need to apply sound reason and logic to help us first recognize and then reconcile the meaning of these events. This will allow us to live our lives in a prosperous and mentally healthy manner. Both physical and mental health as well as a sense of warmth, safety and security must be fought for in order to maintain (or achieve) a climate where one can thrive as a human being. This overall wellness is now being redefined as the world around us changes for the worse. And as I’ve stated in the past I believe true mental health is now being objectively defined by your ability to see beyond the narrow spectrum of mainstream media and into the massive pool of freely available information today — an era properly called the Information Age.

Expand. Click title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )


12.08.2016 Author: Phil Butler

Emerging reports from Syria suggest United States naval and special warfare elements may be assisting extreme jihadists break out of embattled Aleppo. Unconfirmed reports of US warships sharing intelligence with the group Jeish al-Fatah, also suggest US Special Forces elements may be trapped within the surrounded city. If confirmed, these reports would not be the biggest surprise to objective observers. Al Nusra and Al Qaeda, along with ISIL having changed identities a dozen times supersedes any adamant amazement by now. As the Syrian civil war seems to be winding down, we must begin to question America’s real role in this catastrophe.

I was reading earlier today a report FARS News Agency, about alleged assistance being rendered by US forces to a group inside Aleppo. According to this report;

“Syrian army and Hezbollah said the terrorists in Aleppo are both receiving logistical aid and intelligence support from the western states, specially the US warships deployed in the Mediterranean Sea.”

While FARS may not be the most credible source given the Iranian agency’s past record of sensationalist diatribe, these days every news source needs to be scanned and scrutinized, to find the actual truth of matters. If Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal can provide puzzle pieces, then certainly the most one sided media on Earth can render puzzle pieces. As to US collaboration with Al Nusra and Al Qaeda, there is already a mountain of proof. But US warships forwarding intel? Green Berets or Seals embedded in terrorist units? I had to investigate. [Company for the SAS presence. Cc]

Expand. Click title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )

09 August 2016 @ 05:44 pm
Palestine Urges Arab League to help Sue Britain over 1917 Balfour Declaration which Established A “Homeland for the Jewish people.”

UK Column News - 9th June 2016
START    #EUReferendumPsyOp software failures distort Brexit vote
2:30        Blair & John Major appeal for Remain in Northern Ireland
4:40        William Hague : Brexit could ‘Fragment the Western World’
7:40        MI6 exempt from the law over rendition of innocent Libyans
10:00      Facebook & Google feign resistance over Federal surveillance
11:40      state entrapment stings dominate incidents of domestic terror
13:50      various factions utilise Turkish alliance to stoke flames of war
16:20      Saudi Arabia placed on U.N. blacklist over Yemeni atrocities
19:40      NATO expansionism via its subjugated Polish vassal domain
22:50      negligence of US poses immense dangers to the entire world
25:00      BALTOPS theatre escalates European standoff with Russia
31:00      Royal Navy intercepts the ‘potential threat’ of Russian sub
34:30      Japanese and German megabanks break from central banks
44:30      Tim Berners Lee works towards distributed Web
Vid https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-9th-june-2016

UK Column News - 10th June 2016
Expand. Click title or comments to go to the pageCollapse )

11 May 2013. Keep an eye on the long game.
Britain introduces new ploy to arm terrorists in Syria

The British government has been circulating a discussion paper to EU member states in Brussels in yet another attempt to arm terrorists fighting the popular government of president Bashar al-Assad in Syria.
Britain has been pushing desperately to help topple Bashar Assad government, which enjoys the backing of Syrian people, since more than two years ago, when a peaceful call for change in the country was hijacked by foreign-backed terrorists and mercenaries funded by certain regional states including Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey.
The desperate attempts by an alliance of Western governments and al-Qaeda affiliated terrorists to occupy Syria in favor of Zionist regime of Israel and its regional allies have so far failed to bear results.
For the same reason, Britain and the U.S. have been conspiring to send heavy weaponry to armed terrorists on the pretext of helping so-called moderate forces in Syria to end the bloodshed they have created and sponsored in the country.
The UK government argues that by lifting an arms embargo against insurgents in Syria they will compel the Syrian government to enter negotiations on a political solution.
This is while that the government of Syria has been calling for a national reconciliation and negotiations from the very beginning of the conflict and has always dismissed foreign intervention in the country.
Source (more) http://www.presstv.ir/detail/302588.html
All UK in-power political posts should carry a mandatory prison sentence, where trials are held the pre-assumption of guilt should apply.

Nusra Front Claims Responsibility for at Least 600 Terror Acts in Syria

ExpandCollapse )
More of yesterday's news the MSM couldn't handle (because it wasn't in their best interests) in comments.

Mac Slavo
June 30th, 2016

In perfect order out of chaos fashion, the elite are now showing their hand.
Problem. Reaction. Solution.
What will come out of the vote for Britain to leave the European Union, and who will benefit from it?
There is considerable reason to think that it will be the very billionaire elite class who created the EU in the first place.
If the push for Brexit was fueled by the European anger against unlimited migration and its side effects of extreme culture clash, terrorism and sensational incidents of rape, then it was the very crisis that the likes of the Davos elite, and in particular, the Bilderberg elite having been playing upon.

The Problem: Europe is on the verge of collapse
You break it, you buy it.”
We’ve all heard the maxim above, meant to be cautionary warning to clumsy shoppers that the store will not pay for any losses. But on the global scale, it is a recipe to buy up the broken pieces of nations, businesses and entire continents (or at least their most valuable assets) for pennies on the dollar.
It is this type of maneuver that should be considered when looking at the true impact of Brexit, as well as the true reasons for the intense migrant crisis that hit Europe like a wave during the past couple of years.
For instance, the UN Migration Chief Peter Sutherland, who happens to be non-executive chairman of Goldman Sach International and a steering member of the Bilderberg committee, literally called for migration as a weapon in order to “undermine” the homogeneity and sovereignty of European nations:
In 2012 Mr Sutherland was quizzed by the House of Lords EU home affairs sub-committee about what the EU should do about evidence from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that employment rates among migrants were higher in the US and Australia than EU countries.
Mr Sutherland, who has attended meetings of The Bilderberg Group, told the committee: “The United States, or Australia and New Zealand, are migrant societies and therefore they accommodate more readily those from other backgrounds than we do ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others.
“And that’s precisely what the European Union, in my view,  should be doing its best to undermine.”

That was in 2012, as the Syrian refugee migrant crisis was yet to unfold in a huge way.

The Reaction: Market panic, predictable to keen observers
The entire sequence events played upon fear for effect, a catalyst making the strength of the reaction more intense, in turn giving greater momentum to the solution.
Brexit was played up in the media, not just in Europe where its effects would be most felt, but in the United States and globally as well. The shocking death of a Member of Parliament by a deranged killer proclaiming sovereignty for Britain seemed almost calculated to heighten the divisive spirit. There were months of scaremongering and warnings about the fianancial doom a “leave” vote would usher in, in attempt to scare away support for the referendum – or perhaps as prelude to the events to come in the aftermath.
Its causes have been attributed to a swell of populism, fueled by anger over the compounding disasters from migrants being driven from Syria and the Middle East. Years of Greek debt crisis, enormous sums of money for bailouts and a relinquishment of power to centralized bureaucrats made the EU increasingly distasteful.
All that only made disobeying the wishes of the ruling establishment all the more tempting. Nervous money switched hands, and the vote was too close to call. On the eve of the actual vote, there was biblical storm with dramatic flashing lightning, and floods that kept people from the poles.
And, surprise a victory, and quite a reaction there was.

But what does it mean?
Expand- click title to go to the pageCollapse )
03 July 2016 @ 09:46 pm

Invoke Article 50 of The Lisbon Treaty immediately.
The British people have spoken. We have voted to leave the EU. We want article 50 of the Lisbon treaty to be invoked immediately. We still have two years to discuss our exit from the EU, but we do not wish to delay it any further.
Sign this petition

41,784 signatures so far
100,000 needed. We don't need Vatican ghost sigs, show them why.

h/t Brexit Now via Tactical Things

Update July 4 over 48,500 and increasing each time I click refresh. I think this may become a record breaker. Please spread the word.

Our enemies' main propaganda dispenser, the BBC is ignoring this.

I can imagine angry words in the enemy camp. "Whose bright idea was it to allow the tax stock the right to petition us?"

The Calm Stroll to Independence
24 Jun, 2016  Craig Murray
The UK was key to the worst elements of TTIP. Now the British people must ensure we never see its like again. This article was first carried by Huffington Post.
In the space of two years, trade – via the secretly negotiated EU-US deal TTIP – has gone from esoteric policy interest, to the heart of the biggest social movement in Europe for a generation, to an often misunderstood feature of a vitriolic referendum campaign.
TTIP and its parallel EU-Canada deal CETA have caused outrage across Europe. TTIP in particular often grabbed headlines during EU referendum campaigning.
And in a post-Brexit UK soon to be shorn of trade deals including its World Trade Organisation country commitments, trade will be front and centre of new policy-making for the foreseeable future.
Many will now rejoice that for the UK TTIP is dead in the water. Indeed, Brexit may be the killer blow to the deal across Europe. But while the UK has escaped TTIP’s corporate clutches as an EU member state, if the deal does survive the big picture will be a little more complex.
Key to understanding why TTIP may still have an impact on the UK is appreciating the extent to which the deal is intended to enable the EU and USA’s neoliberal agenda to be the template for world trade.
Defeated in previous attempts to secure a pro-business but anti-people and planet deal, the EU and USA simply decided to sidestep multilateralism to impose their will on the rest of the world.
As a secret meeting between the European Commission and Exxon Mobil revealed, the Commission has been shamelessly colluding with the world’s biggest corporations to assure them that through TTIP they can force countries outside the deal (“third countries”) to accept its terms: the eradication of social, health and environmental protections, the locked-in privatisation of public services, and a private justice system so corporations can sue governments for any policies hitting their profits.
As the head of policy at the organisation which wrote the official report into TTIP told a House of Lords committee on TTIP: “They [third countries] obey those rules or they do not export [into Europe], just like Switzerland.” And now, the UK.
As for CETA, the danger is still very much clear and present: the European Commission intends for the deal to be sealed and implemented ahead of a formalised Brexit and without any national parliament votes. Crucially, elements of the deal could apply to the UK even after Brexit.
In the EU, the UK was the most neoliberal country in an avowedly neoliberal bloc.
The UK government opposed any reforms being made to the toxic ISDS ‘corporate court’ mechanism in TTIP and CETA and buried research it commissioned showingnegative impacts of ISDS on the UK. It ensured UK MPs could not read the secret texts of the deal when it could have granted them access.
It has led the charge – against the wishes of the Obama administration – for financial deregulation to be included in TTIP.It doesn’t stop there. The UK chose to include the NHS in TTIP when it could have excluded it, and the government then refused to release legal advice it received on threats to the NHS from the deal. And in spite of David Cameron’s “greenest ever government” claims, the UK teamed up with Canada, the US Trade Representative, BP and Shell to demolish rules that prevent high-polluting forms of oil from entering Europe – with profound implications for climate change and consequently the lives of millions in the global South.
It is this neoliberal elevation of corporate profit above democracy, human rights and protection of the environment which the UK is now free to follow unilaterally in trade deals – unless the British people come together to stop.
EU trade policy has been nothing short of devastating for Southern countries. In this regard, TTIP was little more than the same policies that have destroyed lives and livelihoods in the global South being turned onto Europe by its own leaders, with scant regard for any semblance of democratic process.
Brexit has created the potential greater democratic control of trade deals. And we must ensure we use that to craft a trade policy that is geared to justice for the many rather than profits for the few.
Mark Dearn is Senior Trade Campaigner at War on Want.

489 thoughts on “The Calm Stroll to Independence”
Alan June 26  https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/06/calm-stroll-independence/comment-page-5/#comment-606864
The UK was key to the worst elements of TTIP.

ExpandCollapse )


US-NATO Prepares for War against Russia.
Washington’s Objective: Create Divisions between Europe and Russia

By Pravda.ru
Global Research, June 29, 2016
Pravda.ru 28 June 2016
The NATO has increased its presence in Eastern Europe 13 times for the latest years. In order to stop Russia’s revival, the US unwinds military conflicts plots at every possible way.
Colonel General Leonid Ivashov, President of the International Centre of Geopolitical Analysis explained in an interview to KP, that ‘if data on Russia-NATO power balance at the Western direction is analyzed, as well as military activity build-up rate at our borders, scale of combat equipment deployment, if the grade of Russia’s demonization is estimated, one can say that preparation to a real war is taking place. As such acts are usually undertaken at the forefront of a war.’
The expert noted that the Americans do everything possible today to clash Europe and Turkey with Russia and ignite a big military conflict. The problem from the US point of view is that Russia becomes not only a self-sustained state, but a global geopolitical player. Today all the old Soviet military bases are used by the NATO at full capacity.
He reminded that in Romania the NATO has reactivated one of the largest Soviet Air Forces base in Deveselu. In Poland Dutch-German-Polish corps have been deployed at the former military base of the Soviet times with a headquarters in Szczecin. Beside that, an active propaganda on alleged Russia’s intentions to devour Poland and the Baltics is being held.
However, the NATO is significantly ahead of Russia in the numbers of weapons. But the US is preparing for a nuclear conflict, as it is evidenced, Leonid Ivashov pointed out. ‘And here the main players are certainly not the Europeans. The main player is the Americans. Apart from task to stop Russia, they have yet another one here – not to let Europe get out of the US control. The Europeans have tried to carry out independent policy in economy, in politics, they don’t want to sign a colonial Transatlantic deal. And in military field there is a total American control. Even the Supreme Allied Commander Europe is an American. So they keep politicians and business in Europe through military obedience,’ the analyst highlighted.
According to him, the US practices forces build-up at the military stage in the Eastern Europe. ‘The Americans may not even carry out their ‘global strike’, but create an incident, which will generate an armed conflict. And then they will shed a tear that they don’t want to wage war, but are obliged to defend the NATO allies. It is important for them to wage war not in the territory of the US, but in Europe. As Europe is not only an ally for them, but a competitor in economy. They need to weaken Europe, And it is best of all to implement it orchestrating a conflict with Russia in Europe,’ the expert concluded.
Thus, Russia should be ready for provocations of any kind. ‘And we don’t need to conquer the Baltics or Poland for example. Even if they ask us to be our allies, or what is more, part of Russia. We shouldn’t take them. That is another civilization, and it will destruct us from inside,’ Leonid Ivashov added.
‘It should be kept in mind. We should act on equal terms, trade, not trust them regarding security issues in any case. Only balance of power is our guarantee of no war in the future,’ the expert concluded.


The original source of this article is http://www.pravdareport.com/world/americas/28-06-2016/134849-war-0/
Copyright © Pravda.ru, Pravda.ru, 2016
26 June 2016 @ 11:30 pm
RT Op-Edge

Brexit changes nothing

The morning’s headlines proclaiming the unthinkable didn’t make sense: the UK was leaving the EU; Cameron was resigning. The world had ended and been born anew.

I’ll admit it, I was temporarily stunned. Jacob Rothschild had called for a Remain vote. What else was there to talk about? I hadn’t seen that one coming.

For an entire minute it felt as though there was a chance of a return to the halcyon days, an end to the insanity of moral confusion: no more ripping right things from their places and twisting them into troubling, hybrid forms. Children would be able to play safely in the streets again; decency and order would return; Britain would rise phoenix-like from the ashes of a pitiable self-parody in decline; men would wear tweed, and the women would stop walking like nightclub bouncers and swearing at their children in the high street.

The attempt to brand as morally compromised those who want something other than cultural obliteration for the UK seemed to have failed. O, happy days.

Then I had breakfast.

Expand (or click title to go to the page)Collapse )
24 June 2016 @ 09:37 am


A huge part of the massive overburden of deeply corrupt bureacracy is being removed from the British people.

Without the support of the UK regime the less supported white elephant fascist EU dictatorship will collapse to a burnt out core.

Sufficient people overcame their conditioning, the deceit about the EU regime peddled by MPs, Common Purpose, the media (in that the 4th estate have kept us uninformed, misinformed and disinformed of the EU regime's shortcomings and misdeeds) and the zionist infiltrated and corrupted churches, protestant and catholic alike.

A kick in the teeth for the traitors that were happily signing away Britain for personal advantage.

A kick in the teeth for the zionists and their one world government by violence and deceit ambitions of which the EU regime was a big part.

A kick in the teeth for NATO, membership of the EU regime obliges membership, submission to faceless psychopaths.

A kick in the teeth for the currency fraudsters. The inevitable currency pyramid collapse has been hastened.

A kick in the teeth for those that have been destroying the family, the religion, the culture and  distorting education in the once great sceptred Isles.

If the relatively minor increase in people of other cultures arriving swung it, I thank the evil George Soros for paying for the passage (and fake Syrian passports?) of those muli-raced 'Syrians'.

The 2nd most shameful occupation of the Houses of Parliament after the Blair regime is ending. Cameron has resigned but it will take till October for him to shred all the incriminating papers and seal away those that can't be destroyed (?) so we are stuck with the traitor till then.

It's been a long time since 'Proud to be British' has struck a chord in me. Thanks to all that did the right thing from the bottom of my heart.

We'll be punished and then, gods willing, with, for the first time, a government of the people the land will prosper as never before.


The CIA acting on (whose instructions, the League of Nations?) was fundamental in the creation of the creeping cancer EU regime.

If they aren't too hungover UK column should be interesting. 1pm for the show http://www.ukcolumn.org/
21 June 2016 @ 04:55 pm

Britain being owned by the zio bank clerks that run - ruin the EU regime is beneficial for the 1%, politicians, the currency fraudsters in the BoE, for globalist corporations that are destroying the planet, for the OWG nutters and for the zionist gang that controls the EU dictators and assorted other concerns that work on upward wealth transfer that is legalised theft like inflation and the currency fraud.

Despite such tragedy, the case for Brexit remains strong
Liam Halligan
Telegraph Business 18 June 2016

How to write an economics polemic under such circumstances? How to argue about trade and geo-politics when an MP lies dead, her children bewildered, her husband in unspeakable pain?

I’ve written a weekly economics column for more than 20 years now, more than a decade in this newspaper. This one – so soon after Jo Cox’s death, yet just days before the referendum on Britain’s European Union membership – is easily the toughest.

My head is full of reasons I’ll vote Leave, reasons I still believe stand up to scrutiny. As this build up draws to a close, I also have plenty of telling anecdotes “from the campaign trail”.

What I can’t shake off, though, is the sense that, despite the looming vote, the public is utterly sick of this referendum: sick of “Project Fear”, sick of finger-wagging “experts”, sick of the battle between infantile virtue-signaling and feigned offence-taking among our political and media classes.

I’m voting Brexit because, economically speaking, the EU isn’t where it’s at

Yes, the stakes are extremely high. The whole country is like one big general election constituency during a referendum, so every vote counts. The reputations of many ambitious people are at stake on Thursday, to say nothing of the future path of the world’s fifth biggest economy and the broader “European project”.

Despite that, the conduct of our national debate, while robust and often testy, was until last week still just about acceptable. Then, a Yorkshire MP was slain. Ever since, as the public’s appetite for rhetorical knock-about has vaporised, that very knock-about has plumbed new depths of cynicism as the two sides have traded accusations of either “contributing to” or “exploiting for political purposes” this horrific and brutal murder.

ExpandCollapse )

US = At least 51
UK = More

Read This Before The US Government Uses the Orlando Shooting to Start Another War

Global Research, June 19, 2016
Antimedia 17 June 2016

Late Thursday evening, the Wall Street Journal reported, 51 State Department officials signed a statement condemning U.S. policy in Syria in which they repeatedly call for “targeted military strikes against the Damascus government and urging regime change as the only way to defeat the Islamic State.”

“In other words,” as Zero Hedge summarized;
“over 50 top ‘diplomats’ are urging to eliminate [Syrian Pres. Bashar al] Assad in order to ‘defeat ISIS’, the same ISIS which top US ‘diplomats’ had unleashed previously in order to … eliminate Assad.”

Expand -click title to go to the page-Collapse )

WWII based on lies. Iraq based on lies. Libya based on lies. Syria based on lies. Ukraine based on lies. WWIII based on lies.
The EU eco-fascist central dictatorship based on lies.

Make the traitors get us out.
Then we can work on NO MORE WARS.



How might the CIA control NATO and the NATO-run Bilderberg Group?
Witness X2 noted:
"Parties with underage girls in the Cromwel hotel in Knokke.
"Present: Delvoie - Karel - X2 - Lippens - Van Gheluwe - Etienne Davignon.
"The girls knew where to go and with whom.
"Lippens hits the little girls.
"Several meetings between Karel and Davignon in the Memling hotel with the two Lippens."
(Michel Nihoul and other famous Belgians / ISGP - Dutroux case and X-Dossier victim-witnesses)

Etienne Davignon is the Chairman of the Bilderberg Group.

Article, of 9 May 2011, "What you don’t know about the Bilderberg-Group" tells us:

1. The secret Bilderberg group works for NATO. NATO works for the US government.

2. The invitations to Bilderberg's first meeting, in 1954, were signed by Prince Bernhard.
    Bernhard served in the Nazis' SS cavalry until his marriage in 1937 to Princess Juliana of the Netherlands.

ExpandCollapse )
The Amazing Glyphosate Revolt Grows
NEO 23.05.2016 Author: F. William Engdahl

I must make a confession. I never thought it would get this far. There is an absolutely amazing international revolt against the most deadly and most widely used weed killer in world agriculture–glyphosate. Those of you who have followed my earlier writings can detect my feeling of pessimism that mere “democratic” grass-roots protest, combined with a scientific assessment from an agency of WHO that glyphosate was a “probable carcinogen” would be enough to stop the pending, twice-postponed EU Commission renewal of the expiring license for glyphosate in the EU. It almost doesn’t matter at this point what the ultimate vote is when the next EU Commission glyphosate meeting is convened. The genie is out of the bottle. One of the world’s most important eugenics projects to maim and ultimately reduce human population is on the brink of being banned much as DDT decades ago.

On May 19, a revised proposal by the European Commission to re-approve glyphosate for use in Europe for 9 more years (rather than the original 15 years), but with almost no restrictions on use, failed to secure the required qualified majority among EU governments. This is an amazing and very positive development for democratic empowerment against an institution increasingly seen–not only by the British population–as an anti-democratic, even totalitarian structure irresponsive to the most basic concerns for the health and safety of EU citizens.

The agri-chemical industry bigs—Monsanto, Syngenta, Bayer and friends–are stunned at their failure. Corruption in government corridors whether in Berlin or Brussels seems to be losing its efficacy.

The next step for the troubled glyphosate renewal process will be for the EU Commission, those faceless, unelected bureaucrats, to come up with a new revised proposal that will bring Germany to approval by end of June when the old license expires or order glyphosate withdrawn from the entire EU market within six months according to Henry Rowlands’ international GMO watchdog media, Sustainable Pulse.

More http://journal-neo.org/2016/05/23/the-amazing-glyphosate-revolt-grows/

The Moment of Truth Pat Condell
Do we want to live in a sovereign democracy or a federal dictatorship?ExpandCollapse )
01 June 2016 @ 05:49 pm
The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview 1976

Charles A. Weisman June, 1992
What you are about to read should act as a WARNING to all non-Jews throughout the world. It hopefully should open the eyes of many who knew him in Washington government circles. It becomes indeed obvious that what he discloses is not fiction. It is not imagination! He was not pretending as he spoke with knowledge and intelligence. Many things have been said and written about the One World Jewish Conspiracy but never has it been described so openly. It staggers the imagination. Their plans are shocking and many will be astonished at the contents of this document. NOTHING like it has ever been told before. We prefer not to elaborate. You be the judge. Looking back to the time of this interview and having had time to analyze Harold Rosenthal's candidness, we are compelled to think of him as a conceited, boastful yet very knowledgeable person. I would classify him as an egotist and a egoist. At times his cruelty surfaced with a venom, especially as he describes the STUPID CHRISTIANS or "goys" as he so often referred to "us."
This surprised me because the word "goy" is not in our language and he must have known this. His mind was thoroughly immersed in the ONE-WORLD PLAN of World Jewry. With arrogance, he boasted that the Jew's conquest of the world was almost complete thanks to Christian stupidity. When asked if he was a Zionist, Mr.. Rosenthal replied: "That's a hell of a question! At the foundation of the issue the traditional Zionist concept of aliyah, a Hebrew term meaning the 'in gathering' or return of Diaspora L(dispersed Jews) Jews to the Palestine homeland. Ever since 1948 and the creation of the State of Israel, aliyah has become a basic imperative of Israeli government policy." What is aliyah? Will you please spell it for me? He did so and we inquired as to the realistic meaning of aliyah. Mr.. Rosenthal said: "It is a permanent physical migration to Palestine, not just a visit. "We asked, what is Zionism? I've heard Jews define it as anything from permanent migration to financial spiritual support of Israel from around the world.
Mr. Rosenthal replied: "Our first leader, former Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, said that Zionism without a 'return to Zion' is phony. Not many American Jews migrate permanently to Israel. Some say that all Jews, by definition, are Zionists. Others say that a Jew is not a Zionist unless he's a member who pays dues to an actively Zionist organization. Definitions have been tossed everywhere since the Jewish homeland became a reality."
ExpandCollapse )